Abstract
The third-generation South Pole Telescope camera is designed to measure the cosmic microwave background across three frequency bands (centered at 95, 150 and 220 GHz) with \(\sim \) 16,000 transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometers. Each multichroic array element on a detector wafer has a broadband sinuous antenna that couples power to six TESs, one for each of the three observing bands and both polarizations, via lumped element filters. Ten detector wafers populate the detector array, which is coupled to the sky via a large-aperture optical system. Here we present the frequency band characterization with Fourier transform spectroscopy, measurements of optical time constants, beam properties, and optical and polarization efficiencies of the detector array. The detectors have frequency bands consistent with our simulations and have high average optical efficiency which is 86, 77 and 66% for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors. The time constants of the detectors are mostly between 0.5 and 5 ms. The beam is round with the correct size, and the polarization efficiency is more than 90% for most of the bolometers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Measurements of the intensity and polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at high spatial resolution and high sensitivity are powerful probes of cosmological parameters [1], inflation [2], neutrino physics [3, 4], and galaxy clusters [5]. Currently there are active efforts from ground-based [6,7,8,9] and balloon-borne [10,11,12] projects on this front. The third camera on the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G) is one of the third-generation ground-based CMB cameras designed for all these scientific goals [13]. SPT-3G uses a large-aperture wide-field optical design that fits a large detector array with \(\sim \) 16,000 sinuous-antenna-coupled transition-edge sensors (TESs), which gives us a high mapping speed and unprecedented sensitivity. For a broad overview of SPT-3G see [14], and for the first-year performance see [15].
This paper is organized as follows: in Sect. 2 we discuss the optics and array element design for SPT-3G. We then discuss the on-site measurements of the detectors’ spectral bands in Sect. 3.1. We detail the time constant measurements in Sect. 3.2 and the optical efficiency measurements in Sect. 3.3. We present the detectors’ beam and polarization properties in Sect. 3.4. We summarize all the results in Sect. 4.
2 The Optical Design
2.1 Optical Coupling
SPT-3G is the new camera for the South Pole Telescope, a 10-m off-axis Gregorian telescope located at the geographic South Pole [16]. The sky signal illuminates the primary mirror and is then reflected by a 1.8 m secondary mirror after the primary focus into a folding flat mirror (Fig. 1 left). The Gregorian focus is formed after the folding flat mirror and is right in front of the 25-inch diameter high-density polyethylene (HDPE) receiver cryostat vacuum window with triangular-groove anti-reflective (AR) coating. After the window there are multiple layers of polyethylene foam and an alumina plate at 50 K for blocking infrared radiation. Three 27-inch plano-convex lenses at 4 K re-image the Gregorian focus onto the detector wafers, reducing aberrations and enabling a large field of view. The lenses are made from low-loss alumina by Coorstek and are AR-coated with 2-layer laminated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). At the image of the primary mirror (between the second and third lens), where the diameter of the ray bundle is the narrowest, we set a Lyot stop at 4 K, to reduce stray reflections from beyond the edges of the optical elements, and cut the thermal loading on the detectors. The Lyot stop is a piece of Eccosorb-HR10-coated [17] aluminum plate with a 28-cm-diameter aperture in the center. The size of the aperture defines the center eight-meter illuminated area of the 10-m primary mirror. A 300 GHz low-pass metal-mesh filter is mounted at the aperture of the Lyot stop to further cut the out-of-band optical loading. Finally the sky signal is focused by the alumina AR-coated lenslets onto the antennas of individual array elements. The beam diameter of the array elements through the Lyot stop is \(30^{\circ }\), which is re-imaged by the optical system and gives us a \(1.9^{\circ }\) diameter field of view on-sky.
2.2 The Multichroic Detector Array
The microwave radiation collected by the optical system is measured by a multichroic detector array consisting of ten detector wafers with 269 array elements per wafer. To enhance the coupling to the detector wafer, we use alumina lenslets, one per array element, mounted on a silicon wafer to focus the received radiation. Within each array element (Fig. 1 middle) in the detector wafer, a self-complementary sinuous antenna with a frequency-independent impedance over a broad frequency range is used to couple to the microwave radiation. Microstrip lines designed to match the antenna’s driving impedance are used to transfer the collected radiation, and in-line triplexers with a trio of three-pole lumped element filters (Fig. 1 right) are used to distribute the radiation into three different frequency bands, measured by three TESs. The detailed fabrication and parameter tuning processes are summarized in [18,19,20,21,22]. The TESs are read out using a digital frequency-domain multiplexing (DfMUX) system [23, 24].
3 Optical Characterization Results
3.1 Frequency Bands
We measured the frequency bands of the detectors with a Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS), which uses a symmetric Martin–Puplett design [25]. The FTS has two input ports coupled to two beam-filling sources, one of which is a piece of Eccosorb HR10 at room temperature, and the other of which is a blackbody operating at 1270 K. Within the FTS box (Fig. 2 left), there are four pairs of mirrors for folding the beam, four polarizers (for polarizing, mixing, recombining and splitting the beam), and one moving mirror driven by a linear driver for creating an optical delay between the two optical paths [26]. The folding design helps make the FTS’s size small (\(15 \times 10 \times 3\) inches) and its weight low (13 lbs). The FTS output is proportional to the contrast of the two inputs and is coupled through the three lenses in the receiver cryostat to the detector array. The FTS output beam is arranged to have the same f-number as the detectors’ beams through the lenses. The primary and the secondary mirror of the telescope are not involved in this measurement. To avoid detector saturation, a Mylar beam splitter is used to couple only 2% of the power from the FTS to the detectors, and redirect 98% of the optical coupling onto the sky. To map out the detector array more efficiently, the FTS box is put on a 2D linear driver which can move the FTS to the calculated position of the target bolometers automatically.
The recorded data are the time-varying power incident on the detectors (timestream), while the FTS is scanning back and forth, and contains multiple interferograms. To extract the frequency bands from the timestream data, we first find the center of the interferograms by correlating the timestream data with a timestream template created from the simulated bands. We then separate the interferograms, do FFTs for each of the interferograms and average all the FFTs to reduce the noise.
Figure 2 middle is the average frequency bands for one of the deployed detector wafers. The bands for the other wafers are very similar. For the 95, 150, and 220 GHz bands, the measured band centers are \(96\pm 1\), \(150\pm 3\), and \(220\pm 3~\hbox {GHz}\), respectively, and the measured band widths are \(25\pm 2\), \(33\pm 3\), and \(46\pm 2~\hbox {GHz}\), respectively. The measured band edges agree to within 3 GHz of Sonnet simulations using the appropriate dielectric layer thickness, and the bands lie within the atmospheric windows. The difference between the measured and simulated band edges is likely caused by a frequency-dependent variation of the dielectric layer \(\mathrm {SiO_2}\)’s dielectric constant. The measured bands also include the transmission through the lenses, the alumina filter, and the metal-mesh filter in the optical chain, which contributes to the difference between the measured and simulated band shapes. The bands satisfy our needs.
3.2 Time Constant
The optical time constant of the detectors describes how fast the detectors can respond to a changing optical signal. The intrinsic time constant of the detector is defined by \(\tau _0= C /G\), where C is the thermal capacity of the detector island, and G is the thermal conductivity between the detector island and the thermal bath. However, the effective time constant is sped up to \(\tau =\tau _0/(1+\mathscr {L})\) due to electro-thermal feedback, where \(\mathscr {L}\) is the loopgain of the feedback system [27]. The loopgain is dependent on the bias power and the sharpness of the TESs superconducting transition. Thus, the time constant can be tuned by coupling the TES island to a deposited film with a large thermal capacity, changing the thermal link’s strength or the optical loading on the TES island, and tuning the sharpness of the superconducting transition edge. The time constant needs to be larger than \(5.8\tau _\mathrm{e} = 5.8 ( 2 L/ R)\approx 0.35~\hbox {ms}\) to make sure the system is stably overdamped under a perturbation [27], and smaller than \(\sim 20~\hbox {ms}\) to be able to resolve arcminute-scale features while scanning at \(1^{\circ }/\mathrm{s}\). Here L is the inductance of the multiplexing inductor and equals \(60\,\upmu \hbox {H}\). R is the resistance of the TES sensor and is approximately \(2\,\Omega \). \(\tau _\mathrm{e}\) is the electrical time constant, which is defined by \(\tau _\mathrm{e}=2L/R\).
The detectors’ time constants are measured by recording the detectors’ timestream data, while a calibrator chops a thermal source behind the telescope’s secondary mirror. The calibrator is coupled to a hole in the center of the secondary mirror that overlaps with all detectors’ beams. The calibrator has a gold-plated chopper placed at \(45^{\circ }\) relative to the box surface (Fig. 3 top left). The chopper serves two functions: when the blade is in the optical path, the chopper is reflecting off the radiation from a 1000 K thermal filament; when the blade is out of the way, the chopper is transmitting the room-temperature blackbody radiation. We measure the detector response vs. chopper frequency using a phase-locked demodulator. We assume a single exponential decay model to fit the detector time constant.
According to the fit results, most detectors’ time constants lie within the desired range (Fig. 3 top right). However, there are a few detectors with small time constants which are marginally stable. Reducing the detector saturation power will increase the time constants.
3.3 Optical Efficiency
The optical efficiency of the detectors is measured in the laboratory with a temperature-controlled cold load (Fig. 3 middle left) placed in front of the detector wafer and is calculated by dividing the received optical power by the expected optical power assuming single-mode beam-filling coupling. The cold load used for the calibration has a piece of blackbody material [28] mounted on top of an oxygen-free high thermal conductivity copper plate suspended from the cold load box by four high-pressure fiberglass laminate (G10) legs. The temperature of the blackbody and the copper plate is controlled by a PID feedback system and ranges between 5 and 20 K. The cold load is designed with a large aperture covered by low-pass metal-mesh filters to fill up the detectors’ beam while not loading the cold stage with too much optical power. Figure 3 middle right shows the optical efficiency measurements of a test wafer. The optical efficiency, including the detector, lenslet, and lenslet AR coating, is 86, 77, and 66% for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors, respectively.
The end-to-end optical efficiency of the telescope is also measured by making sky maps of an object with known flux, such as RCW38, and comparing the received power to the expected power. The measured end-to-end efficiency is 32, 33, and 9% for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors. This efficiency matches our expectations, given the measured detector efficiency for 95 and 150 GHz detectors after correcting for the expected loss through the optical system (window, lenses and filters). The 220 GHz efficiency is a factor of \(\sim \) 2 too low compared to expectations and is likely caused by imperfections in the lens AR coating.
3.4 Beam and Polarization
The beams of the detectors need to match the beam from the telescope. We designed a beam-mapper to measure the detectors’ beams. The core part of the beam-mapper is an electrically chopped thermal source [29] mounted in the center of a metal plate coated with Eccosorb HR10. The assembly of the source and the absorptive plate is set in motion by two linear drivers in a 2D plane to point at the detectors from different angles and probe the beam. The FWHM beam sizes of the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors are measured to be \(33^{\circ }, 20^{\circ }\) and \(14^{\circ }\), which match our expectations. These numbers are at the wafer, not at the camera input, where the beam size is set by the Lyot stop and should be independent of frequency. The polarization efficiency is measured by rotating a wire grid in front of a thermal source. Systematics from reflections are carefully reduced by placing the wire grid \(45^{\circ }\) relative to the optical path and coating the surroundings of the optical path with Eccosorb HR10. Most of the detectors have polarization efficiency of \(>90\)%. Sample measurements are shown in Fig. 3 bottom.
4 Conclusion
We have developed calibration instruments and used them to calibrate the optical performance of the SPT-3G camera. We made a compact Martin–Puplett FTS for measuring the detectors’ frequency bands. The measured bands agree with Sonnet simulations. We designed a calibrator which can chop at different frequencies for probing the detectors’ time constants, which are mostly between 0.5 and 5 ms. The optical efficiency was calibrated by a temperature-controlled cold load, and is 86, 77, and 66% for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors. These numbers also agree with the optical efficiency inferred from observations of RCW38. The beam characterization was done by moving a thermal source in a 2D plane in front of the detectors. The beams of the detectors have symmetric 2D Gaussian profiles and their FWHMs are \(33^{\circ }, 20^{\circ }\) and \(14^{\circ }\) for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz frequency bands. The polarization efficiency of the detectors was calibrated by a polarized thermal source and is mostly \(>90\)%.
References
A. Lewis et al., Phys. Rev. D 66(10), 103511 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103511
D. Baumann et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1141(1), 10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3160885
K. Ichikawa, Phys. Rev. D 71(4), 043001 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043001
J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Rev. D 73(4), 045021 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.045021
J. Carlstrom et al., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 40(1), 643–680 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093803
R.J. Thornton et al., APJ Suppl. Ser. 227(2), 21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/21
K. Arnold et al., Proc. SPIE 7741, 77411E (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.858314
Z. Ahmed et al., SPIE Astronomical Telescope + Instrumentation, p. 91531N (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2057224
C.D. Sheehy et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.5516 (2011)
J.P. Filippini et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.2158 (2011)
M.D. Niemack et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. 184(3–4), 746–753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-015-1395-6
G. Marsden et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:0805.4420 (2008)
B.A. Benson et al., SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, p. 91531P (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2057305
A. Anderson et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018)
W. Everett et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018)
J.E. Carlstrom, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 123(903), 568 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1086/659879
Laird Technology, Product Eccosorb HR. http://www.eccosorb.com/products-eccosorb-hr.htm. Accessed 7 May 2018
C.M. Posada et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 28, 094002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/28/9/094002
C.M. Posada et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1924-1
F.W. Carter et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1910-7
J. Ding et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 2100204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2639378
J. Ding et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1907-2
A.N. Bender, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation, vol. 9914, p. 99141D (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2232146
J. Avva et al., J. Low Temp. Phys. This special issue (2018)
D.H. Martin, E. Puplett, Infrared Phys. 10(2), 105–109 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0891(70)90006-0
A. Kogut et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 025 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/025
K.D. Irwin, G.C. Hilton, Cryogenic Particle Detection (Springer, Berlin, 2005), pp. 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/10933596_3
Thomas Keating Ltd., Product Tessellating TeraHertz RAMs. http://www.terahertz.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=448. Accessed 7 May 2018
Helioworks Inc., Product EF-8530. https://helioworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/EF-8530.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018
Acknowledgements
The South Pole Telescope is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Grant PLR-1248097. Partial support is also provided by the NSF Physics Frontier Center Grant PHY-1125897 to the Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, and the Kavli Foundation and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant GBMF 947. Work at Argonne National Laboratory, including Laboratory Directed Research and Development support and use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials, a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science (DOE-OS) user facility, was supported under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. Work at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, a DOE-OS, HEP User Facility managed by the Fermi Research Alliance, LLC, was supported under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359. NWH acknowledges support from NSF CAREER Grant AST-0956135. The McGill authors acknowledge funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, and Canada Research Chairs program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, Z., Ade, P.A.R., Ahmed, Z. et al. Optical Characterization of the SPT-3G Camera. J Low Temp Phys 193, 305–313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1935-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1935-y