Abstract
This article provides a brief review of conjugated polymers and the various typical polymerization reactions exploited by the community to synthesise different conjugated polyelectrolytes with varied conjugated backbone systems. We further discuss with detailed emphasises the mechanism involved such as photo-induced electron transfer, resonance energy transfer, and intra-molecular charge transfer in the detection or sensing of various analytes. Owing to their excellent photo-physical properties, facile synthesis, ease of functionalization, good biocompatibility, optical stability, high quantum yield, and strong fluorescence emission. Conjugated polymers have been explored for wide applications such as chemical and biological sensors, drug delivery and drug screening, cancer therapeutics and imaging. As such we believe it will be a timely review article for the community.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
General introduction
Conjugated polymers (CPs) are organic macromolecules having alternating σ and π bonds along their backbone. The delocalized π-electron cloud over the backbone chain is responsible for the attractive optical and electrochemical properties of CPs. The conducting nature of CPs was first discovered [1] and developed by Alan MacDiarmid, Hideki Shirakawa and Alan J. Heeger in 1977 which led them to win the chemistry Nobel Prize in 2000. CPs has attracted significant attention over the last three decades because of their technologically promising future. These CPs have been explored for a variety of applications, including solar cells [2], light emitting diode (LEDs) [3, 4], organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) [5], energy storage systems [6,7,8], field-effect transistors (FETs) [9, 10], and chemo- and biosensors [11, 12].
CPs can be acquired with variable backbone chains, viz. poly (p-phenylene) (PPP), poly (p-phenylene vinylene) (PPV), poly (p-phenylene ethynylene) (PPE), polyfluorene (PF), polythiophene (PT), polypyrrole (PPy), etc. as shown in Fig. 1a. Conjugated polyelectrolytes (CPEs) are water-soluble conjugated polymers having pendant ionic functionalities such as sulfonate (SO3−), carboxylate (CO2−), phosphonate (PO32−) and quaternary ammonium (NR3+) appended with the main conjugated chain that assists them to ionize in high dielectric media and forming stable electrostatic complexes with target analytes [13,14,15,16]. These materials combine the optoelectronic properties of neutral conjugated polymers (CPs) as well as the electrostatic behaviour of polyelectrolytes, thus, providing an exceptional platform in the field of sensors (chemical and biological) [12, 17,18,19] because of their capability to transform a binding/unbinding event into a measurable optical or electrochemical response, excellent biocompatibility, low cytotoxicity, strong emission brightness and resistance to photo-bleaching. Some examples of CPEs are presented in Fig. 1b above.
Synthesis of conjugated polymers
During the past few decades, a large number of CPEs have been designed and synthesised using the same conjugated backbone structure. Based on the structure of backbone moiety CPs can be classified into various types, namely poly(fluorene-co-phenylene) (PFP), poly(p-phenylenevinylene) (PPV), poly(p-phenyleneethynylene) (PPE), polydiacetylenes (PDA), and poly(thiophene) (PT). For the synthesis of various CPEs commonly employed reactions (Suzuki [20], Heck [21], and Sonogashira [22], Wessling reaction [23], photopolymerization reaction [24], and FeCl3 oxidative polymerization [25]) are shown in Table 1.
Amplified quenching effects
One of the interesting properties of conjugated polymers is the process of efficient fluorescence quenching at low quencher concentrations, which is referred to as amplified quenching [12, 26]. It was Swager and co-workers in 1995 who for the first time demonstrated this phenomenon [26, 27] of super quenching in polymers via the “molecular-wire effect” which is responsible for its superior sensitivity over small molecule indicators. This signal amplification is an outcome of the ability of the CP to generate exciton (bound electron–hole pair) which migrates efficiently along the conjugated backbone. Because of the efficient charge migration, a single quencher unit bound to the receptor site of the polymer will quench the fluorescence of almost the entire polymer chain leading to the amplified quenching response to a target analyte. This incredible feature of CPs validates its widespread application as chemo- and biosensors, since a very dilute concentration of the analyte is required.
Stern-volmer fluorescence quenching
From Eqs. (1) and (2), X* is an excited-state fluorophore, Q is a quencher molecule, kq is the bimolecular quenching rate constant, and ka is the association constant for the ground-state complex formation [X, Q].
Equation (3) is known as the Stern-Vomer equation, where I0 is the fluorescence intensity in absence of a quencher, I is the fluorescence intensity in presence of a quencher, and Ksv is the Stern–Volmer quenching constant. Fluorescence quenching can take place by two different mechanisms i.e., dynamic (collisional) quenching and static (complex formation) quenching. Dynamic quenching (Eq. (1)) occurs when the excited-state fluorophore encounters the quencher molecule which can facilitate non-radiative transitions to the ground state and the fluorescence is quenched. Static quenching takes place by binding the quencher molecule to the fluorophore. The excited fluorophore generated is immediately and quantitatively quenched (Eq. (2)). In the case of dynamic quenching, Ksv = kqτ0, where τ0 is the fluorescence lifetime of X*. The lifetime of the fluorophore in this case is reduced in the presence of a quencher (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, Ksv = Ka, if quenching is dominated by the static mechanism and its lifetime remains unaffected in presence of a quencher (Fig. 2b). In both static and dynamic quenching, the Stern–Volmer plots of I0/I versus [Q] should be linear as per Eq. (3). However, in most cases, the Stern–Volmer plots show non-linearity (curved graph) which can be explained by various complex processes, such as variation in the association constant with quencher concentration, mixed dynamic and static quenching mechanism, and chromophore aggregation.
The proposed mechanism of this effect is efficient energy migration along the polymer backbone as discussed above. In 1998 Yang and Swager explored the above phenomena of signal amplification for the sensitive detection of nitro-explosives 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) [28, 29]. However, the super quenching effect in CPEs was first described by Whitten and co-workers in the study of the fluorescence quenching of MPS-PPV by MV2+ (Fig. 3b) [30]. The fluorescence of the MPS-PPV solution was efficiently quenched by MV2+, with a large Ksv value of 107 M−1. This amplified quenching was attributed to the strong electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged polymer and MV2+ which bring them in close proximity resulting in disruption of exciton diffusion along the polymer backbone which leads to efficient fluorescence quenching (Fig. 3a). This study showed that polymer fluorescence is quenched much more efficiently than oligomers.
Conjugated polymers used as chemo or biosensors
Over the past few decades, CPs have been extensively used as sensory materials for various chemical and biological species [11, 12, 17,18,19, 31,32,33] such as metals ions, anions, environmental pollutants, explosive materials, proteins, enzymes, etc. due to their remarkable sensitivity, high photoluminescence quantum yield, large extinction coefficients, photo- and thermal stability, etc. One of the important features of CPs is their capability to transform a binding/unbinding event into a measurable response (electrochemical or optical) which makes them a material of choice for sensing applications.
In general, CP-based fluorescent sensors can operate either in “turn-off” or “turn-on” modes. In the former, the polymer is fluorescent without a quencher, and its fluorescence is turned off upon the addition of the analyte whereas, in the latter, fluorescence is recovered once the quencher is added. Most of the CPs work on the principle of non-covalent interaction-based sensing mechanisms such as photo-induced electron transfer (PET), resonance energy transfer (RET), inner filter effect (IFE), and intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) to detect various analytes. In the next subsections, we will discuss the mechanisms in detail.
Photo-induced electron transfer
In a PET sensing system, complexation takes place between the excited electron donor (D*) and the electron acceptor species (A), here D* donates its electron to A producing a complex [D+-A−] (Fig. 4i) [34]. Here, the charge transfer (CT) complex relaxes to the ground state via non-radiative transition and the additional electron present on the acceptor can finally return to the electron donor. Thus, PET plays an important role in the process of fluorescence quenching.
Resonance energy transfer
In RET, acceptor A absorbs energy from the excited donor D* while relaxing to the ground state and getting excited to A* (Fig. 4ii). Here, in this case, the rate of energy transfer depends on the relative orientation of the donor and acceptor dipoles, the extent of overlapping of the emission donor and the absorption acceptor, and the distance between the donor and acceptor [12, 35]. Moreover, RET occurs due to the dipolar interaction between the excited donor and acceptor, thus it’s not sensitive to steric factors [36, 37].
Intramolecular charge transfer
In ICT, electron/charge transfer takes place from electron-rich moiety to electron-deficient located in the same molecule. ICT primarily takes place in the photo-excited state of the molecule which facilitates electron transfer from one part of the molecule to another in the excited state. Generally, ICT occurs in those molecules in which donor–acceptor moieties are linked with each other via a π-electron cloud. However, charge transfer can also take place through space but the donor and acceptor must have a favourable orientation.
Inner filter effect (IFE)
IFE was observed by stokes [38]. It’s an important energy conversion model (non-irradiation), resulting from absorption of the excitation or emission light by the absorber [39]. Earlier IFE was considered a problem in fluorescence measurements especially when the analyte with absorbing nature was titrated [40]. In recent years, IFE has emerged as a superior technique in the field of sensing. Two optical units (absorber and fluorescer) are required for the establishment of an IFE based sensing system and for excellent results following points are to be considered. (a) There should be sufficient overlap between the absorption spectrum of absorber and the excitation/emission spectrum of fluorescer. (b) For quantitative analysis of analyte, the absorption spectra of absorber should be sensitive to the analyte concentration. (c) There should be no influence of external agents on the fluorescence and absorption of fluorescer and absorber respectively. (d) There should not be any effect of analyte on the fluorescence emission of fluorescer. (e) The absorber and fluorescer should exist as charge repulsion pairs in order to avoid fluorescence quenching of the fluorescer. Thus IFE-based system provides a simple and flexible method in the field of analytical detection.
Detection of explosives
One of the most successful applications of CP sensors is in the detection of electron-deficient nitro-aromatic explosives, especially 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), trinitrobenzene (TNB), Picric acid (PA) which are of great current interest in both national security and environmental protection because they are not only explosives but also recognized as toxic pollutants [41]. In 1998, Yang and Swager [28] used a fluorescence quenching transduction mechanism along with the amplifying nature of CPs to design P1 (Fig. 5) as a highly sensitive material to detect TNT vapour. An important feature of this design is the rigid pentiptycene group, which prevents the chains of polymer from aggregating and displaying solution-like optical properties in thin films, therefore, preventing the quenching interaction that can hinder the exciton migration. Polymer P1 was able to detect TNT at a concentration of 10 ppb after a few seconds of exposure, thus exhibiting extraordinarily high sensitivity because of energy migration through polymer films.
It has been observed mostly that PA exhibits higher quenching efficiencies than TNT because of its lower LUMO energy level. Therefore, detecting TNT in presence of PA in an aqueous solution is challenging. In this regard, Xu et al. [42] in 2011, designed donor–acceptor (P2) and donor-only (P3 and P4) AIE active conjugated polymers (Fig. 6) for the selective detection and discrimination of TNT and PA in aqueous solution. In P2 the LUMO is mainly localized on the acceptor unit of the CP i.e., 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT). Since PA can easily form a negatively charged anion in an aqueous solution, an electrostatic repulsive interaction between the BT unit and PA will disrupt the efficient electron transfer from the LUMO of P2 to PA which will not occur in the case of TNT. Therefore, P2 can selectively detect TNT instead of PA in an aqueous solution. In the case of polymer P3 and P4 having only donor groups behave similarly to most CP sensors i.e., having greater selectivity toward PA rather than TNT. Furthermore, these polymers were spin-coated and then exposed to the vapours of TNT and PA. For P1 film, the Ksv of TNT (1.2 × 105 M−1) is almost 100 times more than that of PA (1.8 × 103 M−1) and the limit of detection for TNT is about 23 ppb, while the emission of the P4 film was selectively quenched by PA with Ksv constant of 2.8 × 104 M−1 and the detection limit of 2 ppb was observed. The fluorescence quenching response follows the order of DNT > TNT > PA, which can be explained on the basis of the differential vapour pressures of these analytes. Higher quenching for DNT can be attributed to its higher vapour pressure and vice versa in the case of PA.
In 2014, Dong et al. [43] synthesized two poly (3,6-carbazole) P5 and P6 (Fig. 7) with AIE-active tetraphenylethylene (TPE) on their side chains via nickel-catalysed Yamamoto coupling under microwave heating. The resulting polymers combine the electron-deficient behaviour of the polycarbazole and the AIE-active nature of TPE and display distinct AIE properties. P6 shows amplified fluorescence quenching response upon adding trinitrobenzene (TNB) in (1: 9, v/v) THF-water mixtures with a quenching constant of 1.26 × 106 M−1. This enhanced quenching is ascribed to the increased number of quenching sites due to the twisted 3D topology of the polymer in the nanoaggregates that can interact with TNB molecules. The mechanism of quenching was deduced to be excited electron transfer from the LUMO of the polymer to the LUMO of TNB.
Furthermore, for practical applications, Whatman filter paper strips were cut and dip-coated into polymer solutions followed by drying in air. Both the polymers show TNB-induced fluorescence quenching in solution as well as in the vapour phase thus demonstrating the potential in solid state sensors for nitroaromatic explosives.
In 2015, Hussain et al. [44] developed a new strategy of introducing an ionic functionality onto the side chain of the polymer as a receptor for the specific interaction of CP with the target analyte. The methyl imidazolium group was introduced into the precursor polymer system to form a cationic polymer P7 (Fig. 8a). Since PA exists as a negative entity in an aqueous solution and the receptor attached to the CP is positively charged so there is a strong electrostatic attraction which brings the PA in close vicinity resulting in efficient charge transfer or energy transfer from the conjugated polymer to the analyte and ultimately amplified fluorescence quenching is obtained. Here, in this case, the highest quenching constant Ksv of 1 × 107 M−1 and a detection limit of 128 ppt were obtained which confirms the method to be highly sensitive towards PA. Furthermore, paper strips and polymer-doped chitosan films were used for the contact mode detection of PA which confirms the method to be practicable. In the same year, Malik et al. [45] developed conjugated polymer nanoparticle (CPN) via re-precipitation technique based on multiple platforms (i.e.100% water, disposable film and as devices in vapour phase) for the sensing of PA (Fig. 8b). The highest quenching constant (Ksv) of 1.12 × 108 M−1 and a very low detection limit of 7.07 ppt was obtained. The reason behind this ultra-sensitivity was electrostatic interaction, photo induced electron transfer (PET) and/or possible resonance energy transfer (RET) between the quencher molecule and the CPN system. The origin of the remarkable selectivity and the exceptional quenching efficiency by PA can be explained via the electrostatic interaction between PA and P7ˈ. To investigate the possibility of electron transfer process in the quenching mechanism, HOMO and LUMO levels of P7ˈ was obtained and it was found that there is a possibility of excited state electron transfer from LUMO of P7ˈ (-3.08 eV) to the LUMO of PA (-3.89 eV) resulting in the quenching process.
Detection of anions
It is known that selective detection of fluoride anion can be achieved by exploring the unique reactivity of fluoride towards silicon. As shown in Fig. 9a fluoride triggered the removal of silyl from compound 1 which results in the formation of a highly emissive compound 2 (coumarin fluorophore). Kim et al. [46] in 2003 designed polymer P8 (Fig. 9b) and applied the above strategy for the amplified detection of fluoride by exploiting the exciton-transporting property of CPs. As anticipated, fluoride-induced formation of coumarin residues along the polymer chain acts as local band gap traps for the migrating excitons and thus gives an enhanced signal response up to 100-fold compared to single molecule-based detection.
In 2010, Zhao and Schanze [47] developed a cationic CPE P9 (Fig. 10) based on poly (phenylene ethynylene) via Sonogashira coupling reaction with polyamine side chains and explored its application in the ratiometric detection of pyrophosphate (PPi) with a detection limit of 340 nM. Polymer P9 was designed in such a way that it shows redshifts in both emission and absorption spectra upon aggregation. This phenomenon of colour change by switching from the free chain state to the aggregate state was then explored for the naked-eye detection of PPi in an aqueous solution via analyte-induced aggregation of CPE. Upon gradual addition of increasing concentration of PPi into the aqueous solution of P9, the absorption band at 400 nm decreases and a new absorption band appear at 430 nm. The emission spectra also reveal the clear transition between the two states as the blue emission with well-resolved peaks between 433–455 nm decreases in intensity with increasing PPi concentration accompanied by an increase in the green emission band at 520 nm. This large red shift of about 90 nm is due to the efficient intermolecular exciton coupling among the polymer chains which results in a lowering of energy in the aggregate state.
In 2011, Wu et al. [48] developed a new CP P10 (Fig. 11) based on polyfluorene and dicyano-vinyl as a highly selective and sensitive sensor for cyanide. The design of P10 is based on the fact that the dicyano-vinyl group is a reactive site for cyanide via nucleophilic addition reaction which may disrupt the effective conjugation length of the polymer backbone and perturb its optical properties. Moreover, because of the exciton-diffusing property of CPs along its backbone, the nucleophilic adduct thus formed acts as a charge trapping site which may enhance the fluorescence quenching effect and ultimately result in the higher sensitivity of the CP for cyanide ion with a detection limit of 14 ppb.
Furthermore, naked-eye detection of cyanide was also observed upon adding cyanide ions into the polymeric solution as the colour changes from yellow-green to colourless, while no colour change could be observed in presence of other common anions. In 2012, Evans et al. [49] studied the self-assembly complex formation between the cationic CPE P11 (Fig. 12) and two anionic surfactants i.e., sodium octyl sulphate (SOS) and potassium heptadecafluoro-1-octanesulfonate (PFOS) both of which are industrially important. The absorption and emission spectra of P11 were vividly changed in presence of anionic surfactants due to the formation of self-assembly via ionic complex formation. It was observed that subtle structural differences between these surfactants have helped to understand the effect of head group charge density, chain rigidity, and hydrophobicity on both the complex structure and optical properties using UV/vis absorption, fluorescence and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS). It was concluded that P11 is capable of identifying anionic surfactants with distinct subgroups via dual-mode detection.
In 2015, Hussain et al. [50] synthesized a new CPE P7 (Fig. 8a) via oxidative polymerization which displayed high selectivity and sensitivity towards most common anionic surfactants sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate (SDBS) under various harsh conditions such as full pH range (1–14), urine, and in brine as well as in seawater. Polymer P7 is very efficient in detecting and discriminating these moderately dissimilar anionic surfactants under acidic and basic conditions with a detection limit of 31.7 and 17.3 ppb respectively for SDBS and SDS in aqueous solution. Furthermore, P7 could also remove these hazardous surfactants at very low levels from the water and other biological media such as urine in the form of gel or precipitate as a result of its differential aggregation behaviour due to inter-polymer cofacial arrangement via columbic attraction.
In the year 2016, Malik et al. [51] developed P12 a ratiometric sensor for the naked eye detection of anionic surfactants such as SDS and SDBS with a detection limit of 34 ppb and 45 ppb respectively in aqueous media. The polymer P12 (PFBT-MI) changed its colour from blue to yellowish green upon interaction with the anionic surfactants which is due to the inter-molecular FRET within the polymer chains driven by electrostatic interaction and hydrophilic interaction between the polymer and the surfactant (Fig. 13).
Detection of biomolecules
In 2004, Liu and Bazan [52] synthesised a multipurpose cationic CPE P13 (Fig. 14) via the Suzuki-coupling copolymerization technique by introducing 5% 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT) units into cationic poly(fluorine-co-phenylene) to obtain two distinct emission colours from a single polymer chain. The cationic polymer P13 strongly interacts with oppositely charged DNA molecules in an aqueous solution, resulting in the aggregation of polymer chains. Such inter-polymer interactions lead to an increase in the local concentration of benzothiadiazole (BT) units (responsible for FRET) and inter-chain contacts that subsequently improve electronic coupling between the optical partners. This ultimately facilitates the energy transfer process from the fluorine-phenylene (donor) segments to BT (acceptor) units, thus enabling the change in emission colour of the solution from blue to a green that aided in the determination of DNA concentration. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that polymer P13 could also be employed as a three-colour DNA assay using a PNA-C* strand. Depending upon the content of the solution, three different emission colours could be obtained i.e. (i) blue (in the absence of DNA), (ii) green (in the presence of non-complementary ssDNA) and (iii) red (in the presence of complementary ssDNA). Taking advantage of the signal amplification effect of CPs, fine-tuning of electrostatic and optical events leads to multicolour biosensing assay.
In 2009, Pu and Liu [53] designed and synthesized two cationic CPEs P14 and P15 which differ only by side chains (Fig. 15). This benzothiadiazole (BT) based CPEs shows low fluorescence emission in an aqueous solution while as its fluorescence increases in the aggregated state. Taking the advantage of complexation-induced aggregation behaviour, a fluorescence turn-on sensor has been developed for the detection and quantification of heparin. A substantial increase in the fluorescence response of the polymer in presence of heparin as compared to its analogue hyaluronic acid (HA) is because of its strong complexation with heparin, thus allowing discrimination of heparin from HA. The advantage of this strategy is that it does not require a pre-quenching technique and the analyte can be detected directly using this polymer system.
In 2009, Wang and Liu [54] designed a ligand-analyte binding facilitated energy transfer strategy for lysozyme detection using anionic CPE P16 (Fig. 16) and dye-labelled aptamer. When the lysozyme interacts with the dye-labelled aptamer FRET occurs from P16 to dye because of the strong electrostatic interactions and green colour formation. In the absence of lysozyme, no FRET happens and the colour of the solution is blue. The simplicity, sensitivity and specificity of this method have been explored by using lysozyme and lysozyme aptamer which has not been observed in other methods like electrochemistry, ELISA, and aptamer assay-based lysozyme assay therefore, this method has been successfully applied in biological media.
In 2015, Wang et al. [55] designed new water-soluble CP P17 (Fig. 17) with a PEG side chain to which the carboxylic acid group and boronate-protected fluorescein are covalently attached. Carboxylic acid functionality and PEG chain not only increase the solubility of the polymer in water but also reduces nonspecific interactions with the cells and allow further modification of CP (Fig. 18). Efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) takes place from the P18 backbone to the fluorescein unit in the presence of H2O2 upon excitation at 380 nm and the colour of the polymer solution changes from blue to green. Therefore, the polymer probe shows a good ratiometric fluorescence response to H2O2 that was generated from choline and acetylcholine (Ach) under AChE/ChOx enzyme-coupled reaction. The present strategy realizes choline and ACh detection in a simple and selective manner and presents high specificity to choline and ACh, respectively (Table 2).
Conclusions
In this article, recent progress in the design and synthesis of various CPs by exploring various coupling reactions has been summarized. The perspective includes a brief introduction about CPs, followed by a comprehensive study of the sensing mechanism involved. Hence, a new class of materials with exceptional photo-physical properties, good biocompatibility, low cytotoxicity, strong emission brightness and resistance to photobleaching have emerged which resulted in the development of highly selective and sensitive chemical and biological sensors, materials for efficient drug delivery, drug screening, cancer therapeutics, imaging, etc. In conclusion, there is a good potential and opportunity for CPs based approaches to be incorporated into multidisciplinary areas of chemical and biological sciences in the near future.
Change history
05 May 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-023-03568-y
References
Shirakawa H, Louis EJ, MacDiarmid AG, Chiang CK, Heeger AJ (1977) J Chem Soc Chem Commun 578
Gunes S, Neugebauer H, Sariciftci NS (2007) Chem Rev 107:1324
Kraft A, Grimsdale AC, Holmes AB (1998) Angew Chem Int Ed 37:402
Montali A, Smith P, Weder C (1998) Synth Met 97:123
Kim JH, Ahmad Z, Kim Y, Kim W, Ahn H, Lee JS, Yoon MH (2020) Chem Mater 32:8606
Ahmad Z, Lee JS (2022) Electrochim Acta 415:140243
Kim W, Lee HJ, Yoo SJ, Trinh CK, Ahmad Z, Lee JS (2021) Nanoscale 13:5868
Ahmad Z, Kim W, Kumar S, Yoon T-H, Lee J-S (2020) ACS Appl Energy Mater 3:6743
Torsi L, Dodabalapur A, Rothberg LJ, Fung AWP, Katz HE (1996) Science 272:1462
Sirringhaus H (2005) Adv Mater 17:2411
McQuade DT, Pullen AE, Swager TM (2000) Chem Rev 100:2537
Thomas SW, Joly GD, Swager TM (2007) Chem Rev 107:1339
Jiang H, Taranekar P, Reynolds JR, Schanze KS (2009) Angew Chem Int Ed 48:4300
Marques AT, Pinto SMA, Monteiro CJP, Melo JSS, Burrows HD, Scherf U, Calvete MJF, Pereira MM (2012) J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 50:1408
Henson ZB, Zhang Y, Nguyen TQ, Seo JH, Bazan GC (2013) J Am Chem Soc 135:4163
Liu B, Bazan GC (2004) Chem Mater 16:4467
Zhu C, Liu L, Yang Q, Lv F, Wang S (2012) Chem Rev 112:4687
Liang J, Li K, Liu B (2013) Chem Sci 4:1377
Rochat S, Swager TM (2013) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4488
Liu B, Wang S, Bazan GC, Mikhailovsky A (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:13306
Zhu CL, Yang Q, Liu LB, Wang S (2011) Chem Commun 47:5524
Moon JH, McDaniel W, MacLean P, Hancock LE (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:8223
Tang HW, Duan XR, Feng XL, Liu LB, Wang S, Li YL, Zhu DB (2009) Chem Commun 6:641
Kim JM, Lee JS, Choi H, Sohn D, Ahn DJ (2005) Macromolecules 38:9366
Ho HA, Boissinot M, Bergeron MG, Corbeil G, Dore K, Boudreau D, Leclerc M (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41:1548
Zhou Q, Swager TM (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:12593
Zhou Q, Swager TM (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:7017
Yang J-S, Swager TM (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:5321
Yang J-S, Swager TM (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:11864
Chen LH, McBranch DW, Wang HL, Helgeson R, Wudl F, Whitten DG (1999) P Natl Acad Sci USA 96:12287
Kim HN, Guo Z, Zhu W, Yoon J, Tian H (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:79
Lee K, Povlich LK, Kim J (2010) Analyst 135:2179
Albert KJ, Lewis NS, Schauer CL, Sotzing GA, Stitzel SE, Vaid TP, Walt DR (2000) Chem Rev 100:2595
Valeur B (2002) Molecular fluorescence: Principles and applications, Wiley-VCH
Sun X, Wang Y, Lei Y (2015) Chem Soc Rev 44:8019
Cantor CR (1980) Biophysical chemistry: Part II: Techniques for the study of biological structure and function, Macmillan
Zhang Y-Z, Xiang X, Mei P, Dai J, Zhang L-L, Liu Y (2009) Spectrochim Acta, Part A 72:907
Lakowicz JR (2006) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd edn. Springer, New York
Yuan P, Walt DR (1987) Anal Chem 59:2391e2394
Parker CA, Rees WT (1962) Analyst 87:83e111
Tu RY, Liu BH, Wang ZY, Gao DM, Wang F, Fang QL, Zhang ZP (2008) Anal Chem 80:3458
Xu B, Wu X, Li H, Tong H, Wang L (2011) Macromolecules 44:5089
Dong W, Fei T, Palma-Cando A, Scherf U (2014) Polym Chem 5:4048
Hussain S, Malik AH, Afroz MA, Iyer PK (2015) Chem Commun 51:7207
Malik AH, Hussain S, Kalita A, Iyer PK (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26968
Kim T-H, Swager TM (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:4803
Zhao X, Schanze KS (2010) Chem Commun 46:6075
Wu X, Xu B, Tong H, Wang L (2011) Macromolecules 44:4241
Evans RC, Knaapila M, Willis-Fox N, Kraft M, Terry A, Burrows HD, Scherf U (2012) Langmuir 28:12348
Hussain S, Malik AH, Iyer PK (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:3189–3198
Malik AH, Hussain S, Iyer PK (2016) Anal Chem 88:7358
Liu B, Bazan GC (1942) J Am Chem Soc 2004:126
Pu K-Y, Liu B (2009) Adv Funct Mater 19:277
Wang J, Liu B (2009) Chem Commun 2284
Wang Y, Li S, Feng L, Nie C, Liu L, Lv F, Wang S (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:24110
Huang Y, Zhang X, Ouyang RL, Jiang R, Liu X, Song C, Zhang G, Fan Q, Wang L, Huang W (2014) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:19144
Han Y, Chen T, Li Y, Chen L, Wei L, Xiao L (2019) Anal Chem 91:11146
Wang Q-B, Zhang C-J, Lu Q, Liu Z-E, Yao J-S, Zhang X (2020) Dyes Pigm 176:108189
Sun J, Mei H, Wang S, Gao F (2016) Anal Chem 88:7372
Tanwar AS, Parui R, Garai R, Chanu MA, Iyer PK (2022) ACS Meas Sci Au 21:23
Zhong H, Liu C, Ge W, Sun R, Huang F, Wang X (2017) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:22875
Tanwar AS, Adil LR, Afroz MA, Iyer PK (2018) ACS Sens 38:1451
Li J, Tian C, Yuan Y, Yang Z, Yin C, Jiang R, Song W, Li X, Lu X, Zhang L, Fan Q, Huang W (2015) Macromolecules 48:1017
Cui Q, Yang Y, Yao C, Liu R, Li L (2016) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:35578
Qian CG, Zhu S, Feng PJ, Chen YL, Yu JC, Tang X, Liu Y, Shen QD (2015) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:18581
Hussain S, Malik AH, Iyer PK (2016) J Mater Chem B 4:4439
Wang S, Jagadesan P, Sun H, Hu R, Li Z, Huang Y, Liu L, Wang S, Younus M, Schanze K (2020) S Chem Photo Chem 5:123
Wang S, Wu W, Manghnani P, Xu S, Wang Y, Goh CC, Ng LG, Liu B (2019) ACS Nano 13:3095
Monge FA, Jagadesan P, Bondu V, Donabedian PL, Ista L, Chi EY, Schanze KS, Whitten DG, Kell AM (2020) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 50:55688
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Malik, A.H., Habib, F., Qazi, M.J. et al. A short review article on conjugated polymers. J Polym Res 30, 115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-023-03451-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-023-03451-w