Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ayasse, M., Paxton, R. J., and Tengo, J. (2001). Mating behaviour and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 31–78.
Bernays, E. A., and Chapman, R. L. (1994). Host -plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.
Branquart, E., and Hemptinne, J. (2000). Selectivity in the exploitation of floral resources by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae). Ecography 23: 732–742.
Cameron, S. A. (1981). Chemical signals in bumble bee foraging. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 257–260.
Dicke, M. (2000). Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: A multitrophic perspective. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28: 601–617.
Ferguson, A. W., and Free, J. B. (1979). Production of forage-marking pheromone by the honey bee. J. Apicult. Res. 18: 128–135.
Gilbert, F., Azmeh, S., Barnard, C., Behnke, J., Collins, S. A., Hurst, J., and Shuker, D. (2001). The Behavioural Ecology Field Course. Individually recognisable scent marks on flowers made by a solitary bee. Anim. Behav. 61: 217–229.
Goulson, D., Chapman, J. W., and Hughes, W. O. H. (2001). Discrimination of unrewarding flowers by bees: Direct detection of rewards and use of repellent scent marks. J. Insect Behav. 14: 669–678.
Goulson, D., Hawson, S. A., and Stout, J. C. (1998). Foraging bumble bees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumble bee species. Anim. Behav. 55: 199–206.
Goulson, D., Allen, J. A., Stout, J. C., Langley, J., and Hughes, W. H. O. (2000). Identity and function of scent marks deposited by foraging bumble bees. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: 2897–2911.
Heinrich, B. (1979). Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumble bees. Oecologia 40: 235–245.
Kato, M. (1988). Bumble bee visits to Impatiens spp.: pattern and efficiency. Oecologia 76: 364–370.
Marden, J. H. (1984). Remote perception of floral nectar by bumble bees. Oecologia 64: 232–240.
Nufio, C. R., and Papaj, D. R. (2001). Host marking behaviour in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 99: 273–293.
Nunez, J. A. (1967). Sammelbienen markieren versiegte Futterquellen durch Duft. Naturwissenschaften 54: 322–323.
Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.
Schmitt, U., and Bertsch, A. (1990). Do foraging bumble bees scent-mark food sources and does it matter? Oecologia 82: 137–144.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, USA.
Stout, J. C., and Goulson, D. (2001). The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumble bees and honey bees. Anim. Behav. 62: 183–189.
Stout, J. C., and Goulson, D. (2002). The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumble bees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 239–246.
Stout, J. C., Goulson, D., and Allen, J. A. (1998). Repellent scent-marking of flowers by a guild of foraging bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43: 317–326.
Thorp, R. W., Briggs, D. L., Estes, J. R., and Erickson, E. H. (1975). Nectar fluorescence under ultraviolet irradiation. Science 189: 476–478.
Vallet, A., Gassier, P., and Lensky, Y. (1991). Ontogeny of the fine-structure of the mandibular glands of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers and the pheromonal activity of 2-heptanone. J. Insect Physiol. 37: 789–804.
Van der Meer, R. K., Breed, M. D., Espelie, K. E., and Winton, M. L. (1998). Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Williams, C. S. (1998). The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees. Anim. Behav. 56: 673–681.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reader, T., MacLeod, I., Elliott, P.T. et al. Inter-Order Interactions Between Flower-Visiting Insects: Foraging Bees Avoid Flowers Previously Visited by Hoverflies. J Insect Behav 18, 51–57 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-9346-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-9346-8