Abstract
The aim of this work is to present a new genus and species of Dasypodidae from the Lumbrera Formation (“lower Lumbrera”), early-middle Eocene of Salta Province, northwest Argentina. The new taxon, documented by one specimen, consists of an incomplete skull and jaw with teeth housed in their alveoli, postcranial remains, and isolated osteoderms. Lumbreratherium oblitum, gen. et sp. nov., is characterized by heterodont dentition, with a caniniform as the first tooth, diastema between caniniform and first molariform, teeth with closed roots, and a peculiar morphology of the osteoderms. A phylogenetic analysis indicates that Lumbreratherium oblitum, gen. et sp. nov., and Pucatherium parvum belong to a monophyletic clade in a basal position within the Cingulata. The singularity of the morphological characteristics of these Paleogene armadillos of northwest Argentina reinforces the hypothesis of an intertropical origin of mammal clades different from those of the Paleogene in more austral regions of Argentina.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Xenarthra is a very peculiar group of the Neotropical fauna, with a long and successful evolutionary history during the Cenozoic in South America. The group is represented from the late Paleocene or early Eocene up to the present (Scillato--Yané 1976; Oliveira and Bergqvist 1998; Bergqvist et al. 2004; Gelfo et al. 2009). The early divergence of Xenarthra within placentals could have occurred during the Early Cretaceous (Delsuc et al. 2001, 2004; Kemp 2005; Rose and Archibald 2005; Meredith et al. 2011; dos Reis et al. 2012 ), although paleontological evidence does not support this hypothesis.
The armadillos represent the most diverse assemblage within the Xenarthra, with 13 genera and 31 species (Gaudin and Wible 2006; Delsuc and Douzery 2008). The group includes armored forms (Cingulata) and sloths and anteaters (Pilosa). Five families are recognized in Cingulata: Dasypodidae, Peltephilidae, Glyptodontidae, Pampatheriidae, and Palaeopeltidae (Carlini et al. 2008; Góis et al. 2013). Several morphological features support the monophyly of Cingulata (Gaudin and Wible 2006), but the relationships between these families are far from being resolved.
The oldest record of Cingulata is represented by dasypodid remains from the Itaboraian SALMA, late Paleocene (Cifelli 1983; Oliveira and Bergqvist 1998; Bergqvist et al. 2004) or early Eocene (Gelfo et al. 2009; Woodburne et al. 2014) of Brazil. One important feature of Dasypodidae is the presence of a dorsal armor integrated by independent but articulated osteoderms, which are frequently found and have a high diagnostic value (Scillato-Yané 1982; Krmpotic et al. 2009; Fernicola and Vizcaíno 2008).
Paleogene dasypodids from Patagonia, Bolivia, Peru, Brazil, and Chile have been the focus of several studies including osteology, systematics, and phylogenetics, and have also been employed in paleoenvironmental and stratigraphical studies (Cifelli 1985; Scillato-Yané 1986; Vizcaíno 1994; Oliveira and Bergqvist 1998; Bergqvist et al. 2004; Gaudin and Wible 2006; Croft et al. 2007; Ciancio and Carlini 2008; Carlini et al. 2009, 2010, 2013; Billet et al. 2011; Ciancio et al. 2012, 2013; Castro et al. 2013). However, dasypodid fossil records for the Paleogene of northwest Argentina are relatively scarce and mostly consist of isolated osteoderms (Pascual and Vucetich 1981; Alonso et al. 1988; López 1997). In the last decade, important evidence was obtained from findings in the Lumbrera (Salta Group), Casa Grande, Quebrada de los Colorados (Payogastilla Group), and Geste formations (Pastos Grandes Group) (Herrera and Powell 2007, 2009, 2013; Herrera et al. 2010, 2012; Herrera 2013). The dasypodids collected in these formations have increased our knowledge about northwest Argentina Paleogene faunistic associations (Powell et al. 2011; Ciancio et al. in press). Recently, a peculiar dasypodid Pucatherium parvum was described, based on associated osteoderms (Herrera et al. 2012).
The aim of this work is to present a new genus and species of Dasypodidae from the early-middle Eocene of northwest Argentina found in 1977. The fossil remains, which come from the Lumbrera Formation (“lower Lumbrera”) in Salta Province, are represented by an incomplete skull, jaw with teeth, postcranial remains, and isolated osteoderms. This finding is significant, because it has preserved the first known cranium for a dasypodid of this age. In addition, we perform a phylogenetic analysis to determine the relationships of this new taxon.
Materials and Methods
The specimen studied, PVL 4262, includes the left side of a partial skull, an almost complete jaw from which only the anterior region of the symphysis is missing, the upper and lower teeth in their alveoli, and postcranial remains. The last includes the atlas and axis, six lumbar and one caudal vertebrae, ribs, the sternum, the proximal region of the ulna, tibia, and fibula, one metacarpal, and three ungual phalanges. Isolated movable osteoderms have also been preserved.
The terminology used for skull descriptions follows the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria ( 2005) and Wible and Gaudin (2004). The abbreviation for the molariform upper teeth is Mf. In order to describe the osteoderms, we followed Hill (2006), Krmpotic et al. (2009), and Herrera et al. (2012). For the descriptions of the step-like structure in the lateral side of the movable osteoderms, we name the horizontal surface as “tread” and the vertical surface as “rise.”
A phylogenetic analysis of 23 taxa and 144 characters was performed for identifying phylogenetic relationships between the new fossil armadillo from the Lumbrera Formation and Pucatherium parvum, and their associations within the Dasypodidae. The ingroup is represented by 18 dasypodid genera (fossil and extant), one peltephilid, one pampatheriid, and one glyptodont, whereas the outgroup is integrated by the Folivora Bradypus and Paramylodon, following Gaudin and Wible (2006), Gaudin and Bramblett (2010), and Ciancio (2010) (Appendix 1). Twenty-one characters of the carapace and the osteoderm external morphology, and 123 craniodental characters were selected. Characters were selected from Carlini and Scillato-Yané (1996), Gaudin and Wible (2006), Abrantes and Bergqvist (2006), and Billet et al. (2011), although some of them were modified as indicated in the character list. In addition, we present 16 new characters (Appendix 2).
Characters that could not be directly observed were scored from descriptions and illustrations by Scott (1903–5), Stock (1925), Castellano (1958), Patterson et al. (1989), and Vizcaíno and Bargo (1998) (Appendix 1). The data matrix (Appendix 3) was analyzed with TNT 1.1 (Goloboff et al. 2008); heuristic searches were performed under the maximum parsimony criterium, followed by branch swapping through tree bisection reconnection. Fifteen characters were treated as additive. Support indices were calculated with the same program using Bremer supports.
Institutional Abbreviations – AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York, U.S.A.; CML, Colección de Mastozoología Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina; FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, U.S.A.; LACM, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Country, Los Angeles, U.S.A.; MANC, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Buenos Aires, Argentina; MCL, Museu de Ciencias Naturais da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; MNRJ, Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; MPL, Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; PVL, Paleontología Vertebrados Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina; YPM-PU, Princeton University collection housed at the Yale Peabody Museum, Yale University, New Haven, U.S.A.
Geology
The fossil material was collected in 1977 by Dr. José Bonaparte and his team in Pampa Grande locality (Salta Province). It was recovered in the lower deposits of the Lumbrera Formation, identified as “lower Lumbrera” (del Papa 2006), exposed in the Eastern Cordillera of northwest Argentina (Fig. 1).
In Pampa Grande region, the lower Lumbrera Formation has a mean thickness of 150 m and overlies the Maíz Gordo Formation towards the upper Lumbrera through a discontinuity - an omission surface (del Papa et al. 2010). The sedimentary facies are i) metric scale beds of lenticular conglomeratic sandstones to medium-grained sandstones with sharp bases and lateral accretion surfaces, internally trough cross-stratification, climbing ripple structures; ii) heterolithic facies composed of very fine-grained sandstones and red siltstones forming lobulated or tabular bodies; iii) tabular medium- to fine-grained bioturbated sandstones; and iv) sheet-like red mudstone massive, or with paleosols features. The overall sedimentary facies association suggests a fluvial paleoenvironment of meandering type. Meandering systems imply the development of a main, migrating channel with the formation of levee, and fine-grained or cohesive lateral floodplains with vegetation (del Papa 2006). This fluvial system drained to a perennial freshwater lake-Faja Verde lake-characterized by clastic sedimentation and organic-rich facies (del Papa and Quattrocchio 2002). This scenario indicates extensive flat and low areas intensely vegetated, associated with stable water body with free water circulation developed under temperate climatic conditions. Based on the fossil records of mammals and palynomorphs, an early-middle Eocene Age (Casamayoran SALMA – Vacan Subage) is interpreted (Powell et al. 2011).
Systematic Paleontology
Superorder XENARTHRA Cope, 1889
Order CINGULATA Illiger, 1811
Superfamily DASYPODOIDEA Gray, 1821
Family DASYPODIDAE Gray, 1821
Dasypodidae incerte sedis Lumbreratherium, gen. nov.
Type Species
Lumbreratherium oblitum, sp. nov.
Diagnosis
As for the single included species described below
Etymology
Lumbrera from the Lumbrera Formation, where the specimen was recovered, + ‘therium’ from the greek therion, ‘beast’, a common generic suffix for mammalian taxa Lumbreratherium oblitum, gen. et sp. nov.
Holotype
PVL 4262. An incomplete skull that preserves part of the left side, including the maxilla, lacrimal, jugal, part of the squamosal, the basicranium, both almost complete hemimandibles, upper and lower caniniforms and molariforms. The postcranial elements include atlas and axis, six lumbar and a caudal vertebrae, some ribs, a fragment of sternum, proximal end of ulna, proximal end of tibia-fibula, a metacarpal, three ungual phalanges, and several movable osteoderms.
Etymology
oblitum from the latin ‘oblitum’ forgotten.
Distribution
Early to middle Eocene, Casamayoran SALMA, Vacan subage, Lumbrera Formation (“lower Lumbrera”), Pampa Grande, Guachipas department, Salta Province, Argentina.
Diagnosis
Osteoderms larger than those of Pucatherium parvum, but smaller than those of Utaetus, Peltephilus, and Stegotherium. External surface of the osteoderms less rough than in P. parvum. Anterior articular region with two or three poorly marked longitudinal elevations, separated by wide and shallow grooves, unlike P. parvum, which exhibits well-developed elevations and grooves and unlike the rest of the dasypodids, which present a flat articular region. Lateral surfaces with one step-like structure similar to P. parvum, but closer to the dorsal edge. Subrectangular main figure with rounded corners that do not reach the posterior edge of the osteoderm. Five peripheral figures, three anterior and two lateral. Well-defined grooves demarcating the main figure, with three pairs of foramina symmetrically arranged. In P. parvum the main figure reaches the posterior edge of the osteoderm, and is demarcated by weakly developed grooves with five to seven small perforations, and no peripheral anterior figures are found. Posterior third of the inner surface of the osteoderms with two elevations close to the lateral margins, separated by a wide groove. In P. parvum, on the other hand, the inner surface of the osteoderms exhibits three to four short longitudinal elevations and grooves. Piliferous foramina only on the posterior edge, while in P. parvum they can be found on the posterior and lateral edges. Teeth in L. oblitum are protohypsodont (as in Astegotherium), first pair of teeth is caniniform; large diastema between caniniform and first molariform, unlike other dasypodids; one very large mental foramen; paroccipital process of the petrosal is freestanding, rounded, and rugose; straight and thin jugal.
Description
Osteoderms (Figs. 2, 3, 4)
All the preserved osteoderms are movable. They are sub-quadrangular or sub-rectangular and small, but larger than those of P. parvum. In L. oblitum they vary from 6.14 to 8.20 mm length, 2.90 to 4.05 mm in width and 1.70 to 1.92 mm thick, while in P. parvum they vary from 3.43 to 5.17 mm in length, 2.75 to 3.75 mm in width and 1.09 to 1.89 mm thick. The anterior and posterior margins are almost straight. The exposed surface is less rugose than that of P. parvum and Astegotherium.
The outline of the lateral faces of the osteoderms is rhomboidal as found in Stegotherium pascuali. The lateral surfaces of the osteoderms of L. oblitum exhibit a step-like structure (“sls”) only along the exposed surface (it does not reach the anterior articular region: “aar”) (Figs. 3e, 4e); in contrast, in P. parvum this structure extends all along the lateral surface of the osteoderm (Figs. 3e, 4e). In L. oblitum the “tread” and “riser” are narrower and lower, respectively, than in P. parvum (Fig. 4c-f). The contact between adjacent osteoderms occurs on a flat surface below the step (Fig. 4c, e).
In L. oblitum and P. parvum, the external surface of the anterior articular region (“aar”) presents two or three longitudinal elevations separated by grooves. In L. oblitum these elevations and grooves are less marked than in P. parvum (Fig. 3a–e). In the rest of the dasypodids, the anterior articular region is flat (Fig. 4a). There is no transitional zone, as in P. parvum. On the external surface of the exposed region, the main figure is subrectangular with rounded corners and does not reach the posterior margin of the osteoderm. In P. parvum, this figure is similar but contacts the posterior edge. In L. oblitum, there are five peripheral figures, three anterior and two lateral. The former are small, sub-circular, convex, and delimited by well-defined grooves (Fig. 3a, b). The lateral figures are larger and elongated, accompanying the entire length of the main figure. In P. parvum, there are no anterior figures (Fig. 3e). In L. oblitum, there are three pairs of symmetrically arranged foramina, located in the grooves delimiting the main figure, while in P. parvum they vary from three to five pairs. In L. oblitum, there are few piliferous foramina on the posterior edges, while in P. parvum these are located on the posterior and lateral edges of the osteoderms.
In L. oblitum, two elevations on the posterior third of the internal surface of the osteoderms can be found, situated close to the lateral margins. These are separated by a wide and shallow groove. In some osteoderms, a third shorter prominence developed in this groove is found (Fig. 3c, d). Three to four short and well-marked elevations separated by deep grooves are present in P. parvum (Fig. 3f). The other dasypodids do not present such structures on the internal surface.
Skull (Fig. 5)
The premaxillary is not preserved. The facial surface of the maxilla is smooth. The maxillo-lacrimal and maxillo-jugal sutures are slightly concave, the latter directed obliquely towards the ventral edge of the jugal process, as in Tolypeutes (Fig. 5a).
The maxillary crest is less marked than in Dasypus, Euphractus, and Tolypeutes. It begins at the level of the second molariform and projects towards the base of the zygomatic process of the maxilla, contacting the ventral margin of the lacrimal suture (Fig. 5a). In Dasypus, Euphractus, Chaetophractus, and Macroeuphractus, the ridge continues in a well-defined lacrimal crest.
The infraorbital foramen opens at the level of the anterior margin of the fourth molariform as in Cabassous, and in contrast to Dasypus, Euphractus, Chaetophractus, and Macroeuphractus, in which it opens at the level of the anterior margin of the sixth molariform. A shallow groove is observed anterior to the infraorbital foramen. The maxillary foramen opens in the orbital cavity as in Euphractus, Chaetophractus, and Macroeuphractus, contrasting with D. yepesi, Cabassous, and Priodontes, in which it opens below the ventral margin of the anterior root of the zygomatic arch (Billet et al. 2011). A small, slightly marked concavity for the origin of the masseter muscle is situated on the zygomatic process of the maxilla, ventral to the maxillo-jugal suture.
A small, wedge-shaped fragment of the nasal and of the ventral region of the lacrimal (with no evidence of the lacrimal foramen) has been preserved (Fig. 5 a). The lacrimal portion situated below the maxillary crest is smaller than in Dasypus, Chaetophractus, Euphractus, Macroeuphractus, and Zaedyus.
The body of the jugal is thin, cylindrical, and almost straight, unlike that of Dasypus, Zaedyus, Euphractus, Macroeuphractus, and Chaetophractus, in which this bone expands ventrally and bows to form the ventral margin of the orbit (Fig. 5a). The medial portion of the maxillo-palatine suture is observed on the palatal surface of the maxilla. It is straight and runs from a point situated between Mf3 and Mf4 obliquely backward up to the axial plane of the palate. In Chaetophractus, Euphractus, Macroeuphractus, and Zaedyus, the medial portion of the maxillo-palatine suture is straight and perpendicular to the axis of the palate, situated at the level of Mf6. In D. novemcinctus and D. hybridus, this suture is straight, but is located behind the posterior edge of the last molariform and perpendicular to the axis of the palate, while in D. yepesi the suture is placed behind the last molariform, but oriented forward up to the axial plane.
The basioccipital is nearly flat and very wide (twice the maximum width of the occipital condyle) (Fig. 5a), as in Peltephilus, while in Dasypus, Tolypeutes, and Chaetophractus the basioccipital is narrow, less than one and a half times the maximum width of the condyle. There is a prominent crest along the axial plane, which originates at the level of the anterior margin of the petrosal and posteriorly becomes wider and more prominent, as in Zaedyus and Chaetophractus. In Dasypus, this crest is prominent in the anterior region and less marked posteriorly. In Tolypeutes, Cabassous, Euphractus, and Priodontes, the crest is absent. In L. oblitum, two oval protuberances can be found on the basioccipital, near the axial plane, surrounded by a semicircular depression located in the medial margin. In Dasypus and Cabassous, these are not as prominent and the semicircular depression is posterior and lateroposterior, respectively. Chaetophractus and Zaedyus exhibit two oval depressions that occupy the entire basioccipital. These structures serve as attachments of the m. longus capitis and m. rectus capitis ventralis (Wible and Gaudin 2004). The anterior margin of the foramen magnum exhibits a widely open U shape as in Macroeuphractus, whereas it is V-shaped in Dasypus, Tolypeutes, Zaedyus, and Euphractus.
The odontoid notch of L. oblitum, located on the ventral margin of the foramen magnum, is similar to that of Cabassous, and more developed than in Dasypus, Chaetophractus, and Tolypeutes. The anteroventral region of the articular surface of the occipital condyle is similar to that of Euphractus and Cabassous, and less convex than in Dasypus, Zaedyus, Chaetophractus, and Macroeuphractus. No suture of the exoccipital with the basioccipital has been recognized in L. oblitum. The hypoglossal foramen is located anterodorsal to the occipital condyle, with the jugular foramen opening above that of the hypoglossal (Fig. 6a, b). The hypoglossal foramen is similar in size and position to those of D. hybridus, D. novemcinctus, and D. yepesi. The jugular foramen is larger in Tolypeutes, Cabassous, Zaedyus, Macroeuphractus, and Priodontes.
The paroccipital process of the petrosal (=mastoid process) is completely preserved, freestanding, rounded, well developed in the mediolateral plane, and characterized by a rough surface. It is located anterolateral to the occipital condyle and slightly posterior to the jugular foramen (Fig. 6a, b). This process is present in Dasypus, Priodontes, Tolypeutes, Cabassous, Euphractus, and Chaetophractus. In those taxa with bullae it is wider in the mediolateral plane, but appressed to the posterior surface of the ectotympanic/external auditory meatus. In those taxa without bullae it is wider in the anterioposterior plane, and freestanding. The postglenoid process is poorly developed.
No tympanic bulla is found, as in dasypodines and tolypeutines. The tympanic surface of the promontory is slightly globular. The cochlear fenestra is rounded and large. The stylomastoid foramen is rather oval and opens lateral to the petrosal (Fig. 6a, b).
Jaw (Figs. 5, 7)
The jaw is more robust than in Dasypus and less robust than in Utaetus, Zaedyus, Chaetophractus, Cabassous, Euphractus, and Tolypeutes (Table 1). In L. oblitum, the ventral edge is convex in the molariform region but straight in the anterior and posterior portions, while in Utaetus, Tolypeutes, and Cabassous it is more convex in the molariform region. In Dasypus, Chaetophractus, Euphractus, and Priodontes the ventral edge is convex in all its length. The edentulous region of the jaw ends behind the posterior edge of the symphysis as in Dasypus and Priodontes. In Cabassous and Tolypeutes, the symphysis ends in front of the first molariform (Fig. 5a). In Utaetus, Euphractus, Zaedyus, and Chaetophractus, on the other hand, the symphysis ends at the level of the second or third molariform. The jaw in L. oblitum exhibits a large mental foramen that occupies the space between the posterior edge of the symphysis and the first molariform (Figs. 5a, 7a, b). This condition is unique among dasypodids.
The anterior edge of the coronoid process elevates in a 56° angle until it reaches the level of the articular process, and approximately in a 71° angle from the latter process. The base of the coronoid process in L. oblitum is wide and the anterior and posterior edges are sub-parallel as in Utaetus, Euphractus, Chaetophractus, Zaedyus, and Tolypeutes. In Dasypus, Priodontes, and Cabassous, in contrast, the anterior and posterior edges converge on the dorsal end. The condylar process exhibits a short neck, as in Utaetus. Dasypus, Priodentes, Zaedyus, Tolypeutes, Euphractus, and Chaetophractus, while in Cabassous, it exhibits a long neck. In L. oblitum, the angular process is larger and more rounded, but less individualized than in D. novemcinctus, D. hybridus, and D. yepesi. This process is located below the alveolar level, whereas in Utaetus, Tolypeutes, Euphractus, Chaetophractus, Cabassous, and Dasypus is located above the alveolar line. The coronoid, condylar, and angular processes are essentially equidistant (Fig. 5a).
Teeth (Figs. 5, 7)
Six upper and lower teeth are recognized. In this work, the first upper and lower pair of teeth are named caniniforms (Figs. 5a, b; 7a, b). These are straight and conical with a blunt apex, an oval cross section, procumbent, and with a single closed root. The upper caniniform exhibits a slight labial orientation with a narrowing close to the level of the alveolus. The lower caniniform is located at the anterior edge of the mental foramen, in the same transverse plane as the upper caniniform, and the latter occludes in front of the lower. Behind the caniniforms, there is a long diastema equivalent to one-third of the molariform series length (Table 1). None of these features are present in any of the described dasypodids.
Molariforms are protohypsodont; their total height is greater than their width and length (Ciancio et al. 2014). They exhibit two well-defined closed roots. No neck develops between the extra- and intra-alveolar portions. Roots are short (approximately one-sixth of the total height of the teeth) and separated by a wide notch (Fig. 5c).
In the upper left molariform series, only the alveolus of Mf1 has been preserved. Mf2, Mf3, and Mf4 are completely preserved while Mf5 conserves only the intra-alveolar part. Teeth are separated from each other by a variable distance: the distance between Mf1 and Mf2 is equal to the anteroposterior length of Mf2, whereas the distance between Mf2 and Mf3 is equal to the anteroposterior length of Mf3. In the other teeth, this separation is small (Table 1; Figs. 5a, 7a, b).
Mf2, Mf3, and Mf4 have approximately the same size, and exhibit an oval cross section and rounded edges. The labial surface is slightly convex and exhibits a medial basal groove that reaches half the extra-alveolar height of the tooth. Mf5 is smaller and its cross section is sub-circular at the alveolar level. Mf3 and Mf4 are slightly posteriorly oriented (Figs. 5a, 7a, b). The lingual surface of the lower molariforms is convex and exhibits a slightly marked middle groove that reaches the lower half of the extra-alveolar surface (Fig. 5c).
Postcranium (Figs. 2, 5, 8)
The atlas, articulated to the cranium and axis, is exposed only in ventral view. It is slightly narrower than in Chaetophractus and Tolypeutes. The ventral surface is short and smooth, and it lacks the posteroventral medial tuber. In Chaetophractus and Tolypeutes, this structure is present. The left transverse process shows a rounded transverse foramen situated in front of the posterior tuberosity, similar to Chaetophractus. In Tolypeutes, the transverse foramen is situated dorsal to the posterior tuberosity in the lateral face. Only the ventral face of the axis is observed. Over the right side, part of the articular facet for the atlas is slightly convex (Fig. 5a). The ventral face shows longitudinal striations similar to those in Chaetophractus. These striations are not present in Tolypeutes.
There are five articulated lumbar vertebrae exposed in ventral view (Fig. 8c). The vertebral bodies are more robust and wider than in Chaetophractus. A ventral anapophysis has been almost completely preserved in one vertebra. One isolated caudal vertebra exhibits a subcylindrical centrum, with the length being less than double the width. Ventrally, a pair of sharp, elevated medial crests are found, which extend over the posterior two-thirds of the centrum, forming a deep and concave groove. The transverse processes are well developed and exhibit a sharp edge on their lateral margin (Fig. 8a).
One nearly complete rib and many fragments have been preserved. In the proximal end, there are two articular surfaces: the tuberculum and capitulum. The distal end is not observed. The shaft of the rib is wide with a groove in the middle of the length of the shaft, which possibly corresponds to the attachment for the intercostal muscles. The curvature of this element suggests it might be an anterior rib (Fig. 8b).
The manubrium has been preserved. It is approximately rhomboidal, with the anterior region broader than the posterior region and a marked stretching in the medial region. The anterior and posterior edges are convex. On the ventral area, there is a marked keel, which is more prominent towards the anterior end.
The proximal half of the right tibia-fibula is preserved. The medial condyle is not observed, whereas the lateral condyle is oval and convex. The intercondylar eminence is strongly projected proximally, as occurs in Dasypus. On the other hand, in Priodontes and Chaetophractus the intercondylar eminence is less developed. Over the shaft of the tibia, the tibial crest is shorter and less developed than in Dasypus, Priodontes, and Chaetophractus (Fig. 8d).
The proximal end of the ulna is observed in postero-internal view and it is somewhat deformed by compression. The olecranon is well developed, and its end exhibits a sharp curvature.
One metacarpal has been preserved, with a cylindrical, flattened shaft in dorsopalmar orientation. In the distal end, the trochlea exhibits a deep groove. The medial crest, described in other dasypodids, is not observed.
Three ungual phalanges were found, but only one remains complete. The ungual process is conical and slightly curved. There is a groove on the lateral face along its length. The articular surface is concave. The discoidal area, at the base of the proximal end, is higher and more compressed than in Dasypus and Chaetophractus (Fig. 8e).
Phylogenetic Analysis
The phylogenetic analysis resulted in two most parsimonious trees of 515 steps. The strict consensus is shown in Fig. 9. The indices of the present cladogram are: consistency index =0.38 and retention index =0.48.
The Cingulata (clade A) are a monophyletic group. Peltephilus is the sister taxon to all the remaining cingulates, consistent with previous studies (Abrantes and Bergqvist 2006; Gaudin and Wible 2006). Clade B includes P. parvum + L. oblitum as the sister group of a diverse clade that includes dasypodines, tolypeutines, euphractines, and glyptodontoids. Clade C (L. oblitum + P. parvum) is clearly distinguished by the following unambiguous synapomorphies: dorsal carapace formed only by movable bands [2(0)], articular anterior surface of the osteoderms with elevations and grooves [12(0)], posterior edge of the internal surface of the movable osteoderms with elevations and grooves [13(0)], lateral contact area between osteoderms flat and smooth [14(2)], and step-like structure in the lateral surface of the osteoderms [15(1)]. Lumbreratherium oblitum exhibits three anterior and two lateral peripheral figures on the osteoderms [8(0)], whereas P. parvum doest not exhibit peripheral anterior figures. In contrast, P. parvum differs from L. oblitum because the main figure reaches the posterior edge of the osteoderm [10(1)] and the articular surface is developed (representing more than 35 % the total length of the osteoderm) [17(0)].
Clade D includes Utaetus and the remaining dasypodines, pampatheres, and glyptodonts. This clade is supported by four unambiguous synapomorphies: extension of the main figure of the osteoderm contacting the posterior edge [10(0)], small piliferous foramina, located in the posterior margin of the osteoderm [16(0)], nine lower teeth [23(4)], and three or more mental foramina [35(2)]. Simpson (1945, 1948) proposed the inclusion of the genus Utaetus in the Utaetini tribe, based on a set of characters that are considered primitive. Some authors considered Utaetini as a tribe within Euphractinae (Scillato-Yané 1980; McKenna and Bell 1997). Recently, Carlini et al. (2010) questioned the validity of Utaetini as a distinct tribe and considered that Utaetus is closely related to Euphractinae. The euphractines analyzed in this study are not recovered as a monophyletic group, which agrees with results obtained in previous phylogenetic studies (Engelmann 1985; Gaudin and Wible 2006; Abrantes and Bergqvist 2006; Billet et al. 2011). Macroeuphractus + Proeuphractus (Clade F) are basal to the euphractines, eutatines, pampatheres, glyptodonts, and Dasypoda.
In the present analysis, Clade G is an unresolved trichotomy. This grouping includes Eutatus as a sister taxon to Clade H and Clade K. Clade H is a monophyletic group formed by ((Zaedyus pichiy + Calyptophractus retusus) (Chaetophractus vellerosus + Euphractus sexcinctus)). Gaudin and Wible (2006) considered this clade as Euphracta. Wetzel (1985) and Delsuc et al. (2012) considered the Chlamyphoriinae as a subfamily that differs from Euphractinae.
Clade L has (Proeutatus (Propalaeohoplophorus + Vassallia)). The eutatini Proeutatus is the sister taxon of Glyptodontoidea, in agreement with studies by Gaudin and Wible (2006), Gaudin and Bramblett (2010), and Billet et al. (2011). Clade M is composed of Pampatheriidae + Glyptodontidae. The relationship between pampatheres and glyptodonts has been suggested by different authors (Patterson and Pascual 1972; Carlini and Scillato-Yané 1993; McKenna and Bell 1997; Gaudin and Wible 2006; González 2010).
Clade N includes Prozaedyus as sister taxon of Clade O. This clade has (Tolypeutes matacus ((Dasypus novemcinctus + Stegotherium) (Priodontes maximus + Cabassous))). Gaudin and Wible (2006) defined this clade as Dasypoda. Dasypus and Stegotherium remain as a basal monophyletic group in the analyses by Abrantes and Bergqvist (2006); Gaudin and Wible (2006), and Billet et al. (2011). In this analysis, the subfamily Tolypeutinae sensu McKenna and Bell (1997) is not recovered as a monophyletic group.
Discussion
Paleogene armadillos of the early-middle Eocene of northwest Argentina are known from cranial remains, associated postcranial elements, and articulated or isolated osteoderms (Herrera 2013). This contrasts with the majority of the Eocene dasypodids, which are only known by isolated osteoderms and associated postcranial remains.
Pucatherium parvum and L. oblitum are recovered as a new basal clade of dasypodids. This clade is characterized by the articulation between osteoderms of successive bands and the articulation between adjacent osteoderms of the same band. The former occurs between the anterior articular region with the internal face of the distal region of the anterior osteoderm (Fig. 3). Both regions are sculptured with grooves and elevations that lock together. The latter occurs between the lateral face, located immediately below the step (Fig. 4c–f).
This set of characteristics, which we define as “pucatheriin pattern” (Fig. 4c, e) clearly differs from the morphology in the rest of dasypodids (Fig. 4a).
The first tooth is caniniform and behind it there is a large diastema, the length of which is approximately equal to one-third of the preserved molariform series. This tooth is described as caniniform due to its morphology and position. Caniniforms are conical and their major axis is anterolabially oriented; the upper tooth exhibits a distal wearing surface, which suggests that the lower tooth ocludes behind it. This heterodont condition is more similar to mylodontoids and megalonychids than to that specified for armadillos. Vizcaíno (2009) pointed out that in Macroeuphractus the second upper tooth is modified as a “powerful caniniform” (Vizcaíno 2009:349). However, this tooth looks like a well-developed molariform, and is larger than the remaining teeth.
In L. oblitum, the first lower right molariform is displaced from its alveolus, which allows the observation of its complete morphology (Fig. 5c). This tooth is protohypsodont, presents no neck, and has short closed roots separated by a wide notch. The extra-alveolar region corresponds to the upper half of the tooth, while the roots represent approximately only one-sixth of the total height of the tooth. Recently, Ciancio et al. (2014) described two protohypsodont closed-rooted molariforms in a mandibular fragment referred to Astegotherium. These teeth are different from those in L. oblitum because the extra-alveolar region is shorter (restricted to the upper third) and the roots are longer (one third of the total height of the tooth). These authors determined that this Astegotherium specimen corresponds to an adult specimen due to the presence of closed rooted teeth and the absence of the tooth germ underneath (Ciancio et al. 2014). Lumbreratherium oblitum is considered as an adult individual, due also to the obliteration of the sutures of the basicranial region (basisphenoid-basioccipital and basisphenoid-presphenoid).
The reduced number of teeth, the presence of intermolariform diastemata, and the gracefulness of the jaw have been mentioned as features of dasypodids, which feed mainly on social insects (Vizcaíno 2009; Ciancio et al. 2014). As the new taxon described in this study does present these characteristics, it is inferred that L. oblitum was probably an insectivorous species.
Conclusions
Lumbreratheriun oblitum is a new dasypodid from northwest Argentina, due to its very distinctive dental characters and the morphology of the osteoderms. This new taxon comes from the early-middle Eocene Lumbrera Formation (“lower Lumbrera”), Casamayoran SALMA, Vacan subage in Salta province, Argentina. As a result of the phylogenetic analysis of Cingulata, Pucatherium parvum, and L. oblitum form a monophyletic group with a basal position within Dasypodidae. Several authors proposed that the notable presence of basal forms indicates that northwest Argentina was an important region of the early diversification for many notoungulate lineages (Pascual et al. 1996; Goin et al. 1998; Reguero et al. 2008; García López and Powell 2011; Powell et al. 2011). The basal position of these Paleogene armadillos of northwest Argentina reinforces the hypothesis of an intertropical origin of mammal clades, different from those in the Paleogene of more austral regions of Argentina.
References
Abrantes EAL, Bergqvist LP (2006) Proposta filogenética Para os Dasypodidae (Mammalia: Cingulata). In: Gallo V, Brito PM, Silva HMA, Figueiredo FJ (eds) Paleontologia Vertebrados: Grandes Temas e Contribuiçoes Científicas, Interciências, Rio de Janeiro, pp 261–274
Alonso RN, Berman WD, Bond M, Carlini AA, Pascual R, Reguero MA (1988) Vertebrados Paleógenos de la Puna austral: sus aportes a la evolución biogeográfica. V Jorn Argent Paleontol Vertebr 1:6
Bergqvist LP, Abrantes EAL, Avila LDS (2004) The Xenarthra (Mammalia) of São José de Itaboraí Basin (upper Paleocene, Itaboraian), Río de Janeiro, Brazil. Geodiversitas 26:323–337
Billet G, Hautier L, Muizon C de, Valentin X (2011) Oldest cingulate skulls provide congruence between morphological and molecular scenarios of armadillo evolution. Proc R Soc B 278:2791–2797
Carlini AA, Castro MC, Madden RH, Scillato-Yané GJ (2013) A new species of Dasypodidae (Xenarthra: Cingulata) from the late Miocene of northwestern South America: implications in the Dasypodini phylogeny and diversity. Hist Biol 26:728–736
Carlini AA, Ciancio MR, Chimento NR (2008) Neoglyptatelus (Mammalia Cingulata), caracteres y latitudes, en una discusión de afinidades. III Congr Latinoam Paleontol Vertebr 1:49R
Carlini AA, Ciancio MR, Flynn JJ, Scillato-Yané GJ, Wyss AR (2009) The phylogenetic and biostratigraphic significance of new armadillos (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Dasypodidae, Euphractinae) from the Tinguirirican (early Oligocene) of Chile. J Syst Palaeontol 7:489–503
Carlini AA, Ciancio MR, Scillato-Yané GJ (2010) Middle Eocene– early Miocene Dasypodidae (Xenarthra) of southern South America: faunal succession at gran Barranca–biostratigraphy and paleoecology. In: Madden RH, Carlini AA, Vucetich MG, Kay RF (eds) The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 106–129
Carlini AA, Scillato-Yané GJ (1993) Origin and evolution of the “glyptodontoids.” J Vertebr Paleontol 13 (suppl to no 3):28 A
Carlini AA, Scillato-Yané GJ (1996) Chorobates recens (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae) y un análisis de la filogenia de los Euphractini. Rev Mus La Plata (NS) 9:225–238
Castellano A (1958) Descripción preliminar de un cráneo de Macroeuphractus morenoi (lyd.) del Yocahuilense (Araucanense) del Valle de Yocahuil (Santa María) de las provincias de Catamarca, Tucumán, Salta. Acta Geol Lill 2:191–239
Castro MC, Ribeiro AM, Ferigolo J, Langer MC (2013) Redescription of Dasypus punctatus Lund, 1840 and considerations on the genus Propraopus Ameghino 1881 (Xenarthra, Cingulata). J Vertebr Paleontol 33:434–447
Ciancio MR (2010) Los Dasypodoidea (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Deseadense (Oligoceno) de América del Sur. Su importancia filogenética y bioestratigráfica. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad de la Plata
Ciancio MR, Carlini AA (2008) Identificación de Ejemplares Tipo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno de Argentina. Rev Mus Argent Cs Nat 10:221–237
Ciancio MR, Carlini AA, Campbell K, Scillato-Yané GJ (2013) New Paleogene cingulates (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from Santa Rosa, Peru, and their importance in the context of south American faunas. J Syst Paleontol 11:727–741
Ciancio MR, Castro MC, Galliari FC, Carlini AA, Asher RJ (2012) Evolutionary implications of dental eruption in Dasypus (Xenarthra). J Mammal Evol 19:1–8
Ciancio MR, Herrera CM, Aramayo A, Payrola P, Babot MJ (2016) Diversity of cingulate xenarthrans in the middle-late Eocene of northwestern Argentina. Acta Palaeontol Polonica 61:00
Ciancio MR, Vieytes EC, Carlini AA (2014) When xenarthrans had enamel: insights on the evolution of their hypsodonty and paleontological support for independent evolution in armadillos. Naturwissenschaften 101:715–725
Cifelli RL (1983) Eutherian tarsals from the late Paleocene of Brazil. Am Mus Novitates 2761:1–31
Cifelli RL (1985) Biostratigraphy of the Casamayoran, early Eocene, of Patagonia. Am Mus Novitates 2820:1–26
Croft DA, Flynn JJ, Wyss AR (2007) A new basal glyptodontid and other Xenarthra of the early Miocene Chucal Fauna, northern Chile. J Vertebr Paleontol 27:781–797
del Papa CE (2006) Estratigrafía y paleoambientes de la Formación Lumbrera, Grupo Salta, noroeste argentino. Rev Asoc Geol Argent 61:15–29
del Papa CE, García V, Quattrocchio M (2002) Sedimentary facies and palynofacies assemblages in an Eocene perennial lake, Lumbrera formation, Northwest Argentina. J So Am Earth Sci 15:553–569
del Papa CE, Kirshbaum A, Powell JE, Brod A, Hongn F, Pimentel M (2010) Sedimentological, geochemical and paleontological insights applied to continental omission surfaces: a new approach for reconstructing an Eocene foreland basin in NW Argentina. J So Am Earth Sci 29:327–345
Delsuc F, Catzeflis FF, Stanhope MJ, Douzery EJP (2001) The evolution of armadillos, anteaters and sloths depicted by nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies: implications for the status of the enigmatic fossil Eurotamandua. Proc R Soc B 268:1605–1615
Delsuc F, Douzery EJP (2008) Recent advances and future prospects in xenarthran molecular phylogenetics. In: Vizcaíno SF, Loughry J (eds) The biology of the Xenarthra. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, pp 11–23
Delsuc F, Superina M, Tilak MK, Douzery EJ, Hassanin A (2012) Molecular phylogenetics unveils the ancient evolutionary origins of the enigmatic fairy armadillos. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62:673–680
Delsuc F, Vizcaíno SF, Douzery EJP (2004) Influence of tertiary paleoenvironmental change on the diversification of south American mammals: a relaxed molecular clock study within xenarthrans. BMC Evol Biol 4:1–13
dos Reis M, Inoue J, Hasegawa M, Asher RJ, Donoghue PC, Yang Z (2012) Phylogenomic datasets provide both precision and accuracy in estimating the timescale of placental mammal phylogeny. Proc R Soc B 279:3491–3500
Engelmann GF (1985) The phylogeny of the Xenarthra. In: Montgomery GG (ed) The Evolution and Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths and Vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 51–64
Fernicola JC, Vizcaíno SF (2008) Revisión del género Stegotherium Ameghino, 1887 (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Dasypodidae). Ameghiniana 45:321–332
García López D, Powell J (2011) Griphotherion peiranoi gen. et sp. nov., a new Eocene Notoungulata (Mammalia, Meridiungulata) from northwestern Argentina. J Vertebr Paleontol 31:1117–1130
Gaudin TJ, Bramblett J (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of extinct and extant Cingulata (Xenarthra, Mammalia) based on combined cranial and postcranial data. Soc Vertebr Paleontol, Abstract Vol: 95A
Gaudin TJ, Wible J (2006) The phylogeny of living and extinct armadillos (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Cingulata): a craniodental analysis. In: Carrano MT, Gaudin TJ, Blob RW, Wible JR (eds) Amniote Paleobiology: Perspectives on the Evolution of Mammals, Birds and Reptiles. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 153–198
Gelfo JN, Goin FJ, Woodburne MO, Muizon C de (2009) Biochronological relationships of the earliest South American Paleogene mammalian faunas. Palaeontology 52:251–269
Goin FJ, Candela A, López GM (1998) Middle Eocene marsupials from Antofagasta de la Sierra, northwestern Argentina. Geobios 31:75–85
Góis FL, Scillato-Yané GJ, Carlini AA, Guilherme E (2013) A new species of Scirrotherium Edmund and Theodor, 1997 (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Pampatheriidae) from the late Miocene of South America. Alcheringa: An Australasian J Palaeontol 37:177–188
Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K (2008) T.N.T. A free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786
González LR (2010) Los Cingulata (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Mioceno temprano y medio de Patagonia (edades Santacrucense y “Friasense”). Revisión sistemática y consideraciones bioestratigráficas. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad de la Plata
Herrera CMR (2013) Los dasipódidos (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno del noroeste argentino. Aspectos evolutivos y bioestratigráficos. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán
Herrera CM, Powell JE (2007) Un peculiar armadillo (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae) del Paleógeno del noroeste argentino. Su valor cronoestrátigrafico. XXI Jorn Argent Mastozool: 246–247
Herrera CM, Powell JE (2009) Un nuevo astegoterino Para la Formación Quebrada de los Colorados (Grupo Payogastilla). XXIV Jorn Argent Paleontol Vertebr 1:38R
Herrera CM, Powell JE (2013) Un nuevo dasipódido eoceno (Dasypodidae, Xenarthra) de la Formación Lumbrera en la provincia de Salta, Argentina. Ameghiniana 50(suppl to n°6):54R
Herrera CM, Powell JE, del Papa CE (2010) Un nuevo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno de la provincia de Jujuy. XXVII Jorn Cientif Asoc Biol 1:42R
Herrera CM, Powell JE, del Papa CE (2012) Un nuevo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del la Formación Casa Grande (eoceno) de la provincia de Jujuy, Argentina. Ameghiniana 49:267–271
Hill RV (2006) Comparative anatomy and histology of Xenarthra osteoderms. J Morphol 267:1441–1460
Kemp TS (2005) The Origin and Evolution of Mammals. Oxford University Press, New York, 331 pp
Krmpotic CM, Ciancio MR. Barbeito C, Mario RC, Carlini AA (2009) Osteoderm morphology in recent and fossil euphractine xenarthrans. Acta Zool 90:339–351
López GM (1997) Paleogene faunal assemblage from Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province, Argentina). Paleovertebrata 26:61–81
McKenna MC, Bell SK (1997) Clasification of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York
Meredith RW, Janečka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simão TLL, Stadler T, Rabosky DL, Honeycutt RL, Flynn JJ, Ingram CM, Steiner C, Williams TL, Robinson TJ, Burk-Herrick A, Westerman M, Ayoub NA, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2011) Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521–524
Oliveira EV, Bergqvist L (1998) A new Paleocene armadillo (Mammalia, Dasypodoidea) from the Itaboraí basin, Brazil. Asoc Paleontol Argent, Publicación Especial 5:35–40
Pascual R, Ortiz Jaureguizar E, Prado JL (1996) Land mammals: paradigm for Cenozoic South American geobiotic evolution: Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A 30:265–319
Pascual R, Vucetich MG, (1981) El Subgrupo Santa Bárbara (Grupo Salta) y sus Vertebrados. Cronología, paleoambientes y Paleobiograografía. VIII Congr Geolog argent, San Luis 3:743–758
Patterson B, Pascual R (1972) The fossil mammal fauna of South America. In: Keast A, Erk FC, Glass B (eds) Evolution, Mammals, and Southern Continents. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 247–309
Patterson B, Segall W, Turnbull WD (1989) The ear region in xenarthrans (=Edentata: Mammalia) part I. Cingulates. Fieldiana Geol NS 18:1–46
Powell JE, Babot MJ, García López DA, Deraco MV, Herrera CM (2011) Eocene vertebrates of northwestern Argentina: annotated list. In: Salfity JA, Marquillas RA (eds) Cenozoic Geology of the Central Andes of Argentina. SCS Publisher, Salta, Argentina, pp 349–370
Reguero MA, Croft DA, Lopez GM, Alonso RN (2008). Eocene archaeohyracids (Mammalia: Notoungulata: Hegetotheria) from the Puna, Northwest Argentina. J So Am Earth Sci 26:225–233
Rose KD, Archibald JD (2005) The Rise of Placental Mammals. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Scillato-Yané GJ (1976) Sobre un Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) de Edad Riochiquense (Paleoceno superior) de Itaboraí, Brasil. An Academ Bras Cienc 48:527–530
Scillato-Yané GJ (1980) Catálogo de los Dasipodidos fósiles (Mammalia, Edentata) de la República Argentina. II Congr Arg Paleontol Bioestratig I Congr Latinoam Paleontol 3:7–36
Scillato-Yané GJ (1982) Los Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Edentata) del Plioceno de Argentina. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad de la Plata
Scillato-Yané GJ (1986) Los Xenarthra Fósiles de Argentina (Mammalia, Edentata). IV Cong Argent Paleontol Bioestrat, La Plata 2:151–155
Scott WB (1903-1905) Mammalia of the Santa Cruz beds. Part I. Edentata. Report of the Princeton Expedition to Patagonia 5:1–364
Simpson GG (1945) The principles of classification and classification of mammals. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 85:1–335
Simpson GG (1948) The beginning of the age of mammals in South America. Part I. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 91:1–232
Stock C (1925) Cenozoic gravigrade edentates of western North America with special reference to the Pleistocene Megalonychinae and Mylodontidae of rancho La Brea. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 331:1–206
Vizcaíno SF (1994) Sistemática y Anatomía de los Astegotheriini Ameghino, 1906 (Nuevo Rango) (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae, Dasypodinae). Ameghiniana 31:3–13
Vizcaíno SF (2009) The teeth of the “toothless”: novelties and key innovations in the evolution of xenarthrans (Mammalia, Xenarthra). Paleobiology 35:343–366
Vizcaíno SF, Bargo MS (1998) The masticatory apparatus of the armadillo Eutatus (Mammalia, Cingulata) and some allied genera: paleobiology and evolution. Paleobiology 24:371–383
Wetzel RM (1985) Taxonomy and distribution of armadillos, Dasypodidae. In: Montgomery GG (ed) The Evolution and Ecology of Armadillos, Sloths and Vermilinguans. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp 23–46
Wible JR, Gaudin TJ (2004) On the cranial osteology of the yellow armadillo Euphractus sexcinctus (Dasypodidae, Xenarthra, Placentalia). Ann Carnegie Mus 73:117–196
Woodburne MO, Goin FJ, Raigemborn MS, Heizler M, Gelfo JN, Oliveira EV (2014) Revised timing of the South American early Paleogene land mammal ages. J So Am Earth Sci 54:109–119
World Association of Veterinary Anatomists, International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (2005) Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, 5th Edition. International Commission on Veterinary Gross Veterinary Nomenclature. Editorial Committee, 166 pp
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Kramarz and D. Flores (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “B. Rivadavia”), M. Reguero (Museo de La Plata), and M. Díaz (Colección Mamíferos Lillo) for providing us access to the collections under their care. Financial support was provided by Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (CIUNT 26/G522, 26/G513), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnologícas (CONICET PIP -489), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (FONCYT PICT-407). We are very grateful to Fernando Abdala for his comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. We thank E. Guanuco and A. Gutierrez for illustrations, M. Vince for preparation of the material, Sofia Nanni for the transalation of the manuscript. We would like to thank the reviewers, for their insightful comments on the paper, as these comments led us to an improvement of the work. The authors also thank the Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo and the Fundacion Miguel Lillo for research and facilities support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Jaime E. Powell died before the final revision of the manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Appendix 1
Specimens examined for comparative study and cladistic analysis (DOC 62 kb)
Appendix 2
List of characters used in the cladistic analysis. Characters marked with an asterisk (*) are multistate. Characters marked with a double asterisk (**) are additive (DOC 82 kb)
Appendix 3
Data matrix used in the cladistic analysis. (?), missing data; (−), not applicable (DOC 60 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, C.M.R., Powell, J.E., Esteban, G.I. et al. A New Eocene Dasypodid with Caniniforms (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Cingulata) from Northwest Argentina. J Mammal Evol 24, 275–288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-016-9345-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-016-9345-x