Abstract
People are generally exposed to the natural radiation that presents inside and outside the houses. This investigation has been carried out gamma dose rate of 52 areas of Balod district, Chhattisgarh India. The values of outdoor and indoor gamma dose rates observed were 103.0 ± 3.1 to 201.0 ± 6.0 and 132.0 ± 4.0 to 260.0 ± 7.8 nSv/h, respectively. Indoor to outdoor gamma dose ratio was found to be 1.37. Total average annual effective dose value found to be slightly higher than the world population weighted average. Excess lifetime cancer risk was found to be 5.0 × 10−3 to 5.2 × 10−3 for a few places.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Radiation is emitted due to spontaneous transformation of an unstable nucleus. Radiation dose released from natural sources is higher than that of anthropogenic sources, which were received by mankind. Therefore exposure due to natural radiation has special significance [1, 2]. Naturally radioactivity arises from primordial radioactive materials that mainly consisting uranium (238U, 235U), thorium (232Th), potassium (40K) and 226Ra [3,4,5]. The artificial radioactivity is due to various human-artificial activities [6,7,8]. Naturally background radiation is due to cosmic and terrestrial sources [9,10,11]. The variation in the value of terrestrial radiation is generally greater than the cosmic rays [12]. Cosmic radiation comes from the sun and galaxies through the earth’s atmosphere. The worldwide annual average cosmic radiation dose at sea level is 0.39 mSv/y [1, 13]. Terrestrial radiation comes from the radioactive nuclides present in the Earth’s crust, from the atmosphere and from building materials (derived from rocks and soils) [14]. Average annual outdoor terrestrial radiation dose is 0.07 mSv/y and for indoor 0.41 mSv/y [1, 13]. The health impact due to an exposure to radionuclides, inhalation by human beings within the indoor environment is a major public concern worldwide [15, 16]. Avoiding natural radionuclides is not possible since as it is present since the formation of the earth [17]. Few researchers studied the risk assessment of the gamma radiation dose rate for outdoor and indoor environment [3,4,5, 14, 18,19,20,21]. The main objective of this study is to determine the risk arises from the gamma dose rate for Balod District. The result of this study will serve as baseline data for future gamma radiation effect in Chhattisgarh region.
Material and methodology
Selection of the measurement sites
Balod city is situated on the bank of Tandula River, which has District Headquarter from 1st January 2012. This District is situated on an average 324 meters (1063 feet) above sea level. The total areas of District Balod which situated in Chhattisgarh centre is 352,700 ha, where 74,911 ha covered by forest and remain are part of the land. This District is endowed with natural resources like water, forest and mineral resources [22]. Outdoor and Indoor gamma dose rates were measured in 52 study locations from Balod District, Chhattisgarh India, where total population is 78,764 [23]; that is mentioned in Table 1. All study locations are shown in Fig. 1. Six square kilometre grid have been taken as per Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy.
Gamma dose rate measurement
Outdoor and Indoor gamma dose rates were measured by using Geiger–Muller based dosimeter (Polimaster PM-1405) for study locations. Reading was recorded in nSv/h. This apparatus record both the cosmic and the terrestrial radiation at 1 m height above the ground surface. The energy range of this device for gamma radiation is 0.05–3 MeV and measurement range for dose rate is 0.01 µSv/h to 100 mSv/h [20]. The Latitude (N) and Longitude (E) of all study locations were determined by the GPS (GARMIN OREGON-650) coordination device.
Calculation of Annual Effective Dose Equivalent (AEDE)
Annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) value of outdoor and indoor from study locations were calculated by using outdoor and indoor gamma dose rates respectively. The biological effects on humans due to radiations are evaluated on the basis of AEDE [24]. AEDE was estimated by using the following equation:
where: D(indoor) = Absorbed gamma dose rate in indoor (nGy/h), D(outdoor) = Absorbed gamma dose rate in outdoor (nGy/h), T = Time (h).
The value of occupancy factor reported by UNSCEAR for indoor and outdoor was 0.8 and 0.2, respectively; and the conversion coefficient for an adult was reported 0.7 [1]. The values are about 10 and 30% higher for children and infants [1].
Therefore above formula become as:
Equation (2) and (3) were used for calculation of AEDE indoor and outdoor respectively. Total AEDE was calculated by adding indoor and outdoor AEDE values.
Risk assessment
Lifetime effective dose
Lifetime effective dose calculated by total AEDE values and duration of life.
where total AEDE value calculated by Eq. (4) and take duration of life 70 year [3, 20].
Calculation of Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR)
Excess lifetime cancer risk was calculated by using lifetime effective dose (from Eq. (5)) and risk factor. For public, value of risk factor was 0.05 used by ICRP 60 [3, 20]. The value of cancer risk calculated only for those locations where lifetime effective dose crosses the 100 mSv [25].
Results and discussion
Results of outdoor gamma dose rate, indoor gamma dose rate, AEDE and lifetime effective dose from Balod District of Chhattisgarh are presented in Table 1. In the present investigation, the value of outdoor and indoor gamma dose rate range was found to be extending from 103.0 ± 3.1 to 201.0 ± 6.0 and 132.0 ± 4.0 to 260.0 ± 7.8 nSv/h, respectively. The values of the Indoor and outdoor gamma dose rate are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Arithmetic average values for outdoor and indoor gamma dose rate was 143.6 ± 4.3 and 194.7 ± 5.8 nSv/h. The maximum value of indoor gamma dose rate was observed 260.0 nSv/h in Bohara area; however UNSCEAR reported gamma dose rate varies from 20 to 200 nSv/h. In this study indoor gamma dose rate from area code B-3, B-7, B-12, B-19, B-24, B-27, B-28, B-29, B-31, B-40, B-44, B-47, B-48 and B-49 were found to be more than 200 nSv/h.
Annual Effective Dose Equivalent (AEDE)
Annual Effective Dose Equivalent values for outdoor and indoor are shown in Fig. 4. The value of outdoor and indoor AEDE was found to be in the range from 0.13 to 0.25 and 0.65 to 1.28 mSv/y, respectively. In this study Indoor AEDE value found to be higher than the outdoor AEDE because people spend more time inside as compare to outside. Arithmetic average value of indoor AEDE was found to be 0.95 mSv/y and arithmetic average value of outdoor annual dose was found to be 0.18 mSv/y. Total AEDE was found to be 1.13 mSv/y; however the world population weighted average value reported for AEDE was 0.87 mSv/y [1]. The values of total AEDE and their comparison with world population weighed average value are shown in Fig. 5. This study indicates the values of AEDE from Balod District to be slightly higher than the above mentioned world average. The data reported in this study will seem as useful baseline data for this region.
Indoor and outdoor gamma dose rate ratio
The range of indoor to outdoor gamma dose ratios was found to be 0.90–1.92, with an arithmetic average value 1.37. This ratio value is slightly lower than the world population weighted average 1.4 [1]. Only in two study location (B-9 and B-34) indoor gamma dose rate values recorded lower than the outdoor gamma dose rate.
Overall Statistical data of gamma dose rates for Balod District of Chhattisgarh and their comparison with world population weighted average are shown in Table 2.
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR)
The probability of the incidence of cancer and the potentially carcinogenic effects of gamma dose rates during a specific lifetime is evaluated by ELCR [19]. In this study calculated ELCR values with their location are shown in Table 3. The values of ELCR from gamma dose rate in different locations (country/city) of the world are shown in Table 4. The highest value of ELCR found to be 5.2 × 10−3 in Marram Kheda. Present study showed that the ELCR range varies from 5.0 × 10−3 to 5.2 × 10−3; which are higher than the reported values from Jhelum valley Northwest Himalayas, Pakistan; Ondo State, Nigeria; Alapuzha Kerala; Ebonyi State and Turkey [3,4,5, 14, 18,19,20,21]. Previous study was also reported high uranium in water sample from Deur Tarai [26] and in this area ELCR found to be 5.0 × 10−3 due gamma dose rate.
Conclusions
The mean value (arithmetic and geometric) of AEDE for Balod district was slightly higher than the world population weighted average value. The maximum value of AEDE was found to be 1.49 mSv/y in Marram Kheda area. Lifetime effective dose was varies from 54.2 to 104.2 mSv. Only in five area lifetime effective dose more than the 100 mSv. ELCR values were found to be 5.2 × 10−3, 5.0 × 10−3, 5.0 × 10−3, 5.2 × 10−3 and 5.1 × 10−3 in areas Bohara, Deur Tarai, Parregura, Marram Kheda and Pandel, respectively. The population of five areas of Balod district: Bohra, Deor Tarai, Paraguara, Marram Kheda and Pandel was 1011, 583, 746, 217 and 805, respectively; where the ELCR was calculated. This study will be helpful for a preventive measure towards cancer risk. As per Indian scenario we generally lives in concrete structure. So here all most all indoor data were effective the radiation. It seems that our data represent the authentic proof for indoor to outdoor ratios values.
References
UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (2000) Ionizing radiation. Sources and biological effects report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York, United Nations
Sulekha RN, Kajori P, Hiroaki K, Sengupta D (2015) Measurement of environmental external gamma radiation dose rate outside the dwellings of southern coastal Odisha, eastern India. Curr Sci 109(3):600
Taskin H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoglu HS, Karahan G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53
Kobya Y, Taskın H, Yesilkanat CM, Cevik U (2015) Evaluation of Outdoor Gamma Dose Rate and Cancer Risk in Artvin Province, Turkey. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21(8):2077–2085
Avwiri GO, Nwaka BU, Ononugbo CP (2016) Radiological health risk due to gamma dose rates around Okposi Okwu and Uburu Salt Lakes, Ebonyi state. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol 5(9):18–30
Tripathi RM, Sahoo SK, Mohapatra S, Patra AC, Lenka P, Dubey JS, Jha VN, Puranik VD (2012) An Assessment of the Radiological scenario around uranium mines in Singhbhum East district, Jharkhand, India. Radiat Protect Dosim 150(4):458–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr431
Sadegh H, Naghizadeh BA, Hadi S, Manouchehr B, Sahar Z, Soheila R (2012) Investigation of natural effective gamma dose rates case study: Ardebil Province in Iran. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-9-1
Ononugbo CP, Avwiri GO, Ogan CA (2016) Natural radioactivity measurement and evaluation of radiological hazards in sediment of Imo River, in rivers state, Nigeria by gamma ray spectrometry. J Appl Phys 8(3):75–83
Tripathi RM, Sahoo SK, Jha VN, Rajesh Kumar, Shukla AK, Puraniki VD, Kushwaha HS (2011) Radiation dose to members of public residing around uranium mining complex, Jadguda, Jharkhand, India. Radiat Protect Dosim 147(4):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq496
Ahmed RK (2012) Measurement the average gamma rate radiation for some regions in Baghdad city. J Kufa-Phys 4(1):48–55
Muhammad R, Ur RS, Muhammad B, Wajid A, Iftikhar A, Lone AK, Ahmed MK (2014) Evaluation of excess life time cancer risk from gamma dose rates in Jhelum valley. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2013.11.005
Karunakara N, Yashodhara I, Kumara K, Sudeep, Tripathi RM, Menon SN, Kadam S, Chougaonkar MP (2014) Assessment of ambient gamma dose rate around a prospective uranium mining area of South India-A comparative study of dose by direct methods and soil radioactivity measurements. Results Phys 4:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2014.02.001
UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (1993) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR, New York
Prerna S, Kumar MP, Prasad MK (2014) Terrestrial gamma radiation dose measurement and health hazard along river Alaknanda and Ganges in India. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7(4):595–600
Bagher TM, Ehsan K, Zahra S (2012) Assessment of gamma-dose rate in city of Kermanshah. J Educ Health Promot 1:1–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.100159
Ononugbo CP, Avwiri GO, Tutumeni G (2015) Estimation of indoor and outdoor effective doses from gamma dose rates of residential buildings in Emelogu village in Rivers State, Nigeria. Int Res J Pure Appl Phys 3(2):18–27
Jwanbot DI, Izam MM, Nyam GG, Yusuf M (2014) Indoor and outdoor gamma dose rate exposure levels in major commercial building materials distribution outlets in Jos, plateau State-Nigeria. Asian Rev Environ Earth Sci 1(1):5–7
Mahmoud PA, Mahdi A, Iraj N, Majid A (2014) Annual effective dose from environmental gamma radiation in Bushehr city. J Environ Health Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-4
Ezekiel AO (2017) Assessment of excess lifetime cancer risk from gamma radiation levels in Effurun and Warri city of Delta state, Nigeria. J Taibah Univ Sci 11:367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.03.007
Monica S, Prasad Visnu AK, Soniya SR, Jojo PJ (2017) Ambient gamma levels in the in seaside regions of Alapuzha district, Kerala. Int J Pure Appl Phys 13:179–187
Asere AM, Ajayi IR (2017) Estimation of outdoor gamma dose rates and lifetime cancer risk in Akoko Region, Ondo state, Southwestern Nigeria. J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 11(5):49–52. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1105024952
Balod District Administration. Government of Chhattisgarh. http://balod.gov.in/en
Census Data, Meta Data (2011) Ministry of Home Affair, Government of India. http://www.censusindia.gov.in
NRC (National Research Council) (2006) Health risk from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII PHASE 2. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Radiation Risk in Perspective (2016) Position statement of the Heath Physics Society
Sar SK, Diwan V, Biswas S, Singh S, Sahu M, Jindal MK, Arora A (2017) Study of uranium level in groundwater of Balod District of Chhattisgarh State, India and assessment of health risk. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1397498
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India for funding the project 36(4)/14/90/2014-BRNS. The authors are also thankful to Bhilai Institute of Technology for providing the facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jindal, M.K., Sar, S.K., Singh, S. et al. Risk assessment from gamma dose rate in Balod District of Chhattisgarh, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317, 387–395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-5846-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-5846-9