Abstract
Recent seismicity in the northeast India and its adjoining region exhibits different earthquake mechanisms – predominantly thrust faulting on the eastern boundary, normal faulting in the upper Himalaya, and strike slip in the remaining areas. A homogenized catalogue in moment magnitude, M W, covering a period from 1906 to 2006 is derived from International Seismological Center (ISC) catalogue, and Global Centroid Moment Tensor (GCMT) database. Owing to significant and stable earthquake recordings as seen from 1964 onwards, the seismicity in the region is analyzed for the period with spatial distribution of magnitude of completeness m t, b value, a value, and correlation fractal dimension D C. The estimated value of m t is found to vary between 4.0 and 4.8. The a value is seen to vary from 4.47 to 8.59 while b value ranges from 0.61 to 1.36. Thrust zones are seen to exhibit predominantly lower b value distribution while strike-slip and normal faulting regimes are associated with moderate to higher b value distribution. D C is found to vary from 0.70 to 1.66. Although the correlation between spatial distribution of b value and D C is seen predominantly negative, positive correlations can also be observed in some parts of this territory. A major observation is the strikingly negative correlation with low b value in the eastern boundary thrust region implying a possible case of extending asperity. Incidentally, application of box counting method on fault segments of the study region indicates comparatively higher fractal dimension, D, suggesting an inclination towards a planar geometrical coverage in the 2D spatial extent. Finally, four broad seismic source zones are demarcated based on the estimated spatial seismicity patterns in collaboration with the underlying active fault networks. The present work appraises the seismicity scenario in fulfillment of a basic groundwork for seismic hazard assessment in this earthquake province of the country.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N=a-bM and its confidence limits. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 43:237–239
Aki K (1981) A probabilistic synthesis of precursor phenomena. In: Simpson DW, Richards PG (eds) Earthquake Prediction, Maurice Ewing Series 4, AGU 566–574
Aviles CA, Scholz CH, Boatwright J (1987) Fractal analysis applied to characteristic segments of the San Andreas fault. J Geophys Res 92:331–344
Barton DJ, Foulger GR, Henderson JR, Julian BR (1999) Frequency-magnitude statistics and spatial correlation dimensions of earthquakes at Long Valley caldera. California. Geophys J Int 138:563–570
Bender B (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data. Bull Seism Soc Am 73:831–851
Ben-Menahem A, Aboodi E, Schild R (1974) The source of the great Assam earthquake–an interplate wedge motion. Phys Earth and Planet Int 9:265–289
Bhatia SC, Ravi Kumar M, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. Ann di Geofis 42:1153–1166
Bilham R, England P (2001) Plateau ‘ pop up’ in the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature 410:806–809
BIS (2002) IS 1893–2002 (Part 1): Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1–general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
Bormann P, Liu R, Ren X, Gutdeutsch R, Kaiser D, Castellaro S (2007) Chinese national network magnitudes, their relation to NEIC magnitudes, and recommendations for new IASPEI magnitude standards. Bull Seism Soc Am 97:114–127
Braunmiller J, Deichmann N, Giardini D, Wiemer S (2005) Homogeneous moment-magnitude calibration in Switzerland. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:58–74
Brune J, Engen G (1969) Excitation of mantle love waves and definition of mantle wave magnitude. Bull Seism Soc Am 57:1355–1365
Castellaro S, Mulargia F, Kagan YY (2006) Regression problems for magnitudes. Geophys J Int 165:913–930
Chen W, Molnar P (1977) Seismic moments of major earthquakes and average rate of slip in Central Asia. J Geophy Res 82:2945–2969
Chernick MR (1999) Bootstrap methods: a practitioner’s guide, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, New York
Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal K, Venaktraman NV, Dasgupta S, Sural B, Harendranath L, Mazumadar K, Sanyal S, Roy A, Das LK, Misra PS, Gupta H (2000) Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs. Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, India
Deichmann N (2006) Local magnitude, a moment revisited. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:1267–1277
Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D 9:189–208
Gutenberg B (1945a) Amplitudes of surface waves and magnitudes of shallow earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 35:3–12
Gutenberg B (1945b) Magnitude determination for deep-focus earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 35:117–130
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 34:185–188
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann Geofis 9:1–15
Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scales. J Geophysis Res 84:2348–2350
Heaton TH, Tajima F, Mori AW (1986) Estimating ground motion using recorded accelerograms. Surv Geophys 8:25–83
Henderson JR, Main IG, Pearce RG, Takeya M (1992) Seismicity in North eastern Brazil: fractal clustering and the evolution of the b value. Geophys J Int 116:217–226
Hirata T (1989a) A correlation between the b value and the fractal dimension of earthquake. J Geophys Res 94:7507–7514
Hirata T (1989b) Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales. Pageoph 131:157–170
ISC (2007) On-line Bulletin, http://www.isc.ac.uk/Bull, Internatl. Seis. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom
Kagan YY (2003) Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135:173–209
Kagan YY (2007) Earthquake spatial distribution: the correlation dimension. Geophys J Int 168:1175–1194
Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1980) Spatial distribution of earthquakes: the two point correlation function. Geophys JR Astr Soc 62:303–320
Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in Great Earthquakes. J Geophy Res 82:2981–2987
Kanamori H (1983) Magnitude scale and quantification of earthquakes. Tectonophys 93:185–199
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York
Mogi K (1962) Magnitude-frequency relationship for elastic shocks accompanying the fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 40:831–883
Nandy DR (2001) Geodynamics of north eastern India and the adjoining region, 1st edn. ACB publications, Kolkata
Narenberg MAA, Essex C (1990) Correlation dimension and systematic geometric effects. Phys Rev A 42:7065–7074
Nuannin P, Kulhanek O, Persson L (2005) Spatial and temporal b value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32:L11307 DOI 10.1029/2005GL022679
Oncel AO, Wilson TH (2002) Space-time correlations of seismotectonic parameters: example from Japan and from Turkey preceding the Izmith earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:339–349
Oncel AO, Wyss M (2000) The major asperities of the 1999 M 7.4 Izmit earthquake, defined by the microseismicity of the two decades before it. Geophys J Int 143:501–506
Richter CF (1935) An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bull Seis Soc Am 25:1–31
Ristau J, Rogers GC, Cassidy JF (2005) Moment magnitude–local magnitude calibration for earthquakes in western canada. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:1994–2000
Rong Y (2002) Evaluation of Earthquake Potential in China, PhD. Dissertation, Geophysics and Space Physics, University of California, Los Angeles
Schorlemmer D, Neri G, Wiemer S, Mostaccio A (2003) Stability and significance tests for b value anomalies: example from the Tyrrhenian Sea. Geophys Res Lett 30:1835 DOI 10.1029/2003GL017335
Scholemmer D, Wiemer S, Wyss M (2005) Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437:539–542
Scholz CH (1968) The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 58:399–415
Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. J Seis 10:225–236
Stromeyer D, Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2004) Chi-square regression for seismic strength parameter relations, and their uncertainties, with applications to an Mw based earthquake catalogue for central, northern and northwestern Europe. J Seis 8:143–153
Suyehiro S, Asada T, Ohtake M (1964) Foreshocks and aftershocks accompanying a perceptible earthquake in central Japan: on the peculiar nature of foreshocks. Pap Meteorol Geophys 19:427–435
Thenhaus PC, Campbell W (2003) Seismic hazard analysis. In: Chen WF, Scawthorn C (eds) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–43
Turcotte DL (1986) A fractal model for crustal deformation. Tectonophysics 132:261–269
Utsu T (1965) A method for determining the value of b in the formula log N=a-bM showing the magnitude–frequency relation for the earthquakes. Geophys Bull Hokkaido Univ 13:99–103
Utsu T (1999) Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: a historical review and some new approaches. Pageoph 155:509–535
Wesnouski SG, Scholz CH, Shimazaki K, Matsuda T (1983) Earthquake frequency distribution and the mechanics of faulting. J Geophys Res 88:9331–9340
Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:859–869
Willemann RJ, Storchak DA (2001) Data collection at the international seismological centre. Seis Res Lett 72:440–453
Woo G (1996) Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling. Bull Seism Soc Am 86:353–362
Wyss M, Sammis CG, Nadeau RM, Wiemer S (2004) Fractal dimension and b value on creeping and locked patches of the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California. Bull Seism Soc Am 94:410–421
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thingbaijam, K.K.S., Nath, S.K., Yadav, A. et al. Recent seismicity in Northeast India and its adjoining region. J Seismol 12, 107–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-007-9074-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-007-9074-y