Abstract
In the majority of classical inventory theory literature, demand arises from exogenous sources upon which the firm has little or no control. In many practical contexts, however, aggregate demand is comprised of individual demands from a number of distinct customers or markets. This introduces new dimensions to supply chain planning problems involving the selection of markets or customers to include in the demand portfolio. We present a nonlinear, combinatorial optimization model to address planning decisions in both deterministic and stochastic settings, where a firm constructs a demand portfolio from a set of potential markets having price-sensitive demands. We first consider a pricing strategy that dictates a single price throughout all markets and provide an efficient algorithm for maximizing total profit. We also analyze the model under a market-specific pricing policy and describe its optimal solution. An extensive computational study characterizes the effects of key system parameters on the optimal value of expected profit, and provides some interesting insights on how a given market’s characteristics can affect optimal pricing decisions in other markets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abad P.L. (1996). Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability and partial backordering. Manage. Sci. 42(8): 1093–1104
Armstrong, M.: Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. In: Blundell R., Newey W., Persson T. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications: Ninth World Congress, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Balakrishnan A., Natarajan H.P. and Pangburn M.S. (2000). Optimizing delivery fees for a network of distributors. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 2(3): 297–316
Battalio R.C., Ekelund, R.B., Jr. (1972). Output change under third degree discrimination. South. Econ. J. 39(2): 285–290
Cabral, L.M.B.: Introduction to Industrial Organization. MIT Press (2000)
Carr S. and Lovejoy W. (2000). The inverse newsvendor problem: choosing an optimal demand portfolio for capacitated resources. Manage. Sci. 46(7): 912–927
Chang P.L. and Lin C.T. (1991). On the effect of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42(11): 1025–1030
Chen M.S. and Lin C.T. (1989). Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 40(6): 597–602
Chen F., Federgruen A. and Zheng Y.S. (2001). Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Manage. Sci. 47(5): 693–708
Chen F., Federgruen A. and Zheng Y.S. (2001). Near-optimal pricing and replenishment strategies for a retail/distribution system. Oper. Res. 49(6): 839–853
Cherikh M. (2000). On the effect of centralisation on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(6): 755–761
Eppen G.D. (1979). Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manage. Sci. 25(5): 498–501
Federgruen A. and Heching A. (2002). Multilocation combined pricing and inventory control. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 4(4): 275–295
Geunes J., Shen Z. and Romeijn H.E. (2004). Economic ordering decisions with market choice flexibility. Naval Res. Logist. 51: 117–136
Geunes J., Romeijn H.E. and Taaffe K. (2006). Requirements planning with pricing and order selection flexibility. Oper. Res. 54(2): 394–401
Lau A. and Lau H. (1988). The newsboy problem with price-dependent demand distribution. IIE Trans. 20(2): 168–175
Lau A. and Lau H. (2003). Effects of a demand-curve’s shape on the optimal solutions of a multi-echelon inventory/pricing model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147: 530–548
Layson S.K. (1994). Market opening under third-degree price discrimination. J. Ind. Econ. 42(3): 335–340
Lin C.T., Chen C.B. and Hsieh H.J. (2001). Effects of centralization on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(6): 839–841
Mills E.S. (1959). Uncertainty and price theory. Quart. J. Econ. 73: 116–130
Petruzzi N.C. and Dada M. (1999). Pricing and the newsvendor problem: a review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2): 183–194
Phlips L. (1988). Price discrimination: a survey of the theory. J. Econ. Surv. 2(2): 135–167
Pigou, A.C.: The Economics of Welfare. MacMillan and Co. (1920)
Polatoglu L.H. (1991). Optimal order quantity and pricing decisions in single-period inventory systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 23: 175–185
Porteus E.L. (1985). Investing in reduced set-ups in the EOQ model. Manage. Sci. 31: 998–1010
Ray S., Gerchak Y. and Jewkes E.M. (2005). Joint pricing and inventory policies for make-to-stock products with deterministic price-sensitive demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 97: 143–158
Robinson, J.: The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Macmillan and Co. (1933)
Ross, S.M.: Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press (2006)
Schmalensee R. (1981). Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination, Am. Econ. Rev. 71(1): 242–247
Shen Z.J., Coullard C. and Daskin M. (2003). A joint location-inventory model. Transport. Sci 37(1): 40–55
Taaffe, K., Geunes, J., Romeijn, H.E.: Target market selection and marketing effort under uncertainty: the selective newsvendor. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (Forthcoming)
Tirole, J.: The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press (1988)
Varian H.R. (1985). Price discrimination and social welfare. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(4): 870–875
Viswanathan S. and Wang Q. (2003). Discount pricing decisions in distribution channels with price-sensitive demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149: 571–587
Whitin T.M. (1955). Inventory control and price theory. Manage. Sci. 2: 61–68
Young L. (1978). Price, inventory and the structure of uncertain demand. New Zeal. Oper. Res. 6(2): 157–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bakal, I.S., Geunes, J. & Romeijn, H.E. Market selection decisions for inventory models with price-sensitive demand. J Glob Optim 41, 633–657 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9269-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9269-3