Introduction

Organic luminophores, as basic dopants for polymer matrixes, are known to be used in construction of electroluminescent light emitting diodes (LEDs), electroluminescent (ELDs), thin film transistor and photovoltaic devices. The spectral range of the fluorescence may be modified by switching to pyrazolo-quinoline (PQ) derivatives, i.e. by introducing a different type of organic or inorganic substituents. The absorption and emission spectra in this case significantly depend on the substitution pattern as well as on the type of substituents [1, 2]. A prominent example is diethyl amine pyrazolo-quinoline-derivative which generates a sharp green electroluminescence [3]. Further improvement/modification of basic characteristics of organic luminophores requires a detailed knowledge concerning their electronic properties. Important information on this account may be obtained by studying an optical absorption and photoluminescence in UV/Vis parts of the spectra in combination with a quantum chemical modeling. H. Ze and co-workers reported the synthesis of pyrazolo[3,4-b]quinoline derivatives with the efficient blue photoluminescence and energy transfer in polymer materials [4]. Thus a suitable blue-emitting material with high brightness and good thermal stability still remains to be developed.

In our earlier publications [58] we have reported the synthesis of dipyrazolo[3,4-b:3,4-d]pyridines (DPP), pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyridines (PPP) and pyridine-3-carbonitriles which showed remarkable fluorescent properties. We noted that the fluorescent properties of these derivatives depend upon the nature of substituents on the phenyl ring in dipyrazolo[3,4-b:3,4-d]pyridine (DPP) and on the phenyl group attached to N-atom of pyrazole ring in pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyridines (PPP). Encouraged by this study and hunt for new fluorescent compounds, we investigated the novel synthesis and photophysical properties of spiro-oxazino-quinolines.

Result and discussion

The synthesis of spiro-quinolone derivatives 6, 8 and 10 were achieved from highly reactive starting material, 2-aminoquinoline-3-carbonitrile 4 and cyclic ketone 5, 7 and 9. Compound 4 has been synthesized starting with 2-aminobenzaldehyde [9, 10]. The compound 1 containing bifunctional groups (NO2 and CHO) was used as precursor for the synthesis of 2-aminoquinoline-3-carbonitrile 4. Thus, commercially available compound 1 on reaction with malanonitrile in ethanol containing catalytic amount of piperidine at 20–25 °C furnished an open chain compound 2 in 80% yield. After successful reduction of nitro to amino by using reducing agent Fe/FeCl3 gave compound 4 (withought isolation of 3) in 80% yield (Scheme 1). Compound 4 is an important intermediate for the various heterocyclic compounds and we have used it for the synthesis of spiro-compounds 6, 8 and 10. Thus, the compound 4 on reaction with cyclic ketones 5, 7 and 9 in presence of Lewis acid (ZnCl2) yielded spiro-quinoline derivatives in 60–70% yield (Scheme 2). The structure of compound 6, 8 and 10 were confirmed by spectroscopic analysis. For example, the 1H NMR spectrum of spiro compound 6a showed triplet at δ 1.3 for two protons of methylenes group. The multiplet between δ 2.80–2.90 due to eight protons of 4-CH2 group of cyclohexane moiety in 6a. The multiplet between 7.22–7.80 corresponded to four protons of benzene ring in 6a. Singlet appeared at δ 8.50 for aromatic proton of pyridine ring. Both the NH and C=NH protons showed broad singlet at δ 8.40 and 10.20 respectively. The mass spectrum of 6a displayed a molecular ion peak m/z at 267, which is constituent with the molecular weight of 6a. The structure of the other compounds 8 and 10 were established on the basis of spectroscopic and analytical data (experimental section).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthetic route for 2-aminoquinoline-3-carbonitrile

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Synthetic route for spiro-oxazino-quinolines (6, 8 and 10)

Mechanism

The proposed mechanism for the formation of spiro[1, 3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclohexan-4(1H)-imine (6, 8, 10) derivatives can be explained by Scheme 3. The nucleophilic attack of the amino group of 4 onto the carbonyl carbon atom of cyclic ketone gave intermediate 11 and the product (6, 8 and 10) were obtained through subsequent cyclization by attack of the oxygen atom onto the nitrile group of 4.

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Proposed mechanism

Photophysical properties

The photophysical properties of compounds 6, 8 and 10 were determined with respect to quinine sulphate which was used as a reference standard for the present study. Compounds 6, 8 and 10 showed (Table 1) absorption and emission in near visible region and it is remarkable that compound 6b showed absorption in visible region (UV λMax = 430 nm) and emission (Em λMax = 480.5 nm). It was noted that, when compound 4 was condensed with 4-methylcyclohexanone (5b), the resulted spiro-quinoline compound 6b showed red-shifted absorption as compared to 6a, 6c and 6d (Fig. 1). This may be due to the presence of electron donating methyl group at para position in 6b. These finding reveals that the compound 6b exhibit remarkable fluorescent character with high quantum yield (ϕF = 0.21) in comparison with other derivatives of 6a, 6c, 6d, 8 and 10.

Table 1 The photophysical data for electronic (UV λMax.) and fluorescence (Em λMax.) and quantum yield (ϕ) of compounds 4, 6, 8 and 10 in CHCl3 as the solvents at 25 °C
Fig. 1
figure 1

The comparative absorption (UV λMax.) and emission (Em λMax.) spectra of compounds (6b) and (6c) respectively

Semi-empirical study

The gain interest into the atomic contribution on the frontier orbital, we analyzed the three-dimensional HOMO and LUMO coefficient contribution by the MOPAC-2009 (Version 8.331) [11, 12] and are given in Table 2. From this we observed that, 2-aminoquinoline-3-carobonitrile (4) has low GAP values (eV = 7.792) hence it is more thermally stable than 6, 8 and 10. This indicated higher overlapping of HOMO or LUMO orbital in the molecules 4 (Table 2).

Table 2 The molecular electronic properties (HOMO-LUMO energy, GAP) of the spiro-oxazino-quinolines (6, 8 and 10) and 2-aminoquinoline-3-carobonitrile (4)

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have described a novel and efficient method for the synthesis of spiro-oxazino-quinoline derivatives via cyclocondensation of substituted 2-aminoquinoline-3-carobonitrile 4 and cyclic ketones (5, 7 and 9) using easily available Lewis acid catalyst ZnCl2. Compounds 6, 8 and 10 showed very good fluorescent properties and it was noted spiro-compound (6b) obtained by the condensation of 4-methylcyclohexanone with compound 4, absorb in visible region (λMax. = 430 nm). Thermal analysis of compounds 6ad, 8 and 10 by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that they are thermally stable up to 300 °C. The efficient blue light emission and physical and chemical stability makes spiro-oxazino-quinoline a promising family of materials which may be useful in opto-electronic applications. The practical results obtained are in agreement with the HOMO, LUMO and heat of formation obtained by the semiempirical PM3/PM6 methods.

Experimental

General

Melting points were determined on a Barnstead Electro Thermal melting point apparatus, Mod. No. IA-9200 in open capillary tubes. The 1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) spectra were recorded on Varian XL-300 spectrometer. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm from internal tetramethylsilane standard and are given δ-units. The solvent for NMR spectra was deutero-chloroform unless otherwise stated. Infrared spectra were taken on Shimadzu IR-408, instrument in potassium bromide pellets unless otherwise stated. Elemental analyses were performed on a Hosli CH-Analyzer and are within ±0.3 of the theoretical percentage. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained with a Mat 112 Varian Mat Bremen (70 eV) mass spectrometer. Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (s.d. Fine Chemicals, 60–80 mesh). Solutions were concentrated in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure. All reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC), carried out on 0.2 mm silica gel 60 F254 (Merck) plates using UV light (254 and 366 nm) for detection. Common reagents-grade chemicals are either commercially available 2-aminobenzaldehyde [10] and were used without further purification or prepared by standard literature procedures. Semiempirical molecular orbital calculations were done by semiempirical PM3/PM6 methods, MOPAC [11, 12] program package.

Procedure for the synthesis of 2-(2-nitrobenzylidene)-malononitrile (2)

A mixture of compound 1 (5 g, 0.033 mol) and malononitrile (2.4 g, 0.036 mol) was dissolved in ethanol (25 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 5 h. After completion (TLC Check Toluene: Acetone 8:2), reaction mixture was poured in ice-cold water (100 mL), and further stirred for 1 h to obtained colorless solid. Filtered, dried and recrystallized from ethanol to afford colorless prism in 80% yield, mp 141–143 °C, IR (KBr): 2985 m, 2715 s, 2225 m, 1540 m, 1480 m, 1623 s, 922 s, 752 m cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.21 (s, 1H, CH), 7.96–8.43 (m, 4H, ArH), MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 199(20) [M +1], 168(60), 150(60), 118(100), 102(90). Anal. calcd. For C10H5N3O2 (199.17): C, 60.35; H, 2.53; N, 21.11. Found: C, 60.48, H, 2.73, N, 21.23.

Procedure for the synthesis of 2-aminoquinoline-3-carbonitrile (4)

A mixture of compound 2 (10 g, 0.05 mol) and Fe (Iron) powder (12.75 g, 0.25 mol) was added in 100 ml ethanol and mixture was stirred at 40–45 °C for 30 min. Then solution of FeCl3 (0.63 g, FeCl3 dissolved in 6 ml water) was added drop wise in above reaction mixture. After complete addition, reaction mixture was refluxed for 7–8 h (TLC Check), filtered, and half of the solvent was evaporated under vacuum and remaining reaction mixture was quenched in ice-cold water (100 mL), to obtain the yellow color solid. Filtered, dried and recrystallized from THF to afford yellow crystal of 4. Yield: 7.2 g (80%); mp 188–192 °C, IR(KBr): 3396 m, 3321 m, 3161 m, 2225 s, 1652 s, 920 m, 748w, cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 5.45 (bs, 2H, NH2), 8.30 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.24–7.66 (m, 4H, ArH). MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 170 (50) [M+1], 155 (100), 113 (80), 108(60). Anal. Calcd. For C10H7N3 (169.18): C, 71.07; H, 4.17; N, 24.84. Found: C, 71.28, H, 4.28, N, 24.92.

General procedure for the synthesis of spiro[1, 3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-(6, 8 and 10)

To a solution of DMF (10 mL) and ZnCl2 (1.6 g, 0.0118 mol) were added substituted 2-aminocarbonitrile 4 (2 g, 0.0118 mol) and cyclic ketone (4 mL) (5ad, 7, 9). The mixture was heated at reflux for 3–4 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated by the TLC (eluent: ethyl acetate: n-hexane 9:1), the cooled reaction mixture was quenched with water (15 mL) and the precipitate was separated by filtration. The filtration residue was dispersed into water and titrated to pH 12–13 by 30% sodium hydroxide. After filtration the crude product was purified by recrystalistaion.

Spiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclohexan]-4(1H)-imine (6a)

Yield: 2.05 g (65%), recrystallized from ethylacetate to afford yellow solid; mp 236–238 °C. IR (KBr): 3254 m, 3175 m, 2856 m, 1654 s, 1618 s, 1562 m, 1436 m, 804 m, 761 m cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ) δ :1.31 (t, 2H, CH2), 2.80–2.90 (m, 8H, 4 × CH2), 7.22–7.80 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.40 (bs, 1H, NH), 8.50 (s, 1H, ArH), 10.20(bs, 1H, NH). MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 268 (40, [M+1], 265(70), 249(80), 237(10), 169(20), 142(10), 127(30), 113(15). Anal. Calcd. For C16H17N3O (267.33): C, 71.97; H, 6.41; N, 15.73. Found C, 72.19; H, 6.63; N, 15.51.

4-Methylspiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclohexan]-4(1H)-imine (6b)

Yield: 2.15 g (65%), recrystallized from ethyl acetate to afford pale yellow crystal; mp 242–244 °C. IR (KBr): 3248 m, 3168 m, 2949 m, 2927 m, 1672 s, 1622 s, 1577 m, 1390 m, 806 m, 766 m cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz,CDCl3) δ: 0.91 (d, 3H, CH3), 1.30 (q, 2H, CH2), 1.60 (q, 1H, CH), 1.80 (t, 4H, 2 × CH2), 2.20(t, 2H, CH2), 3.80 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.90 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.20–7.60 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.60 (s, 1H, ArH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 22, 38, 68, 112, 124, 126, 130, 132, 136, 140, 148, 154, 162. Anal. Calcd. For C17H19N3O (281.35): C, 72.66; H, 6.81; N, 14.95. Found C, 72.43; H, 6.52; N, 14.71.

2-Methylspiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclohexan]-4(1H)-imine(6c)

Yield: 2.20 g (68%), recrystallized from ethanol to afford pale yellow crystal; mp 235–238 °C. IR (KBr): 3186 m, 3051 m, 2929 m, 1666 s, 1620 s, 1578 m, 1502 s, 1433 s cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 0.9 (d, 3H, CH3), 1.22 (q, 1H, CH), 1.50 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.60 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.72 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.94 (t, 2H, CH2), 8.35 (bs, 1H, NH), 8.40 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.20–7.80 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.60 (s, 1H, ArH). MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 282 (50) [M+1], 265(10), 241 (40), 169(20), 127(10). Anal. Clacd. For C17H19N3O (281.35): C, 72.66; H, 6.81; N, 14.95. Found C, 72.44; H, 6.78; N, 14.68.

3-Methylspiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclohexan]-4(1H)-imine(6d)

Yield: 1.90 g (60%), recrystallized from ethanol to afford yellow crystal; mp 228–230 °C. IR (KBr): 3170 m, 3077 m, 2950 m, 1680 s, 1620 s, 1560 m, 1489 m, 818 m, 768 m cm−1 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 0.82 (d, 3H, CH3), 1.20 (t, 2H, CH2), 1.55–1.90 (t, 7H, 3 × CH2 and CH), 7.70 (bs, 1H, NH), 8.50 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.20 (t, 1H, ArH), 7.5–7.6 (dd, 2H, ArH), 7.90 (d, 1H, ArH), 8.60 (s, 1H, ArH). Anal. Calcd. For C17H19N3O (281.35): C, 72.66; H, 6.81; N, 14.95. Found C, 72.52; H, 6.58; N, 14.68.

Spiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-cyclopentan]-4(1H)-imine (8)

Yield: 1.79 g (60%), recrystallized from ethanol to afford yellow crystal; mp 236–238 °C IR (KBr): 3174 m, 3057 m, 2939 m, 1685 s, 1618 s, 1568 m, 1502 m, 1429 m, 810 m, 760 m cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.85 (q, 4H, 2 × CH2), 2.01 (q, 4H, 2 × CH2), 5.80 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.70 (bs, 1H, NH), 7.20–7.80 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.60(s, 1H, ArH). MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 253 (90) [M+1], 241(50), 236(90), 202(40), 169(20), 127(20). Anal. Calcd. For C15H15N3O (253.3): C, 71.21; H, 5.97; N, 16.60. Found C, 71.41; H, 6.18; N, 16.88.

3′,4′-Dihydro-2′H-spiro[1,3]oxazino[4,5-b]quinoline-2,1′-naphthalen]-4(1H)-imine (10)

Yield: 2.60 g (70%), recrystallized from ethanol to afford pale yellow crystal; mp 266–268 °C. IR (KBr): 3178 m, 3024 m, 2935 m, 1654 s, 1618 s, 1573 m, 1504 m, 1433 m, 1390 m, 1346 m, 818 m, 755 m cm−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO) δ: 2.04 (t, 2H, CH2), 2.60 (t, 2H, CH2), 2.80 (t, 2H, CH2), 7.10–7.30 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.40–7.80 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.20 (bs, 1H, NH), 8.60 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.80 (bs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO) δ: 18, 28, 68, 111, 122, 123, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 131, 136, 139, 149, 154, 160. Anal. Calcd. For C20H17N3O (315.37): C, 76.26; H, 5.43; N, 13.33. Found C, 75.92; H, 5.21; N, 13.20.