Abstract
This article discusses pragmatic aspects of our interpretation of intensional constructions like questions and prepositional attitude reports. In the first part, it argues that our evaluation of these constructions may vary relative to the identification methods operative in the context of use. This insight is then given a precise formalization in a possible world semantics. In the second part, an account of actual evaluations of questions and attitudes is proposed in the framework of bi-directional optimality theory. Pragmatic meaning selections are explained as the result of specific rankings of potentially conflicting generation and interpretation constraints.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. Aloni (2000) ‘Conceptual Covers in Dynamic Semantics’ L. Cavedon P. Blackburn N. Braisby A. Shimojima (Eds) Logic, Language and Computation CSLI Stanford, CA
Aloni, M.: 2001, ‘Quantification under Conceptual Covers’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam
M. Aloni (2002) ‘Questions under Cover’ D. Barker-Plummer D. Beaver J. Benthem Particlevan P. Scottodi Luzio (Eds) Words, Proofs, and Diagrams CSLI Stanford, CA
R. Blutner (2000) ArticleTitle‘Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation’ Journal of Semantics 17 IssueID3 189–216 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jos/17.3.189
Blutner, R. and Jäger, G.: 2000, ‘Against Lexical Decomposition in Syntax’, in A. Z. Wyner (ed.), The Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics. The Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference, reprinted in Reinhard Blutner and Gerhard Jäger (eds.), Studies in Optimality Theory, University of Postdam
S. Boër W. Lycan (1985) Knowing Who MIT Press Cambridge, MA
A. Bonomi (1995) ‘Transparency and Specificity in Intensional Contexts’ P. Leonardi M. Santambrogio (Eds) On Quine, New Essays Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA 164–185
M. Crimmins J. Perry (1989) ArticleTitle‘The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs’ Journal of Philosophy 86 685–711
H. Hoop Particlede H. Swart Particlede (2000) ArticleTitle‘Temporal Adjunct Clauses in Optimality Theory’ Rivista di Linguistica 12 IssueID1 107–127
H Hoop Particlede P. Hendriks (2001) ArticleTitle‘Optimality Theoretic Semantics’ Linguistics and Philosophy 24 IssueID1 1–32 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005607111810
J. Gerbrandy (2000) ‘Identity in Epistemic Semantics’ L. Cavedon P. Blackburn N. Braisby A. Shimojima (Eds) Logic, Language and Computation CSLI Stanford, CA
J. Ginzburg (1995) ArticleTitle‘Resolving Questions, I & II’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18 459–527 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00985365
Groenendijk, J.: 1999, ‘The logic of interrogation’, in T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch (eds.), The Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Semantics and Linguistie Theory, CLC Publications
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M.: 1984, ‘Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam
J. Hintikka (1969) ‘Semantics for Propositional Attitudes’ Hockney Davis Wilson (Eds) Philosophical Logic Reidel Dordrecht
J. Hintikka (1975) The Intensions of Intensionality and Other New Models for Modalities Reidel Dordrecht
L. Horn (1984) ‘Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicatures’ D. Schiffrin (Eds) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context Georgetown University Press Washington 11–42
D. Kaplan (1969) ‘Quantifying in’ D. Davidson J. Hintikka (Eds) Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine Reidel Dordrecht 221–243
A. Prince P. Smolensky (1997) ArticleTitle‘Optimality: From Neural Network to Universal Grammar’ Science 275 1604–1610 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.275.5306.1604 Occurrence Handle9054349 Occurrence HandleMR1435275
Quine W. V. (1953) ‘Reference and modality’, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press (chapter VIII)
Quine, W. V.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53, 101–111, reprinted in: Quine, W. V: 1966, The Ways of Paradox and other Essays, Random House, New York
Quine, W. V.: 1961, ‘Reply to Professor Marcus’, Synthese 13, 323–330, reprinted in Quine, W. V.: 1966, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Random House, New York
Roberts, C.: 1996, ‘Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics’, in J. Yoon and A. Kathol (eds.), OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49, pp. 91–136
R. Stalnaker (1978) ‘Assertion’ P. Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics Academic Press New York 315–332
R. Stalnaker (1988) ‘Belief Attribution and Context’ R. Grimm D. Merril (Eds) Contents of Thought Arizona University Press Tucson
R. A. Sandt Particlevan der (1992) ArticleTitle‘Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution’ Journal of Semantics 9 333–377
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1979) ArticleTitle‘Propositional Attitudes in Weak Pragmatics’ Journal of Philosophy 76 365–374
van Rooy R. (1997) ‘Attitudes and Changing Contexts’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart
R. Rooy Particlevan (2003) ArticleTitle‘Asserting to Resolve Decision Problems’ Journal of Pragmatics 35 1161–1179 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00186-8
E. Williams (1997) ArticleTitle‘Blocking and Anaphora’ Linguistic Inquiry 28 577–628
H. Zeevat (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Asymmetry of Optimality Theoretic Synatx and Semantics’ Journal of Semantics 17 IssueID3 243–262 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jos/17.3.243
H. Zeevat (2002) ‘Explaining Presupposition Triggers’ K. Deemter Particlevan R. Kibble (Eds) Information Sharing CSLI Stanford, CA 61–88
Additional information
This material has grown out of chapters 1, 2 and 4 of my PhD thesis ‘Quantification under Conceptual Covers’. I would like to thank my supervisors Jeroen Groenendijk and Paul Dekker, and the organizers and participants of the Amsterdam workshops “Questions under Discussion” and “Communication and Attitudes” for having inspired part of that work. Furthermore I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer, and to the audiences of TARK 2001, the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium, the Semantics Colloquium Nijmegen and the workshop (“Pragmatics in Bi-directional Optimality Theory” (ESSLLI 2002) for insightful comments on previous versions of this article. Part of this research has been financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aloni, M. A Formal Treatment of the Pragmatics of Questions and Attitudes*. Linguist Philos 28, 505–539 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-1160-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-1160-4