Abstract
We evaluate observed inequality between population groups against a benchmark of the maximum between-group inequality attainable given the number and relative sizes of those groups under examination. Because our measure is normalized by these parameters, drawing comparisons across different settings is less problematic than with conventional inequality decompositions. Moreover, our measure can decline with finer sub-partitioning of population groups. Consequently, the exact manner in which one groups the population acquires greater significance. Survey data from various countries suggest that our approach can provide a complementary perspective on the question of whether (and how much) a particular population breakdown is salient to an assessment of inequality in a country.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anand, S.: Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1983)
Bourguignon, F.: Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47, 901–920 (1979)
Cowell, F.A.: On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 521–531 (1980)
Cowell, F.A.: Measurement of inequality. In: Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution. North Holland, Amsterdam (2000).
Cowell, F.A., Jenkins, S.P.: How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the United States. Econ. J. 105(429), 421–430 (1995)
Cowell, F.A., Kuga, K.: Additivity and the entropy concept: An axiomatic approach to inequality measurement. J. Econ. Theory 25, 131–143 (1981)
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A., Özler, B., Simler, K.: On the unequal inequality of poor communities. World Bank Econ. Rev. 18(3), 401–421 (2004)
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A., Özler, B.: Re-interpreting sub-group inequality decompositions. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3687 (2005)
Foster J., Sen A.K.: On economic inequality. Expanded edition. Clarendon, Oxford (1997)
Kanbur, R.:Income distribution and development. In: Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution. North Holland, Amsterdam (2000)
Mookherjee, D., Shorrocks, A.: A decompositions analysis of the trend in UK income inequality. Econ. J. 92(368), 886–902 (1982)
Özler, B.: Not separate, not equal: Poverty and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 55(3) 487–529 (2007)
Shorrocks, A.F.: The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48, 613–625 (1980)
Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52, 1369–1385 (1984)
Shorrocks, A.F., Wan, G.: Spatial decomposition of inequality. J. Econ. Geogr. 5, 59–81 (2004)
World Bank: World development report. Equity and development. Oxford University Press, Washington D.C. (2006)
Yitzhaki, S., Lerman, R.I.: Income stratification and income inequality. Rev. Income Wealth 37(3), 313–329 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10888-008-9098-8
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J.A. et al. Reinterpreting between-group inequality. J Econ Inequal 6, 231–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-007-9064-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-007-9064-x