Abstract
Content analyses of computer databases parsed into notes or ideas do not shed adequate light on the role of collaboration and the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environment in knowledge building; analysis of what is happening in the classroom and how students interpret that is also needed. This study used ethnographic methods to explore activity theory as an analytic framework for knowledge building, drawing from a class of Grade 4 students’ contributions to online and face-to-face discourse over a period of five months, as well as end-of-year interviews with the students. The analysis focuses on four issues: community; rules; mediating artefacts; and division of labour. The findings indicate how understanding such issues can lead to better understanding of collaboration and of the role of the online environment. The use of activity theory as a framework for improving pedagogy aimed at knowledge building is also outlined.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 485–513). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1–40.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punmamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 39–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punmamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 129–156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hewitt, J. (2004). An exploration of community in a knowledge forum classroom: An activity system analysis. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 210–238). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hsi, S., & Hoadley, C. M. (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 23–36.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe, Inc.
Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building: From facts to explanations in primary students' computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3, 179–199.
Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24, 125–155.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Salovaara, H., & Järvelä, S. (2003). Students' strategic actions in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 267–285.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sha, L., & van Aalst, J. (2003, April). An application to social network analysis to knowledge building. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Shipstone, D. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 33–51). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Beyond “sitting next to each other”: A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 20–28). Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wells, G. (2001). Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
White, B. Y., & Fredericksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aalst, J.V., Hill, C.M. Activity Theory as a Framework for Analysing Knowledge Building. Learning Environ Res 9, 23–44 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-9000-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-9000-6