Abstract
Coding statements of criminal suspects facilitated tests of four hypotheses about differences between behavioral cues to deception and the incriminating potential (IP) of the topic. Information from criminal investigations corroborated the veracity of 337 brief utterances from 28 videotaped confessions. A four-point rating of topic IP measured the degree of potential threat per utterance. Cues discriminating true vs. false comprised word/phrase repeats, speech disfluency spikes, nonverbal overdone, and protracted headshaking. Non-lexical sounds discriminated true vs. false inthe reverse direction. Cues that distinguished IP only comprised speech speed, gesticulation amount, nonverbal animation level, soft weak vocal and “I (or we) just” qualifier. Adding “I don't know” to an answer discriminated both IP and true vs. false. The results supported hypothesis about differentiating deception cues from incriminating potential cues in high-stakes interviews, and suggested that extensive research on distinctions between stress-related cues and cues to deception would improve deception detection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anolli, L.,& Ciceri, R. (1997). The voice of deception: Vocal strategies of naÏve and able liars. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 259–284.
Baldwin, J. (1992). Video taping police interviews with suspects: An evaluation. London: Police Research Series: Home Office Police Department.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N.,& Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C. H.,& Ebesu, A. S. (1994). Interpersonal deception VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 366–395.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G.,& Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Davis, M.,& Hadiks, D. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106, 5–54.
Davis, M., Walters, S. B., Vorus, N., Meiland, P. A.,& Markus, K. A. (2000). Verbal and nonverbal cues to false testimony in criminal investigations. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, DC.
DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J.,& O'Brien, T. P. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177–201.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K.,& Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
DeTurck, M. A.,& Miller, G. R. (1985). Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. Human Communication Research, 12, 181–201.
Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 163–175.
Ekman, P. (1992). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ekman, P.,& Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V.,& O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 414–420.
Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V.,& Scherer, K. R. (1991). Invited article: Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.
Hess, E. H.,& Polt, J. M. (1963). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 140, 1190–1192.
Horvath, F. S., Jayne, B.,& Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavior analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793–807.
Kasl, S. V.,& Mahl, G. F. (1965). The relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 425–433.
Knapp, M. L.,& Comadena, M. E. (1979). Telling it like it isn't: A review of theory and research on deceptive communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270–285.
Kraut, R. E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209–216.
Landis, J. R.,& Koch, G. G. (1977). A one-way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 671–679.
Mann, S., Vrij, A.,& Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies, and videotapes: An analysis of authentic high stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376.
Markus, K. A., Davis, M.,& Walters, S. B. (2004). A behavioral typology of deception in criminal confessions. Manuscript in preparation.
Miller, G. R.,& Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Porter, S.,& Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443–458.
Sapir, A. (1987). The LIS course on scientific content analysis (SCAN). Phoenix, AZ: Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.
Shuy, R. W. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Steller, M.,& Koehnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence, (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit. Chichester: Wiley.
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L.,& Morris, P. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87–102.
Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P.,& Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239–264.
Vrij, A.,& Mann, S. (2001). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203.
Walters, S. B. (1996). Principles of kinesic interview and interrogation, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M.,& Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, M., Markus, K.A., Walters, S.B. et al. Behavioral Cues to Deception vs. Topic Incriminating Potential in Criminal Confessions. Law Hum Behav 29, 683–704 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-7370-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-7370-z