Abstract
There appears to be a lack of evidence concerning the effect of rehabilitation programmes for the long-term sick. More focus in this area would supplement an approach that has been directed toward process evaluation of rehabilitation programmes. It was the purpose of this study to shed light on individual factors and health care and social welfare-related factors, which play a role for the outcome of rehabilitation programmes. In connection with a participatory, action-oriented outpatient rehabilitation program, a questionnaire survey was performed among the programmes participants (“clients”). Questionnaires were completed before the rehabilitation programme’s start, at the end of the 8-week programme, and at the 9-months follow-up. Among 389 clients, 271 (69.7%) participated in the study at baseline as well at the 9-months follow-up. The majority of 212 participants were on sick leave—66.6% for more than 1 year. The remainder had been transferred to receiving social benefits after having exceeded the time limit for being sick-listed. A plan of action for active rehabilitation, which was made at the end of the 8-week rehabilitation programme, was only poorly fulfilled after 9
months, 48% were still on sick leave or social benefits at this time. Individual background variables, as well as psychological well-being, mental health, pain level, and pain coping, seemed to have little effect on the outcome of rehabilitation, whilst clients’ own evaluations of competence and ability of the involved health care professionals were found important for a positive outcome of the programme. Especially stable relations to a single General Practitioner (GP), who took good care of the patient in the form of giving good information about health and social possibilities, and an empathic attitude toward these hard-pressed clients, were important factors. The odds ratio for a nonbeneficial outcome of the rehabilitation programme, among those who had changed GP and reported poor case treatment by the GP, was 3.9 (95% CI;1.3–11.9). Additional findings were an association between a desire to go on early retirement pension, higher age, and self-estimated poorer health at baseline, and actual status as pensioner 9 months after the programme. Predictors of a beneficial outcome from the 8-week rehabilitation programme included good and comprehensive care-taking in particular by the clients’ GP. The presence of a high level of symptoms and complaints of pain and stress had no effect on the outcome of rehabilitation in this cohort.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Foldspang A, Hoffmeyer J, Svendsen IL. Prediction of the course of rehabilitation. Social and medical predictors for discharge status in a rehabilitation clinic. Ugeskr Laeger 1981; 143: 3249–3252.
Eklund M, Eriksson S, Fugl-Meyer AR. Vocational rehabilitation in northern Sweden. II. Some psycho-socio-demographic predictors. Scand J Rehabil Med 1991; 23: 73–82.
Marnetoft SU, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Factors associated with successful vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 71–78.
Taylor W, Simpson R, Gow D, McNaughton H. Rehabilitation that works-vocational outcomes following rehabilitation for occupational musculoskeletal pain. NZ Med J 2001; 114: 185–187.
Bjørner JB, Thunedborg K, Kristensen TS, et al. The Danish SF-36 health survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 991–999.
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Empirical validation of the “pain intensity” construct. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 1991; 39: 369–381.
Little P, Everitt H, Williamson E, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, Ferrier G, Payne S. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001; 323: 908–911.
Marnetoft SU, Selander J. Multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation focusing on work training and case management for unemployed sick-listed people. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 271–279.
Selander J, Marnetoft SU. Risk factor for disability pension among unemployed women on long-term sick-leave. Int J Rehabil Res 1999; 22: 277–282.
Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A two-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 639–654.
Lindqvist R, Grape O. Vocational rehabilitation of the socially disadvantaged long-term sick: Inter-organizational co-operation between welfare state agencies. Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 5–10.
Sandstroem J, Esbjoerssen E. Return to work after rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986; 18: 29–33.
Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64 year old Swedes: In relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 84–90.
Ericsson M, Poston WS, Linder J, Taylor JE, Haddock CK, Foreyt JP. Depression predicts disability in long-term chronic pain patients. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 334–340.
Linder J, Poston WS, II, Haddock CK, Foreyt JP, Ericsson M. Does personality or psychopathology predict disability in chronic pain patients? Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 281–287.
Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning proces at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 169–81.
Tarrant C, Windrigde K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G. How important is personal care in general practice? BMJ 2003; 326: 1910–1913.
Baker R, Mainous AG, III, Gary DP, Lovee MM. Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust inregular doctors and patient satisfaction and consultations with family doctors. Scand J Health Care 2003; 21: 27–32.
Nystuen P, Hagen KB. Feasibility and effectiveness of offering a solution-focused follow-up to employees with psychological problems or muscolo-skeletal pain: A randomised control trial. BMC Public Health 2003; 3: 19–24.
van der Klink JJ, Blonk RW, Schen AH, van Dijk FJ. Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: A cluster randomised controlled design. Occup Environ Med 2003; 6: 429–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasmussen, K., Andersen, J.H. Individual Factors and GP Approach as Predictors for the Outcome of Rehabilitation Among Long-Term Sick Listed Cases. J Occup Rehabil 15, 227–235 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-1221-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-1221-0