Introduction

In order to replace the petroleum-based fuels, biodiesel became a significant alternative between the biomass products as consequence of its economic, social and environmental positive impacts [15]. It is currently the most widely accepted as alternative fuel for diesel engines because of its technical, environmental, and strategic advantages. It has enhanced biodegradability, reduced toxicity and improved lubricity in comparison with conventional diesel fuels. Being derived from biomass resources, biodiesel is regarded as a renewable and biodegradable fuel [6]. Biodiesel is defined as the monoalkyl esters of vegetable oils or animal fats.

The vegetable biodiesel can be obtained from different sources, as soy, cotton, sunflower, palm bean or simply oil of domestic fry. This is made through a chemical process called transesterification where by the glycerin is separated from the fat or vegetable oil. The process generates two products: methyl or ethyl esters (the chemical name for biodiesel) [7]. Although the renewable origin and biodegradability of the biodiesel are widely presented as advantage, its decomposition profile confers to itself lower oxidative stability in comparison to mineral diesel [2, 8]. Biodiesel, an alternative fuel prepared by transesterification of vegetable oils or animal fats, is susceptible to autoxidation. They are oxidized by metal traces, oxygen and temperature, and their stability is also influenced by the unsaturated fatty acid composition [912]. Generally, the rate of oxidation of fatty compounds depends on the number of double bonds and their position. The oxidation chain reaction is usually initiated at the positions allylic to double bounds. Thus, fatty acids (FA) with methylene-interrupted double bonds, for example, linoleic acid [(9Z, 12Z)-octadecadienoic acid], are more susceptible to oxidation because they contain methylene groups that are allylic to two-double bonds. Fatty acids with conjugated double bonds, for example, linolenic acid [(9Z, 12Z, 15Z)-octadecatrienoic acid], are even more susceptible to oxidation [13]. In order to evaluate the susceptibility to oxidation, the biodiesel is submitted to accelerated oxidation under controlled conditions and may be evaluated by thermal analysis techniques by using pressure differential scanning calorimetry (P-DSC) [14, 15].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the thermal and oxidative stability of the cotton and sunflower biodiesels obtained by the methanol route, using thermal analysis by non-isothermal TGA and P-DSC.

Experimental

Sunflower and cotton oil were converted to biodiesel using alkaline transesterification. The sample was prepared in 1:6 molar ratio of oil / methanol. In this reaction 1% wt catalyst (potassium hydroxide) in relation to oil was dissolved in methanol, and then added to the oil being stirred at a constant temperature for 2 h. After the decantation process, the glycerine was removed and the biodiesel were purified with the addition of water, then the biodiesel were dried and characterized. The analyses of the oil and pure biodiesel (B100) were performed as indicated by the Resolution Nº 7 of ANP, the Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels [16].

The obtained sunflower and cotton biodiesel were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) with a flame ionization detector, in order to determine the conversion of triacylglyceride to methyl esters of the corresponding fatty acids upon the transesterification reaction. A Thermo Trace GC-FID gas chromatograph was used. The FID detector temperature was 250 °C. The oven program to carry out the analysis of ester content had initial temperature of 150 °C for 6 min, next, the first heating rate was 10 °C min−1 up to 210 °C for 5 min, finally a second heating rate was 5 °C min−1 up to 240 °C for 2 min.

The thermogravimetric (TG) experiments were carried out using a Thermobalance Mettler-STGA 851 model, in the temperature range of 30–600 °C, under nitrogen atmosphere flowing in a rate of 25 mL min−1, using alumina crucible of 75 μL and heating rates 10 °C min−1.

The curves of differential scanning calorimeter under pressure (P-DSC) were obtained from a calorimeter mark TA Instruments MDSC model 2920 coupled with cell DSC Cell Pressure, pressure 1400 kPa, in an atmosphere of oxygen. Analyses with P-DSC were performed by two methods: dynamic and isothermal. The curves obtained by the dynamic method were performed using a heating ramp of 10 °C min−1, from room temperature to 600 °C. In the isothermal method the test is started at 50 °C and then subjected to a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 to 110 °C, where it is kept at constant temperature until the complete oxidation of the sample.

Results and discussion

As the data shown in Table 1, the oils analyzed showed physico-chemical properties suitable for use as raw material in the synthesis of biodiesel. The Biodiesel from those presented in accordance with the specifications of Resolution No 7 of the ANP.

Table 1 Physico-chemical data the oils and biodiesel

Observed that the viscosities of biodiesel are lower than of the raw materials that gave rise to them. This decrease is a positive factor, since high values can lead to engine problems. This significant decrease is partly because the chain of the esters to be lower than that of triglycerides. This property serves as indication that the conversion of carboxylic acids into methyl esters was effective, since the change in values is significant.

The determination of methyl esters was performed by gas chromatography in order to confirm the conversion of the carboxylic acids present in the raw material for the methyl esters. As presented in the Table 2, it is observed the conversion of triglycerides to methyl esters of 98.01 % for cotton biodiesel and 97.35 % for sunflower to biodiesel. The composition of the biodiesel showed methyl linoleate and methyl oleate as the major constituents.

Table 2 Determination and quantification of total biodiesel esters by gas chromatography

The Fig. 1 illustrates the thermal behavior of cotton oil in inert atmosphere presented one mass loss step between 304 and 490 °C attributed to the triacylglycerides volatilization and combustion processes, which are responsible for approximately 97.5% of mass loss. The TG curve of the cotton biodiesel, methanol route, presented one mass loss step, between 135 and 344 °C with mass loss of 98.6%. The step is ascribed to the volatilization and/or combustion of the methyl esters, with the prevalence of methyl linoleate. It was also demonstrated in Fig. 1 that oil sunflower presented only one mass loss step of 98.7%, between 300 and 495 °C. The sunflower biodiesel, whose major component is methyl linoleate, also presented one loss step, 115–315 °C, of 98.1%. It was observed that the thermogravimetric profiles of the samples are similar. This suggests a similarity between the chemical compositions of vegetable oils in the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

TG curves of cotton and sunflower oil and their biodiesel

In Table 3 was calculated the residual masses, in which the sunflower oil (1.3%) showed better results in residual masses compared with cotton oil (2.5%). Because of its chemical composition have more unsaturated compounds become less stable than cotton oil.

Table 3 Representative TG data of the samples in inert atmosphere

Regarding mass loss may be a correlation with gas chromatography. The thermogravimetry analysis may serve as a qualitative analysis of the conversion of fatty acid methyl esters. Whereas within the experimental errors, the values are exactly similar and that thermogravimetry can replace the gas chromatography (GC) with time savings, cost and without quality loss in the results unless there is a need to identify the esters.

The oxidative stability can be used for evaluating the quality of oils, fats and biodiesels. Such property depends on chemical composition, the quality of the raw material, the conditions of refining processes (oils and fats), transesterification route (biodiesel), and the storage conditions [1719]. The onset is the temperature at which it initiates the oxidation process. Figures 2 and 3 show the dynamic P-DSC curves and Table 4 the values of onset. It may be noted that raw materials have a higher oxidative stability than their respective biodiesel. This fact expected, since the methyl esters are more susceptible to suffer the oxidation process [20]. The values close to biodiesel can be attributed to similarity in their composition.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dynamic P-DSC curves of sunflower and cotton oil

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dynamic P-DSC curves of sunflower and cotton biodiesel

Table 4 Onset and peak temperatures obtained from P-DSC curves (dynamic procedure) of oil and biodiesel samples

Oxidative induction time (OIT) indicated that the as extracted oils have higher stability than the biodiesel comes from them (Table 5). This occurs because of the ester functional group present in biodiesel, which that are more sensitive to oxidation than carboxylic acids present in vegetable oil. The sunflower oil showed induction time of 193 min versus 203 min for cotton oil. These close induction times, were attributed to the similarity in chemical composition of vegetable oils studied.

Table 5 Oxidative induction time obtained from pressure differential scanning calorimetry curves (isothermal procedure) of oil and biodiesel samples

The Fig. 4 shows the isothermal P-DSC curves of biodiesel (cotton and sunflower). The induction time of cotton biodiesel was 140 min and of the sunflower biodiesel was 120 min, showing similar oxidative stability profiles. However, there were differences in the values of OIT around 15% which can be attributed to a slightly higher percentage of unsaturated methyl esters present in sunflower biodiesel. This can be correlated by the analysis of gas chromatography discussed.

Fig. 4
figure 4

P-DSC curves of the biodiesel

Conclusions

The use of P-DSC to measure the oxidative induction time showed to be useful and efficient. For both the dynamic and isothermic methods, it was found that the thermal-oxidative stabilities of these vegetable oils and their respective biodiesel were similar, due to their chemical compositions present fatty acids in equivalent percentages.