Abstract
Sol–gel process is a very unique wet chemical method for producing advanced materials in various areas of research. An increasingly evolution trend of this process is to combine with other technologies, such as surface modification, hybridization, templating induction, self-assembly, and phase separation, for preparing new materials possessing controllable shape, unique microstructure, superior properties, and special application. The review aims to present the synthesis of several typical sol–gel-derived materials (monodisperse nanoparticles, hybrid coatings, hollow microspheres, aerogels, and porous monoliths) via sol–gel process combining with other technologies . Some examples of application of the sol–gel-derived materials are also included.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Sol–gel process is a very unique wet chemical method for producing advanced materials in various areas of research. This simple, high-purity, low-cost, and low-temperature process dexterously combines the fine control of composition and microstructure at the molecular level with the ability to shape material in bulk, powder, fiber, thin film, and monolith forms. The processed materials can be inorganic, organic, and hybrid, ranging from highly advanced materials to common materials, from optics, electronics, catalysis, separation, energy, space, medicine, sensors, biologics to architecture. This process is attracting more and more attention due to its outstanding advantages and wide application, and its tentacles are extending to the new fields that have not been involved. Sol–gel process is developing to be a multidisciplinary science and technology system owing to its exuberant vitality, and will become one of the most important and promising preparation methods for advanced materials [1–6].
As is well known, sol–gel process commonly involves hydrolysis of precursors (such as metal alkoxides, inorganic salts, and organic polymers), polycondensation to form colloidal sol, sol–gel transition to freeze gel network, drying of wet gel, or/and heat treatment to form crystalline phases. In addition, it is also possible to carry out the purification and stabilization of sol and the strengthening of gel. Some external field conditions such as strong field induction, ultrasonic assistant, microwave assistant, and magnetic field assistant are often used, in some special research areas. In the past decades, a continuing interest for this process is to synthesize all kinds of new materials possessing controllable shape, unique microstructure, superior properties, and special application, through combining with other technologies, such as surface modification, hybridization, templating induction, self-assembly, and phase separation [7–15].
In this review, we demonstrate the synthesis of several typical sol–gel-derived materials (monodisperse nanoparticles, hybrid coatings, hollow microspheres, aerogels, and porous monoliths) via sol–gel process combining with other technologies. For example, we propose a sol–gel route combining with surface modification to precisely synthesize monodisperse nanoparticles and nanopowders for improving the sintering characterization, microstructure, and mechanical and dielectric properties of electroceramic [16–20], electrical contact materials [21–23], and structural ceramics [24–26] due to unusual nanosize effect. We develop an organic–inorganic hybridization method based on sol–gel technology to prepare many kinds of functional coatings such as antireflection coating [27], anticorrosion coating [28], wearable coating [29–31], and antibacterial coating [32]. We develop a sol–gel self-assembly technology to prepare novel mesoporous silica hollow microspheres inside-loaded Ag nanoparticles that possess good Ag release property and long-term antibacterial activity for antibacterial materials [33]. We adopt a facile one-step route, which is an oil–water (O/W) emulsion process accompanied by sol–gel reaction in the presence of phase separation inducer, to fabricate metallic oxides (TiO2, ZrO2, and Al2O3) or polymer (ethyl cellulose) hollow microspheres for delivery, adsorption, catalysis, and insulation [35–39]. We present an improved sol–gel route followed by surface modification and atmospheric pressure drying to prepare metallic oxide aerogels (SiO2/TiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2) [40–42]. We explore the template-free sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation to fabricate hierarchically porous monoliths (SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2) that have three-dimensional cocontinuous macropores, fine mesoporous structure, and controlled solid skeletons due mainly to their applicability to efficient separation media, flow-through reactors, and anode materials [43–47].
2 The synthesis and application of monodisperse nanoparticles or granules by sol–gel route combining with surface modification or spray-drying
2.1 Introduction
Nanostructure materials exhibit unusual physical and chemical properties, significantly different from those of conventional bulk materials, due to their extremely small size or large specific surface area [48]. Nanosized powders or particles with uniform compositions, no aggregation, and good flowability is one of the key factors for nanostructure materials. So the preparation and characterization of nanoparticles or nanopowders have attracted great attentions, not only for fundamental scientific interest, but also for technological application. Among the preparation methods, sol–gel method displays obvious advantages of obtaining well-defined size and morphology, achieving superior purity, and requiring lower heat treatment temperatures since raw ingredients are microscopically homogeneous from the outset [49–51].
Recent developments in the synthesis of monodispersed, narrow-size-distributed nanoparticles by sol–gel process provide significant boost to development of nanostructure materials by combining with surface modification, in situ doping or spray-drying. These improved processes are widely used to produce pure nanopowders or nanoparticles due to its ability to control the particle size, size distribution, morphology, uniformity, and agglomeration through systematic monitoring of reaction parameters and ingeniously using of dispersion mechanism.
In this work, we propose a sol–gel route combining with surface modification, in situ doping, or spray-drying to precisely synthesize monodisperse nanoparticles, nanopowders, or granules for improving the sintering characterization, microstructure, mechanical and dielectric properties of electroceramic, electrical contact materials, and structural ceramics due to unusual nanosize effect [16–26].
2.2 Preparation and application of monodisperse nanopowders for electroceramics
High-performance electroceramics are necessary for the miniaturization of microwave components. Various electroceramics such as high-permittivity (Ca1−x , Nd2x/3)TiO3 [52, 53], perovskite-structured BaTiO3 [54, 55], and rock salt-structured Li2TiO3 [56, 57] have been successively reported. In the previous study, most of the electronic ceramic powders were usually made by standard solid-state reactions or co-precipitation method which requires relatively higher calcination temperature, the powder obtained usually displays large grain size and inferior sinterability. Thus, it was very difficult to obtain a pure electroceramic with high densification, and the porous microstructure caused by evaporation of element and phase transition under high sintering temperature can be detrimental for the further improvement of quality factor. In contrast, sol–gel method starts with a homogeneous liquid solution of cation ingredients, with metal cations mixed in stoichiometric ratios at the atomic scale. Therefore, pure samples at the nanometer scale could theoretically be obtained at lower temperature and shorter reaction time than that afforded by solid-state reaction.
In the present work, we have successfully prepared some typical electronic ceramic nanopowders [(Ca1−x , Nd2x/3)TiO3, (Nd2/3−x , Li3x )TiO3, Li2TiO3, BaTiO3] by a sol–gel method combining with surface modification [16–20]. In these systems, the polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) was used as a surfactant to inhabit nanoparticles interacting to agglomerate and grow bigger. The resultant nanopowders possess an average particle size below 100 nm, narrow particle size distribution, and high dispersion. The corresponding electronic ceramics prepared by nanopowders can be sintered at a lower temperature, and shows good temperature stability and high electrical properties. Here, we only report an example about the preparation of monodisperse Li2TiO3 nanoparticles with an average particle size below 20 nm via a simple sol–gel method in the presence of PEG 400. The phase formation, microstructure, sintering characteristic, and microwave dielectric of Li2TiO3 ceramics are investigated systematically [16].
2.2.1 Preparation of monodisperse Li2TiO3 nanopowders
In the synthesis procedure, the stoichiometric Li2TiO3 compositions were synthesized by a sol–gel method combining with surface modification. PEG 400 as a surfactant was added into the system with 3 wt% of the total solution. The mixed solution was held in water bath at 50 °C until it turned completely to a gel. The gel was dried at 120 °C for 12 h and then was treated at 500–700 °C for 2 h to obtain monodisperse Li2TiO3 nanopowders. The resultant Li2TiO3 powder from gel heat-treated for 2 h at 500–700 °C exhibits well-defined characteristic peaks assigned to the pure β-Li2TiO3 phase (JCPDS card: 33-0831) (Fig. 1), indicating high crystallinity of these samples. With the increase in the heat treatment temperature, the intensity of superstructure lines increases, but no traces of additional phase are visible.
The as-prepared Li2TiO3 nanoparticles with PEG 400 (Fig. 2a) were well dispersed, with an average crystal size of 6–12 nm. No obvious aggregation can be observed, and nearly spherical nanoparticles were obtained. However, some of the particles were agglomerated and appeared to be spherical with size 20–50 nm for the sample without PEG 400 (Fig. 2b). This inserted SAED pattern indicates that the spherical nanoparticles are polycrystalline.
Most of the dispersants have a long chain, and when the dispersant is added to the solution during the formation of sol, dispersant can keep the sol particles separated in the solution by adhering to the surface of the particles or absorbing inorganic ions into their network to form nanoparticles. It is established that the formation of metal oxide nanoparticles undergoes two main steps: (1) hydrolysis of metal precursors to produce unstable hydroxyalkoxide, and (2) subsequent condensation reactions by means of olation or oxolation to form M–O–M network. When the PEG 400 is added to the sol, one side of the molecular chain can stick on the surface of the particles while another side keeps dissolved in the solution. Afterward, the particles are wrapped and separated by the shell formed from PEG 400 dispersants. Since the PEG 400 is one kind of glycol which has lots of hydroxyl on its both sides, the existence of a great amount of hydroxyl can lead to the stereo-hindrance effect. Besides, because PEG 400 is nonionic surfactant, the shielding effect which decreases the electrostatic attraction among sol particles also plays an important role during the sol–gel process. These effects can influence the nucleation and growth through the interfacial free energy due to Gibbs–Thomson effects. The surface tension is expected to reduce significantly. As a result, the condensation reactions are reduced correspondingly. Thus, well-distributed particle size can be obtained by controlling the surface free energy during the growth process through the function of dispersant PEG 400.
2.2.2 Application of Li2TiO3 nanoparticles in microwave electroceramics
The resulting Li2TiO3 nanoparticles were easily densified to produce the Li2TiO3 ceramic specimens by pressureless sintering at 1250 °C. There have been previous reports showing that it is very difficult to obtain a pure dense Li2TiO3 ceramic under 1300 °C, since much porous microstructures and microcracks will be caused by lithium evaporation and order–disorder phase transition above 1150 °C, with solid-state reacted powder as raw materials. In contrast to that, after sintered at 1250 °C, the Li2TiO3 nanopowders synthesized by the sol–gel method could be densified with less micropores and cracks (Fig. 3). This result indicates that the nanoparticles with high ratio specific surface area and surface energy can facilitate the sintering properties and decrease the sintering temperature.
The produced Li2TiO3 ceramics shows high microwave dielectric properties (Table 1). In the case of pure Li2TiO3 samples, the dielectric constant and quality factor increase with increasing temperature up to 1250 °C. The increase in ε r and Q × f is in agreement with the increase in bulk density as shown in the table. As is reported, the optimal dielectric properties of ε r = 23.29 and Q × f = 15,525 GHz were acquired by the conventional solid-state reaction. In addition to that, we have also synthesized the Li2TiO3 ceramics by solid-state reaction, and the dielectric properties were ε r = 22.2, Q × f = 18,273 GHz. Compared with the same samples fabricated from a conventional solid-state reaction, the value of quality factor of the stoichiometric sample from nanopowders prepared via the sol–gel method in the investigation is enhanced due to less porosity and high densification.
As shown in our report, the present results confirm that sol–gel process is an effective route to prepare high-quality nanopowders for microwave electroceramics with excellent dielectric properties.
2.3 In situ doping of functional additive by sol coating for microwave ceramics
Doping is an important method in improvement of dielectric properties and sintering characteristics. Generally, the doping additive was introduced by mechanical solid mixing; however, it is very difficult for solid mixture to homogenously disperse a small amount of functional aids in the matrix. In order to improve their electrical properties and homogeneity of electrical ceramics, we developed several kinds of microwave ceramics such as ZnO–TiO2, Al2O3, and CaO–SiO2 by preparing the matrix materials using conventional solid-state reaction and adding to a few additives by sol–gel method [19, 20]. Here, the preparation, structure, and dielectric properties of low-temperature-sintered ZnO–TiO2 ceramics doped with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 by sol–gel were described as an example [19].
2.3.1 Preparation and characteristic of in situ doped powders
Reagent-grade ZnO and TiO2 powders were mixed according to the mol ratio of ZnO:TiO2 = 1:1.2 and then calcined at 850 °C for 2 h. The ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol was prepared as follows: ZnAc, TEOS, and H3BO3 were dissolved in ethanol, respectively. Those solutions were mixed with molar ratio of ZnO:B2O3:SiO2 = 1:2:7, stirred, and then transparent sol was formed. The calcined ZnO–TiO2 powder was added to the sol, followed by stirring for 60 min and standing for 24 h to transform into colloidal matter. Colloidal matter was dried and calcined at 650 °C for 2 h. As shown in SEM photographs (Fig. 4a) of original calcined powder of ZnO–TiO2, the average particle size of original powder is about 0.8 μm, and the particle shape is irregular. However, it can be observed in Fig. 4b that ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol was uniformly coated on the surface of ZnO–TiO2 powder, and then, the spherical grains were formed. It indicates that ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 additive can be in situ introduced in the ZnO–TiO2 powders by sol coating.
2.3.2 Sintering characteristic and dielectric properties of in situ doped powders
The synthesized powders were pressed into pellets, and the pellets were subsequently sintered at 900 °C for 3 h in air. As sintering additives, ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol and ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 glass are chosen to lower the sintering temperature of ZnO–TiO2 ceramics effectively from 1100 to 900 °C due to the liquid-phase effect, respectively. For the samples with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol (Fig. 5a), the ZnO–TiO2 ceramics possesses dense structure with few pores. However, the porous structure occurs in the sample with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 glass (Fig. 5b). The result indicates that ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol can be distributed uniformly in the ZnO–TiO2 matrix and was sufficient to improve the densification and microstructure of ZnO–TiO2 ceramic.
Dielectric properties of ZnO–TiO2 ceramics with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol and ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 glass were, respectively, tested. For the sample with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol, the dielectric constant (ε r) varies from 26.7 to 27.3, and the Q × f value changes from 20,050 to 21,640 GHz. Therefore, the deviation of different pellets in ε r and Q × f value was ±0.3 and ±1000 GHz, respectively. However, for the sample with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 glass, the ε r changed from 26.5 to 28.0, and the Q × f value varied from 18,320 to 22,450 GHz. The deviation of different pellets in ε r and Q × f value was ±0.8 and ±2100 GHz, respectively. It can be seen that the discreteness of dielectric properties of the ceramic with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol is less than that with ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 glass, resulting from the uniform distribution of ZnO–B2O3–SiO2 sol on the surface of ZnO–TiO2 powder particles.
2.4 Low-temperature preparation and application of nanoparticles by sol–gel method for electrical contact materials
As core foundation of electrical industry, electrical contact materials and components are responsible for making and breaking a current, and thus, their performance directly determines switching capacity, service life, and reliability of equipment. Environmentally friendly electrical contact materials are attracting more and more attention as the hazardous Ag/CdO material has being phased out in recent years [58–60]. Ag/La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ (Ag/LSCO) is one of the latest environmentally friendly electrical contact materials, in which Ag matrix is strengthened by evenly dispersing LSCO particles. Solid-state reaction is widely used as the synthesis approach of LSCO particles due to its simple process and low cost [61, 62]. However, there exist uncontrolled particles agglomeration, irregular particle sizes, nonuniform compositions, and low phase purity in the solid-state reaction. In this work, we report the low-temperature preparation of LSCO nanoparticles by sol–gel process with inorganic precursors as raw materials for Ag/LSCO electrical contact materials [21–23].
2.4.1 Sol–gel preparation of LSCO nanoparticles
La1−x Sr x CoO3−δ (x = 0.1–0.7) (LSCO) nanoparticles were successfully prepared by sol–gel with La(NO3)3, Sr(NO3)2, and Co(NO3)2·6H2O as raw materials. The resultant dried gel is amorphous, the crystalline phase of La1−x Sr x CoO3−δ (x = 0.1–0.7) is generated after calcined at 700 °C for 8 h (Fig. 6a), and the doping amount does not change the formation of LSCO crystals (Fig. 6b). Compared with solid-state reaction, the formation temperature of La1−x Sr x CoO3−δ prepared by sol–gel process is lower than 300 °C. More importantly, the doping of Sr element is easy to achieve in the sol–gel preparation.
2.4.2 Microstructure and electrical conductivity of LSCO nanoparticles
The as-prepared LSCO nanoparticles are spherical, well dispersive, and with smaller particle size (approximately 50 nm) (Fig. 7). As is known, when the size of LSCD particles decreases, the contact area of Ag with LSCD increases correspondingly. A strong adhesion between LSCO and liquid Ag will occur under arc condition, which decreases the splash loss and obtains a high arc erosion resistance. The electrical conductivity of LSCD nanoparticles firstly increases, and then decreases, with the increase in Sr2+ doping content. At x = 0.5, LSCD nanoparticles have good electrical conductivity (λ max = 5176 S cm−1). Further increase in Sr2+ doping content will obviously decrease the electrical conductivity again.
2.4.3 Application of LSCO nanoparticles in electrical contact materials
As shown in Fig. 8a, LSCO nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method can partially be decomposed in the temperature range of 700–950 °C, while giving off O2. The emitted oxygen can help to prevent welding and blow out the arc when it occurs in the working process of electrical contact materials, effectively reducing the destruction of the arc on the Ag matrix. The Ag/LSCO electrical contact material was prepared by mechanical alloying process. It is seen from Fig. 8b that LSCO nanoparticles uniformly distribute in the Ag matrix, and Ag/LSCO electrical contact material possesses high electrical properties. Summarily, LSCO nanopowders prepared by sol–gel method are more worthy of being chosen as reinforcements in the designing of silver-based eco-friendly electrical contact materials.
2.5 Preparation and application of nanocomposite granules by sol dispersing nanoparticles combining with spray-drying
Dispersion of multiphase nanoparticles is a key factor for the preparation of nanocomposite powder without aggregation, with uniform compositions, and good flowability [63–66]. A uniform and stable suspension (or emulsion) system is known as an important approach to realize the dispersion of multiphase nanoparticles [67–69]. However, it is difficult to achieve the ultimate uniform and stable due to the differences in dispersion mechanism in multiphase nanoparticles with distinctive polarity and isoelectric points. Moreover, the conventional drying technology to obtain nanocomposite powder will change the dispersion and stability of suspension, which leads to the reaggregation of multiphase nanoparticles. Here, the aim of this work was to produce spherical micron-sized nanocomposite granules by sol dispersing nanoparticles combining with aqueous spray-drying. The targeted application for such nanocomposite granules is to prepare SiC-based ceramic nanocomposite [24–26].
2.5.1 Overview of sol dispersing nanoparticles and spray-drying
In the sol dispersing system (Fig. 9a), the Y3Al5O12 (YAG) sol with fine network is firstly built by sol–gel method, and the size of one network is about 100 nm. About 40-nm β-SiC (87.5 wt%) and 20-nm TiN nanoparticles (2.5 wt%) are added into YAG sol accompanying with dispersant (0.25 wt% dispersant TMAH) in deionized water, and YAG sol and nanoparticles are combined with each other by ball milling. The nanoparticles will be “parceled” or “fixed” by YAG sol, and a network just contains one or two nanoparticles. The sol dispersing nanoparticle slurry system with a 25 wt% solid content has well stability and dispersion by network structure and dispersant.
Spray-drying is an immediate solidifying and drying process, and during spray-drying, the YAG sol is rapidly gelated to form YAG gel with the shrinking of network (Fig. 9b). The shrinking direction of network is to the surface of nanoparticles, and finally, the nanoparticles are absolutely enwrapped by dried network and do not reaggregate each other. Because of this parcel, the nanocomposite powders have a fine distribution after spray granulation.
2.5.2 Characteristics of spray-dried nanocomposite granules
Spray-dried granules (Fig. 10a) show spherical pellets with particle size from 10 to 20 μm. The granules have a wide size distribution, indicating good gradation for moulding. From the enlarged surface morphology of a granule, it may be seen that surface structure is smooth without large defects and homogenous chemical compositions, indicating good flowability and compaction properties for green body. The loose density of nano-SiC spray-dried granules reaches to 0.729 g ml−1, and the angle of repose decreases to 26.1°, which confirms that spray-dried granules have well flowability. The distribution of Y, Al, O, Ti, and N in the nanocomposite powders is homogeneous, indicating YAG and nano-TiN uniformly distributing in the matrix (Fig. 10b).
2.5.3 Application of spray-dried granules in ceramic nanocomposites
The spay-dried nanocomposite granules were uniaxially pressed at a pressure of 160 MPa for 10 s, and cold isostatic pressing with an applied pressure of 250 MPa for 300 s was conducted subsequently. And then, two-step pressureless sintering, that is, after sintered at 1900 °C for 15 min and then 1750 °C for 45 min, was successfully used to densify nano-SiC-based composites. As shown in Fig. 11, the nanocomposites containing 2.5 wt% nano-TiN had high sintering and mechanical properties with relative density of 96.1 %, bending strength of 545.2 MPa, Vickers’ hardness of 19.0 GPa, and fracture toughness of 7.8 MPa m1/2. The addition of nano-TiN was beneficial to restrain the growth of nano-SiC grains to some extent and obtain uniform microstructure with grain size of 200–400 nm (Fig. 12). The strengthening and toughening mechanism of nano-TiN and YAG grains was integrated to reinforce the nano-SiC-based ceramic composites.
In summary, by combining with sol dispersing nanoparticles and spray-drying, well stability and dispersion of slurry, homogenous distribution and flowability of granules, and nanosized sintering agents for ceramic nanocomposites are obtained simultaneously, which is beneficial for preparing ceramic nanocomposite.
3 The preparation and application of functional coatings by sol–gel technology combining with organic–inorganic hybrid method
3.1 Introduction
Functional coatings have become important advanced materials mainly due to the interesting chemical, optical, mechanical properties. There are several technologies used to deposit functional coatings, such as PVD/CVD (vapor deposition) and the use of a plasma beam, electrochemical deposition, and sol–gel coating technology, wherein sol–gel coating technology is an emerging technology enabling the functional structuration of coatings or thin film due to its well-known advantages (i.e., high-performance, room-temperature, and low-cost process). Sol–gel coating can widely be used as protective, antireflection, medicine, flexible, and antibacterial coatings for various applications such as optics, energy conversion, electronics, or sensing.
Recent development in sol–gel coatings is organic–inorganic hybrid coatings, which are prepared by co-hydrolysis and polycondensation of metal alkoxides or organosilanes and optional organic precursors. The sol–gel-derived hybrid coatings could significantly improve the coating forming process, enhance the microstructure uniformity and functional properties, and extend the application fields that cannot be involved in by sol–gel coatings.
Here, the present work describes an organic–inorganic hybrid method based on sol–gel technology to prepare many kinds of functional coatings such as antireflection coating, anticorrosion coating, wearable coating, and antisoiling coating [27–31].
3.2 Preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid antireflection coating and its application in solar photovoltaic technology
As solar photovoltaic technology becomes popular as a clean energy technology, the photovoltaic component is widely used. However, the lower conversion efficiency restricts the use of the existing photovoltaic component. Many efforts have been dedicated to improving the conversion efficiency, and the antireflective (AR) coating on solar cover glass is one of the most effective approaches.
Porous silica coating is usually chosen for the AR coating on solar glass of photovoltaic components due to its low refractive index and mechanical stability [70–74]. However, pure inorganic porous silica coating absorbs moisture in air at a high humidity due to the abundant hydroxyl group in the micropore structure of coating, leading to the decrease in the transmittance of the solar glass coated with the AR coating and the conversion efficiency. This is so-called condensation phenomenon. Some solutions to this problem were reported [75, 76]. Guillemot et al. [75] intended to enlarge the diameter of pore structure to reduce the condensation phenomenon on coating, exhibiting the superior condensation resistance performance. Vicente et al. [76] used hydrophobic compound hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) to modify the coating surface, obtaining the contact angle (CA) in water of 100°.
In the present work [27], the organic–inorganic AR coatings were prepared by a sol–gel method with TX-100 as a porogen and TEOS, MTES as precursors. The effect of the amount of MTES on the properties and structure of coating was investigated, as shown in Fig. 13. The transmittance of coating is low in the absence of MTES (see bare glass in Fig. 13). The transmittance of AR coating increases in the presence of MTES, and the maximum transmittance is 99.6 % at 530 nm when the ratio of MTES to TEOS is 1:2. The surface of AR coating becomes rougher when MTES increases. The more mesopore structure with the pore diameter of 30 nm appears in the coating when the amount of MTES increases, as shown in Fig. 14. The decrease in the abrasion resistance of the coating leads to the increase in the average transmittance. The optimum performance of AR coating can be obtained at the mole ratio of MTES to TEOS of 1:2.
3.3 Preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid anticorrosion coating and its application in metal protection
Metals are extensively used in many industrial fields, and their surfaces are generally protected by various coatings to avoid corrosion. Traditionally, chromate coatings are of the most effective and economical corrosion protection coatings [77]. However, the chromates, especially Cr6+, are toxic and will be eliminated in the industrial products in the near future. So the substitution for the chromate anticorrosion system becomes a popular topic in the material research areas. One of the prospective substitutes for the chromate anticorrosion system is sol–gel-derived films. Most recently, many studies have been carried out and have made some progress [78, 79], and various kinds of modified silicon alkoxide (ORMOSIL)-derived anticorrosion coating and their anticorrosion performance were studied [80, 81]. However, regarding the application of coatings, besides anticorrosion, other properties such as heat resistance and wear resistance need to be investigated as well. Furthermore, the performance of anticorrosion for the sol–gel films still needs to be improved.
In our early work, methyl triethoxysilane (MTES) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) were used as precursors to produce the anticorrosive coatings with organic–inorganic compound, but the anticorrosion performances of the coating are unsatisfied [82]. So, by using SiO2 sol as the source of nanophase and MTES as the precursor, a SiO2/polysiloxane hybrid coating for anticorrosion was prepared by sol–gel technique. The effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on the properties and structure of coatings were studied [28]. From Fig. 15, compared with bare cold rolled steel panel (curve 1 in Fig. 15), the impedance magnitude of the coated steel panel increases greatly. For hybrid coatings, when the amount of SiO2 nanoparticles increases from 0 to 15 wt%, the anticorrosion performance of coating increases and the impedance magnitude reaches maximum at 15 %. It is possibly because that the used SiO2 nanoparticles increase the interfaces between SiO2 and the polysiloxane matrix compared with micron SiO2 particle. With further increasing the amount of SiO2 nanoparticles to 30 wt%, the impedance magnitude drops sharply (curve 5) which is even lower than the undoped coating (curve 2), especially in high-frequency range. The photographs of the hybrid coatings with different amounts of SiO2 nanoparticles are consistent with electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) measurements.
The texture (Fig. 16a) of coating without SiO2 is uniform and even, and the roughness of coating texture increases with the doping of SiO2 nanoparticles, especially for the doping of 30 wt% SiO2 nanoparticles, which results in the segregation of nanoparticle phase and the polysiloxane matrix. The segregation will destroy the compactness of the hybrid coating and finally results in deterioration of the barrier properties or anticorrosion performance of the coatings. The DTA curves (Fig. 16b) show that with the doping of SiO2 nanoparticles, the exothermic peaks of hybrid coatings become smaller and shift to the higher temperature, resulting from high temperature of decomposition of methyl group from MTES. This result suggests that SiO2 nanoparticles doping can also improve the heat resistance of the hybrid coating by several decades centigrade.
3.4 Preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid wearable coating and its application in surface reinforcing of optical plastics
Optical plastics such as polycarbonate (PC) are a kind of the most widely used engineering thermoplastics because of transparency, excellent toughness, thermal stability, and a very good dimensional stability and have been gradually replaced inorganic glass in application for shatterproof windows, lightweight eyeglass lenses, and optical devices. However, optical plastic is easy to be scratched in use due to the low surface hardness and poor wear resistance, which makes the loss of operation life and limits the application. One of the effective methods to improve the properties of optical plastics such as surface hardness, abrasion resistance, and transparency is to spread hard film or coating on it. At present, the hard film includes three types: inorganic film, organic film, and inorganic–organic film. The inorganic film has high hardness but poor adhesive to organic substrates. The organic film adheres to organic substrates strongly, but the hardness is poor. The organic–inorganic film can integrate the excellent properties of the organic phase and of the inorganic phase into one materials and yield the properties of high abrasion resistance, high transparency, and good adhesion, which has became the hot study spot of abrasion-resistant coatings on optical plastics [83–86].
In the present work, on the basis of present research of organic silicone films, the inorganic sol modified silicone hybrid wearable coating was prepared by sol–gel method. The composition, structure, and properties of the resultant hybrid wearable coating were studied systemically [29–31]. Firstly, the ethylorthosilicate, aluminum isopropoxide, and zirconium oxychloride were hydrolyzed and condensed in mixture of alcohol and water and aggregated to nanosized silica, alumina, and zirconia sol particles. Secondly, with KH-570 modified silica, alumina, and zirconia as inorganic phase, condensates of methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS) as film forming materials, the modified sol/silicone hybrid wearable coating was prepared on PC, respectively. The hybrid wearable coating is composed of inorganic network structure such as Si–O–Si,Si–O–Al,Al–O–Al,Si–O–Zr, and Zr–O–Zr endcapped with organic groups, and the addition of KH-570 can improve the stability of coating solution, and the flexibility of coating because of the long alkyl chain. As a result, the sol/organosilicone hybrid coating with crack-free, adjustable thickness, wear resistance, and high light transmittance can be obtained , as show in Figs. 17, 18, and 19.
The silica sol enhancing silicone hybrid coating improves the light transmittance and hardness of PC. When mole ratio of TEOS and MTMS was 2, the pencil hardness of PC was improved from 2B to 2H, and the light transmittance of silica sol/organosilicone hybrid-coated PC was increased from 88.6 % to above 90 %. Alumina sol was more effective to increase hardness than silica sol. When the mole percent of Al and MTMS was 15 %, the pencil hardness of alumina sol/organosilicone hybrid-coated PC reached 2H, and the light transmittance of the coated PC was above 90 %. The effect of zirconia sol/organosilicone hybrid coating on light property of PC changed with zirconia sol content. When mol ratio of Zr and Si was lower than 1, the light transmittance of zirconia sol/organosilicone hybrid-coated PC was above 88.6 %, while the highest pencil hardness of the coated PC is only H.
It is of important theoretical value and instructive meanings to the research and development of hybrid wearable coating prepared by sol–gel method and the surface modification and extant application of optical plastics.
3.5 Preparation and super-hydrophobic properties of lotus-leaf-like hydrophobic antibacterial film
Bacteria have a strong ability to attach to solid surfaces and finally form a biofilm, which will serve as a reservoir for the development of pathogens, leading to health threats of mankind. Biofilm formation is a multifactorial infection process, which is also influenced by the physiochemical properties of the substrate surface. It has been reported that hydrophilic surface is a major factor for bacterial adhesion and biofilm, while hydrophobic surface can effectively inhibit protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion on materials [87–90]. However, it is difficult to obtain notable hydrophobicity surface just relying on the low surface energy, especially for so-called lotus effect surface. The observation of hydrophobicity related to the topology of the surface of a plant leaf was reported by Barthlott and Neinhuis [91]. It was believed that this unique property is based on surface roughness caused by the micrometer-scale papillae and the epicuticular wax [92]. Jiang also reported a novel finding of lotus leaf, i.e., branch-like nanostructures on top of the micropapillae [93]. These structures can induce super-hydrophobic surfaces with large water contact angle, as well as high bacteriostatic ability. However, resisting bacteria via the super-hydrophobic surface is only a kind of passive strategies, because the super-hydrophobic surface just reduces bacterial adhesion rather than kills them. More importantly, the bacteria will still adhere to the super-hydrophobic surface when the surface becomes fully wet after long time exposing to moist environments [94, 95]. Thus, more and more attentions are paid on the combination of super-hydrophobic surface and bacterial killing materials [96, 97].
In the present work, we report a novel method to fabricate a lotus-leaf-like hydrophobic antibacterial film via three-step process (see Scheme 1). Firstly, Ag+ ions are adsorbed on the surface of sulfonated polystyrene (PS) beads via electrostatic interaction, and then reduced and protected by polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to obtain PS/Ag composite spheres. Secondly, silica colloids generated by the hydrolysis and polymerization of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) are assembled on the PS/Ag composite spheres via hydrogen bond force to form silica shell, followed by the removal of the PS core and PVP through calcinations to get MSMAs. The obtained MSMAs (Fig. 20a) possess relatively uniform shape with rough surface, whereas at the inner of the hollow microcapsules, it can be seen that many AgNPs, corresponding to the white spots, load onto the interior wall of the spherical shell (Fig. 20b). More importantly, the Ag+ ions can release from AgNPs via oxidization by dissolved oxygen and slowly diffuse to the external medium through the mesopore channels in the shell, inducing sustained-release property and antibacterial activity. Thirdly, the MSMAs are loaded onto the FSR (fluorosilicone resin) film, and the silanols on the silica colloid surfaces provide bonding site, leading to combination with FSR molecular chains, which allows the MSMAs to be partially embedded in the film (see Fig. 21a), forming a lotus-leaf-like hierarchical microscale- and nanoscale-structured surface. Therefore, the hydrophobicity of MSMA/FSR film is enhanced, and its water contact angle increases from 112.0° (FSR film) to 150.4°. The MSMAs/FSR film displays higher antibacterial activity compared with FSR film, indicating that the high antibacterial activity can be achieved by the joint action of the super-hydrophobic property and the sustained release of Ag+ ions.
4 The fabrication and application of hollow microspheres by sol–gel route combining with self-assembly technology or emulsion process
4.1 Introduction
Hollow microspheres are all kinds of the core–shell-structured microspheres with the internal hollow structures such as simple cavity structure, multicavitiy structures, multishell hollow structure, and sandwich hollow structure. Increasing attention has been attracted by hollow microspheres due to their special characteristics, such as low density, low thermal conductivity, high specific surface, and good flow ability. Hollow microspheres have been widely used in all kinds of applications such as catalysis, adsorption, drug delivery, and building materials [98].
Up to now, diverse hollow microspheres with different special characteristics including hollow microspheres with a single cavity, hollow microspheres with multiple shells, and hollow microsphere with multicavities have been fabricated by templating method, emulsion processing, high-temperature treatment, layer-by-layer self-assembly technique, and so on, wherein hollow microspheres with multicavitiy pores as an important class of hollow spheres have gained growing attention for their potential applications such as adsorption and catalysis, especially in drug delivery systems. Moreover, the microspheres loaded with nanoparticles and mesoporous-structured shell have been also fabricated for multiple applications, such as light diffusers and magnetic-assisted separation agents.
Here, we demonstrate the preparation and nanoparticle loadings of some typical hollow mesostructured microspheres by sol–gel route combining with self-assembly technology or emulsion process as follows [35–40].
4.2 Preparation of novel mesoporous silica hollow microspheres inside-loaded Ag nanoparticles by sol–gel self-assembly technology
Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) have shown more superior antibacterial activity compared to that of bulk silver as well as other silver compounds [99–101], due to their high specific surface area, high fraction of surface atoms, and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity [102, 103]. However, AgNPs, with the form of colloids, have tend to aggregate in practical application as their high surface activity, leading to the deterioration of chemical properties and antibacterial performance [104, 105]. Moreover, another problem encountered in the antibacterial application of AgNPs is that antibacterial materials are desired to be chemically durable, and to release Ag slowly over a long period [103].
One of the strategies for overcoming above problems is to load AgNPs on supporting matrix. Various kinds of AgNP-loaded antibacterial materials have been developed in the past decades. These investigations mainly focused on the deposition of AgNPs on inorganic microspheres (silica, titanium dioxide, carbon spheres, etc.) [106–108], nanofiber or nanotube (titanium dioxide or carbon) [109–111], polymer films (polystyrene, carboxymethyl-chitosan, polyamide, etc.) [112–115]. However, in all these researches, AgNPs were just loaded on the surface of matrix and thus may be quickly consumed due to the weak binding, chemical erosion or excessive extraction, resulting in rapid decrease in antibacterial activity. Hence, sustained-release performance of AgNP-loaded composite materials is required considering the practical application. Some efforts have been made toward the development of core–shell system to isolate the inner AgNPs core from the outer environment [116–118]. In the typical preparation process, AgNPs were used as cores, and silica was directly coated on the AgNPs through a modified Stöber method to provide a robust substrate with consistent surface chemistry. This core–shell structure can effectively protect active AgNPs and solve the oxidation problems, and thus achieve relatively high chemical stability. However, the current researches of such core–shell Ag–silica composite material mainly focus on its application in optical fields, such as SERS or nonlinear optical response, while rarely discuss its antibacterial performance [116–118]. For the antibacterial application of such core–shell Ag–silica composite material, it is believed that the potent antibacterial ability of the AgNPs cannot be put into full play in this core–shell structure, due to its slow Ag ions release rate [119], and thus how the Ag+ ions release from the core–shell structure is still a challenging problem. Hence, it is necessary to design a new form of Ag–silica composite structure, to get better antibacterial performance.
Herein, we report a sol–gel method to fabricate mesoporous silica microcapsule with AgNPs loading onto the interior wall of mesoporous silica shell (denoted as AgNPs@silica microcapsule) [33, 34]. The preparation mechanism of AgNPs@silica microcapsule is illustrated in Fig. 22a. Firstly, sulfate groups are introduced at the surface of PS beads via sulfonation to obtain negative charged sulfonated PS beads, and then Ag+ ions will be adsorbed on the surface of sulfonated PS beads via electrostatic attraction after addition of silver nitrate (AgNO3).
Secondly, PVP serving as both reducing and protecting agent is added to the reaction system. PVP macromolecule in solution which mostly likely adopts a pseudo-random coil configuration may take part in some form of association with the metal atoms, thus increasing the probability of nucleus formation. More specifically, Ag+ ions will coordinate with lone pair electrons from the oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N) atoms of polar groups (O=C–N) in PVP molecules, and the polar group of one PVP unit may occupy two sp orbitals of the Ag+ ions to form a complex compound [29, 30] (as shown in Fig. 22b). Thus, the coordination structure is activated, and the Ag+ ions in the coordination compounds may receive electronic clouds from the ligand of –N and O=C in pyrrolidone ring to form Ag nuclei atomic metal that grow into AgNPs, resulting in the formation of PS/Ag composite spheres [120]. Thirdly, silica colloids (primary particles, several nanometers), generated by the hydrolysis and concentration of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) with the catalysis of ammonia, are assembled on these spheres to form core–shell PS/Ag/silica composite spheres. The silanols (Si–OH groups) on the silica colloid surface provide bonding site, and will combine with PVP molecular chains via hydrogen bonding force between OH- and O atom on the carbonyl group (C=O), as shown in Fig. 22c, thus achieving order assembly of silica shell, whereas PVP molecules will also be trapped in the structure of silica shell due to hydrogen bonding combination [121]. Finally, the PS core and PVP are removed by calcinations, forming AgNPs@silica microcapsule characterized by hollow core and mesoporous shell with AgNPs loading onto the interior wall.
It can be seen from the typical SEM images of PS beads (Fig. 23a) that the PS beads are uniform with a diameter of ca. 3 μm and have good monodispersity. As shown in Fig. 23b, AgNPs reduced by PVP are homogenously supported on the surfaces of PS beads without any aggregation. The diameter of the monodispersed Ag NPs is about 90 nm, as seen inset in Fig. 23b. In order to observe the interior wall of the silica shell, the microcapsule was dispersed into ethanol and ultrasonized to get broken spherical shells. As shown in Fig. 23c, it can be seen that many AgNPs, corresponding to the white spots, load onto the interior wall of the spherical shell, which is in well consistence with Fig. 23b. Moreover, it can be also observed from the edge of broken spherical shell that the thickness of the shell is about 100 nm, and the shell is composed of monolayer of silica particles.
As shown in Fig. 24a, the concentration of Ag released from the interior of the shell into water increases with soaking time and reaches the equilibrium after 6 days. Figure 24b gives a distinct picture of the release rate of Ag. It displays a three-stage release profile characterized by an initial rapid release phase, followed by a modulated and progressive release of Ag for several days, and then reaches approximately dynamic equilibrium at last. It indicates that the AgNPs@silica microcapsule can protect the immobilized AgNPs for a long time. Therefore, the antibacterial activity of AgNPs@silica microcapsules can remain at a high level of 99.2 % (as shown in Table 2), even being soaked into deionized water for 2 months, further proving that the as-prepared AgNPs@silica microcapsule can release Ag slowly and maintain their high antibacterial activity for long periods.
This unique structure can protect the inner AgNPs and effectively avoid the aggregation problem existing in traditional Ag colloid system, keeping the inherent activity of individual AgNPs. Meanwhile, owing to the mesoporous structure of the shell, Ag+ ions can be slowly released from the interior of the shell, resulting in higher antibacterial durability.
4.3 Template-free synthesis of three-dimensional mesoporous nanocomposite microspheres
The photocatalytic activity of semiconductor materials mainly depends on the specific surface area, light response characteristic, and quantum efficiency [122–125]. Thus, with respect to the bulk materials, nanoscale photocatalytic materials often exhibit better catalytic activity due to their larger specific surface area and higher quantum efficiency [126]. However, there are difficulties in dispersing the nanoscale materials and recycling them from the solutions. In recent years, 3D micro- and nano-hierarchical structure materials, which are assembled from nanoparticles, nanorods, nanoplates, and other building blocks, have attracted significant attention due to their unique morphology and properties [127–129]. A large number of studies have shown that this kind of three-dimensional micro- and nano-structural materials can effectively overcome the above problems and usually exhibit superior photocatalytic properties [130–134].
In this work, 3D hierarchical structure InVO4 porous microspheres with different grain size and morphology was successfully synthesized by a sol–gel method under hydrothermal conditions in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) [34, 35]. The most plausible mechanism for the growth of the monodisperse microspheres can be proposed to include Oswald ripening and self-assembly aggregation, as shown in Fig. 25. Firstly, numerous small crystallites nucleate from solution, and the primary amorphous nanoparticles quickly suffer from entropy-driven random aggregation, and the growth of crystallites results in the formation of well-crystallized InVO4 nanoparticles through the typical Oswald ripening process [135–137] (Step 1). Secondly, the self-random aggregation of InVO4 nanocrystals, which have a higher surface energy, will assemble spontaneously to form perfect hierarchical microspheres in order to further reduce the interfacial energy [138, 139] (Steps 2 and 3). From a view of kinetics, however, for the aggregates to form perfect spheres, there must be sufficient short-range repulsion due to surface charge between them to allow the particles to settle into the microspheres in addition to high concentration of primary particles [140]. So, the cationic CTAB template here is important as expected to bind the nanoparticles together through electrostatic interaction after the aggregation has taken place.
As shown in Fig. 26a, the InVO4 nanoparticles assemble spontaneously to form hierarchical microspheres with the diameter about 2–5 μm. Figure 26b shows a single InVO4 microsphere with 3D hierarchical structure composed of small-size particles. The inset of Fig. 26b shows clear lattice fringes with the lattice interplanar spacing of 0.39 nm, which corresponds to the (111) crystalline plane of orthorhombic InVO4.
Furthermore, we further fabricated TiO2/InVO4 nanocomposites based on the in situ growth of TiO2 nanoparticles on 3D hierarchical InVO4 porous microspheres, as shown in Figs. 27 and 28 [35]. Such structural material offers two advantages: (1) TiO2 nanoparticles can be uniformly loaded on the surface of InVO4, forming interconnected biphase TiO2/InVO4 nanocomposites with the close interface, which leads to the highly efficient interparticle electron transfer and thus achieving improved photocatalytic properties [141]; (2) The 3D hierarchical porous microspheres can combine the advantages of high-surface-area materials and large-scale materials, achieving both high photocatalytic activity and easy recycling characteristics, thereby showing a promising potential in environmental protection.
4.4 Fabrication of metallic oxide hollow microspheres with incontinuous multicavities by oil–water (O/W) emulsion process accompanied by sol–gel reaction
Metallic oxide hollow microspheres possess excellent characteristics derived from metallic compositions and hollow structure simultaneously, such as good thermal stability, chemical stability, electrical conductivity, low density, and high porosity [142–144]. Due to the unique characteristics, metallic oxide hollow microspheres have a wide range of applications in the sensitive material, biochemistry, solid oxide fuel cell, thermal barrier coatings, etc. [145–149]. In this work, typical metallic oxides such as TiO2, ZrO2, and Al2O3 have been successfully prepared via an oil–water (O/W) emulsion process accompanied by sol–gel reaction in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), without any templates at room temperature [36–39].
4.4.1 Formation mechanism of hollow microspheres with multicavities
The mechanism for the formation of the TiO2 hollow spheres with multicavities may be explained on the basis of nucleation-growth phase separation model, which is schematically shown in Fig. 29. The oil phase is cut into small spherical droplets by high-speed shearing under vigorously stirring when it is mixed with water phase. Then, the water molecules diffuse through oil–water interface and react with tetrabutyl titanate. The reaction is comprised of the hydrolysis of tetrabutyl titanate and polycondensation, leading to the sol–gel transition of the original oil droplets which built the solid spheres. The addition of EAA suppresses the hydrolysis of tetrabutyl titanate, which ensures the thoroughly emulsification of oil phase before gelation to form spherical morphology. And the PVP acted as phase separation agent in this reaction is crucial in the formation of porous structure of TiO2 microspheres. Moreover, Span 80 used as phase separation stabilizer has a great effect on the preservation of spherical morphology and porous structure of TiO2 microspheres.
4.4.2 Control of multicavity structures inside hollow microspheres
As shown from the SEM images of TiO2 microspheres fabricated with different amounts of PVP (Fig. 30), spherical structures are obtained for all five particles, and the surfaces of the microspheres fabricated with different amounts of PVP are generally smooth. The addition of PVP leads to cage-like porous structures, and the average cavity diameters calculated from the SEM images are ~500 nm, ~750 nm, ~1.2 μm, and ~1.3 μm, respectively, as shown in Fig. 31. It indicates that the cavity size distributions also become wider with the increase in PVP content generally. However, the addition of PVP nearly does not affect the size distribution of titania microspheres, and all the samples show a size distribution with only one peak.
4.4.3 Preparation of other metallic oxides hollow microspheres by using similar approach
As known, hollow zirconia and alumina spheres are widely used as absorbents, composite materials, ceramics, and catalyst support due to their instinct microporous structures, large surface area, high stability, and various acid/basic sites. Herein, the one-step route presented in this work is proven to be applicable to fabricate zirconia and alumina microspheres with incontinuous multicavities successfully, as shown in Fig. 32.
4.5 Synthesis of porous ethyl cellulose (EC) microspheres loaded with nanoparticles by oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion process
Ethyl cellulose porous spheres (ECPSs) as an important class of hollow spheres have gained growing attention for its potential application in drug delivery system because of high porosity, nontoxicity, good mechanical properties, and other advantages [150–153]. Moreover, the hollow spheres loaded with nanoparticles have also been fabricated for multiple applications, such as light diffusers and magnetic-assisted separation agents [154]. In this work, ethyl cellulose porous spheres (ECPSs) loaded with various amounts of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) were successfully synthesized by adding SPIONs into oil phase system via the emulsion method. All the obtained ECPSs possess open macropores in the shell and interconnected pores inside the spheres [38].
4.5.1 Control of morphology and internal structure of ECPSs–SPIONs
The formation mechanism of the ethyl cellulose porous spheres (ECPSs) can be attributed to phase separation as depicted as above mentioned. As shown in Fig. 33, the ECPSs–SPIONs are shown to be well spherical particles with a diameter size of around 40 μm and similar shape. All the obtained spheres possess open pores in their shells. The SPIONs uniformly distribute on the surface of the ECPSs, and the amount of SPIONs increases with the increase in SPIONs dispersion liquid.
From cross section of the ECPSs–SPIONs (Fig. 34), there exist cocontinuous porous structures in four samples, and the porous structures do not change with the increase in SPIONs dispersion liquid. The above results indicate that SPIONs are uniformly loaded on the ECPSs, and the loading.
4.5.2 Application of ECPSs–SPIONs in magnetic-assisted separation
As shown in Fig. 35, the loading of SPIONs has no effect on the morphology and porous structures of the ECPSs, while reduces the decomposition temperature of ECPSs. The addition of SPIONs increases the magnetization of the ECPSs–SPIONs and decreases the coercivity at room temperature. With the increase in the loading amounts of SPIONs, the saturation magnetizations of ECPSs–SPIONs increase and the coercivity decreases, respectively.
Due to their high magnetization, stable morphology, and other benign character of EC, the magnetized ECPSs are supposed to be applied in more areas, such as site-specific delivery and quick separation. More importantly, our work may have suggested a general method to synthesize ethyl cellulose porous spheres incorporated with useful nanoparticles.
5 The synthesis and application of metallic oxide aerogels by sol–gel process followed by surface modification and ambient pressure drying
5.1 Introduction
Aerogels are designated as dried gels with a very high relative pore volume, and are a class of mesoporous materials assembled by fine particles with network structure and gaseous dispersion mediums [3, 155, 156]. Aerogels are mesoporous solid materials composed of a three-dimensional network of nanoscale skeletons, and exhibit very high-surface-area and porosity, low-density, and a controllable structure. Aerogels are expected to be used as thermal and phonic insulators, electrodes, chromatographic packings, adsorbents, and catalyst supports [3].
As is well known, the drying process of gels is a key factor for the preparation of aerogels. During the conventional drying process of wet gels, a liquid–vapor meniscus is formed due to the surface tension of the liquid, and thus, a capillary pressure is built up in the pore walls of the gels, which is able to collapse most parts of the pore volume since most gels have weak network strength. To avoid this collapse, a CO2 supercritical drying technique is usually applied during the preparation of low-density aerogel materials [157–160]. However, the CO2 supercritical drying technique is a multistep and time-consuming production procedure and not a good choice for mass production. It is therefore desirable to develop new preparation methods for producing aerogels under conventional ambient pressure drying conditions. A number of approaches have been reported in the preparation of silica aerogels.
In this study, we demonstrated an improved sol–gel route followed by surface modification and atmospheric pressure drying to prepare metallic oxide aerogels such as SiO2/TiO2 [40], TiO2 [41], and ZrO2 aerogels [42].
5.2 Synthesis and application of porous SiO2/TiO2 composite aerogels
In recent years, the application of porous aerogel adsorbent in water pollution treatment has attracted much attention. The SiO2/TiO2 aerogel adsorbent has a multilevel pore structure with the great specific surface area and diffusion resistance. Besides the multilevel pore structure and great specific surface area, it is also important for the enhancement of the adsorption capacity of adsorbent to chemically modify the adsorbent. In this work, porous SiO2/TiO2 aerogels with high surface area are prepared via sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation using tetraethoxysilane and tetrabutyl orthotitanate as source of silica and titania, followed by ambient pressure drying to remove the solvents from the gels. The preparation proceeding shows that the morphology of porous structure and the size of the interconnected pores can be controlled by adjusting the compositions. The results show that SiO2/TiO2 aerogel is a kind of porous composite solid materials which is composed of dispersed nano-SiO2 and TiO2. The multilevel pore structures make composite powders have higher specific surface area and better adsorption performance. Structure change in the composite aerogels is the result of competition between phase separation process and sol–gel process essentially. Proper silicon content can refine the structure of SiO2/TiO2 composite aerogels dramatically. The prepared SiO2/TiO2 (3:1) aerogels not only exhibit bicontinuous channel structure (Fig. 36) and high BET surface area of 1000.5 m2/g (Fig. 37), but also demonstrate multilevel pore structure. The adsorption process of Ce(IV) simulating Pu(IV) ions by the synthesized SiO2/TiO2 aerogels was studied.
The adsorption of Ce(IV) is carried out at same initial concentrations of 1400 mg L−1 at 35 °C. When the optimal adsorbent dosage is 6 g L−1, the adsorption equilibrium time is 90, 105, 124 h, and the maximum adsorption capacities are 229.98, 212.52, 196.94 mg/g for SiO2/TiO, SiO2, and TiO2 aerogels, respectively. By comparing the adsorption equilibrium time and the maximum adsorption capacities of the three aerogels, we can determine the contribution of high BET surface area (1000.5 m2 g−1) and the multilevel pore structures of micropore (1–2 nm) and mesopore (2–20 nm) in SiO2/TiO2 aerogels to the efficiency and stability improvement. Pure SiO2 particles have good dispersion performance toward TiO2 particles. As a result, the SiO2/TiO2 aerogels exhibited a larger BET surface area than the SiO2 aerogels (475.4 m2 g−1) and TiO2 aerogels (625.1 m2 g−1). This indicates that the higher BET surface area can make the surface of the optimum SiO2/TiO2 aerogels has more adsorption sites to catch Ce(IV) ions and speed up the removal efficiency.
5.3 Preparation of monolithic titania aerogels by a sol–gel process combined with surface modification
Titania (TiO2) aerogel is an important aerogel material combining catalytic activity, nontoxicity, good chemical stability of TiO2 with low density, high surface area, and high porosity of aerogels [161–164]. The present monolithic or particulate TiO2 aerogels are usually obtained by the supercritical drying. The process at such high pressures needs the use of expensive autoclaves, which restricts its industrial application due to production costs. In addition, TiO2 aerogel has a weaker network skeleton than SiO2 aerogel, and it is very difficult to prepare single TiO2 aerogel (not composite aerogels, such as TiO2–SiO2 aerogel [40]) with monolithic shape and no cracking by ambient pressure drying. In the present work, monolithic titania (TiO2) aerogels with high surface area were successfully synthesized by the sol–gel process combined with surface modification, followed by ambient pressure drying to remove the solvents from the gels. The effects of surface modification used polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2000 as surfactant on the gelation and microstructure of the aerogel were studied in detail [41].
5.3.1 Effects of surfactant on the microstructure of aerogels
After surface modification, the apparent density of TiO2 aerogels slightly decreases and the corresponding porosity increases, with the increase in PEG 2000 content (Fig. 38). The apparent density and porosity of the TiO2 aerogels without surface modification are 0.818 g cm−3 and 79 %, respectively, and the apparent density becomes the minimum as low as 0.716 g cm−3 and the corresponding porosity is about 81.6 %, when the molar ratio of PEG 2000:TBOT reaches to 0.005. With the further increase in PEO 2000 content, the apparent density increases and the corresponding porosity decreases.
From the morphology of fracture surface of TiO2 aerogels with different PEG 2000 contents, compared with the aerogel without surfactant (Fig. 39g), the modified aerogel sample (Fig. 39e) shows a pore structure with smaller pore size and uniform pore size distribution. With the further increasing amount of surfactant, the macropore size becomes larger and the particles aggregate to form skeleton. The modified aerogel shows monolithic shape without cracks, although its outside is not smooth, as shown in Fig. 39h.
5.3.2 Effects of surfactant on the pore structure of aerogels
The variation in the size and shape of the pores may be associated with the surface modification of PEG 2000. As shown in Fig. 40, the dried gel without surfactant possesses a surface area of 415 m2 g−1 with a average pore size of about 8 nm and a whole pore volume of 0.86 cm3 g−1. The addition of surfactant (the sample with PEG 2000:TBOT = 0.005) increases surface area to 495 m2 g−1 and increases the pore size to 10 nm and the pore volume to 1.181 cm3 g−1, respectively. With the further increases in surfactant (the sample with PEG 2000:TBOT = 0.006), the surface area decreases to 411 m2/g, and the pore size and volume rapidly decrease to 8 nm and 0.84 cm3 g−1, respectively. As a result, the resultant aerogel with the PEG 2000:TBOB (molar ratio) of 0.005 exhibits specific surface area as high as 495 m2 g−1, apparent density of 0.716 g cm−3, and porosity of 81.6 %.
5.3.3 Heat treatment of aerogel after surface modification
Compared with the aerogels without heat treatment, the crystalline titania aerogel has a shrinkage about 10 %, while still keeps the shape and morphology before heat treatment (Fig. 41). The morphology is basically maintained after heat treatment. It indicates that the crystallization of aerogels after heat treatment does not spoil the monolithic shape and morphology of the aerogel basically. After heat treatment, the specific surface area decreases from 495 m2 g−1 (before heat treatment) to 209 m2 g−1, which indicates that specific surface area still keeps a relative high value after heat treatment. The facile route provides a low-cost strategy for the preparation of metal oxide aerogels with high surface area. The monolithic TiO2 aerogels will produce a lot of benefits and extend its application fields such as catalysis, separation, and absorption.
5.4 Synthesis of core–shell-structured zirconia aerogels by sol–gel process combining with atmospheric pressure drying
ZrO2 aerogel has attracted much attention and has potential application in heat insulation materials because of their excellent properties combining zirconia with aerogel [165–168]. Many studies have been devoted to the synthesis of ZrO2 aerogels by using supercritical drying. As is known, using supercritical drying enhances the network of ZrO2 gel and prevents obvious shrinkage during drying; however, it is of high energy consumption and not a good choice for mass production. In this study, we demonstrate an improved sol–gel route followed by surface modification and atmospheric pressure drying to prepare ZrO2 aerogel. In order to reduce the effect of capillary stress on gel skeletons during drying, formamide (FA), PEG 400, and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) were used as drying control chemical additive, dispersant, and surface modifier, respectively. The effect of the amount of formamide and the concentration of tetraethoxysilane solution were investigated [42].
5.4.1 Overview of sol–gel process combining with atmospheric pressure drying
High-surface-area ZrO2 aerogel can be obtained after atmospheric pressure drying mainly because of two factors (Fig. 42): (1) The utilization of FA as a gelation agent as well as a DCCA promotes the condensation process uniformly and modifies the polarity of gel skeletons; (2) the deposition of SiO2 on the surface of primary particles forms a core–shell-like structure, which can resist the capillary stress better.
5.4.2 Effect of drying control chemical additive
The SEM images (Fig. 43) of ZrO2 aerogels prepared with varied amounts of FA show that when little FA is added, the gel exhibits obvious shrinkage after drying and few pores are observed (Fig. 43a). The morphology transforms to porous structure composed of loosely compacted particles with an increase in FA. Compared with the other samples, the pore size of the sample with Zr(IV):FA (mole) = 1:2.0 is homogeneously distributed and the as-dried gel exhibits a monolithic shape.
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (Fig. 44) of ZrO2 aerogels prepared with varied amounts of FA show that the BET surface area increases from 430 to 619 m2/g, and the median pore size increases from 7.4 to 12.4 nm with the addition of FA; however, when too much FA is added, an obvious decrease in BET surface area is observed (520 m2/g).
5.4.3 Effect of modification solution
We investigated the effect of modification solution on the wet gels prepared from the starting compositions, as shown in Fig. 45. When dried in atmospheric pressure directly, the gel becomes fragments after drying, and almost no pores are observed even appropriate amount of FA is added (Fig. 45a). After immersed in TEOS solution for 24 h, aerogel with uniform mesoporous structure is obtained (Fig. 45b). And it seems that the morphology does not change much with a longer immersion time. For ZrO2 aerogel immersed in TEOS solution for 48 h, the corresponding XP levels (Fig. 46) of O1s indicate that some SiO2 generated from the hydrolysis of TEOS is deposited on the surface of ZrO2 gel particles to form core–shell-structured aerogels.
In summary, appropriate choice of formamide and tetraethoxysilane solution allowed the formation of core–shell-structured ZrO2 aerogel with a BET surface area of 619 m2/g and a pore size of 8.1 nm.
6 The fabrication and application of hierarchically porous monoliths by sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation
6.1 Introduction
Hierarchically structured porous materials, displaying multiple-level porosity integrated in a single architecture, have recently triggered extensive research because of their fascinating features such as high surface area, facilitated interface transport, and advanced mass transport kinetics [169–173]. Compared with single-sized porous materials, hierarchically porous materials in the form of monolith have more superior properties and applications [174–177]. The incorporation of mesopores into macroporous architectures offers an alternative strategy to greatly minimize diffusion barriers and potentially enhance the distribution of active sites. The reactants/products are able to enter/exit mesopores but experience attendant diffusion, such bimodal pore structures can significantly improve active site accessibility [178]. The comment synthesis strategy to prepare hierarchically structured porous materials is template method with various templates, such as dual and multiple surfactants, micelles, small solid particles, liquid drops, gas bubbles, and supramolecular aggregates. The present synthesis approaches have extended to combining the single surfactant-assisted procedure with supplementary chemical and/or physical methods such as aging, drying, phase separation, and post-treatment. Here, we report the preparation of three typical hierarchically porous monoliths (SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2) by sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation [43–47].
6.2 Spontaneous preparation of hierarchically porous silica monoliths with uniform spherical mesopores
Hierarchically porous silica monoliths with well-defined interconnected macropores and uniform spherical mesopores were spontaneously prepared by combining the polymerization-induced phase separation with epoxide-mediated sol–gel route without any complicated aging and drying and high-temperature heat treatment. Tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) and propylene oxide (PO) were used as the silica source and gelation mediation agent, and hydrochloric acid (0.01 mol L−1 HCl) and ethanol were the catalyst and solvent, respectively. The precise controlling for pore structures can be realized by using propylene oxide (PO) as the gelation mediation agent, poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (P123) as the phase separation inducer as well as the structure-directing agent and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB) as the micelle-swelling agent [43].
6.2.1 Formation mechanism of hierarchically porous silica monoliths
As shown in Scheme 2, in the TMOS–HCl–PO–P123 system, the micelle-swelling agent TMB enters into the middle of P123 molecules and stabilizes the assemblage of P123-silica adducts in the whole process of sol–gel accompanied by phase separation, resulting in the expansion of mesopores and slight influence on macropores. After solvent exchange and drying process, TMB is removed.
6.2.2 Morphology and pore structures of hierarchically porous silica monoliths
From the appearance, SEM and TEM images, and pore structure of hierarchically porous silica monoliths (Fig. 47), the as-prepared silica dried gel exists in the form of monolith, possesses an interesting hierarchically porous structure constructed by 10 nm uniform spherical mesopores confined in macroporous framework of well-defined 1 μm macropores, and exhibits a BET surface area as high as 848 m2 g−1.
6.2.3 Thermal stabilization of hierarchically porous silica monoliths
Heat treatment at 400–1400 °C of the resultant hierarchically porous silica monolith (MPT4) was conducted to investigate the thermal stability of the macro-mesoporous structure as well as the influence of high temperature on the surface area of the monoliths as shown in Fig. 48. Heat treatment at 400–800 °C gradually decreases the BET surface area to 195 m2 g−1, while most of the uniform mesoporous structure remains intact. The resultant hierarchically porous silica monolith could be a promising material for a broad variety of application.
6.3 Sol–gel synthesis of nanocrystal-constructed hierarchically porous TiO2-based composites
Titanium oxide (TiO2) has received considerable attention because of its photoelectric properties, biocompatibility, and chemical stability and has been extensively applied in various kinds of fields such as photocatalysis [179, 180], sensing [181], dye-sensitized solar cells [182–184], and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) [185–189]. In this work, hierarchically porous TiO2-based composites (pure TiO2 and TiO2/Carbon (TiO2/C) composite) were synthesized by a facile sol–gel process followed by post-calcination. Ionic precursor (TiOSO4·xH2O) was utilized as the titanium source, and the mixtures of distilled water and ethylene glycol were used as the solvents. Formamide was utilized to initiate gelation, and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) acts as a phase separation inducer as well as a carbon source. The resultant TiO2/C composite exhibits excellent cycling stability and superior rate capability as anode materials for LIBs [46].
6.3.1 Characteristics and functions of hierarchically porous TiO2 monoliths
As shown in Fig. 49, the as-prepared TiO2-based composites reveal some distinguishing features: (1) Both of the pure TiO2 and TiO2/C composites show a hierarchically porous structure (Fig. 49b) with a high specific surface area, enlarging the contact surface between electrode and electrolyte. (2) The cocontiuous skeletons are constructed by many interconnected nanocrystals with sizes of 10–30 nm (Fig. 49c), which shorten the diffusion distance of Li-ion for the fast charge–discharge cycles. (3) During the procedure, PVP is used as a phase separation inducer as well as a carbon source resulting in the in situ formed TiO2/C composites, which ensures an intimate contact of carbon and TiO2, providing excellent electrical conductivity for high rate performance. The structure and electrochemical performance of pure TiO2 and TiO2/C composite calcined at different temperatures are investigated. The resultant TiO2/C composite exhibits excellent rate and cycling performance due to the synergistic effect of the hierarchically porous structure resulting in large specific surface area and enhanced electrical conductivity ascribe to the in situ formed carbon derived from PVP.
6.3.2 Morphology and pore structures of hierarchically porous TiO2 monoliths
Pure TiO2 and TiO2/C composite calcined at different temperatures demonstrates an interconnected macroporous structure (as shown in Fig. 50), and the typical size of cocontiuous macropores is in the range of 1–3 μm in diameter. The high-magnification SEM images (insets) reveal that the skeleton surface consists of many fine nanocrystals. With the increase in temperature, the porosity decreases due to the increase in average grain size, resulting in more compact skeletons.
Samples calcined at 500 and 600 °C present a typical type IV with H1 hysteresis loops at relative pressure of 0.65–0.85 according to IUPAC classification (Fig. 51), representing the mesoporous structure. The BET specific surface area of samples calcined at 500, 600, and 800 °C are identified to be 170, 132, and 7 m2 g−1, respectively. The surface area and pore volume decrease as temperature increases, which could be ascribed to the effect of sintering and the growth of grains.
6.3.3 Application of hierarchically porous TiO2/C monoliths in lithium-ion batteries
The hierarchically porous TiO2/C composite shows excellent electrochemical performances with fast lithium-ion diffusion and electronic transport (Fig. 52), resulting from hierarchically porous structure and conductive carbon material. The TiO2/C composite calcined at 500 °C exhibits superior cycling stability (delivers a remarkable discharge capacity of 132 mAh g−1 at 1 C after 100 cycles) and excellent rate capability (over 96 mAh g−1 at 30 C rate). We believe that this facile synthesis method can be extended to other composites (such as Li4Ti5O12 and TiO x ) for a variety of energy conversion and storage applications.
6.4 Preparation of hierarchically porous zirconia monoliths from ionic precursors with solvothermal treatment
As an important structural and functional material, zirconia (ZrO2) has attracted considerable attention because of superior thermal, mechanical, chemical stability, electrical properties [190–192]. Zirconia has been extensively applied as an advanced material in various kinds of areas, such as electronic, optics, catalysis, and high-temperature structural engineering [193–199].
In this work, the novel and facile preparation of porous zirconia monolith via sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation was reported. The ionic precursors (zirconium oxychloride, ZrOCl2·8H2O) are utilized to synthesize zirconia monolith in the presence of propylene oxide (PO) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). The gelation of the system is mediated by PO, whereas PEO is added as a phase separation inducer. The resulting zirconia monoliths possess precisely controllable macropores at suitable starting compositions, and the solvothermal treatment of the resultant monoliths can further yield a tremendous number of mesopores on crystallized skeletons, leading to a remarkable increase in surface area [47].
6.4.1 Morphology and pore structures of ZrO2 monoliths
Appropriate proportion of PO (0.52 mL) and PEO (0.105 g) can lead to concurrent sol–gel transition and phase separation, producing cocontinuous porous structures. The system is divided into the cocontinuous gel phase and the fluid phase. The fluid phase is transformed into macropores after evaporation drying. As a result, monolithic dried gels with interconnected macropores and cocontinuous skeletons are obtained, as shown in Fig. 53. The macropore size of the dried gels is distributed roughly between 0.3 and 1 μm, and the median macropore size is 0.55 μm. The bulk densities of the three dried gels are 1.08 g cm−3 corresponding to 18.3 % of theoretical density (5.89 g cm−3), the total pore volume is 0.473 cm3 g−1, and the total porosity is 51.2 %.
6.4.2 Solvothermal treatment of macroporous ZrO2 monoliths
Solvothermal treatment of gels is introduced to study the effects on crystallization and modification of ZrO2 skeletons. In this study, ethanol solution of ammonia was chosen as the solvent, and ZrO2 monoliths were solvothermally treated with various ammonia concentrations at 180 °C for 12 h. Figure 54 shows the XRD patterns, SEM image, and pore structure of hierarchically porous zirconia monoliths with after solvothermal treatment with ammonia concentration of 2.0 mol L−1. The peaks of tetragonal ZrO2 crystallite become more and more sharp when the ammonia concentration increases from 0.5 to 2.0 mol L−1. Solvothermal treatment with an ethanol solution of ammonia increases the number and size of the micropores and mesopores, thereby increasing the BET surface area from 171.9 to 583.8 m2 g−1. The presented synthesis process thus enables us to produce ZrO2 monoliths having bimodal meso- and macroporous structures with adjustable pore sizes.
7 Conclusions
Recent progress made in the synthesis of several sol–gel-derived materials was briefly reviewed. By combining with sol–gel process and other technologies, several typical materials (monodisperse nanoparticles, hybrid coatings, hollow microspheres, aerogels, and porous monoliths) possessing controllable shape, unique microstructure, superior properties, and special application were successfully synthesized for various areas of research and application fields. These aid technologies involve surface modification by using surfactants to inhabit nanoparticles interacting to agglomerate and obtain monodisperse nanoparticles, sol coating or dispersing particles to achieve in situ doping or uniform distribution of functional additives, organic–inorganic hybridization to enhance the microstructure uniformity and functional properties of coatings, templating induction followed by self-assembly to prepare mesoporous microcapsule loaded with functional nanoparticles, emulsion process accompanied by sol–gel reaction to fabricate hollow microspheres with incontinuous multicavities or interconnected pores, atmospheric pressure drying combining with surface modification to prepare metallic oxide aerogels, and cooperatively controlled phase separation parallel to sol–gel transition to fabricate hierarchically porous monoliths.
The above review and examples are not enough to demonstrate the abilities and advantages of sol–gel method combining with other technologies in the preparation of advanced materials. It is foreseeable that more and more new sol–gel-derived materials will be produced by sol–gel method, and a growing number of advanced technologies must be applied in the sol–gel process as significant aid.
References
Jeffrey Brinker C, Scherer GW (1990) Sol–gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol–gel processing. Academic Press, New York
Levy D, Zayat M (2015) The sol–gel handbook: synthesis, characterization and applications. Wiley-VCH, New York
Aegerter MA, Leventis N (2011) Aerogels handbook. Springer, New York
Guglielmi M, Kickelbick G, Martucci A (2011) Sol–gel nanocomposites. Springer, New York
Wright JD, Sommerdijk NAJM (2001) Sol–gel materials: chemistry and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Dimitriev Y, Ivanova Y, Iordanova E (2008) J Univ Chem Technol Metall 43(2):181
Rahman IA, Padavettan V (2012) J Nanomater 2012:1
Grujić-Brojin M, Armaković S, Tomić N et al (2014) Mater Charact 88:30
Purcar V, Donescu D, Spataru IC et al (2013) Rev Roum Chim 58:37
Jung I, Gurav JL, Bangi UKH, Baek S, Park HH (2012) J Non-Cryst Solids 358:550
Iwamura T, Takasaki M (2015) Encycl Polym Nanomater 2015:1
Wu N (2010) J Ind Text 39:293
Nakanishi K (1997) J Porous Mater 4:67
Gaweł B, Gaweł K, Øye G (2010) Materials 3:2815
Kato M, Sakai-Kato K, Toyo’oka T (2005) J Sep Sci 28:1893
Hao YZ, Zhang QL, Zhang J, Xin CR, Yang H (2012) J Mater Chem 22:23885
Zhang QL, Wu F, Yang H, Zou D (2008) J Mater Chem 18:5339
Zhang QL, Wu F, Yang H (2011) Scrip Mater 65:842
Zhang QL, Yang H, Tong JX (2004) Rare Metal Mater Eng 33(Suppl. 3):133
Zhang QL, Yang H, Wang HP (2006) J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 40:1450
He Q, Yang H, Chen L et al (2014) Procedia Eng 94:37
He Q, Yang H, Chen L et al (2013) Adv Mater Res 815:80
He Q, Yang H, Chen L et al (2012) Electr Eng Mater 3:14 (In Chinese)
Guo XZ, Yang H, Zhu XY, Zhu L, Zhang LJ (2012) Mech Mater 46:11
Guo XZ, Yang H, Zhu XY, Zhang LJ (2013) Scrip Mater 68:281
Guo XZ, Zhu XY, Zhang LJ, Yang H, Fu PX, Gao LH (2010) J Chin Ceram Soc 38:258 (In Chinese)
Huang YP, Wu CC, Yang H, Que YS, Pan CG (2015) J Chin Ceram Soc 43:705 (In Chinese)
Wu CC, Yang H, Dong Z, Wu XR (2010) J Chin Ceram Soc 38:178 (In Chinese)
Lu JJ, Guo XZ, Yang H (2006) J Chem Ind Eng (China) 57:3511 (In Chinese)
Lu JJ, Guo XZ, Yang H (2005) Polym Mater Sci Eng (China) 22:211 (In Chinese)
Lu JJ, Guo XZ, Yang H, Zhang RJ, Zhang J (2006) Bull Chin Ceram Soc 25:133 (In Chinese)
Yang H, You WH, Shen QH et al (2014) RSC Adv 4:2793
Yang H, Liu Y, Shen QH, Chen LF, You WH, Wang XM, Sheng JS (2012) J Mater Chem 22:24132
Shen JC, Yang H, Shen QH, Feng Y (2013) J Mater Sci 48:7574
Shen JC, Yang H, Feng Y, Cai QF, Shen QH (2014) Solid State Sci 32:8
Cai WW, Yang H, Guo XZ (2014) Chin Chem Lett 25:441
Cai WW, Yang H, Guo XZ (2014) Procedia Eng 94:71
Yang H, Xie Y, Han DX, Mao WQ, Cai W, Guo XZ (2015) Colloid Polym Sci 293:1915
Yang H, Cai WW, Guo XZ, Zhang H (2013) Thermochim Acta 569:161
Fu YY, Ding XG, Meng M, Dou TJ, Yang H (2014) J Chin Ceram Soc 1:28
Yang H, Zhu WJ, Sun S, Guo XZ (2014) RSC Adv 4:32934
Ren J, Cai XB, Yang H, Guo XZ (2015) J Porous Mater 22:973
Guo XZ, Wang R, Yu H, Zhu Y, Nakanishi K, Kanomori K, Yang H (2015) Dalton Trans 44:13592
Guo XZ, Li WY, Zhu Y, Nakanishi K, Kanomori K, Yang H (2013) Acta Phys Chim Sin 29:646
Li WY, Guo XZ, Zhu Y, Yang H, Kanomori K, Nakanishi K (2013) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 67:639
Zhu WJ, Yang H, Nakanishi K, Kanomori K, Guo XZ (2015) RSC Adv 5:24803
Guo XZ, Song J, Lvlin YX, Nakanishi K, Kanomori K, Yang H (2015) Sci Technol Adv Mater 16:025003
Hyeon T (2003) Chem Commun 8:927
Dinh CT, Ngnyen TD, Kleitz F, Do TO (2009) ACS Nano 3:3737
Wang X, Zhuang J, Peng Q, Li YD (2005) Nature 437:121
Cozzoli PD, Pellegrino T, Manna L (2006) Chem Soc Rev 35:1196
Tseng CF, Huang CL, Yang WR (2007) Mater Lett 61:4054
Fu MS, Liu XQ, Chen XM (2008) J Eur Ceram Soc 28:585
Ferrarelli MC, Tan CC, Sinclair DC (2011) J Mater Chem 21:6292
Ogihara H, Randall CA, Trolier-McKinstry S (2009) J Am Ceram Soc 92:110
Nakazawa T, Naito A, Aruga T, Grismanovs V, Chimi Y, Iwase A, Jitsukawa S (2007) J Nucl Mater 367:1398
Hoshino T, Tanaka K, Makita J, Hashimoto T (2007) J Nucl Mater 367:1052
Ćosović V, Ćosović A, Talijan N et al (2012) Sci Sinter 44:245
Zheng J, Li SL, Song XZ et al (2012) Adv Mater Res 479:1986
Braunovic M, Konchits VV, Myshkin NK (2010) Electrical contacts fundamentals, applications and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Pereñíguez R, Hueso JL, Gaillard F et al (2012) Catal Lett 142:408
Wathanyu K, Rojananan S (2012) Adv Mater Res 486:529
Asthana R, Ashok K, Narendra BD (2006) Nanomaterials and nanomanufacturing. In: Materials processing and manufacturing science. Elsevier, pp 551–614
Gadow R, Kern F, Killinger A (2008) Mater Sci Eng, B 148:58
Kireitseu M, Hui D, Tomlinson G (2008) Compos B 39:128
Guo ZH, Kin TY, Lei K, Pereira T (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:164
Hyuncheol O, Sangsoo K (2007) J Aerosol Sci 38:1185
Karimian H, Babaluo AA (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:19
Valter C, Cinzia DV (2004) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108–109:167
Dafinone MI, Feng G, Brugarolas T, Tettey KE, Lee D (2011) ACS Nano 5:5078
Helsch G, Mös A, Deubener J (2010) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94:2191
Wang XD, Shen J (2010) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 53:322
Shimizu W, Murakami Y (2010) Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3128
Chi FT, Yan LH, Lu HB, Jiang B (2011) Mater Lett 65:1095
Guillemot F, Brunet-Bruneau A, Bourgeat-Lami E (2010) Chem Mater 22:2822
Vicente GS, Bayón R, Germán N, Morales A (2011) Sol Energy 85:676
Osborne JH (2001) Prog Org Coat 41:280
Wang DH, Bierwagen GP (2009) Prog Org Coat 64:327
Zhludkevich ML, Salvado MI, Ferreira MGS (2005) J Mater Chem 15:5099
Moutarlier V, Neveu B, Gigandet MP (2008) Surf Coat Technol 202:2052
He XD, Shi XM (2009) Prog Org Coat 65:37
Chen Y, Wu CC (2010) Rare Met Mater Eng 39:288 (in Chinese)
Li CH, Jordens K, Wilkes GL (2000) Wear 242:152
Lee TH, Kang ES, Bae BS (2003) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 27:23
Li HY, Chen YF, Ruan CX et al (2001) J Nanopart Res 3:157
Wouters MEL, Wolfs DP, Van der Linde MC et al (2004) Prog Org Coat 51:312
Zhu ZF, He ZL, Li JQ, Zhou JQ, Wei N, Liu DG (2011) J Mater Sci 46:931
Jiang HY, Meng X, Dai HX, Deng JG, Liu YX et al (2012) J Hazard Mater 217–218:92
Zhang X, Zhang LZ, Xie TF, Wang DJ (2009) J Phys Chem C 113:7371
Tian LH, Ye LQ, Deng KJ, Zan L (2011) J Solid State Chem 184:1465
Xu F, Guo DF, Han HJ, Wang HX, Gao ZY et al (2012) Res Chem Intermed 38:1579
Zhang LS, Wang WZ, Chen ZG, Zhou L, Xu HL, Zhu W (2007) J Mater Chem 17:2526
Li JF, Lu GZ, Wang YQ, Guo Y, Guo YL (2012) J Colloid Interface Sci 377:191
He JY, Wang WM, Long F, Zou ZG, Fu ZY, Xu Z (2012) Mater Sci Eng, B 177:967
Xiang LQ, Zhao XP, Yin JB, Fan BL (2012) J Mater Sci 47:1436
Yang LX, Zhu YJ, Tong H, Liang ZH, Wang WW (2007) Cryst Growth Des 7:2716
Yuan CZ, Zhang XG, Su LH, Gao B, Shen LF (2009) J Mater Chem 19:5772
Hu J, Chen M, Fang XS, Wu LM (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:5472
Chau NH, Bang LA, Buu NQ, Dung TTN, Ha HT, Quang DV (2008) Adv Nat Sci 9:241
Shi Q, Vitchuli N, Nowak J, Noar J, Caldwell JM, Breidt F, Bourham M et al (2011) J Mater Chem 21:10330
Senapati S, Srivastava SK, Singh SB, Mishra HN (2011) J Mater Chem 22:6899
Cui JH, Hu CF, Yang YH, Yang LF, Wang YL, Liu YL, Jiang ZY (2012) J Mater Chem 22:8121
Kim YH, Lee DK, Cha HG, Kim CW, Kang YS (2007) J Phys Chem C 111:3629
Ma JZ, Zhang JT, Xiong ZG, Yong Y, Zhao XS (2011) J Mater Chem 21:3350
Xiu ZL, Wu YZ, Hao XP, Zhang L (2011) Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 386:135
Gu GX, Xu JX, Wu YF, Chen M, Wu LM (2011) J Colloid Interface Sci 359:327
Naro H, Shuster M, Awnir D (2011) J Sol Gel Technol 59:194
Xu WP, Zhang LC, Li JP, Lu YY, Li HH, Ma YN, Wang WD, Yu SH (2011) J Mater Chem 21:4593
Wang YG, Cao LN, Guan SW, Shi GN, Luo Q, Miao L et al (2012) J Mater Chem 22:2575
Roguska A, Pisarek M, Andrejcuk M, Lewandowska M, Kurzydlowski KJ et al (2012) Mater Res A 100A:1954
Liu X, Yu LM, Liu F, Sheng LM, An K, Chen HX, Zhao XL (2012) J Mater Sci 47:6086
Zhao YH, Zhou Y, Wu XM, Wang L, Xu L, Wei SC (2012) Appl Surf Sci 258:8867
Stevanovic MM, Skapin SD, Bracko I, Milenkovic M, Petovic J, Filipic M et al (2012) Polymer 53:2818
Kumar R, Howdle S, Münstedt H, Biomed J (2005) Mater Res Part B 75B:311
Kumar R, Howdle S, Münstedt H (2005) Biomaterials 26:2081
Rocks L, Faulds K, Graham D (2011) Chem Commun 47:4415
Uzayisenga V, Lin XD, Li LM, Anema JR, Yang ZL, Huang YF, Lin HX et al (2012) Langmuir 28:9140
Torres-Torres C, Tamayo-Rivera L, Rangel-Rojo R, Torrers-Martinez R et al (2011) Nanotechnology 22:355710
Ma ZJ, Ji HJ, Tan DZ, Dong GP, Teng Y, Zhou JJ, Guan MJ et al (2011) Nanotechnology 22:305307
Zhang ZT, Zhao B, Hu LM (1996) J Solid State Chem 121:105
Chou KS, Chen CC (2007) Microporous Mesopor Mater 98:208
Zhu ZF, He ZL, Li JQ, Zhou JQ, Wei N, Liu DG (2011) J Mater Sci 46:931
Jiang HY, Meng X, Dai HX, Deng JG, Liu YX, Zhang L, Zhao ZX, Zhang RZ (2012) J Hazard Mater 217–218:92
Zhang X, Zhang LZ, Xie TF, Wang DJ (2009) J Phys Chem C 113:7371
Tian LH, Ye LQ, Deng KJ, Zan L (2011) J Solid State Chem 184:1465
Zhang LW, Fu HB, Zhang C, Zhu YF (2006) J Solid State Chem 179:804
Zhou J, Song B, Zhao GL, Han GR (2012) Nanoscale Res Lett 7:217
Jiang DH, Hu WB, Wang HR, Shen B, Deng YD (2012) J Mater Sci 47:4972
Lu F, Cai WP, Zhang YG (2008) Adv Funct Mater 18:1047
Xu F, Guo DF, Han HJ, Wang HX, Gao ZY, Wu DP, Jiang K (2012) Res Chem Intermed 38:1579
Zhang LS, Wang WZ, Chen ZG, Zhou L, Xu HL, Zhu W (2007) J Mater Chem 17:2526
Li JF, Lu GZ, Wang YQ, Guo Y, Guo YL (2012) J Colloid Interface Sci 377:191
He JY, Wang WM, Long F, Zou ZG, Fu ZY, Xu Z (2012) Mater Sci Eng, B 177:967
Xiang LQ, Zhao XP, Yin JB, Fan BL (2012) J Mater Sci 47:1436
Kukushkin SA, Osipov AV (1998) J Exp Theor Phys 86:1201
Oskam G, Hu ZS, Penn RL, Pesika N, Searson PC (2002) Phys Rev E 66:011403
Hu ZS, Oskam G, Penn RL, Pesika N, Searson PC (2003) J Phys Chem B 107:3124
Yang LX, Zhu YJ, Tong H, Liang ZH, Wang WW (2007) Cryst Growth Des 7:2716
Yuan CZ, Zhang XG, Su LH, Gao B, Shen LF (2009) J Mater Chem 19:5772
Wang GZ, Saeterli R, Rorvik PM, van Helvoort ATJ, Holmestad R, Grande T, Einarsrud MA (2007) Chem Mater 19:2213
Shen F, Que W, Liao Y, Yin X (2011) Ind Eng Chem Res 50:91317
Cheng DL, Gao HC, Hao LJ, Cao XD, Wang YJ (2013) Mater Lett 111:238
Hu J, Chen M, Fang XS, Wu LM (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:5472
Wang JZ, Sugawara-Narutaki A, Fukao M, Yokoi T, Shimojima A, Okubo T (2011) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1538
Zhu YF, Shi JL, Shen WH, Dong XP, Feng JW, Ruan ML, Li YS (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:5083
Lai CY, Trewyn BG, Jeftinija DM, Jeftinija K, Xu S, Jeftinija S, Victor S-Y, Lin VSY (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:4451
Wang LY, Bao J, Wang L, Zhang F, Li YD (2006) Chem Eur J 12:6341
Steaurra Stepban (1996) NASA Conf Publ 3425:26
Kim WS, Lee WY, Hyeon T (2002) J Chem Soc 124:7
Rogers TL, Wallick D (2012) Drug Dev Ind Pharm 38:521
Fernandez-Urrusono R, Gines JM, Morillo E (2000) J Microencapsul 17:331
Sahoo SK, Mallick AA, Barik BB, Senapati PC (2007) Pharmazie 62:117
Akbuga J (1991) Int J Pharm 76:193–198
Zhao YJ, Xie ZY, Gu HC, Zhu C, Gu ZZ (2012) Chem Soc Rev 41:3297
Alain CP, Gérard MP (2002) Chem Rev 102:4243
Daniel C, Alfano D, Venditto V (2005) Adv Mater 17:1515
Kanamori K, Aizawa M, Nakanishi K, Hanada T (2008) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 48:172
Kanamori K, Aizawa M, Nakanishi K, Hanada T (2007) Adv Mater 19:1589
Kanamori K, Nakanishi K (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:754
García-González CA, Camino-Rey MC, Alnaief M, Zetzla C, Smirnova I (2012) J Supercrit Fluids 66:297
Malinowska B, Walendziewski J, Robert D (2003) Int J Photoenergy 5:147
Kim WI, Suh DJ, Park TJ (2007) Top Catal 44:499
Štengl V, Bakardjieva S, Subrt J et al (2006) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 91:1
Zhang L, Liang Z, Yang K (2012) Anal Chim Acta 729:26
Signoretto M, Oliva L, Pinna F, Strukul G (2001) J Non-Cryst Solids 290:145
Cimino S, Pirone R, Lisi L (2002) Appl Catal B 35:243
Bahamonde A, Campuzano S, Yates M, Salerno P, Mendioroz S (2003) Appl Catal B 44:333
Yamahara K, Sholklapper TZ, Jacobson CP, Visco SJ, De Jonghe LC (2005) Solid State Ion 176:1359
Zhang XY, Liu DX, Xu DD, Asahina S, Cychosz KA, Agrawal KV, Wahedi YA, Bhan A, Hashimi SA et al (2012) Science 336:1684
Lopez-Orozco S, Inayat A, Schwab A, Thangaraj S, Schwieger W (2011) Adv Mater 23:2602
Davis ME (2002) Nature 417:813
Yang XY, Su BL, Sanchez C (2012) Hierarchically structured porous materials: from nanoscience to catalysis, separation, optics, energy, and life science. Wiley-VCH, New York
Stevens SM, Loiola AR, Cubillas P (2011) Solid State Sci 13:745
Yang XY, Leonard A, Lemaire A, Tian G, Su BL (2011) Chem Commun 47:2763
Chen X, Wang X, Fu X (2009) Energy Environ Sci 2:872
Cao JL, Shao GS, Ma TY, Wang Y, Ren TZ, Wu SH, Yuan ZY (2009) J Mater Sci 44:6717
Zeng TY, Zhou ZM, Zhu J, Cheng ZM, Yuan PQ, Yuan WK (2009) Catal Today 147:S41
Gheorghiu S, Coppens MO (2004) AIChE J 50:812
Roy N, Sohn Y, Pradhan D (2013) ACS Nano 7:2532
Liu ZY, Sun DDL, Guo P, Leckie JO (2007) Nano Lett 7:1081
Wang G, Wang Q, Lu W, Li JH (2006) J Phys Chem B 110:22029
Huang JH, Hung PY, Hu SF, Liu RS (2010) J Mater Chem 20:6505
Pan K, Dong YZ, Tian CG, Zhou W, Tian GH, Zhao BF, Fu HG (2009) Electrochim Acta 54:7350
Stefik M, Heiligtag FJ, Niederberger M, Gratzel M (2013) ACS Nano 7:8981
Deng D, Kim MG, Lee JY, Cho J (2009) Energ. Environ Sci 2:818
Wagemaker M, Kentgens APM, Mulder FM (2002) Nature 418:397
Huang H, Yu ZY, Zhu WJ, Gan YP, Xia Y, Tao XY, Zhang WK (2014) J Phys Chem Solids 75:619
Huang H, Fang JW, Xia Y, Tao XY, Gan YP, Du J, Zhu WJ, Zhang WK (2013) J Mater Chem A 1:2495
Bi ZH, Paranthaman MP, Menchhofer PA, Dehoff RR, Bridges CA, Chi MF, Guo BK, Sun XG, Dai S (2013) J Power Sources 222:461
Tanabe K (1985) J Mater Chem Phys 13:347
Mercera P, Vanommen J, Doesburg E, Burggaaf A, Ross J (1991) J Appl Catal 71:363
Wirth H, Hearn MA (1995) J Chromatogr 711:223
Ortiz-Landeros J, Contreras-García ME, Pfeiffer H (2009) J Porous Mater 16:473
Wu CH, Chen SY, Shen P (2013) J Solid State Chem 200:170
Jung W, Hertz JL, Tuller HL (2009) Acta Mater 57:1399
Gionco C, Paganini MC, Giamello E, Burgess R, DiValentin C, Pacchioni G (2014) J Phys Chem Lett 5:447
Larsen G, Lotero E, Petkovic LM, Shobe DS (1997) J Catal 169:67
Diaz-TorresL A, De la Rosa E, Salas P, Romero VH, Angeles-Chavez C (2008) J Solid State Chem 181:75
Fonseca FC, de Florio DZ, Muccillo R (2009) Solid State Ion 180:822
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51372225), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LY13B010001), and the High Science & Technique Brainstorm Project of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No. 2014C01025).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, X., Zhang, Q., Ding, X. et al. Synthesis and application of several sol–gel-derived materials via sol–gel process combining with other technologies: a review. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 79, 328–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3935-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3935-6