Abstract
In this article I evaluate the contribution of R&D investments to productivity growth. The basis for the analysis are the free entry condition and the fact that most R&D innovations are embodied. Free entry yields a relationship between the resources devoted to R&D and the growth rate of technology. Since innovators are small, this relationship is not directly affected by the size of R&D externalities, or the presence of aggregate diminishing returns in R&D after controlling for the growth rate of output and the interest rate. The embodiment of R&D-driven innovations bounds the size of the production externalities. The resulting contribution of R&D to productivity growth in the US is smaller than 3–5 tenths of 1% point. This constitutes an upper bound for the case where innovators internalize the consequences of their R&D investments on the cost of conducting future innovations. From a normative perspective, this analysis implies that, if the innovation technology takes the form assumed in the literature, the actual US R&D intensity may be the socially optimal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt (1992). ''A Model of Growth Trough Creative Destruction,''Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.
Basu, S. (1996). ''Procyclical Productivity:Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?''Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 709–751.
Berndt, E. [1976] ''Reconciling Altenative Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution,''The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, No. 1. (Feb), pp. 59–68.
Burnside, C., M. Eichenbaum and S. Rebelo [1995]. ''Capital Utilization and Returns to Scale,''NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 67–110, Cambridge.
Campbell, J., and P. Perron (1991). ''Pitfalls and Opportunities:What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots,''in O. Blanchard and S. Fisher (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comin, D. (2002),''R&D? A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth,'' C. V. Starr Working Paper #2002–01
Comin, D., and S. Mulani (2004). ''Growth and Volatility,'' NYU mimeo
Dension, E., [1964] ''The Unimportance of the Embodied Question,'' American Economic Review, 54, 90–93.
Fisher, F., D. Levhari, and E. Sheshinski (1969). ''On the Sensitivity of the Level of Output to Savings: A Clari cation Note,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 83(2), 347–348.
Griliches, Z. (1992). ''The Search for R&D Spillovers,'' Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.
Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hamilton, J. (1994) Time Series Analysis Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Jones, C. (2002). ''Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas,'' American Economic Review 92(1) 220–239.
Jones, C., and J. Williams (1998). ''Measuring the Social Return to R&D,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1119–1138.
Jones, C., and J. Williams (2000). ''Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D,'' Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65–85.
Kortum, S. (1993). '' Equilibrium R&D and the Patent-R&D Ratio:U.S. Evidence,'' American Economic Review, 83, 450–457.
Levhari, D., and E. Sheshinski (1969). '' On the Sensitivity of the Level of Output to Savings,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 81, 524–528.
Mansfield, E., M. Schwartz and S. Wagner (1981). ''Imitation Costs and Patents:An Empirical Study,'' Economic Journal 91, 907–918.
Matthews, R. (1964). ''The New View of Investment:Comment,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(1), 164–172.
McHugh R., and J. Lane (1987). ''The Role of Emdodied Technological Change in the Decline of Labor Productivity,''Southern Economic Journal 53(4), 915–24.
Mehra, R., and E. Prescott (1985). ''The Equity Premium:A Puzzle,'' Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145–161.
Nadiri, I. (1993). ''Innovations and Technological Spillovers,'' C. V. Starr Working Paper #93–31.
Norrbin, S. (1993). ''The Relationship between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry:A Contradiction,'' Journal of Political Economy 101, 1149–1164.
Phelps, E. (1962). ''The New View of Investment:A Neoclassical Analysis,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 76(4), 548–567.
Phelps, E., and M. Yaari (1964). ''The New View of Investment:Reply,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 78(1), 172–176.
Pakes, A., and M. Schankerman (1984). ''The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources,'' in Zvi Griliches (ed.), Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rapoport, J. (1971). ''The Autonomy of the Product-innovation Process:Cost and Time,'' E. Mansfield (ed.), In Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation 110–35. New York: Norton, pp. 110–135.
Romer, P. (1990). ''Endogenous Technological Change,'' Journal of Political Economy 98, S71-S102.
Solow, R. (1959). ''Investment and Technical Change,'' in Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford.
Stokey, N. (1995). ''R&D and Economic Growth,'' Review of Economic Studies 62, 469–489.
Wagner, L. (1968). Problems in Estimating Research and Development Investment and Stock,'' in Proceedings of the business and economic statistics section. Washington, DC: American Statistics Association, pp. 189–198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comin, D. R&D: A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 391–421 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-004-4541-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-004-4541-6