Abstract
Objective
Hyperinflation of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff is thought to be the etiology underlying many of the complications associated with the use of this device. Until now, there has not been a clinically acceptable method (besides direct measurement) to assure that the cuff pressure is maintained less than the recommended maximum value of 44 mm Hg (60 cm H2O).
Methods
We inflated sizes #2 and #5 LMAs with air to 40, 60, or 120 mm Hg starting pressures, using 30- and 60-ml BD™ and B Braun™ syringes; we then allowed the syringe plungers to recoil to equilibrium before removing the syringe from the LMA inflation port. Residual LMA cuff pressures following complete passive recoil were measured and recorded.
Results
A number of combinations of syringes (30 and 60 ml) and starting pressures (40, 60, 120 mm Hg) resulted in safe residual (#2 and #5 LMA) cuff pressures of <44 mm Hg.
Conclusion
When using specific combinations of syringes, LMA sizes and inflation pressures, these data demonstrate an efficient, practical and easy method to achieve an initial equilibrium recoil LMA cuff pressure that is less than, or very near to, the recommended upper safe limit of 44 mm Hg.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Dingley J, Whitehead MJ, Wareham K. A comparative study of the incidence of sore throat with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:251–4.
Wakeling HG, Butler PJ, Baxter PJ. The laryngeal mask airway: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:687–90.
Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:652–7.
Rosenberg MK, Rontal E, Rontal M, Lebenbom-Mansour M. Arytenoid cartilage dislocation caused by a laryngeal mask airway treated with chemical splinting. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1335–6.
Laxton CH, Kipling R. Lingual nerve paralysis following the use of the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:869–70.
Marjot R. Trauma to the posterior pharyngeal wall caused by a laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1991;41:589–90.
Inomata S, Nishikawa T, Suga A, Yamashita S. Transient bilateral vocal cord paralysis after insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:787–8.
Licina A, Chambers NA, Hullett B, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Lower cuff pressures improve the seal of pediatric laryngeal mask airways. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:952–6.
Brain AI. Pressure in laryngeal mask airway cuffs. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:603.
Ong M, Chambers NA, Hullett B, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube cuff pressures in children: are clinical endpoints valuable for guiding inflation? Anaesthesia. 2008;63:738–44.
Maino P, Dullenkopf A, Keller C, Bernet-Buettiker V, Weiss M. Cuff filling volumes and pressures in pediatric laryngeal mask airways. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:25–30.
Haldar M, Immanuel P. LMA cuff pressure: an audit (abstract). Anesthesiology. 2008;109:A1720.
Lenoir RJ. Venous congestion of the neck; its relation to laryngeal mask cuff pressure. Br J Anesth. 2004;93:476–7.
Brimacombe J, Berry A, Brain AI. Optimal intracuff pressures with the laryngeal mask. Br J Anesth. 1996;77:295–6.
Abud TMV, Braz JRC, Martins RHG, Gregorio EA, Saldanha JC, Raiza ACP. The Lanz® endotracheal tube decreases tracheal injury in dogs. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:878–82.
Maino P, Dullenkopf A, Bernet V, Weiss M. Nitrous oxide diffusion into the cuffs of disposable laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:278–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Rice MJ, Gravenstein NL, Brull SJ, Morey TE, Gravenstein N. Using the inflating syringe as a safety valve to limit laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rice, M.J., Gravenstein, N.L., Brull, S.J. et al. Using the inflating syringe as a safety valve to limit laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure. J Clin Monit Comput 25, 405–410 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-011-9319-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-011-9319-8