Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the connection between experiential knowledge of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer and understandings of personal cancer risk. Using a qualitative research design, the investigator conducted in-depth interviews with 53 individuals (45 female, 8 male) from families at high-risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Study results showed that two forms of experiential knowledge, empathetic and embodied knowledge, were integral to participants’ constructions of their cancer risk. They also illustrated that knowledge derived from experience often took precedence over objective clinical estimates of risk. The paper discusses the clinical implications of these findings and suggests that counseling strategies, which expand upon patient’s lived experience and knowledge of the disease, may enhance communication of genetic risk. Assessment of experiential knowledge promises to suggest new ways to frame genetic information that will enable people to better understand their objective risk or to modify exaggerated and/or inaccurate risk perceptions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abel, E. K., & Browner, C. H. (1998). Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In M. Lock & P. A. Kaufert (Eds.), Pragmatic women and body politics (pp. 310–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Babbit, S. (1993). Feminism and objectives interests: The role of transformation experiences in rational deliberation. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 245–263). New York: Routledge.
Baider, L., & De-Nour, A. K. (2000). Cancer and couples-its impact on the healthy partner: Methodological considerations. In L. Baider, C. Cooper, & A. K. De-Nour (Eds.), Cancer and the family, (2nd ed., pp. 41–52). New York: Wiley.
Baider, Ever-Hadani, P., & DeNour, A. K. (1999). Psychological distress in health women with familial breast cancer: Like mother, like daughter? Inter J Psych Med, 29(4), 411–420.
Beeson, D., & Doksum, T. (2001). Family values and resistance to genetic testing. In B. Hoffmaster (Ed.), Bioethics in social context (pp. 153–179). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bernhardt, B., Geller, G., Strauss, M., Helzlouer, K., Stefanek, M., Wilcox, P., et al. (1997). Toward a model of informed consent process for BRCA1 testing: A qualitative assessment of women’s attitudes. J Genet Couns, 6, 207–222.
Biesecker, B. (1997). Psychological issues in cancer genetics. Sem Oncol Nurs, 13(2), 129–134.
Blandy, C., Chabal, F., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., & Julian-Reynier, C. (2003). Testing participation in BRCA1/2 positive families: Initiator role of index cases. Genet Testing, 7(3), 225–233.
Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Lovato, C. Y., & Joab, S. A. (1998). Communicating cancer risk information: The challenges of uncertainty. Pat Educ Couns, 33(1), 67–81.
Braithwaite, D., Emery, H., Walter, F., Prevost, A., & Sutton, S. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nat Can Inst, 96(2), 122–133.
British Columbia Ministry of Education (1989). Year 2000: A curriculum and assessment framework for the future. Province of British Columbia.
British Columbia Ministry of Education (1990). Year 2000: A Framework for Learning. Province of British Columbia.
Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chalmers, K., & Thomson, K. (1996). Coming to terms with the risk of breast cancer: Perceptions of women with primary relatives with breast cancer. Qual Health Res, 6(2), 256–282.
Chalmers, K., Thomson, K., & Degner, L. F. (1996). Information, support, and communication needs of women with a family history of breast cancer. Can Nurs, 19(3), 204–213.
Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15–48). New York: Routledge.
Cull, A., Anderson, E., Campbell, S., MacKay, J., Smyth, E., & Steel, M. (1999). The impact of genetic counseling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer, 79, 501–508.
d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2003). Experiential knowledge, moral agency and genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Dalmiya, V., & Alcoff, L. (1993). Are “Old Wives’ Tales” Justified? In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 217–244). New York: Routledge.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erblich, J., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Valdimarsdottir, H. B. (2000). Looking forward and back: Distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Ann Behav Med, 22, 53–59.
Evans, D. G. R., Blair, V., Greehalg, R., Hopwood, P., & Howell, A. (1994). The impact of genetic counseling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 70, 934–938.
Evans, D. G. R., Brunell, L. D., Hopwood, P., & Howell, A. (1993). Perception of risk in women with a family history of cancer. Br J Cancer, 67, 612–614.
Geller, G., Bernhardt, B., Helzlouer, K., Holtzman, N., Stefanek, M., & Wilcox, P. (1995). Informed consent and BRCA1 testing. Nat Genet, 11, 364.
Geller, G., Strauss, M., Bernhardt, B., & Holtzman, N. (1997). Decoding informed consent: Insights from women regarding breast cancer susceptibility testing. Hastings Cen Rep, 27(2), 28–33.
Good, B. (1994). Medicine, rationality and experience: An anthropological perspective Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hailey, B., Carter, C. L., & Burnett, D. (2000). Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Health Care Women Int, 21, 701–715.
Hallowell, N., Stratham, H., & Murton, F. (1998). Women’s understanding of their risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer before and after genetic counseling. J Genet Couns, 7, 345–364.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity?” In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge.
Hopwood, P., Keeling, F., Long, A., Pool, C., Evans, G., & Howell, A. (1998). Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer. Some preliminary indicators. Psychosoc Oncol, 7, 402–412.
Hopwood, P., Shenton, A., Lalloo, F., Evans, D. G. R., & Howell, A. (2001). Risk perception and cancer worry: An explanatory study of the impact of genetic risk counseling in women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet, 38, 139–142.
Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (1994). Data management and data analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jacobs, L. (2000). An analysis of the concept of risk. Canc Nurs, 23, 12–19.
Jacobsen, P., Valdimarsdottir, H., Brown, K. L., & Offit, K. (1997). Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosom Med, 59, 459–466.
Julian-Reynier, C., Eisinger, F., Vennin, P., Chabal, F., Aurran, Y., Nogues, C., et al. (1996). Attitudes towards cancer predictive testing and transmission of information to the family. J Med Genet, 33, 731–736.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 262–290.
Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., & Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviours of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 84, 24–30.
Kasper, A. S., & Ferguson, S. J. (Eds.). (2000). Breast cancer: Society shapes and epidemic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kenen, R., Audern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2002). Family stories and the use of heuristics: Women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Soc Health Illn, 25, 838–865.
Kenen, R., Audern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004). We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer. Psychooncology, 13, 335–345.
Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A., & Balshem, A. (1994). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol, 12, 843–850.
Lerman, C., Day, M., Sands, C., Balshem, A., Lustbader, E., Heggen, T., et al. (1993). Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 85, 1074–1080.
Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C., et al. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 87, 286-292.
Lerman, C., Seay, J., Balshem, A., & Audrain, J. (1995). Interest in genetic testing among first degree relatives of breast cancer patients. Am J Med Genet, 57, 385–392.
Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., & Tylee, A. (1996). Familial breast cancer: A controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending genetic counseling. Br J Cancer, 74, 482-487.
Lock, M., & Kaufert, P. (1998). Introduction. In M. Lock & P. Kaufert (Eds.), Pragmatic women and body politics (pp. 1–27). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marteau, T., & Lerman, C. (2001). Genetic risk and behavioural change. Br Med J, 322, 1056–1059.
McAllister, M. (2002). Predictive genetic testing and beyond: A theory of engagement. J Health Psychol, 7, 491–508.
McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. Clin Genet, 64, 179–189.
Murphy, A. (1999). Dealing with the uncertainty of developing a cancer. Euro J Cancer Care, 8, 233–237.
Potts, L. (Ed.). (2000). Ideologies of breast cancer: A feminist perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Rees, G., Fry, A., & Cull, A. (2001). A family history of breast cancer: Women’s experiences from a theoretical perspective. Soc Sci Med, 52, 1433–1440.
Richards, M. (1996). Families, kinships and genetics. In T. Marteau and M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 249–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenbaum, M. E., & Roos, G. M. (2000). Women’s experiences of breast cancer. In A. S. Kasper & S. J. Ferguson (Eds.), Breast cancer: Society shapes an epidemic (pp. 153–182). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist constructivist approach. J Res Sci Teach, 32, 897–924.
Ryan, E., & Skinner, C. (1999). Risk beliefs and interest in counseling: Focus group interviews among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. J Cancer Educ, 14, 99–103.
Sachs, L. (1999). Knowledge of no return: Getting and giving information about genetic risk. Acta Oncol, 38, 735–740.
Sachs, L., Taube, A., & Tishelman, C. (2001). Risk in Numbers–Difficulties in the transformation of genetic knowledge from research to people. Acta Oncol, 40, 445–453.
Saywell, C., Beattie, L., & Henderson, L. (2000). Sexualized illness: The newsworthy body in media representations of breast cancer. In L. Potts (Ed.), Ideologies of breast cancer (pp. 37–61). London: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer: Strategies for genetic counseling. New York: Wiley-Liss.
Shaw, C., Abrams, K., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Psychological impact of predicting individuals’ risk of illness: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med, 49, 1571–1598.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbain, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Ground theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
Struewing, J. P., Lerman, C., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T., & Tucker, M. (1995). Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Preve, 4, 169–173.
Vernon, S., Voget, V., et al. (1993). Factors associated with perceived risk of reast cancer among women attending a screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 28(2), 137-144.
von Glaserfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York: Norton.
Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, H., et al. (1999). The impact of genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of cancer. Br J Cancer, 79, 868–874.
Weihs, K., & Reis, D. (2000). Family reorganization in response to cancer: A developmental perspective. In L. Baider, C. Cooper, & A. K. De-Nour (Eds.), Cancer and the family, (2nd ed., pp. 17–40). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wellisch, D., & Lindberg, N. (2000). Women at increased risk for breast cancer: Family issues, clinical treatment and research findings. In L. Baider, C. Cooper, & A. Kaplan De-Nour (Eds.), Cancer and the family, (2nd ed., pp. 405–423). Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Wexler, N. (1979). Russian roulette: The experience of being at risk for Huntington’s disease: Harbinger of the new genetics. In S. Kessler (Ed.), Genetic counseling: Psychological dimensions (pp. 199–220). New York: Academic Press.
Zakowski, S. G., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Bowberg, D. H., Borgen, P., Holland, J., & Kash, K. (1997). Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer. Ann Behav Med, 19, 362–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
d’Agincourt-Canning, L. The Effect of Experiential Knowledge on Construction of Risk Perception in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer. J Genet Counsel 14, 55–69 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0