Abstract
Petro-based plastics are linked to various environmental issues throughout their lifecycle, including pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, persistence in marine and terrestrial habitats, etc. The utilization of biopolymers is a prominent substitute for petro-based materials. Further, the reinforcement of natural fibers (NFs) to biopolymers significantly improves the functionality of biopolymers. The functionality of NFs is crucial to promote the interfacial interaction with biopolymers and achieving high-performance materials which could compete with traditional petro-based materials. NFs have several benefits over synthetic fiber, including biodegradability, low density and cost, lighter weight, superior life cycle, and good mechanical properties. This review article focuses on the characterization and properties of plant-based NFs and their synergistic application. This thorough assessment of the state-of-the-art focuses on current research on how NFs can be used for their potential role as reinforcement in the packaging industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Environmental plastic pollution has become a priority of major global entities, including the United Nations (UN), the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the European Union (EU). In the context of circular economy and sustainable development, countries worldwide are looking for new materials that are more eco-friendly and cost-effective to replace traditional petrochemical-based plastics [1]. Interestingly, bioplastics are a fast-expanding class of polymeric materials frequently offered as substitutes for traditional petro-based plastics [2]. The sustainability performance of bio-based plastics concluded that bio-based plastics could save up to 315 million tons of CO2 equivalents annually [3]. Plant-based natural fibers (NFs) are a promising and sustainable reinforcing material for packaging applications because they have several benefits over synthetic fiber, including reduced density, biodegradability, abundance, good damping qualities, less abrasive damage to equipment, and high health safety (Table 1). Several plant-based NFs have been isolated from various parts of the plant, including bast, leaves, seeds, fruits, and stalks [4], which includes jute, cotton, sisal, banana, oil palm, kenaf, pineapple, okra, coir, etc. are widely used in fabrication [5]. According to the Natural Fiber Composites Market Forecast research, the market for Natural fiber–reinforced composites will grow from $4.46 billion in 2016 to $10.89 billion in 2024 (NFC, 2018). In order to address sustainability challenges, including environmental pollution and the depletion of natural resources, NFs-reinforced biopolymer composites are the “green composites” of the future. The advantages of using NFs in composites fabrication are lower specific weight results in a higher specific stiffness than glass, low mechanical properties, especially impact resistance, renewable resource, moisture sensitivity, production with low investment, low thermal stability, low abrasion and hence less tool wear, low durability, widely available, poor fire resistance, biodegradable, etc. [5]. NFs are frequently employed as reinforcers/fillers in polymeric matrices where polymers are binding agents for holding fibers together and offering dimensional stability. Reinforcement of NFs improves functionality and broad applicability by improving various mechanical properties, including tensile strength, tensile modulus, bending strength, bending modulus, elongation at break, impact strength, compressive strength, toughness, etc. [5,6,7]. Further, adding NFs such as flax, sisal, hemp, kenaf, jute, etc., can also improve antimicrobial and thermal properties. Additionally, NFs contribute to the circular economy concept by reducing costs and improving eco-friendliness.
To the best of our knowledge, few studies have compiled this information based on recent research studies to provide the latest scientific support for plant-based natural fiber for biopolymer-based packaging. The current review focuses on collecting, comprehending, and synthesizing the fundamental functions of the characterization, properties, and application of NFs in food packaging. Also, the review examines several strategies to improve and enhance the properties of biopolymer-based materials.
Extraction and Characterization of Natural Fibers
Cellulosic fibers originating from trees and plants are termed natural fibers (NFs). Plant fibers come together to form a stem and ribbon. Fibers are extracted to improve their physical properties and remove cellulose, lignin, and other micro-level fibers. Extraction methods are suitably selected based on the parts of the plant from which the fiber is to be extracted. The choice of extraction methods governs the characteristics and properties of composites fabricated from it. The process of extracting fibers from the plants through separating, dissolving, and decomposing pectins, gums, and other muscle elements is called retting. This process is tedious and time-consuming, and the quality of extracted NFs depends on the skill of the laborer. Retting separated the fibers into smaller bundles and elementary fibers. This is a key process and an important criterion to determine the properties of extracted fibers. Dew and water retting are the traditional methods: other methods include chemical, mechanical, and enzymatic retting. A brief comparison between different retting processes is shown in Table 2.
The deliberation of NFs characteristics is a prerequisite to exploring its usefulness and effective application in composites to replace synthetic polymers. Different kinds of analysis are performed to characterize the plant fibers: physical, chemical, thermal, spectroscopic, and surface morphology. Figure 1. shows the structure characterization of plant fibers.
A physical analysis is fundamental to envision the density and fiber’s geometrical parameters. The cell wall length, thickness, diameter, and density are the dominant factors in plant fibers to decide the peculiar physical attributes. The density is generally estimated by employing toluene and a real density analyzer, also known as a helium pycnometer, for pycnometer experimentation. A micrometer instrument or optical microscope predicts diameter, fiber length, and thickness. Comparatively, a more accurate method to determine density is based on standard procedures of ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) D8171-18 [8]. Otherwise, Archimedes’ principle (using hexane) is also applied to determine fiber density [9].
Every natural plant fiber’s chemical composition beholds in species or its variety; the source of fiber is obtained from different parts like stem, root, fruit, leaf, and seed [10]. The evaluation of chemical composition is important to quantify the plant fiber constituents- (i) cellulose, (ii) lignin, (iii) hemicellulose, (iv) moisture, (v) ash, (vi) wax. This quantification aids in identifying the bonding ability and strength of the fibers [11, 12]. An ideal plant fiber with good mechanical properties must have a high percentage of cellulose. Still, low amounts of other constituents like lignin are required, and hemicellulose, moisture, ash, and wax contents should be small [13, 14]. The specific standard test procedures and specifications are used to evaluate each type of chemical component. The Kurchner-Hoffer procedure determines the composition of cellulose in plant fiber, lignin, and hemicellulose content by ASTM D 1104–56 method, wax by Contard method, and ash by ASTM D 1102–84 method [8].
The surface morphological study of fiber includes the roughness of the fiber surface, structure of the cell wall, diameter, and so on. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and others demonstrate such properties. SEM scans the fiber through a beam of electrons and focuses on the top of the vital facet of the fiber by deducing the secondary signals and backscattered electronic signals to finally provide a high-resolution meticulous image [15]. AFM is characterized by its very high-resolution microscopic property. AFM depicts the resolution up to a fragment of a single nanometer (nm), a thousand times improved resolution compared to the optical diffraction limit. AFM can determine the extraordinary surface parameter such as average roughness of the surface, maximum peak, root mean square (RMS) roughness, and others. Vertical scanning procedures have been adopted to determine fiber surface roughness, specifically using a confocal microscope, confocal chromatic aberration, and coherence scanning interferometer. While scanning, laser microscopy and structured light scanner can also be employed based on the principle of horizontal scanning. However, surface roughness is measured by methods other than scanning, including a digital holography microscope [14]. During the formation of a matrix and composite reinforcement, fiber wettability is considered crucial and drastically influenced by the diameter and roughness of the fiber surface. The wettability of natural fiber relies on the nature and portion of waxes present in the fiber, and it is calculated by contact angle measurement [16].
Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analyzes the organic and inorganic compounds qualitatively and quantitatively, providing essential information on chemical functional groups and molecular structures in the natural plant fibers to disclose the accurate chemical composition [17]. The two types of FTIR spectroscopy methods are prevalent, testing absorbance and transmittance. FTIR with transmittance is broadly accepted for NFs [14]. The spectrograms extended by the specific peaks emerge in a graph composed of wave number versus transmittance, which is embodied by the bending, stretching, and vibration brought about by the varied functional groups owned by the fibers [11].
X-ray diffraction is routinely used to analyze the crystal type and crystallinity of plant cellulose [18]. Crystallinity analysis grabs great importance by offering information regarding the nature of amorphous cellulose [19]. Among several diffraction methods, the Segal peak height method is the most prevalent in analyzing cellulose crystallinity [20]. Another method is based on peak deconvolution, in which the area under diffraction peaks is to be divided by the total area Hermans and Weidinger [21]. One more approach given by Rietveld [22] is occasionally applied to determine cellulose crystallinity. Unlike the deconvolution method, this approach uses all the diffraction peaks lost or ignored as the amorphous scattering. But the accuracy of such methods has been doubted. For instance, Scherrer [23] depicted that sharp peaks are related to large crystals, and broad peaks are related to small crystals. When such peaks are enlarged to compare with the peaks that arose from model crystals, it demonstrated that much of the intensity previously attributed to “amorphous scatter” was only the overlapped intensity out of adjacent crystalline peaks [18]. The intensity among the peaks came out of peak overlap and was observed specifically in the region dedicated to only amorphous intensity by Segal. This raise doubt on crystallinity determination by Segal method [24]. same way, many other analysis methods bears the flaws and doubted for their accuracy. French [18] determined the powder diffraction patterns from cellulose Iα, Iβ, II, IIII, and IIIII on the basis of published atomic coordinates and unit cell dimentions. Their calculation included peak widths at half maximum height of both 0.1 and 1.5º 2θ, offered highly convinced prospects of the each contributing contemplation to the detectable diffraction peaks and intensity profiles, appear more firmly simulate standard cellulose samples.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) are the primary analytical instruments to determine the thermal performance and chemical constitution of natural plant fibers. TGA evaluates thermal stability and weight loss percentage in the various constituents of NFs during thermal degradation. Plant fibers have excellent thermal insulation properties; products from such fibers can be used in different thermal applications [14]. Cellulose fiber generally decomposes at around 200 ℃, mainly occurring in the amorphous regions. Whereas crystalline a-cellulose of untreated jute fibers was decomposed at a temperature of 362.2 ℃, but after mercerization, decomposition was reduced to 348 ℃ [25].
Properties of NFs
Morphological Properties
Plant fibers have been widely used for diverse commercial applications for a long. Classification of plant fibers is generally based on botanical origin like (i) bast- kenaf, hemp, ramie, flax, jute, (ii) leaf- bananas, sisal, abaca, pineapple leaves, curaua, raphia, fique, (iii) seeds and fruits- coir, cotton, Java cotton, soybean husk, paddy-husk, (v) stalk- paddy, wheat, corn, barley, rye, oats, (vi) grass- bamboos, baggase, esparto, elephant-grass, canary-grass, switch-grass, (vii) wood fibers- phragmites, rosewood, teak, etc. [16].
Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) is a native to Central Africa and belongs family Malvaceae; it is an annual herbaceous plant that requires a warm season to grow [26]. Kenaf plants are stiff, tough, and strong, with high resistance to insect attack [27]. Kenaf bast fiber is widely utilized for different injection molded or extruded polymer applications in the packaging [28]. One more bast fiber crop, flax (Linum usitatissimum), belongs to the same family Malvaceae and has been grown in temperate regions since ancient times and grows up to 1 m in height depending on the species [29]. Canada produces and exports flax at the largest level in the world [30]. Flax fiber is found as the most suitable replacement for glass fibers to embody the reinforcements in panel boards, lining, and packaging materials [28]. Hemp (Cannabis sativa) bast fiber is obtained from an annual herbaceous plant, belongs to the Cannabaceae family, and is largely cultivated in Europe but native to Asia [31]. It attains a height of 1.2–4.5 m when fully grown [32]. Raw Hemp fiber in raw form is generally thin, coarser, shinier, and light-colored hemp fibers are utilized in packaging paper applications [26]. Jute (Corchorus capsularis) is an annual plant from the family Tiliaceae, which grows in the monsoon season in Asian countries (Bangladesh, India, and China) and grows up to a height of 15–20 cm [33]. Bast fibers from jute are used to manufacture shopping bags and reinforcement materials for polymer manufacturing. Ramie (Boehmeria nivea) is a flowering plant belonging to Urticaceae family that requires normal soil conditions for growth and grows up to 1–2 m. China, Japan, and Malaysia are the native and the largest producer of ramie [34]. This bast fiber is the longest, finest, and strongest among all bast fibers. Ramie, flax, and hemp bast fibers highly resist insects and pests [28].
Leaf fiber is obtained from the sisal (Agave sisalana) plant from the Asparagaceae family and reaches up to 1.5–2 m [35]. Sisal is native to Mexico and produced abundantly in Brazil (Varghese et al., 2018). Nowadays, it also grows commercially in India, Brazil, Indonesia, and East Africa. It is comparatively easily cultivated in soil other than clay in hot weather and arid zones. In a life span of 6 to 7 years, the sisal plant produces approximately 200 to 250 leaves for commercial use [36]. Sisal fibers are employed in polymer composites for package trays [37]. Abaca is one of the strongest leaf fibers from the banana (Musa textilis) plant from the family Musaceae, grown abundantly in Ecuador and the Philippines. Pineapple leaf fiber containing high cellulose, drawn from the pineapple (Ananas comosus) plant, belongs to the large genus Ananas of the family Bromeliaceae, a tropics plant that originated from Brazil. Pineapple leaf fiber is mostly used in polymer reinforcement applications [29]. Another leaf fiber from the Curaua (Ananas erectifolius) plant originated from the Amazon forest and is similar to the pineapple.
Coconut fiber is also known as coir; this lignocellulosic fiber is found between the coconut shell and husk (Cocus nucifera). Coconut is a tropical palm belonging to the family Arecaceae [38]. The countries, including Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka, Philippines, and Malaysia, are the prime commercial producers of coconut and coir fiber [39]. In particular, coir fiber is light in weight and strong fiber. Coconut coir is getting wide acceptance to reinforce the material in polymers by virtue of its strength and durability [31].
The bamboo (Bambusoideae) plant is a kind of grass belonging to the family Poaceae, an evergreen perennial plant that gains a height of approximately 40 m in the monsoon season [29]. Many bamboo plant parts (leaves, hard trunk, and branches) are used to obtain fibers mainly via steam explosion and mechanical treatment [31]. One exquisite property of bamboo fiber is its considerable absorbance of ultraviolet (UV) light, which is utilized to produce hand-crafted paper [28]. Bagasse is a stalk fiber, a by-product residue of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) juice milling. Bagasse fiber is getting acceptance as a reinforcement material for composite preparation [38].
Chemical Properties
The chemical constituents and internal structure of plant fiber provide the basis for the characteristic physical properties. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are primary units to comprise lignocellulosic structures of plant fibers, including other minor constituents like pectins, wax, ash, proteins, tannins, oils, and inorganic salts. The amorphous components like hemicelluloses, lignin, pectin, and others create a matrix to sustain cellulosic fibrils together, which works as a reinforcement. However, such composition varies in accordance with the plant source or species, plant growth conditions, life cycle phase, and fiber extraction procedure that ultimately influence the structural development and performance of the fiber [40]. These factors must be considered to overcome the quality variation of plant fiber. Further, higher cellulosic content and diminishing microfibrillar angle are responsible for the alluring mechanical attributes [41, 42]. This property is utilized foremost during composites’ reinforcement [43]. NFs containing a relatively excellent amount of cellulose, primarily the crystalline parts including cotton, cotton linter, kapok, and ramie, and the low lignin content are subjected to high tensile strength (TS) due to the higher crystallinity [44]. Likewise, the cellulose content of natural fiber from ramie is 68.6–85 wt. %, and higher Young modulus (YM) and TS are produced at 24.5–128 MPa and 400–1000 MPa, respectively [43]. Although several other factors influence the TS, this correlation cannot always be linear [44]. In contrast, rising non-cellulosic constituents pare the TS and YM, thereby decrementing the properties of natural plant fiber-reinforced composites [45]. Pectin and lignin compose the middle lamella of fiber cells; these fiber cells assist in yielding plant fiber structure by compiling and binding fiber bundles. The presence of pectin with lignin in fibril bundles alters the mechanical attributes of plant fibers by plunging the interfacial characteristics among the fibers and composites matrix [46].
Cellulose is a glucan polymer with higher hydrophilic properties and is more thermally stable than hemicellulose. It has a higher thermal decomposition temperature from 315 °C to 400 °C. In natural plant fibers, cellulose unites with pectin and produces a stronger cell wall, helping retain cell structure in water [17]. The glucose units link together to form linear chains via β-(1–4) glycosidic linkages, confer strength, stability, and stiffness, subsequently forming the characteristic cellulose structure with a higher degree of polymerization [47]. Cellulosic plant fiber generally swells when water exposure, demonstrates high moisture absorption, and becomes dimensionally unstable [44]. The hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties of fibers, and when fiber interacts with the respective matrix, significantly affect the adhesion of the fibers with NFs in terms of reinforcement [28].
Lignin is an amorphous and cross-linked polymer, abundantly found in plant cells, that enhances the structural support comprised of non-uniform hydroxy- and methoxy-substituted phenylpropane units [28, 48]. The molecular structure of lignin is aromatic and links by forming an ester bond with hemicellulose. It consists of three functional groups in active form, coniferyl alcohol (G), p-coumaryl alcohol (H), and synapyl alcohol (S). Lignin predominantly forms aryl ether linkage (β-O-4) and is easily cleaved during conversion and depolymerization [49]. Another interesting fact about lignin is that it accounts for destroying UV and forming char in plant fibers [50]. Lignins are comparatively thermally stable and decompose at 165 to 900 °C [17].
Hemicellulose is also one of the primary components of the cell wall of lignocellulosic plants, possessing branched structures and a reduced degree of polymerization. As a result, pre-treatment processing of lignocellulose leads to easy degradation in the liquid fraction. Further, a large amount of pentose (principle hemicellulose) in non-wood plants impacts the evolution of fibrils from fibers by multiplied bond formation, and ultimately flexibility of fiber increases in pulp sheets [51]. Hemicellulose content inversely influences the crystallinity of cellulose, and stunted content incurs beneficial effects on amorphous cellulose [52]. In addition, the existence of hemicellulose downturns the biological and thermal solidity, including moisture absorption in NFs [50].
Pectin is a structurally complex heteropolysaccharide (acidic) largely consisting of esterified d- glucuronic acid and rhamnose residues, which lies in an α-(1–4) chain. Pectin chains enhance the structural solidarity of plant fibers by means of cross-linking with ions of calcium. The unified role of lignin, hemicellulose, and pectin in the form of a matrix collectively holds the structure of the cellulosic biomass in fiber composites. Plant fiber comprises cellulose (60%–80%), lignin (5%–20%), and an average moisture content of about 20% [28]. The chemical attributes of various NFs are demonstrated in Table 3.
Physical Characteristics
Physical attributes of plant fiber are merely related to their chemical composition, but several other factors are also responsible, like plant species, maturity, size, geographical conditions, and methods for fiber extraction [46]. Cell wall length, thickness, diameter, aspect ratio (ratio of length and diameter), and density are generally measured to estimate the physical properties of natural plant fibers. But a reliable density value in natural plant fibers is hard to achieve, considering their porous nature. While the density and lumen size of fiber increase with the increase in porosity and vice versa. Sisal leaf and ramie bast fibers possess low densities of 0.76 g/cm3 and 1.38 g/cm3, respectively [53]. The general range of densities of NFs is 1.2 to 1.6 g/cm3, which is lesser than glass fibers (2.4 g/cm3), thereby producing lightweight composites by incorporating plant fibers [54]. The curtailing density of NFs produces an advantageous effect on particular mechanical properties, so NFs’ performance looks right compared to artificial fibers. Correspondingly, ramie fiber showed a low density of 1.0–1.55 g/cm3, illustrating higher strength and YM [43]. Different plant fibers have disparity in diameter measures, which is significant in determining the mechanical performance. Yet, it was seen that mechanical characteristics improve with decreasing diameter of plant fiber [55]. For example, ramie has a small diameter of its fiber, i.e., 20–80 mm, but demonstrates very high YM and TS [43]. The physical characteristics of various NFs are enlisted in Table 4.
Mechanical Properties
The mechanical strength of the plant fiber has been the leading factor to consider when choosing natural plant fibers for precise applications [29]. Mechanical attributes of a plant fiber particularly count on the proportion of cellulose content, degree of polymerization, and microfibril angles. Table 5 depicts the salient mechanical properties of NFs. The hydrogen bonding and structural linkages of cellulose are the prime determinants of TS and the stiffness of plant fibers [56]. With the increase in the amount of cellulose, TS and YM also rise while decreasing by multiplying the portion of non-cellulosic chemical constituents, like lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and wax [57]. The fiber strength is evaluated by testing only one fiber or a bundle of fibers. A single unit fiber test offers accuracy in results during practical application, but in reality, the testing with a bundle of fiber is comparatively preferred, considering the ease of performance and faster outcomes.
The cross-section area of the fiber is a key component to impact the strength of the fiber [58], whereas the microstructure and chemical composition govern the mechanical attributes of fibers [59]. During extraction and chemical treatments, the TS of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin of gets affected. Besides, soaking carrot grass (Parthenium hysterophorus) in alkali increased the TS values [60]. The mechanical attributes of NFs stand nowhere in front of synthetic fibers, but surface modification techniques can improve the mechanical performance of natural plant fibers to a great extent, even with the varied and comparatively lower mechanical properties, in particular, density, TS, microfibrillar angle, specific modulus, modulus of elasticity, in addition to elongation at break. The natural origins of plant fibers attract different fabrication companies to incorporate plant fibers into engineered polymer composite manufacturing [13]. Since plant fibers provide greater advantages over synthetic fiber (Table 4). The administration of plant fibers in reinforcing materials in composites is established by its characteristic TS and stiffness. Generally, plant fibers are rigid (fructurability) and withstand during processing, which makes their specific strength as well as stiffness comparable with glass fibers [48]. Most plant fibers possess diminishing density with competing for YM or elasticity [61]. As per Elanchezhian et al. [62], NFs are easily available, inexpensive, renewable, light in weight, low density, and toughness, and could be a potential replacement for glass and carbon fibers. These biodegradable fibers contain the potency to be applied as a substitute for conventional reinforcement materials during composite manufacturing, where high strength/weight ratio and reduction are prerequisites in various applications.
Microfibrillar angle is a characteristic that deviates amid the different fiber axis and even among the plant species. Microfibrillar angle significantly affects the mechanical features of NFs. The values of the microfibrillar angle are inversely related to TS along with the YM of fiber [63]. For instance, the microfibrillar angle of natural fiber ramie was observed at 7.5, exhibiting a higher TS, i.e., 400–1000 MPa, with 24.5–128 GPa YM [43]. NFs from flax and hemp also have higher TS. The TS of bamboo fiber is somewhat greater than the maximum of the plant fibers, including sisal and jowar [64]. The observation from stress–strain of plant fibers stipulates the low-strain and high-stress properties of ramie, kenaf, pineapple, sansevieria, and sisal, although coconut husk fiber exemplifies high strain and low stress [58]. Further, pineapple and jute fiber followed a similar representation of the stress–strain curve [65]. Karimah et al. [66],Yamanaka et al. [67] also mentioned that the ramie fiber’s tremendous mechanical performance was governed by its high molecular weight and amount of cellulose (69%–97%) with limiting microfibrillar angle (7%–12%). It was also reported that sisal fiber has good physicomechanical properties with regard to porosity, bulk, absorbency, TS, and folding strength [68]. Nevertheless, such plant fibers possess stunned stiffness properties balanced with high elastic recovery and elongation [69]. Interestingly, banana stem fiber confers a comparable or even higher mechanical strength than synthetic fibers. These natural plant fibers with great mechanical properties offer substantial scopes to produce brawny composites with synthetic or glass fibers. For instance, enforcing sisal in glass fibers biocomposites multiplied the tensile and bend strength [70]. Hariprasad et al. [71] also exhibited the upsurge in TS of composite, composed of polypropylene by reinforcing fibers from hay, milkweed, kusha grass and sisal fiber.
Applications
Petro-based plastics are the most often used packaging material in the food sector. However, the extensive use of these traditional plastics has had significant adverse environmental consequences and is damaging the environment daily [72]. Due to the increased need for sustainability, the innovation of bio-derived plastics derived from renewable sources has received a lot of attention [73, 74]. To address this issue, food packaging materials should be replaced with “green” or biodegradable materials, typically NFs reinforced with biopolymer composites. Numerous research has been conducted over the years to find an eco-friendly substitute for these packaging plastics to address the ongoing plastic waste disposal problems [75,75,77]. Using a sustainable bio-polymer combined with NFs filler produces a biocomposite that provides a technical and potential long-term alternative to plastics in the food packaging market [78]. In this section, the review application of different plant-based fibers for food packaging has been discussed. Figure 2 demonstrates the potential applications of plant-based fibers for food packaging applications.
Sugar Palm Starch (SPS)
The major purpose of food packaging is to protect the quality and food safety throughout transit and storage and to extend the shelf-life of food goods by avoiding adverse circumstances. Packaging materials are employed as a packaging bag and a defensive barrier with a specific function. Sanyang et al. [79] presented sugar palm starch (SPS) as a green biopolymer for developing bio-based packaging materials to tackle the challenges involved with food packaging. One of the substitutes for petroleum-based plastic in the packaging industry is a starch-based packaging material. SPS is advantageous in producing packaging films because it is a compostable, environmentally sustainable polymer derived from renewable sources. According to this study, SPS is often collected from the trunk of sugar palm trees, particularly those that are unproductive and unable to generate sap. Although SPS is a great alternative to petroleum-based food packaging materials, there are some drawbacks that must be addressed before SPS can be considered a high-performing thermoplastic starch for packaging applications. Due to its high hydrophilicity, multiple modification methods were used to resolve the drawbacks in the properties of starch-based films. Using nanotechnology and nanomaterials to improve the functional characteristics of SPS-based films was discovered to be an effective option for food packaging films. Because of their physical and chemical properties, nanomaterials make them broadly accessible in numerous areas [80].
However, it has been found that using a starch polymer as a film has low water barrier capabilities. Due to their high hydrophilicity, multiple modification methods were used to resolve the drawbacks in the properties of starch-based films. Using nanosized NFs during starch biopolymer film preparation is a viable method for improving food packaging films ([81, 82]. The use of nanotechnology to improve the functional characteristics of SPS-based films has been discussed later in this section.
Poly(Hydroxy-3-Butyrate-co-3-Valerate) (PHBV)
Mechanical and gas transfer qualities of food packaging material must be changed as a function of the food product needs to provide optimal preservation. Biodegradable materials are an appealing food storage option for items with a limited shelf life. Poly(hydroxy-3-butyrate-co-3-valerate) (PHBV) is bio-based and potentially manufactured from food industry by-products ([83,83,85]. However, PHBV is quite costly, and its barrier qualities are too high to meet the demands of respiratory products. As a result, one technique for modulating PHBV while retaining complete biodegradability and lowering final material costs is to blend it with cheap lignocellulosic fibers, including wood fibers, powdered olive stone, spruce fibers, and so on. On the other hand, Berthet et al. [86] obtained lignocellulosic fibers from the olive pomace, wheat straw, and spent grains by dry grinding these agro-wastes to assess their suitability as fillers in PHBV for food packaging. The major purpose of this research was to understand the impact of fiber origin on grinding behavior, interfacial properties, and melt extrusion processability. This research also looked at the correlations between several composite’s key structural traits and their ingredients, as well as the composite’s attributes. According to the findings, brewing spent grains contained more cellulose, whereas olive mills contained more lignin. The grinding capability and energy usage of various fibers differed due to differences in composition [81, 82]. Meanwhile, the inclusion of fibers harmed the mechanical characteristics of PHBV-based materials, resulting in a significant reduction in both PHBV stress and strain at break, as shown in Fig. 3a. The effect of fibers on water vapor permeability (WVP) isn’t the same since adding wheat straw fibers to PHBV enhanced the water vapor transmission rate while adding olive mills lowered the water vapor transmission rate. Therefore, PHBV/wheat straw fiber composites are suitable for respiring food goods, whereas PHBV/olive mills composites are better equipped for water-sensitive products [86].
Biodegradable Composites
Biodegradable composites, including consumable components such as starch and fiber-rich lentil flour, show great promise for application as biodegradable and edible food coatings [87, 88]. Ochoa-Yepes et al. [89] examined the structure, physicochemical properties, and biodegradability of thermoplastic starch films containing rich fiber lentil flour. Starch-lentil flour films with various concentrations of rich fiber lentil flour were prepared by the casting method. It was discovered that adding lentil flour to the composites increased their YM, strength at break, and durability, demonstrating that it is a fantastic enhancer to use as reinforcement for starch-glycerol films, making them more resistant and capable of protecting food products from damage. Moreover, the addition of lentil flour also improved the permeability of water vapor, and all the films were proved to be thermally stable. These films are also completely biodegraded in vegetal compost.
Lignocellulosic Wastes
On the other hand, Sánchez-Safont et al. [78] investigated the eligibility of seagrass (SG), rice husk (RH), and almond shell (AS), which are other kinds of lignocellulosic wastes, as fillers in PHB/fiber composites implementations. Melt blending was used in this work to prepare the PHB/Fiber. While PHB is a great alternative for environmentally friendly packaging, it has significant disadvantages that restrict its usage in food packaging. Using excellent, sustainable fillers to overcome these deficiencies is an appealing and long-term option. The fiber type and content had little influence on the crystallinity of PHB, however, variances in size and shape generated variations in the composite characteristics. The addition of fibers was observed to diminish thermal stability and barrier characteristics. When compared to clean PHB, the reduction in barrier performance resulted in an increase in WVP for all of the composites, as shown in Fig. 3b. Meanwhile, the fibers have demonstrated mechanical reinforcement through increased elastic modulus. The addition of AS resulted in the smallest rise in permeability and improved the thermoformability of PHB.
According to Salwa et al. [90], most bio composite materials contain only the matrix or the fiber/filler from natural renewable resources. As a result, green biocomposites, made of full compostable NFs and a biopolymer matrix, would be an excellent choice since they can be decomposed naturally and returned to the environment safely after being used [90]. Biocomposites are advantageous due to their significant mechanical properties and several processing benefits. Furthermore, biocomposites are less expensive, more widely available, lighter in weight, and more environmentally sustainable due to their renewability and degradability. Salwa et al. [91] studied the conceptual design and selection of NFs-reinforced biopolymers. The authors used the Kano Model, Quality Function Deployment for Environment (QFDE), morphological map, and Analytic Hierarchy Method (AHP) framework to describe the conceptual design of biopolymer reinforced with NFs for takeout food containers. The morphological chart (MC) is employed to organize all potential ideas into one place, and the conceptual design is produced by sequentially combining the solution ideas for the design aspects proposed for the food container [92, 93]. The MC created in this design generation activity is shown in Fig. 4. Nineteen generated conceptual designs are detailed. The conceptual designs were created by combining each MC solution. The Autodesk Inventor Professional 2020 design modeling process yielded all the design attributes displayed. In Fig. 5a–f, six idea designs are displayed.
Biocomposite material has gained wide attention from scientists due to the ordered structure of cellulose that produces micro-sized or nanosized dimensions chemically, mechanically, or by combining both means. Nanocellulose can be used to enhance the effectiveness of biocomposites. Nanocellulose can be classified into three types that are a) cellulose nanocrystals; b) nano-fibrillated cellulose; and c) bacterial nanocellulose [94, 95]. Nanocrystalline cellulose is captivating due to its versatility and strength. Nanocrystalline cellulose can be used as a filler while also improving the properties of composites, which makes it a promising biomaterial for food packaging applications [45, 46, 96,93,98]. The awe-inspiring characteristics of nanocrystalline cellulose were proven in another research work where Hachaichi et al. [99] successfully managed to isolate nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) from date palm microcrystalline cellulose (MCC-DP) by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. NCC is gaining popularity owing to its remarkable properties, which include a wide surface area, a high aspect ratio, and greater mechanical and barrier properties. NCC was characterized to investigate its properties. As illustrated in Fig. 6, the morphological investigation using FESEM and TEM demonstrated the effective extraction of NCC from MCC-DP when the samples displayed noticeable needles. The findings of the XRD spectra suggest that NCC is acceptable for usage in excellent tensile applications, and the thermal analysis suggests that it has strong thermostability, implying that it might be employed in high-temperature synthesis processes [100]. Hence, the isolated NCC could be a potential bio filler for food packaging applications [6, 7].
Starch Polymer
Another study focused on using a starch polymer as a film. Even though starch is a viable solution for non-biodegradable plastic, the starch polymer has been demonstrated to have poor water barrier qualities when used as a film. Based on the research that various researchers have done, it can be concluded that adding nanosized NFs like nanocrystalline celluloses (NCCs) while preparing the starch biopolymer film is an impactful technique for enhancing the characteristics of packaging films [96, 97, 101,102,103,104]. It was also discovered that the nanocellulose and the starch matrix have high compatibility, which is important for improved barrier properties of the film. Consequently, Ilyas et al. [94, 95] synthesized sugar palm cellulose nanocrystals (SPCNCs) nanocomposites and used them as a biodegradable reinforcing material to boost the barrier properties of an SPS-based film. SPCNCs of varied sizes based on hydrolysis time were inserted into SPS plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol. The biodegradation analysis revealed that SPS degraded faster than SPS/SPCNCs by reducing 61.93% of its weight at the end of 7 days. Furthermore, when the size of the SPCNCs reinforced bio matrix was reduced, the WVP effect on the SPS and SPS/SPCNCs bio nanocomposites improved significantly. Hence, SPS/SPNCCs bionanocomposite showed good biodegradable and WVP properties for food packaging applications. The main objective is to minimize the production and material costs of these nanocomposites so that they can compete with synthetic polymers. To address these obstacles, researchers continue to develop innovative methods for making food packaging materials without neglecting food packaging safety.
Corn Starch Film
In another research work, by introducing immobilized bacteria, Bagde et al. [101] created an antibacterial corn starch film with increased. A flexible film was created using corn starch and glycerol. A bio-mechanical technique was used to produce nanocellulose crystals from cotton liners. After then, CNC was added to the corn starch film to increase its mechanical and barrier qualities. Then, as an antibacterial agent, a bacteriocin produced from LAB was put into the starch film to make antibacterial packaging. Incorporating bacteriocin-immobilized nanocellulose crystals into antibacterial films increased TS, antibacterial potential, and biodegradability. The addition of CNC increased the WVP of starch films by 36%, and the addition of BIN increased it by 41%–46%. When bacteriocins were introduced, however, the decrease was 19%–23%. Meanwhile, after including CNC, bacteriocins, and BIN in the films, a drop in WVP was seen, with the least reduction when CNC was introduced and the greatest reduction when bacteriocins were added. Also, the films incorporated with BIN were not spoiled for 28 days. Based on the findings of this study, corn starch film mixed with BIN might be a suitable antibacterial packaging film with better mechanical qualities. Other biopolymers, including chitosan and gelatin, have developed as viable options for petro-based packaging materials that provide the required packaging performance while being biodegradable. Unfortunately, when gelatin and chitosan are used independently for food packaging, they do not meet the food packaging standards due to various deficiencies. To solve this issue, Kumar et al. [105] employed solution casting to effectively produce a hybrid nanocomposite film composed of chitosan (CS), gelatin (GL), polyethylene glycol, and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The use of AgNPs as a filler in CS-GL biocomposite improved the antibacterial activities, thermal, mechanical, and barrier potential of the film. Several films with varying levels of chitosan and AgNPs were created in this work. The addition of silver nanoparticles improved mechanical properties and decreased transparency in the visible light region. The analysis shows that the TS decreases, whereas the percentage elongation at break increases when AgNPs concentration in the films increases. TheTS and extensibility of film are essential in determining its capacity to preserve integrity in the face of external stress factors involved with packaging applications. The storage time of red grapes covered in the developed CS-GL-AgNPs hybrid film was investigated with plastic wrap as a control to assess its potential food packaging applicability. Figure 7 shows red grapes covered in films for 14 days of storage at 37 ℃. The red grapes coated with the CS-GL-AgNPs hybrid film stayed fresh and free of odours, while the surface remained smooth and free of juice leakage. The findings suggest that the CS-GL-AgNPs hybrid films produced might be a suitable food packaging material capable of protecting food from microbial contamination and extending its shelf life.
Compatibility Issue Between Biopolymers and NFs Materials
Biopolymers and natural fibers (NFs) have been widely used in composite materials due to their biodegradable nature and excellent mechanical properties. However, biocompatibility is major drawback fibers face due to improper wetting and improper bonding to the composite, leading to poor performance [14]. The choice of biopolymer and NF material depends on their compatibility, which plays a crucial role in determining the final properties of the composite product. Compatibility issues between biopolymers and NF materials:
The main compatibility issue between biopolymers and NF materials is their lack of intermolecular interactions [106]. Biopolymers are typically hydrophilic and have a high affinity for water molecules, while NF materials are typically hydrophobic and have a low affinity for water. This leads to poor wetting of the NF material by the biopolymer, resulting in weak adhesion and poor dispersion of the NF material in the biopolymer matrix. This, in turn, leads to poor mechanical properties of the composite product [106]. Another common compatibility issue is the difference in polarity between the biopolymer and NF material. Biopolymers are typically polar, while NF materials are nonpolar. This leads to a difference in surface energy between the two materials, leading to poor wetting and adhesion [107].
To improve their compatibility and dispersion and distribution into an organic medium, two different strategies are usually practiced, specifically: (i) introduction of compatibilizing agents; for example, modified polymers containing polar groups [108], and (ii) chemical modification including,alkaline treatment/mercerization [109], acetylation treatment/esterification [110], silane treatment [111], benzoylation treatment [112], permanganate treatment [113], peroxide treatment [114] and maleated coupling agents [115]. When fiber surfaces are chemically treated, the chemicals enhance the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the fibers, inhibiting fiber dispersion within the polymer matrix. Many researchers stated chemical treatments to improve fiber strength, fiber stiffness, and adhesion between fiber and matrix of natural fiber-reinforced composites [109,105,106,107,108,109,115] (Table 6).
Industrial and Commercialization of Natural Fiber
Plant-based NFs are becoming increasingly popular as a sustainable alternative to synthetic materials for food packaging [116]. The industrial importance of plant-based natural fibers for food packaging lies in their environmental sustainability, biodegradability, and renewability [117]. Unlike synthetic materials, plant-based NFs are not derived from non-renewable resources and do not create as much environmental waste. In addition, they are biodegradable and can be composted, reducing the impact on landfills and the environment [118].
Plant-based natural fibers can be commercialized by using them to create a range of food packaging products such as bags, pouches, and containers. These products can be marketed to businesses in the food industry, such as grocery stores, restaurants, and food manufacturers. Additionally, consumers are becoming more conscious about the environmental impact of their purchases and are willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly products. Besides that, according to Martins [119], many customers are willing to pay more for sustainable products with high-quality, environmentally friendly packaging. Furthermore, sustainable products can be profitable. In the UK, the market for such goods was valued at £41 billion (approximately $56 billion) in 2019, indicating significant potential for financial gain. Similarly, in India, sales of organic and sustainable products have grown by 13% since 2018. As environmental concerns continue to rise on a worldwide level, an increasing number of companies are becoming more mindful of how the purchasing decisions of consumers can impact the environment. As such, they are placing more emphasis on promoting eco-friendly products and taking note of consumer behavior in this regard.
Sun and Yoon [120] conducted a study on a new theory-driven approach to understanding what makes consumers purchase eco-friendly products at a premium price. It draws on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). It employs variables such as attitude toward eco-friendly companies, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, ethical consumption consciousness, etc., to validate the factors affecting consumer behavior towards eco-friendly products. The results indicate that attitudes towards environmentally friendly products and ethical consumption consciousness positively impact the intention to buy them at higher prices. Therefore, marketing plant-based natural fiber food packaging to consumers can also be a lucrative strategy [121]. Motivating the industrial sector towards biopolymer food packaging can involve several strategies, including:
-
1.
Raising awareness: Educate the industry about the benefits of biopolymer food packaging, such as reduced environmental impact, cost-effectiveness, and improved consumer perception. This can be done through workshops, seminars, and other forms of outreach.
-
2.
Providing incentives: Offer incentives to companies that switch to biopolymer food packagings, such as tax breaks or grants. This can encourage companies to make the change by offsetting the costs associated with transitioning to new packaging material.
-
3.
Collaboration: Foster collaboration between stakeholders, including suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors, to develop and implement sustainable biopolymer food packaging solutions that meet the needs of the industry.
-
4.
Regulatory support: Provide regulatory support by creating policies that mandate the use of biopolymer food packaging or incentivize its use. This can provide a framework that encourages companies to switch to biopolymer packaging.
-
5.
Highlighting successful case studies: Highlight successful case studies where companies have switched to biopolymer food packaging and seen positive results, such as increased sales or reduced environmental impact. This can help demonstrate the benefits of biopolymer food packaging and encourage others to change.
To successfully commercialize plant-based natural fiber food packaging, it is important to consider cost, durability, and performance factors. The cost of production and the durability of the packaging are important considerations for businesses looking to switch to more sustainable options. Additionally, the packaging should be able to perform its intended function, such as preserving the freshness of the food and preventing contamination [122]. Overall, motivating the industrial sector towards biopolymer food packaging will require a multi-faceted approach that addresses the economic, environmental, and social benefits of such a shift.
Challenges and Future Perspective
Despite the advantages of using NFs in packaging systems, there are also some challenges.
-
1.
NFs are hydrophilic that cause moisture absorption and, consequently, swelling of the fibers, although, in the context of the materials for respiring food packaging, this property is considered an advantage. The polymers have hydrophobic properties, so their fiber affinity is weak. The good interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the filler is a key factor associated with the processing and production of composites. So, there is always a challenge of affinity of fibers to polymer matrices.
-
2.
Compared to synthetic materials, natural fibers may not be as strong and durable, which can affect the overall performance of the packaging. Additional processing and treatment may be required to improve their strength and durability, which can increase costs.
-
3.
Natural fibers can be more prone to contamination by bacteria, fungi, or other microorganisms, which can affect the hygiene and safety of the packaged products. Special precautions may be required to prevent contamination during processing and storage.
-
4.
Further, there is a research gap regarding the safety, durability, and especially recyclability of NFs-reinforced polymer composites. The major technical challenges for recycling and application of NFs-reinforced polymer composites that need to be addressed include polymer and fiber degradation, high moisture content, flammability, variation in the natural fiber composition, and poor bonding between hydrophilic fibers and hydrophobic polymers.
-
5.
A major challenge for external recycling of NFs-reinforced polymer composites is the contamination and immiscibility of polymers during recycling.
There is a future need to modify the NFs by chemical or physical means to impact the production of composites positively. Interesting materials that can be used in the food packaging industry are hybrid materials, such as nano clay/natural fibers filled composites with the polymeric matrix. This kind of composite is usually characterized by combining the advantages of components with eliminating their disadvantages. Future work must be performed to investigate more effective additives to improve composite properties. Fundamental research on the fiber-matrix interface for improving interfacial adhesion is necessary.
Conclusion
The present food packaging situation relies mostly on synthetic plastics derived from petroleum. As a result, excessive pressure is placed on using non-renewable fossil resources, and the non-biodegradable nature of these polymers makes municipal trash disposal extremely problematic. All these difficulties need the search for biodegradable alternatives that can handle them all simultaneously. NFs have shown great potential to replace synthetic fibers in packaging applications. They offer several advantages, such as renewability, biodegradability, and low cost, making them a sustainable and eco-friendly option. Various NFs such as jute, kenaf, sisal, and hemp have been used in combination with biopolymers to produce composites with excellent mechanical properties. However, the compatibility issue between biopolymers and NFs can lead to poor dispersion and weak adhesion resulting in decreased mechanical properties. Modifications of NFs have been used to improve the compatibility between biopolymers and NFs, leading to improved functionality of composite material. With ongoing research and development, NFs are expected to become even more prevalent in the packaging industry leading to a more sustainable future.
References
Mistry PA, Konar MN, Latha S, Chadha U, Bhardwaj P, Eticha TK (2023) Chitosan superabsorbent biopolymers in sanitary and hygiene applications. Int J Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4717905
Aaliya B, Sunooj KV, Lackner M (2021) Biopolymer composites: a review. Int J Biobased Plast 3(1):40–84
Spierling S, Knüpffer E, Behnsen H, Mudersbach M, Krieg H, Springer S et al (2018) Bio-based plastics-a review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J Clean Prod 185:476–491
Li M, Pu Y, Thomas VM, Yoo CG, Ozcan S, Deng Y et al (2020) Recent advancements of plant-based natural fiber–reinforced composites and their applications. Compos Part B: Eng 200:108254
Akter T, Hossain MS (2021) Application of plant fibers in environmental friendly composites for developed properties: a review. Clean Mater 2:100032
Bangar SP, Harussani MM, Ilyas RA, Ashogbon AO, Singh A, Trif M, Jafari SM (2022) Surface modifications of cellulose nanocrystals: processes, properties, and applications. Food Hydrocoll 130:107689
Bangar SP, Whiteside WS, Dunno KD, Cavender GA, Dawson P, Love R (2022) Starch-based bio-nanocomposites films reinforced with cellulosic nanocrystals extracted from Kudzu (Pueraria montana) vine. Int J Biol Macromol 203:350–360
Geremew A, De Winne P, Adugna T, de Backer H (2021) An overview of the characterization of natural cellulosic fibers. Key Eng Mater 881:107–116
de Carvalho C, Benini KC, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH, Milanese AC, Ornaghi HL (2017) Characterization of a New lignocellulosic fiber from Brazil: Imperata brasiliensis (Brazilian Satintail) as an alternative source for nanocellulose extraction. J Nat Fibers 14(1):112–125
Vijay R, Lenin Singaravelu D, Vinod A, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Jawaid M et al (2019) Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fibers from Tridax procumbens. Int J Biol Macromol 125:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056
Manimaran P, Saravanan SP, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Jawaid M, Khan A (2019) Characterization of new cellulosic fiber: Dracaena reflexa as a reinforcement for polymer composite structures. J Market Res 8(2):1952–1963
Vijay R, Singaravelu DL, Vinod A, Paul Raj IDF, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S (2019) Characterization of novel natural fiber from Saccharum bengalense Grass (Sarkanda). J Nat Fibers 17:1739–1747
SudamraoGetme A, Patel B (2020) A Review: bio-fiber’s as reinforcement in composites of polylactic acid (PLA). Mater Today: Proc 26:2116–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.457
Vinod A, Sanjay MR, Suchart S, Jyotishkumar P (2020) Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: an assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. J Clean Prod 258:120978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978
do Nascimento HM, dos Santos A, Duarte VA, Bittencourt PRS, Radovanovic E, Fávaro SL (2021) Characterization of natural cellulosic fibers from Yucca aloifolia L. leaf as potential reinforcement of polymer composites. Cellulose 28(9):5477–5492
Hosseini SB (2020) Natural fiber polymer nanocomposites. In: Fiber reinforced nanocomposites fundamentals and applications, Elsevier, pp. 279–299
Azammi AMN, Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ibrahim R, Atikah MSN, Asrofi M, Atiqah A (2020) Characterization studies of biopolymeric matrix and cellulose fibres based composites related to functionalized fibre-matrix interface. In: Goh KL, De Silva RT, Thomas S (eds) Interfaces in Particle and Fibre Reinforced Composites. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 29–93
French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896
French AD (2020) Increment in evolution of cellulose crystallinity analysis. Cellulose 27(10):5445–5448
Segal L (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794
Hermans PH, Weidinger A (1948) Quantitative X-ray investigations on the crystallinity of cellulose fibers: a background analysis. J Appl Phys 19:491–506
Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 2:65–71
Scherrer P (1918) Bestimmung der Gro¨sse und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Ro¨ntgenstrahlen (Determination of the size and internal structure of colloid particles using X-rays). Go¨ttinger Nachrichten Gesell, 2: 98–100.
French AD, Santiago Cintro’n M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20:583–588
Ray D, Sarkar BK, Basak RK, Rana AK (2002) Study of the thermal behavior of alkali-treated jute fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 85:2594–2599
Terzopoulou ZN, Papageorgiou GZ, Papadopoulou E, Athanassiadou E, Alexopoulou E, Bikiaris DN (2015) Green composites prepared from aliphatic polyesters and bast fibers. Ind Crops Prod 68:60–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.034
Shahinur S, Hasan M (2019) Jute/Coir/Banana fiber reinforced bio-composites: critical review of design, fabrication, properties and applications.
Mohamed SAN, Zainudin ES, Sapuan SM, Azaman MD, Arifin AMT (2018) Introduction to natural fiber reinforced vinyl ester and vinyl polymer composites. In: Sapuan SM, Ismail H, Zainudin ES (eds) Natural fibre reinforced vinyl ester and vinyl polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 1–25
Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596
Zhu J, Zhu H, Njuguna J, Abhyankar H (2013) Recent development of flax fibres and their reinforced composites based on different polymeric matrices. Materials 6:5171–5198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6115171
Varghese AM, Mittal V (2018) Polymer composites with functionalized natural fibers. In: Shimpi N (ed) Biodegradable and biocompatible polymer composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 157–186
Réquilé S, Le Duigou A, Bourmaud A, Baley C (2018) Peeling experiments for hemp retting characterization targeting biocomposites. Ind Crops Prod 123:573–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018
Behera AK, Avancha S, Basak RK, Sen R, Adhikari B (2012) Fabrication and characterizations of biodegradable jute reinforced soy based green composites. Carbohyd Polym 88(1):329–335
Yang G, Park M, Park S-J (2019) Recent progresses of fabrication and characterization of fibers-reinforced composites: a review. Compos Commun 14:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2019.05.004
Broeren MLM, Dellaert SNC, Cok B, Patel MK, Worrell E, Shen L (2017) Life cycle assessment of sisal fibre—Exploring how local practices can influence environmental performance. J Clean Prod 149:818–827
Aslan M, Tufan M, Küçükömeroğlu T (2018) Tribological and mechanical performance of sisal-filled waste carbon and glass fiber hybrid composites. Compos B Eng 140:241–249
Naveen J, Jawaid M, Amuthakkannan P, Chandrasekar M (2019) Mechanical and physical properties of sisal and hybrid sisal fiber-reinforced polymer composites. In: Jawaid M, Thariq M, Saba N (eds) Mechanical and physical testing of biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 427–440
Sanjay MR, Yogesha B (2017) Studies on natural/glass fiber reinforced polymer hybrid composites: an evolution. Mater Today: Proc 4(2):2739–2747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.151
Pham LJ (2016) Coconut (Cocos nucifera). In: McKeon TA, Hayes DG, Hildebrand DF, Weselake RJ (eds) Industrial oil crops. AOCS Press, Urbana, pp 231–242
Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J (2010) Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41(4):480–488
Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP (1999) The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok for composite reinforcement. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 272(1):108–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19991201)272:1%3c108::AID-APMC108%3e3.0.CO;2-9
Oksman K, Bengtsson M (2007) Wood fibre composites processing properties and future developments Engineering biopolymers homopolymers blends and composites. Hanser, Munchen, pp 755–761
Dittenber DB, GangaRao HVS (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43(8):1419–1429
Silva G, Kim S, Aguilar R, Nakamatsu J (2020) Natural fibers as reinforcement additives for geopolymers—A review of potential eco-friendly applications to the construction industry. Sustain Mater Technol 23:e00132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00132
Khalid MY, Al Rashid A, Arif ZU, Ahmed W, Arshad H, Zaidi AA (2021) Natural fiber reinforced composites: sustainable materials for emerging applications. Results Eng 11:100263
Fuqua MA, Huo S, Ulven CA (2012) Natural fiber reinforced composites. Polym Rev 52(3):259–320
Gupta PK, Raghunath SS, Prasanna DV, Venkat P, Shree V, Chithananthan C et al (2019) An update on overview of cellulose, its structure and applications. In: Martín MEE, Pascual AR (eds) Cellulose. IntechOpen, London
Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (eds) (2005) 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Solihat NS, Sari FP, Falah F, Ismayati M, Lubis MAR, Fatriasari W, Syafii W (2020) Lignin as an active biomaterial: a review. Jurnal Sylva Lestari 9(1):1–22
Azwa ZN, Yousif BF, Manalo AC, Karunasena W (2013) A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Materi Des 47:424–442
Taslima F, Quaiyyum MA, Bashar S, Jahan MS (2020) Anatomical, morphological and chemical characteristics of kaun straw (Seetaria-ltalika). Nord Pulp Pap Res J 35(2):288–298
Wan JinQ, Wang Y, Xiao Q (2010) Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. Biores Technol 101(12):4577–4583
SasaSofyan M (2007) Characterization of the morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of seven non-wood plant fiber bundles. J Wood Sci 53(2):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-006-0836-x
ThyavihalliGirijappa YG, MavinkereRangappa S, Parameswaranpillai J, Siengchin S (2019) Natural fibers as sustainable and renewable resource for development of eco-friendly composites: a comprehensive review. Front Mater 6:226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00226
Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8(5):313–343. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855401753255422
Siakeng R, Jawaid M, Ariffin H, Sapuan SM, Asim M, Saba N (2019) Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: a review. Polym Compos 40(2):446–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24747
Hasan A, Rabbi MS, MarufBillah Md (2022) Making the lignocellulosic fibers chemically compatible for composite: a comprehensive review. Clean Mater 4:100078
Munawar SS, Umemura K, Kawai S (2007) Characterization of the morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of seven non-wood plant fiber bundles. J Wood Sci 53(2):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-006-0836-x
Camargo MM, AdefrsTaye E, Roether JA, TilahunRedda D, Boccaccini AR (2020) A review on natural fiber-reinforced geopolymer and cement-based composites. Materials (Basel) 13(20):4603
Vijay R, Singaravelu DL, Vinod A, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S (2021) Characterization of Alkali-treated and untreated natural fibers from the stem of Parthenium hysterophorus. J Nat Fibers 18(1):80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1612308
Ticoalu A, Aravinthan T, Cardona FP (2010) A review of current development in natural fiber composites for structural and infrastructure applications. Paper presented at the Southern Region Engineering Conference, Toowoomba.
Elanchezhian C, Ramnath BV, Ramakrishnan G, Rajendrakumar M, Naveenkumar V, Saravanakumar MK (2018) Review on mechanical properties of natural fiber composites. Mater Today: Proc 5(1, Part 1):1785–1790
Huang Y, Fei B, Wei P-L, Zhao C (2016) Mechanical properties of bamboo fiber cell walls during the culm development by nanoindentation. Ind Crops Prod 92:102–108
Madueke CI, Mbah OM, Umunakwe R (2022) A review on the limitations of natural fibres and natural fibre composites with emphasis on tensile strength using coir as a case study. Polym Bull 80(4):3489–3506
Ramamoorthy SK, Skrifvars M, Persson A (2015) A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: plant, animal and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polym Rev 55(1):107–162
Karimah A, Ridho MR, Munawar SS, Adi DS, Ismadi D et al (2021) A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations. J Market Res 13:2442–2458
Yamanaka A, Yoshikawa M, Abe S, Tsutsumi M, Oohazama T, Kitagawa T et al (2005) Effects of vapor-phase-formaldehyde treatments on thermal conductivity and diffusivity of ramie fibers in the range of low temperature. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43(19):2754–2766. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.20563
Sudjindro M (2011) Prospek serat alam untuk bahan baku kertas uang. Perspektif 10(2):92–104
Campilho RDSG (ed) (2015) 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Sapuan SM, Leenie A, Harimi M, Beng YK (2006) Mechanical properties of woven banana fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Des 27(8):689–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.016
Hariprasad K, Ravichandran K, Jayaseelan V, Muthuramalingam T (2020) Acoustic and mechanical characterisation of polypropylene composites reinforced by natural fibres for automotive applications. J Market Res 9(6):14029–14035
Jawaid M, Swain SK (2017) Bionanocomposites for packaging applications. Bionanocompos Packag Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67319-6
Liu Y, Ahmed S, Sameen DE, Wang Y, Lu R, Dai J, Li S, Qin W (2021) A review of cellulose and its derivatives in biopolymer-based for food packaging application. Trends Food Sci Technol 112:532–546
Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, Parameswaranpillai J, Jawaid M, Ozbakkaloglu T (2022) Lignocellulosic fiber reinforced composites: progress, performance, properties, applications, and future perspectives. Polym Compos 43(2):645–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26413
Kumari N, Bangar SP, Petrů M, Ilyas RA, Singh A, Kumar P (2021) Development and characterization of fenugreek protein-based edible film. Foods 10(9):1976
PuniaBangar S, Nehra M, Siroha AK, Petrů M, Ilyas RA, Devi U, Devi P (2021) Development and characterization of physical modified pearl millet starch-based films. Foods 10(7):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071609
Sanjay MR, Siengchin S (2021) Exploring the applicability of natural fibers for the development of biocomposites. Express Polym Lett 15(3):193–193. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.17
Sánchez-Safont EL, Aldureid A, Lagarón JM, Gámez-Pérez J, Cabedo L (2018) Biocomposites of different lignocellulosic wastes for sustainable food packaging applications. Compos B Eng 145:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2018.03.037
Sanyang ML, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, Ishak MR, Sahari J (2016) Development and characterization of sugar palm starch and poly(lactic acid) bilayer films. Carbohyd Polym 146:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.051
Chadha U, Bhardwaj P, Selvaraj SK, Arasu K, Praveena S, Pavan A, et al. (2022) Current trends and future perspectives of nanomaterials in food packaging application. J Nanomater, 1–32.
Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Atiqah A, Ibrahim R, Abral H, Ishak MR, Zainudin ES, Nurazzi NM, Atikah MSN, Ansari MNM, Asyraf MRM, Supian ABM, Ya H (2020) Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata [Wurmb.] Merr) starch films containing sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose as reinforcement: Water barrier properties. Polym Compos, 41(2).
Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ibrahim R, Abral H, Ishak MR, Zainudin ES, Atikah MSN, MohdNurazzi N, Atiqah A, Ansari MNM, Syafri E, Asrofi M, Sari NH, Jumaidin R (2019) Effect of sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose concentrations on morphological, mechanical and physical properties of biodegradable films based on agro-waste sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr) starch. J Mater Res Technol 8(5):4819–4830
AG Soares da Silva F, Matos M, Dourado F, AM Reis M, C Branco P, Poças F, Gama M (2022) Development of a layered bacterial nanocellulose-PHBV composite for food packaging. J Sci Food Agric. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11839
Gupta A, Lolic L, Mekonnen TH (2022) Reactive extrusion of highly filled, compatibilized, and sustainable PHBV/PBAT—Hemp residue biocomposite. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 156:106885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106885
Kliem S, Kreutzbruck M, Bonten C (2020) Review on the biological degradation of polymers in various environments. Materials 13(20):1–18
Berthet MA, Angellier-Coussy H, Machado D, Hilliou L, Staebler A, Vicente A, Gontard N (2015) Exploring the potentialities of using lignocellulosic fibres derived from three food by-products as constituents of biocomposites for food packaging. Ind Crops Prod 69:110–122
Riyajan SA, Traitananan K (2020) Fabrication and properties of macrocellular modified natural rubber-poly (vinyl alcohol) foam for organic solvent/oil absorption. Ind Crops Prod 153:112404
Reichert CL, Bugnicourt E, Coltelli MB, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A, Canesi I, Braca F, Martínez BM, Alonso R, Agostinis L, Verstichel S, Six L, Mets SD, Gómez EC, Ißbrücker C, Geerinck R, Nettleton DF, Campos I, Sauter E, Pieczyk P, Schmid M (2020) Bio-basedpackaging: Materials, modifications, industrial applications and sustainability. Polymers 12(7):1558
Ochoa-Yepes O, Medina-Jaramillo C, Guz L, Famá L (2018) Biodegradable and edible starch composites with fiber-rich lentil flour to use as food packaging. Starch/Starke
Salwa HN, Sapuan SM, Mastura MT, Zuhri MYM (2019) Green bio composites for food packaging. Int J Recent Technol Eng 8(2 Special Issue 4):450–459. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1088.0782S419
Salwa HN, Sapuan SM, Mastura MT, Zuhri MYM (2021) Conceptual design and selection of natural fibre reinforced biopolymer composite (NFBC) takeout food container. J Renew Mater 9(4):803. https://doi.org/10.3204/jrm.2021.013977
Alemam A, Li S (2016) Matrix-based quality tools for concept generation in eco-design. Concurr Eng 24(2):113–128
Asyraf MRM, Ishak MR, Sapuan SM, Yidris N (2019) Conceptual design of creep testing rig for full-scale cross arm using TRIZ-Morphological chart-analytic network process technique. J Market Res 8(6):5647–5658
Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, Zainudin ES (2018) Sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch composite: Degradation and water-barrier properties. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 368(1):012006
Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR, Zainudin ESD (2018) Development and characterization of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch bionanocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 202(May):186–202
Nazrin A, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, Tawakkal ISMA, Ilyas RA (2021) Water barrier and mechanical properties of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites. Nanotechnol Rev 10(1):431–442. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2021-0033
Nazrin A, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, Tawakkal ISMA, Ilyas RA (2022) Flammability and physical stability of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch/poly (lactic acid) blend bionanocomposites. Nanotechnol Rev 11:86–95
Syafiq RMO, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, Othman SH, Ilyas RA (2022) Effect of plasticizers on the properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/cinnamon essential oil reinforced starch bionanocomposite films. Nanotechnol Rev 11(1):423–437. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0028
Hachaichi A, Kouini B, Kian LK, Asim M, Fouad H, Jawaid M, Sain M (2021) Nanocrystalline cellulose from microcrystalline cellulose of date palm fibers as a promising candidate for bio-nanocomposites: isolation and characterization. Materials 14(18):1–12
Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Kiziltas A, Cai Z, Tshabalala MA (2013) Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20:2379–2392
Bagde P, Nadanathangam V (2019) Mechanical, antibacterial and biodegradable properties of starch film containing bacteriocin immobilized crystalline nanocellulose. Carbohyd Polym 222(April):115021
Montero B, Rico M, Rodríguez-Llamazares S, Barral L, Bouza R (2017) Effect of nanocellulose as a filler on biodegradable thermoplastic starch films from tuber, cereal and legume. Carbohyd Polym 157:1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.073
Nazrin A, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, Ilyas RA, Syafiq R, Sherwani SFK (2020) Nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch (TPS), polylactic acid (PLA), and polybutylene succinate (PBS) for food packaging applications. Front Chem 8(213):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00213
Travalini AP, Prestes E, Pinheiro LA, Demiate IM (2017) Extraction and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from Cassava Bagasse. J Polym Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-0983-8
Kumar S, Shukla A, Baul PP, Mitra A, Halder D (2018) Biodegradable hybrid nanocomposites of chitosan/gelatin and silver nanoparticles for active food packaging applications. Food Packag Shelf Life 16:178–184
Dintcheva NT, Infurna G, Baiamonte M, D’Anna F (2020) Natural compounds as sustainable additives for biopolymers. Polymers 12(4):732
Shahzad A, Tanasa F, Teaca CA (eds) (2022). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
Imre B, Pukánszky B (2013) Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends. Eur Polymer J 49(6):1215–1233
Mbeche SM, Omara T (2020) Effects of alkali treatment on the mechanical and thermal properties of sisal/cattail polyester commingled composites. Peer J Mater Sci 2:e5
Chung TJ, Park JW, Lee HJ, Kwon HJ, Kim HJ, Lee YK, Tze TY, Tai Yin Tze W (2018) The improvement of mechanical properties, thermal stability, and water absorption resistance of an eco-friendly PLA/kenaf biocomposite using acetylation. Appl Sci 8(3):376
Hong H, Xiao R, Guo Q, Liu H, Zhang H (2019) Quantitively characterizing the chemical composition of tailored bagasse fiber and its effect on the thermal and mechanical properties of polylactic acid-based composites. Polymers 11(10):1567
Singhal P, Tiwari SK (2014) Effect of various chemical treatments on the damping property of jute fibre reinforced composite. Int J Adv Mech Eng 4(4):413–424
Vidyashri V, Lewis H, Narayanasamy P, Mahesha GT, Bhat KS (2019) Preparation of chemically treated sugarcane bagasse fiber reinforced epoxy composites and their characterization. Cogent Eng 6(1):1708644
Razak NIA, Ibrahim NA, Zainuddin N, Rayung M, Saad WZ (2014) The influence of chemical surface modification of kenaf fiber using hydrogen peroxide on the mechanical properties of biodegradable kenaf fiber/poly (lactic acid) composites. Molecules 19(3):2957–2968
Zhang L, Lv S, Sun C, Wan L, Tan H, Zhang Y (2017) Effect of MAH-g-PLA on the properties of wood fiber/polylactic acid composites. Polymers 9(11):591
Hazrati KZ, Sapuan SM, Ilyas RA (2019) Biobased food packaging using natural fibre : a review. Pros. Semin. Enau Kebangs. Institute of Tropical Forest and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bahau, pp. 140–142
Versino F, Ortega F, Monroy Y, Rivero S, López OV, García MA (2023) Sustainable and bio-based food packaging: a review on past and current design innovations. Foods 12(5):1057
Coppola G, Gaudio MT, Lopresto CG, Calabro V, Curcio S, Chakraborty S (2021) Bioplastic from renewable biomass: a facile solution for a greener environment. Earth Syst Environ 5:231–251
Martins A, (2019) Most consumers want sustainable products and packaging. Businessnewsdaily. com.
Sun ZQ, Yoon SJ (2022) What makes people pay premium price for eco-friendly products? The effects of ethical consumption consciousness, CSR, and product quality. Sustainability 14(23):15513
Varghese SA, Pulikkalparambil H, Promhuad K, Srisa A, Laorenza Y, Jarupan L et al (2023) Renovation of Agro-Waste for sustainable food packaging: a Review. Polymers 15(3):648
Wandosell G, Parra-Meroño MC, Alcayde A, Baños R (2021) Green packaging from consumer and business perspectives. Sustainability 13(3):1356
Sisti L, Totaro G, Vannini M, Celli A (2018) Retting process as a pretreatment of natural fibers for the development of polymer composites. In: Kalia S (ed) Lignocellulosic composite materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 97–135
Tavares TD, Antunes JC, Ferreira F, Felgueiras HP (2020) Biofunctionalization of natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for biomedical applications. Biomolecules 10(1):148
Ntenga R, Saidjo S, Wakata A, Djoda P, Tango M, Mfoumou E (2022) Extraction, Applications and Characterization of Plant Fibers.
Hattalli S, Benaboura A, Ham-Pichavant F, Nourmamode A, Castellan A (2002) Adding value to Alfa grass (Stipa tenacissima L.) soda lignin as phenolic resins 1 lignin characterization. Polym Degrad Stab 76:259–264
Khan A, Vijay R, Singaravelu DL, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Jawaid M et al (2020) Extraction and characterization of natural fibers from Citrullus lanatus climber. J Nat Fibers 19:621–629
Maran M, Kumar R, Senthamaraikannan P, Saravanakumar SS, Nagarajan S, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S (2020) Suitability evaluation of Sida mysorensis plant fiber as reinforcement in polymer composite. J Nat Fibers 19(5):1659–1669
Rowell RM (2014) The use of biomass to produce bio-based composites and building materials. In: Waldron K (ed) Advances in Biorefineries. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 803–818
Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS (2011) Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Carbohyd Polym 86(1):1–18
Khan A, Raghunathan V, Singaravelu DL, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S, Jawaid M et al (2022) Extraction and characterization of cellulose fibers from the stem of Momordica Charantia. J Nat Fibers 19(6):2232–2242
Malkapuram R, Kumar V, Negi YS (2008) Recent development in natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 28(10):1169–1189
Funding
No funding was received for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, analysis, and the first draft of the manuscript were performed by SPB, NC, RAI, and AC, SPB and JML reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Human and Animal Rights
This research contains no experiments with human participants or animals.
Consent to Participations
All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with submission to Cellulose.
Consent to Publications
This work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it under consideration by another journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Punia Bangar, S., Ilyas, R.A., Chaudhary, N. et al. Plant-Based Natural Fibers For Food Packaging: A Green Approach To The Reinforcement of Biopolymers. J Polym Environ 31, 5029–5049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-023-02849-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-023-02849-3