Abstract
This study examines perceptions of personal distress, interpersonal functioning and family climate reported by men and women involved in unidirectional versus bidirectional spouse abuse. Participants were 7253 offenders treated by the USAF Family Advocacy Program from 1988 to 1996. Over a quarter of the sample is female and included among them were both unidirectional and bidirectional offenders. Grouping factors for the analysis are gender, directionality of aggression, history of abuse in childhood, history of recidivism, and severity of aggression. Females and offenders raised in abusive homes reported more negative perceptions across the measured spheres. Unidirectional abusers reported more personal distress, but bidirectional abuse had more conflicted family climates. Few differences were noted in offenders' perceptions based on the severity of their abuse or their history of repeat offenses. Tests for interactions yielded no reliable pattern indicating that grouping factors were related to outcomes in an additive fashion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anglin, K., and Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1997). Comparing the responses of maritally violent and nonviolent spouses to problematic marital and nonmarital situations: Are the skill deficits of physically aggressive husbands and wives global? J. Fam. Psychol. 11: 301–313.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 126: 651–680.
Brinkeroff, M. B., and Lupri, E. (1988). Interspousal violence. Can. J. Sociol. 13: 407–434.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., and Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Soc. Prob. 39: 71–91.
Hamby, S. L., and Sugarman, D. B. (1999). Acts of psychological aggression against a partner and their relation to physical assault and gender. J. Marriage Fam. 61: 959–970.
Hudson, W. W. (1982). The Clinical Measurement Package: A Field Manual, Dorsey, Homewood, IL.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. J. Marriage Fam. 57: 283–294.
Johnson, M. P., and Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. J. Marriage Fam. 62: 948–963.
Kwong, M. J., Bartholomew, K., and Dutton, D. G. (1999). Gender differences in patterns of relationship violence. Can. J. Behav.l Sci. 31: 150–160.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., and Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. J. Fam. Viol. 10: 159–176.
Lehr, R. F., and Fitzsimmons, G. (1991). Adaptability and cohesion: Implications for understanding the violence-prone system. J. Fam. Violence 6: 255–265.
Lloyd, S. A. (1990). Conflict types and strategies in violent marriages. J. Fam. Violence 5: 269–284.
Lloyd, S. A. (1996). Physical aggression, distress, and everyday marital interaction. In Cahn, D. D., and Lloyd, S. A. (eds.), Family Violence From a Communication Perspective, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 177–198.
Madgol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A.., Newman, D. L., Fagan, J., and Silva, P. A. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. J. Counsel. Clin. Psychol. 65: 68–78.
McFarlane, J., and Willson, P. (2000). Intimate partner violence. J. Interpers. Violence 15: 158–169.
Meredith, W. H., Abbott, D. A., and Adams, S. L. (1986). Family violence: Its relation to marital and parental satisfaction and family strengths. J. Fam. Violence 4: 299–305.
Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory Manual, 2nd edn., PSYTEC, Decalb, IL.
Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 14: 547–583.
Moos, R. H., and Moos, B. S. (1986). Family Environment Scale Manual, 2nd edn., Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Nazroo, J. (1995). Uncovering gender differences in the use of marital violence: The effect of methodology. Sociology 29: 475–494.
Stets, J. E. and Straus, M. (1989). The marriage as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabitating, and married couples. J. Fam. Violence 4: 161–180.
Stets, J. E., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 151–165.
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41: 75–88.
Straus, M. (1980). Victims and aggressors in marital violence. Am. Behav. Sci. 23: 681–704.
Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marriage Fam. 48: 465–479.
Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 95–112.
Straus, M. A., and Sweet, S. (1992). Verbal/symbolic aggression in couples: Incidence rates and relationships to personal characteristics. J. Marriage Fam. 54: 346–357.
Thompson, E. H. (1991). The maleness of violence in dating relationships: An appraisal of stereotypes. Sex Roles 24: 261–278.
Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Violence Victims 9: 107–124.
Zlotnick, C., Kohn, R., Peterson, J., and Pearlstein, T. (1998). Partner physical victimization in a national sample of American families. Relationship to psychological functioning, psychosocial factors, and gender. J. Interpers. Violence 13: 156–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, L., Pittman, J.F. Sex of Spouse Abuse Offender and Directionality of Abuse as Predictors of Personal Distress, Interpersonal Functioning, and Perceptions of Family Climate. J Fam Viol 20, 329–339 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-6609-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-6609-2