Abstract
Groundwater in the Geum River basin is a major agricultural and domestic water resource. In the present study, we collected 128 groundwater samples from four candidate regions (KS, KJ, NS, and BO) for hydrochemical analyses to identify large-scale groundwater distribution. Only 5.5% of samples showed natural background levels of NO3-N and Cl, whereas about 65% of samples reflected the influence of external pollutants according to drinking water standards. Levels of tritium (3H) in groundwater in the BO region indicated rapid recharge over a uniform time span (2.88 ± 0.43 TU). The hydrochemical properties of water samples collected in this study suggest a sustainable water supply in the Geum River basin.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Global warming is characterized by the frequent occurrence of floods and droughts, which can have profound consequences for water resources [1, 2]. The quantity of groundwater remains constant despite climate change [3]; therefore, groundwater is important for mid- to long-range water resource planning for stable water supplement to cope with water scarcity [4, 5].
In 2018, groundwater in Korea was mainly utilized for domestic (1229 million m3/year; 42.5% of total usage) and agricultural (1485 million m3/year; 51.7%) applications [6]. Groundwater consumption in Korea is highest in Daejeon, Sejong, and Chungcheongnam-do, excluding Jeju Island [6]. Chungcheong-do, which encompasses Daejeon, Sejong, Chungcheongnam-do, and Chungcheongbuk-do, is located in the midwestern region of South Korea, facing the Yellow Sea. The Geum River is a major river in Korea that flows through Chungcheong-do; its estimated groundwater recharge rate reaches 3298 million m3/year, with about 91% (3012 million m3/year) occurring in the Chungcheong-do area [7]. Nevertheless, the accumulated summer (June–August) precipitation in this area was 365 mm in 2019, which was less that in 2018 (588 mm), as well as the overall average for Korea (493 mm) [8]. Salt accumulation and nitrate contamination are increasing in this region due to the development of small and medium cities, agricultural activities, and livestock facilities. Seawater intrusion by excessive pumping of groundwater in coastal areas also contributes to the degradation of groundwater quality in midwestern South Korea [6, 7, 9].
In this study, we used contamination indicators including ionic and isotopic species to identify groundwater sources. These include nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and chlorine (Cl) as anthropogenic inputs, fluoride (F–) as a geologic input, chloride (Cl–) and bromide (Br–) as seawater intrusion inputs. NO3-N is present in natural water at very low concentrations, where concentrations > 3 mg/L are interpreted as having artificial origin [10, 11]. Potential sources of NO3-N leaching include animal mature, domestic sewage, agricultural operations, and inflow from air pollution. The high solubility of this species facilitates inflow and migration into soil water and groundwater [12, 13]. High concentrations of NO3-N (> 10 mg/L) in drinking water can cause methemoglobinemia, which leads to acute toxic responses to NO2 exposure via oxygen transport [14]. Therefore, the NO3-N drinking water standard for Korea has been established at 10 mg/L (~ 44 mg/L as NO3) [15].
F– is generally present in natural water at concentrations < 1 mg/L; it is usually derived from rock minerals such as fluorite, apatite, amphiboles, and micas [10]. Low concentrations (< 0.7 mg/L) of F– in natural water can prevent tooth decay [16]. However, excessive F– can cause dental fluorosis and bone weakness; therefore, F– levels should be maintained within 1.5 mg/L [14].
Cl– and Br– concentrations can be influenced by seawater intrusion, domestic sewage, industrial waste water, de-icing salt dissolution, and bedrock mineral interactions. These ions represent stable species in the natural environment because they do not adsorb to other minerals or organic matter, or form non-soluble precipitations according to changes in the oxidation–reduction environment [17].
Tritium (3H; t1/2 = 12.43 years, Emax = 18.6 keV) is a natural radioactive nuclide that is produced by cosmic ray bombardment of nitrogen and deuterium in the upper atmosphere.3H enters the hydrological cycle in the form of tritiated water molecules (HTO), where it can be used as a conservative groundwater tracer as a component of the water molecule. When water infiltrates groundwater, it becomes isolated from the atmospheric 3H source and its 3H concentration decreases over time due to radioactive decay. Therefore, 3H is used as a groundwater dating tool for ages up to 100 years [18, 19].
Decreases in annual precipitation and active groundwater pumping can deplete water resources and lower its quality. For the sustainable use and efficient management of groundwater in midwestern South Korea, it is necessary to understand the recharge characteristics and spatial distribution of groundwater hydrochemistry. Therefore, we investigated the coastal and inland groundwater hydrochemistry of the Geum River basin regional water system. Specifically, we assessed the spatial distribution of groundwater hydrochemistry in the Chungcheong-do region, determined the type and sources of groundwater contaminants, and identified promising candidate sites for large-scale groundwater supply to cope with potential water shortages.
Site description
The average annual temperature of South Korea for the past 30 years has been 10.9 °C, and the average annual precipitation is 1295 mm, indicating a temperate climate [8]. Our study site (35°58′33.71″–37°03′40.10″N, 126°07′13.25″–128°04′06.03″E; Fig. 1) covers Sejong, Chungcheongnam-do, and Chungcheongbuk-do, but excludes Daejeon because it contains several industrial complexes, has a high population density, and therefore cannot meet our study objectives.
The area of the study site is approximately 12,294 km2 and is bounded to the east by the southern Sobaek mountain range and to the west by the Yellow Sea. Thus, the topography of the site slopes downward from the east to the west, and agricultural fields and urban districts are mainly distributed in the west, whereas forests are distributed in the east. The geology of the study site is mainly composed of the Archean–Proteorozoic Gyeonggi metamorphic complex, the Sobaegsan metamorphic complex, and Jurassic Daebo granitoids [20], in connection with the Mesozoic rift, as well as rocks from the Paleozoic Okcheon Supergroup (from Chungcheongbuk-do to Daejeon) and Great Limestone series (Chungcheongbuk-do). Large-scale plutonic rock has developed in the parallel Okcheon Belt, via the Jurassic Daebo orogeny. Because we examined groundwater over a large area in this study, we have simplified the bedrock geology to nine hydrogeological units: crystalline gneiss, intruded Cretaceous granite, intruded Jurassic granite, unconsolidated detrital deposits, metasedimentary rock (with preserved structural geometry), metasedimentary rock, (with depleted structural geometry), nonporous volcanic rock, clastic sedimentary rock, and carbonate rock.
Materials and methods
Field sampling and ion analyses
Most of the groundwater sampling sites were located adjacent to rice paddies or dry farms during the agricultural off-season to avoid direct contamination and observe background hydrochemistry. We collected 128 groundwater samples for hydrochemical identification (Table 4) and analyzed 47 samples for isotope distribution in April 2020 (Table 1 and Fig. 8).
According to the field data, which included factors such as groundwater level and pumping rate, we selected four candidate sites to identify a promising site for a large-scale groundwater system: KS, KJ, NS, and BO. Hydrochemical, stable isotope (δ18O and δ2H), and 3H analyses were conducted to determine the groundwater recharge properties of these sites (Table 1).
In situ pH and electrical conductivity (EC) measurements were performed using a multi-parameter portable meter (WTW Multi 3620 IDS, Fisher Scientific, Sweden) and the uncertainty range of EC value was below ± 0. 5. Cation (Ca, K, Mg, and Na), anion (F, Cl, Br, NO3, and SO4), stable isotope (18O and 2H), and radioisotope (3H) analyses were performed in the laboratory. Alkalinity titration was performed to measure HCO3 ion levels using 0.02 N hydrochloric acid and a Rondolino DL50 Titroprocessor (Mettler Toledo, Australia). All water samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm pore size cellulose acetate membrane (Advantec), stored in polypropylene bottles, and kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C for later chemical analyses. Cation samples were acidified with concentrated nitric acid to pH < 2. Cation and anion concentrations were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES, OPTIMA 7300DV, PerkinElmer, USA) and ion chromatography (Dionex Aquion, Thermo Scientific, USA), respectively. The sample ion concentration charge balance error was within ± 10%.
Isotope analyses
Oxygen (18O) and hydrogen (2H) isotopes were analyzed using cavity ring-down spectroscopy (L2140-i for isotopic H2O; Picarro, USA) and the results were compared to those of standard mean ocean water (V-SMOW). The stable isotope data of 18O and 2H are reported with the δ in ‰ deviation relative to V-SMOW and the uncertainties of isotope ratios were generally below ± 0. 1‰ for δ18O and ± 0.5‰ for δ2H.
Two local meteoric water regression lines (LMWLs) were plotted to describe the isotopic data for different seasons: δD = 7.93δ18O + 8.11 for summer precipitation and δD = 7.79δ18O + 18.39 for spring, autumn, and winter precipitation [21]. The slope and intercept of the regression line for wet season precipitation were virtually identical to those of the empirical global meteoric water line (GMWL) [22]:
For 3H analyses, groundwater samples were filtered through a 0.45 µm nuclear pore filter and distilled to remove impurities, followed by electrolytic enrichment as previously described [23]. The enriched sample was distilled and a 10 mL water sample was mixed with a 10 mL cocktail (Ultima Gold LLT, PerkinElmer) consisting of a mixture of scintillator, solvent, and surfactant. Subsequent 3H measurements were performed using a low-level liquid scintillation counter (Wallac Quantulus 1220, PerkinElmer).
Geographic information system (GIS) database
A map of East Asian administrative boundaries (National Spatial Data Infrastructure Portal; http://data.nsdi.go.kr/dataset/20171206ds00003) was used as the GIS base map, with rivers (K-water; http://www.wamis.go.kr:8081/WaterMap2013/watermap.aspx?paramTab=searchmap), hydrogeological units, and electrical conductivity (EC) as layers. Open source data were obtained from Arcgis Online. Hydrogeological units were classified according to geological age, lithofacies, topography, and porosity (Table 2) [24]. EC spatial distribution was analyzed using inverse distance weighting (IDW) using the IDW spatial analyst tool in the ArcGIS ver. 10.7 software. Interpolation was performed using a distance index of 2, influence radius of 12 wells per central well, and an output raster cell size of 30 m × 30 m.
Results and discussion
Regional hydrochemistry distribution
Most of the groundwater samples in the Chungcheong-do region were distributed in fields 3, 5, and 6 of the Durov diagram (Fig. 2). The pristine groundwater in this region is characterized by the Ca-HCO3 water type, and is most influenced by simple dissolution of geologic materials or mixed natural/anthropogenic inputs (Table 5) [25]. Annual groundwater usage in this area has been stable since 2010, at about 39 million m3/year, but decreased significantly in 2018 to about 28 million m3/year [26]. Based on these data, seawater intrusion decreased with the change in pumping, and fresh groundwater increased the depth of the coastal aquifer causing reverse cation exchange. However, the amount of total dissolved solids (TDS) was highest in this region among all groundwater samples (Fig. 2); therefore, this site continues to experience seawater intrusion or effects from other pollutants.
Groundwater samples from fields 8 and 9 (G14 and G65 of Table 4, respectively) were collected from wells that were 100 and 210 m deep, respectively. These samples had lower Na+ concentrations than the other samples, but the highest Na+ + K+ contribution, according to the major ion ratio data shown in Fig. 3A. The high concentrations of F– indicated alkaline, Na–HCO3 type water, developed through the dissolution of biotite from Mesozoic granitoids and Precambrian granitic gneiss [27].
The six sampling sites with the highest EC values (> 625 μS/cm) are shown in Fig. 3B; half of these sites are distributed inland, and half in coastal areas. These EC values were affected by seawater intrusion as well as input from other pollutants. Site A (G32 of Table 4) is bounded by the sea on three sides, and is about 200 m from a livestock facility; the groundwater sample from this site had the highest EC value (3390 μS/cm), likely due to input by seawater and livestock manure. Site D (G82 of Table 4), which had the highest population density (1,057 people/km2) and an urban area ratio of 42% [28, 29] had the second highest EC value. Sites B and C (G74 and G60 of Table 4, respectively) are located in coastal areas with dense facilities (65 million in 2010) and very high groundwater usage (44 million m3/year in 2010) due to water supply shortages, with a 69.6% penetration rate in 2014 [28]. About 91% of all area in Sites E and F is non-urban (G88 and G65 of Table 4, respectively), with low population density (22 people/km2) [28]; however, these sites had high groundwater EC and high F– concentrations. The pristine groundwater at these sites likely reflects geologic characteristics.
Site-specific hydrochemistry
Bubble plots of each sampling site showing specific hydrochemical indicators are shown in Fig. 4. Most groundwater in the study area showed F– concentrations < 1.5 mg/L, which is the drinking water standard [15], except at two sites (Fig. 4a). The groundwater samples with the highest (6.86 mg/L, G65 plotted on the field 9) and second highest (3.36 mg/L, G92 plotted on the field 8) F– concentration also had high Na-HCO3 concentrations. The geology of these areas mainly comprises metasedimentary rocks from the Paleozoic Okcheon supergroup and Granitoid intrusions of Mesozoic age [20]. In these regions, F– was likely released through the reaction of groundwater with rock-forming minerals in granite, which promoted calcite precipitation and fluorite dissolution at high pH [30, 31].
Cl– concentrations varied greatly along the coast, and were highest at an inland sampling site with dense residential population and industrial facilities (Fig. 4b). The average background concentration of Cl– in groundwater of South Korea is about 5–10 mg/L [32, 33]; about 27.3% of our samples (35 sites) were within the background range. About 7% of samples (nine sites) exceeded 50 mg/L Cl–, reflecting water pollutants from urban areas [34], and one site (G32 of Table 4) exceeded the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking water standard of 250 mg/L, at which a salty taste is detected [14]. NO3-N concentrations exceeded 3 mg/L at about 65% of sites (83 sites) (Fig. 4C) and exceeded the drinking water standard at about 16% of sites (20 sites), presumably under the influence of anthropogenic sources such as livestock facilities, which are found within a 500 m radius of 55.5% of all groundwater sampling sites, and residential and industrial facilities (23.4%). The detailed values are presented on the Table 4.
Source estimation using ion indicators
A number of our samples were identified as endmembers, including those indicated in the lower left and upper right of Fig. 5a, which have a background concentration of Cl– [32, 33, 35] and the highest natural (seawater intrusion) and anthropogenic (domestic/industrial sewage, animal manure) contamination among our samples. Cl– concentration and EC were positively correlated (R2 = 0.7932) among the groundwater samples; thus, this pair of samples are thought to have been similarly affected by contamination.
Groundwater contamination factors can be identified using the relationship between Cl/Br and Cl in the range above background concentration (10 mg/L Cl–). Br– is introduced into groundwater aquifers as a by-product of industrial activity or decomposition of organic matter in the soil layer [36]. Samples from agricultural areas with Cl–concentrations > 100 mg/L (Fig. 5b) can be interpreted as pristine groundwater mixing with halite, sewage, animal waste (manure), basin brine, and landfill leachate [35]. Samples with Cl–concentrations > 10 mg/L and with Cl/Br molar ratios greater than that of seawater (655 ± 4) indicate seawater intrusion of a coastal area.
The correlation between Cl– and NO3-N concentrations (Fig. 5c) can be used to distinguish contamination sources for a range of pristine groundwater and that contaminated by synthetic fertilizer, road de-icer, manure, septic sources, and other mixed sources [37]. The thresholds of NO3– contamination for South Korea are 3.0 mg/L (0.68 mg/L NO3-N) for bedrock groundwater and 5.5 mg/L (1.24 mg/L NO3-N) for alluvial groundwater [38]. The background concentration of Cl– in shallow gravel aquifers is typically 10–20 mg/L in the USA and other countries [39]. About 14% of samples (18 sites) showed a background level of NO3– (< 5.5 mg/L), and only about 5.5% (seven sites) showed background levels of both NO3– and Cl– (< 10 mg/L), which indicates that most Geum River basin groundwater samples were affected by natural or anthropogenic pollutants.
Regional isotope distribution
Oxygen–hydrogen isotope pairs (δ18O–δ2H) in samples collected in the study area were correlated with altitude and latitude, and a stronger positive correlation with altitude was detected (Fig. 6a, red arrow). Samples from higher-altitude regions showed depleted isotopic composition, apparently affected by winter precipitation, based on the winter LMWL. Samples from lower-altitude regions showed enriched isotopic composition and were affected mainly by precipitation recharge in summer. Some groundwater appears to have undergone evaporation (Fig. 6a, black arrow); these samples showed no significant relationship with contamination by F, Cl, or NO3-N. The sample obtained closest to the coast (i.e., lowest altitude) showed the highest level of contamination in the study area and the greatest depletion of δ18O–δ2H, likely due to mixing with domestic sewage and livestock manure.
The Cl– concentration of fresh groundwater was at the background level, at about 0.28 mEq/L (~ 10 mg/L Cl–) [32, 33]; thus, about 27.3% of samples (35 sites) had background Cl– levels. As the groundwater Cl– concentration increased in this area, δ18O enrichment was observed (Fig. 6b), likely due to the influence of evapotranspiration during recharge [40]. Mixing due to agricultural activity, domestic sewage, and livestock manure can increase Cl– and NO3-N concentrations and affect δ18O enrichment [41]. The highest Cl– concentration (26.5 mEq/L, G32 of Table 4) was associated with depleted δ18O, likely due to proximity to a livestock facility rather than seawater intrusion.
The distribution of 3H concentrations in Geum River basin groundwater is shown in Table 3. Similar 3H residence times were observed among regions, with averages of 2.19 ± 0.59 TU (1.03–2.88 TU) at KS, 2.15 ± 0.55 TU (0.90–2.91 TU) at KJ, 2.38 ± 1.08 TU (1.01–4.87 TU) at NS, and 2.48 ± 0.69 TU (1.14–3.60 TU) at BO. The 3H concentration distribution was narrow at KJ but broad at NS; values were higher at BO than in other regions (Fig. 7). Therefore, BO groundwater appears to be younger, with faster recharge times than observed in other regions [42, 43]. Values of 3H concentration < 0.5 TU indicate recharge prior to the 1950s, indicating older groundwater, whereas those > 2 TU indicate younger groundwater. Most 3H values from the four candidate sites examined in this study are located between 1.5 to 3 TU, indicating recent recharge or slight mixing with old groundwater at these sites.
Conclusion
We investigated regional groundwater hydrochemistry and isotopic distribution in 128 groundwater samples collected in Chungcheong-do (excluding Daejeon), which is highly dependent on groundwater for domestic and agricultural usage. Most of the sampling sites are located on rice paddies or dry farms, but are within a 500 m radius of livestock, residential, or industrial facilities. In the study area, groundwater is mainly recharged through precipitation and water is mainly of the Ca-HCO3 type due to simple dissolution and/or mixing processes.
About 65% (83 sites) of all samples showed NO3-N concentrations > 3 mg/L, indicating that the sampling aquifer was influenced by anthropogenic inputs, and about 16% (20 sites) exceeded the NO3-N drinking water standard of Korea. Cl– concentrations > 100 mg/L were observed at six sites in inland or coastal areas; these clearly indicated contaminant mixing. High F– concentrations were correlated with high Na+ and HCO3– concentrations due to interactions between the water and bedrock containing fluorine minerals.
Based on indicators of natural and anthropogenic contamination, the BO region is a promising candidate site for a large-scale groundwater system. The groundwater in this region has a relatively fast recharge time within a uniform time span, and contamination indicators were observed within background levels. Further groundwater sampling should be conducted at the BO site using a denser sampling strategy and more diverse indicators for the creation of a systematic preservation plan for long-term groundwater availability.
References
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Jimenez, B.E., T. Oki, N.W. Arnell, G. Benito, J.G. Conley, P. Döll, T Jiang, and S.S. Mwakalila. Freshwater resources. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White (eds.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Payus C, Huey LA, Adnan F, Rimba AB, Mohan G, Chapagain SK, Gasparatos A, Roder G, Fukushi K (2020) Impact of extreme drought climate on water security in North Borneo: case study of Sabah. Water 12(4):1135
Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZWW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (2008) Linking climate change and water resources: impacts and responses. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva
Foster S, Ait-Kadi M (2012) Integrated water resources management (IWRM): how does groundwater fit in? Hydrogeol J 20(3):415–418
van Geldern R, Baier A, Subert HL, Kowol S, Balk L, Barth JA (2014) Pleistocene paleo-groundwater as a pristine fresh water resource in southern Germany–evidence from stable and radiogenic isotopes. Sci Total Environ 496:107–115
ME (Ministry of Environment) and K-water (2019) Groundwater annual report 2019. Sejong, Daejeon
MOLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) (2017) National Groundwater Management Plan (2017~2026). Sejong
KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration), Climate information in weather. https://www.weather.go.kr/weather/climate/past_cal.jsp. Accessed 15 Dec 2020
Lee CM, Hamm SY, Cheong JY, Kim K, Yoon H, Kim M, Kim J (2020) Contribution of nitrate-nitrogen concentration in groundwater to stream water in an agricultural head watershed. Environmental Research 109313
Hem JD (1985) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water (Vol. 2254). Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston
Madison RJ, Brunett JO (1985) Overview of the occurrences of nitrate in groundwater of the United States. In: National Water Summary 1984: Hydrologic Events, Selected Water-Quality Trends, and Ground-Water Resources. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2275, p 93–105
Bouchard DC, Williams MK, Surampalli RY (1992) Nitrate contamination of groundwater: sources and potential health effects. J Am Water Works Ass 84(9):85–90
Wakida FT, Lerner DN (2005) Non-agricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: a review and case study. Water Res 39(1):3–16
WHO (World Health Organization) (2017) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254637/1/9789241549950-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 15 Dec 2020
ME (Ministry of Environment) (2020) Drinking Water Management Act. https://law.go.kr/LSW/engLsSc.do?menuId=0&query=&subMenu=5#AJAX. Accessed 15 Dec 2020
Gooch BF (2015) U.S. public health service recommendation for fluoride concentration in drinking water for the prevention of dental caries. Public Health Reports 130(4):318–331
Fetter CW (2018) Applied hydrogeology. Waveland Press, Long Grove
Clark ID, Fritz P (1999) Environmental isotopes in hydrology. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 179–186
Kazemi GA, Lehr JH, Perrochet P (2006) Groundwater age. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 84–92
MOLIT (Ministry of land, infrastructure, and transport) and NGII (National geographic information institute) (2018) The National Atlas of Korea, Volume II: Natural environment and land. Jinhan M&B, Seoul, p 244
Lee KS, Lee CB (1999) Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic composition of precipitation and river waters in South Korea. J Geol Soc Korea 35:73–84 (in Korean with English abstract)
Craig H (1961) Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133:1702–1703
Yoon Y, Lee K, Ko K (2010) Development and validation of Ni–Ni electrolytic enrichment method for tritium determination in samples of underground waters of Jeju Island. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286(2):591–595
K-water (2015) Basic groundwater survey, groundwater map production, and management guidelines. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and K-water, Daejeon, p 163
Lloyd JW, Heathcote JAA (1985) Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to ground water. Clarendon Press, Oxford
GIMS (National Groundwater Information Management and Service Center), Statistics in Groundwater in Korea. http://www.gims.go.kr/en/gims_start.do. Accessed 15 Dec 2020
Choi BY, Yun ST, Kim KH, Kim JW, Kim HM, Koh YK (2014) Hydrogeochemical interpretation of South Korean groundwater monitoring data using self-organizing maps. J Geochem Explor 137:73–84
KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service) (2019) Resident Registration Population. Daejeon
LH (Korea Land and Housing Corporation) (2019) The Present Status of Urban Planning. Jinju
Rao NR, Rao N, Rao KSP, Schuiling RD (1993) Fluorine distribution in waters of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 21(1–2):84–89
Hwang J (2001) Fluorine distribution and attenuation of groundwater within limestone and granite from Keumsan–Wanju fluorite mineralized zone. Econ Environ Geol 34(1):105–117
Cho BW, Lee BD, Yoon W, Im HC (2003) Study on the possibility of seawater intrusion in the Ulsan area using Br: Cl weight ratios of groundwater. Econ Environ Geol 36(5):339–347
Park SC, Yun ST, Chae GT, Yoo IS, Shin KS, Heo CH, Lee SK (2005) Regional hydrochemical study on salinization of coastal aquifers, western coastal area of South Korea. J Hydrol 313:182–194
Yoon W, Ji SJ, So CS (2003) The hydrochemical and stable isotope characteristics of shallow groundwater near the Gwangju stream. Econ Environ Geol 36(6):441–455
Mullaney JR, Lorenz DL, Arntson AD (2009) Chloride in groundwater and surface water in areas underlain by the glacial aquifer system, northern United States (vol. 5086). US Geological Survey, Reston
Gerritse RG, George RJ (1988) The role of soil organic matter in the geochemical cycling of chloride and bromide. J Hydrol 101(1–4):83–95
Taylor SJ, Kelly WR, Panno SV, Weck R, Zheng W, Zhang Y, Liu WT (2014) Karst groundwater contaminants in western illinois: comparison of current conditions with historical data. Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, p 53
Kim KH, Yun ST, Kim HK, Kim JW (2015) Determination of natural backgrounds and thresholds of nitrate in South Korean groundwater using model-based statistical approaches. J Geochem Explor 148:196–205
Panno SV, Hackley KC, Hwang HH, Greenberg SE, Krapac IG, Landsberger S, O’kelly DJ, (2006) Characterization and identification of Na-Cl sources in ground water. Groundwater 44(2):176–187
Han D, Currell MJ (2018) Delineating multiple salinization processes in a coastal plain aquifer, northern China: hydrochemical and isotopic evidence. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:3473–3491
Re V, Sacchi E (2017) Tackling the salinity-pollution nexus in coastal aquifers from arid regions using nitrate and boron isotopes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(15):13247–13261
Koh DC, Chae GT (2008) Estimation of mixing properties and mean residence time using 3H for groundwater in typical geothermal and CO2-rich areas in South Korea. J Geol Soc Korea 44(4):507–522
Jung YY, Koh DC, Yoon YY, Kwon HI, Heo J, Ha K, Yun ST (2019) Using stable isotopes and tritium to delineate groundwater flow systems and their relationship to streams in the Geum River basin, Korea. J Hydrol 573:267–280
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Basic Research Project (21-3411) of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), funded by the Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology. We thank the other members of the Groundwater Research Center at KIGAM for their help with system setup and operation, data acquisition, and sample analyses. We also thank Dr. Min Han at the Geological Research Center at KIGAM for his considered advice regarding the geology of the study site.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, H., Lee, CM., Koh, D.C. et al. Recharge and spatial distribution of groundwater hydrochemistry in the Geum River basin, South Korea. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 330, 397–412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07807-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07807-8