Abstract
Traditional intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function involves the use of three techniques: 1. Orthodromic ascending somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and 2. antIDromic descending neurogenic somatosensory evoked potentials (DNSSEPs) monitor long-tract sensory function. SSEPs and DNSSEPs do not monitor interneuronal gray matter function. 3. Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TMEPs) monitor descending long-tract motor function and measure interneuronal gray matter function by activating motor neurons. TMEPs activate from 4–5% of the motor neuron pool. When using TMEPs 95–96% of the motor spinal cord systems activating the motor neurons are not monitored. Our ability to interact with our environment involves not only intact sensation and strength, but also complex coordinated motor behavior. Complex coordinated motor behavior is controlled by groups of electrically-coupled spinal cord central pattern generators (CPGs). The components of CPGs are: descending and propriospinal systems, peripheral input, and segmental interneurons. The point-of-control is the level of excitation of interneurons, which is determined by the integrated activity of the other components. Spinal cord injury (SCI) changes segmental reflex gain by uncoupling these components. Changes in gain are detected by recordings from muscles. SSEPs, DNSSEPs and TMEPs provIDe limited information about the status of CPGs. H-reflexes measure the function of from 20–100% of the motor neuron pool. F-responses measure the function of from 1–5% of the motor neuron pool. H-reflexes and F-responses provIDe information about the degree of coupling between CPG components. Recording H-reflexes and F-responses together with SSEPs and TMEPs not only monitors spinal cord long-tract function, but also provIDes a multiple-systems approach that monitors those spinal cord systems that are responsible for the control of complex coordinated motor behavior. The objective of this paper is to describe how H-reflexes and F-responses can be used to monitor complex coordinated motor behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
1 Nash CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 126: 100–105.
2 Cohen AR, Young W, Ransohoff J. Intraspinal localization of the somatosensory evoked potential. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 157–162.
3 Cusick JF, Myklebust JF, Larson SJ, Sances A Jr. Spinal cord potentials in the primate: Neural substrate. J Neurosurg 1978; 49: 551–557.
4 Larson SJ, Sances A Jr, Christenson PC. Evoked somatosensory potentials in man. Arch Neurol 1966; 15: 88–93.
5 Macon JB, Poletti CE, Sweet WH, Ojemann RG, Zervas NT. Conducted somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal surgery. Part 2: Clinical applications. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 354–359.
6 Jones SJ, Edgar MA, Ransford AO. Sensory nerve conduction in the human spinal cord: Epidural recordings made during spinal cord surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1982; 45: 446–451.
7 York DH. Somatosensory evoked potentials in man: differentiation of spinal pathways responsible for conduction from forelimbs vs hindlimb. Prog Neurobiol 1985; 25: 1–25.
8 Powers SK, Bolger CA, Edwards MS. Spinal cord pathways mediating somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 472–482.
9 Simpson RK Jr, Blackburn JG, Martin HF 3rd, Katz S. Peripheral nerve fibers and spinal cord pathway contribution to the somatosensory evoked potential. Exp Neurol 1981; 73: 700–715.
10 Leppanen R, Tyler W. Evidence for parallel spinal cord conduction by dissociation of spinal and cortical somatosensory components: Case study [abstract]. J Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 17: 531. Abstract C121.
11 Hurlbert RJ, Fehlings MG, Moncada MS. Use of sensory-evoked potentials recorded from the human occiput for intraoperative physiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. Spine 1995; 21: 2318–2327.
12 Dimitrijevic MR. Clinical neurophysiology of neural stimulation. In: Ducker TD, Brown RH, eds. Neurophysiology and standards of spinal cord monitoring. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988: 11–15.
13 Merton PA, Morton HB. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 1980; 285: 227.
14 Jellinek D, Jewkes D, Symon L. Noninvasive intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials under propofol anesthesia: effects of spinal surgery on the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 551–557.
15 Levy WJ. Use of motor evoked potentials as a monitoring tool. In: Stimulation of the brain and spinal cord: Fundamentals and clinical applications. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc. 1988: 275–296.
16 Edmonds HL, Paloheimo MPJ, Backman MH, Johnson JR, Holt RT, Shields CB. Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials(tcMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scoliosis surgery. Spine 1989; 14: 683–686.
17 Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 219–226.
18 Leppanen RE. Intraoperative interaction of transcranial electrical motor and somatosensory evoked potentials and f-responses [abstract]. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 22: 361. Abstract F123.
19 Deletis V, Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways [Review]. Adv Neurol 1993; 63: 201–214.
20 Deletis V, Bueno De Camargo A. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection [comment]. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 1488–1489.
21 Deletis V, Isgum V, Amassian VE. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans: Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 438–444.
22 Owen JH, Bridwell KH, Grubb R, Jenny A, Allen B, Padberg AM, Shimon SM. The clinical application of neurogenic motor evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function during surgery. Spine 1991; 16(8 Suppl): S385–S390.
23 Leppanen RE, Madigan R, Sears C, Maguire J, Wallace S, Captain J. Intraoperative collision studies demonstrate descending spinal cord stimulated evoked potentials and ascending somatosensory evoked potentials are mediated through common pathways. Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring, May 2, 1997, Chicago, Illinois.
24 Leppanen RE. Is the neurogenic motor evoked potential really a motor response? Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neurophysiology, January 28, 1999, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
25 Leppanen R, Madigan R, Sears C, Maguire J, Wallace S, Captain J. Intraoperative collision studies demonstrate descending spinal cord stimulated evoked potentials and ascending somatosensory evoked potentials are mediated through common pathways [abstract]. J Cin Neurphysiol 1999; 16: 170. Abstract A104.
26 Toleikis JR, Skelly JP, Carlvin AO, Burkus JK. Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 736–742.
27 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic lab. Descending neurogenic evoked potentials. Spine J 2004; 4: 713–716.
28 Minahan RE, Sepkuty JP, Lesser RP, Sponseller PD, Kostuik JP. Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials. [see comment]. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1442–1450.
29 Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gulati M, Lyon R, Gupta N, Yingling C. Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations. Neurosurgery 2002; 51(5): 1199–1206, discussion 1206-7.
30 Sepkuty J, Jallo G, Weingart J, Gokaslan Z, Gutierrez S. Dorsal column mapping: a new clinical tool for spinal cord monitoring. Accumulating experience in Johns Hopkins Hospital. Presented at the Joint Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, December 6, 2005, Washington, D.C..
31 Deletis V, Bueno De Camargo A. Interventional neurophysiological mapping during spinal cord procedures. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2001; 77: 25–28.
32 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic Lab. Where electrical stimulation is used to map sensory and motor spinal cord function and free-run EMG can be used to monitor motor neuron function during removal of intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Spine J, submitted 1/12/2006.
33 Taborikova H, Sax DS. Motoneurone pool and the H-reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1968; 31: 354–361.
34 Kimura J. Principles of nerve conduction studies. In: Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1983: 353–398.
35 Hultborn H, Nielsen JB. H-reflexes and F-responses are not equally sensitive to changes in motoneuronal excitability.[comment]. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 1471–1474.
36 Lin JZ, Floeter MK. Do F-wave measurements detect changes in motor neuron excitability? Muscle Nerve 2004; 30: 289–294.
37 Leppanen R, Maguire J, Wallace S, et al. Intraoperative recording of long-latency lower-extremity reflexes for the detection of suprasegmentally altered complex spinal cord electrophysiological processing [abstract]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 86: 28P.
38 Leppanen RE, Maguire J, Wallace S, Madigan R, Draper V. Intraoperative lower-extremity reflex muscle activity as an adjunct to conventional somatosensory-evoked potentials and descending neurogenic monitoring in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995; 20(17): 1872–1877.
39 Leis AA, Zhou HH, Mehta M, Harkey HL 3rd, Paske WC. Behavior of the H-reflex in humans following mechanical perturbation or injury to rostral spinal cord. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19(11): 1373–1382.
40 Leis AA. Physiology of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans. I. Behavior of the H-reflex and F-wave immediately following injury to rostral spinal cord in humans. Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neurophysiology, June 20–22, 1996, Chicago, IL.
41 Maguire J, Wallace S, Madigan R, Leppanen RE, Draper V. Intraoperative long-latency reflex activity in idiopathic scoliosis demonstrates abnormal central processing: A possible etiology for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1993; 18: 1621–1626.
42 Grillner S. Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods and fish. In: Brookhart JM, Mountcastle VB, eds. Handbook of physiology. The Nervous System. Vol. II, Part 2. Motor Control. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981: 1179–1236.
43 Anderson B, Binder M. Spinal and supraspinal control of movement and posture. In: Patton HD, Fuchs AF, Hillie B, Scher AM, Steiner R, eds. Textbook of physiology: Excitable cells and neurophysiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1988: 563–581.
44 Binder M. Peripheral motor control: Spinal reflex actions of muscle, joint and cutaneous receptors. In: Patton HD, Fuchs AF, Hille B, Scher AM, Steiner R, eds. Textbook of physiology: Excitable cells and neurophysiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1988: 522–48.
45 MacKay-Lyons M. Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 69–83.
46 Dietz V. Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 1379–1389.
47 Ghez C. The control of movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of neural science, 3rd Edition. East Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1991: 533–547.
48 Lloyd DPC. Reflex action in relation to pattern and source of afferent stimulation. J Neurophysiology 1943; 6: 111–120.
49 Sherrington CS. The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1906.
50 Calancie B, Broton JG, Klose KJ, Traad M, Difini J, Ayyar DR. Evidence that alterations in presynaptic inhibition contribute to segmental hypo- and hyperexcitability after spinal cord injury in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophys 1993; 89: 177–186.
51 Barnes CD, Joynt RJ, Schottelius BA. Motoneuron resting potentials in spinal shock. Am J Physiol 1962; 203: 113–116.
52 Walmsley B, Tracey DJ. The effect of transection and cold block of the spinal cord on synaptic transmission between 1a afferents and motoneurones. Neuroscience 1983; 9: 445–451.
53 Schadt JC. Barnes CD. Motoneuron membrane changes associated with spinal shock and the Schiff-Sherrington phenomenon. Brain Research 1980; 201: 373–383.
54 Cope TC, Nelson SG, Mendell LM. Factors outside neuraxis mediate “acute” increase in EPSP amplitude caudal to spinal cord transection. J Neurophys 1980; 44: 174–183.
55 Leis AA, Kronenberg MF, Stetkarova I, Paske WC, Stokic DS. Spinal motoneuron excitability after acute spinal cord injury in humans. Neurology 1996; 47(1): 231–237.
56 Slimp JC. Electrophysiologic intraoperative monitoring for spine procedures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2004; 15: 85–105.
57 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic lab. In which experiments on dogs show how spinal cord injury alters spinal cord processing and modulates late response recordings. Spine J 2005; 5: 115–117.
58 Shimoji K, Maruyama Y, Shimizu H, Fujioka H, Taga K. Spinal cord monitoring — a review of current techniques and knowledge. In: Schram J, Jones SJ, eds. Spinal cord monitoring. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 16–28.
59 Machida M, Weinstein SL, Yamada T, Kimura J. Spinal cord monitoring. electrophysiological measures of sensory and motor function during spinal surgery. Spine 1985; 10: 407–413.
60 Leppanen R, Tyler W. Evidence for parallel spinal cord conduction by dissociation of spinal and cortical somatosensory components: case study. J Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 17: 531.
61 Robertson SC, Traynelis VC, Yamada TT. Identification of the sensorimotor cortex with SSEP phase reversal. In: Loftus CM, Traynelis VC, eds. Intraoperative monitoring techniques in neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994: 107–111.
62 Dumitru D. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Special nerve conduction techniques. Baltimore: Mosby, 1995: 191–209.
63 Fisher MA. AAEM Minimonograph #13: H reflexes and F waves: Physiology and clinical indications. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 1223–1233.
64 Aminoff MJ. Other electrodiagnostic techniques for the evaluation of neuromuscular disorders. In: Electromyography in clinical practice; Clinical and electrodiagnostic aspects of neuromuscular disease, 3rd Edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998: 180.
65 Mayer RF, Mosser RS. Maturation of human reflexes. In: Desmedt JE, ed. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, Vol 3. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1973: 294–307.
66 Huffman P. Über die beziehungen der schnenreflexe zur ill kurlichen be wegung und zum tonus. Z Biol 1918; 68: 351–370.
67 Magladery JW, McDougal DB Jr. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1950; 86: 265–290.
68 Mayer RF, Mawdsley C. Studies in man and cat of the significance of the H-wave. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1965; 28: 201–211.
69 Oh SJ. Anatomical and physiological basis for electromyography studies. In: Clinical electromyography: nerve conduction studies, 2nd Edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993: 51.
70 Meunier S, Pierrot-Deseillgny E, Simonetta M. Pattern of monosynaptic heteronymous 1a connections in the human lower limb. Exp Brain Res 1993; 96: 534–544.
71 Magladery JW, Porter WE, Park AM, Teasdall RD. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. IV. The two-neurone reflex and identification of certain action potentials from spinal roots and cord. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 88: 499–519, 1951.
72 Magladery JW, Teasdall RD. Stretch reflexes in patients with spinal cord lesions. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1958; 103: 236–241.
73 Magladery JW, Teasdall RD, Park AM, Languth HW. Electrophysiological studies of reflex activity in patients with lesions of the nervous system. 1. A comparison of spinal motoneurone excitability following afferent nerve volleys in normal persons and patients with upper motor neurone lesions. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1952; 91: 219–244.
74 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic lab. H-reflexes in hand muscles after cervical spinal cord disease. Spine J 2003; 3: 405.
75 Taborikova H, Sax DS. Conditioning of H-reflexes by a preceding subthreshold H-reflex stimulus. Brain 1969; 92: 203–212.
76 Hugon M. Proprioceptive reflexes and the H-reflex. Methodology of Hoffman reflexes in man. In: Desmedt JE, ed. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1973: 277–293.
77 Braddom RI, Johnson EW. Standardization of H reflex and diagnostic use in S1 radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974; 55: 161–166.
78 Jankus WR, Robinson LR, Little JW. Normal limits of side-to-side H-reflex amplitude variability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 3–7.
79 Ma MD, Liveson JA. Nerve conduction handbook. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1983.
80 Dumitru D. Electrodiagnosis medicine. Needle electromyography. Baltimore: Mosby, 1995: 213.
81 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic lab. Intraoperative reflexes can be used to monitor nerve root and spinal cord gray matter function. Spine J 2004; 4: 480–481.
82 Schimsheimer RJ, de Visser BW, Kemp B. The flexor carpi radialis H-reflex in lesions of the sixth and seventh cervical nerve roots. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48: 445–449.
83 Schimsheimer RJ, Ongerboer de Visser BW, Kemp B, Bour LJ. The flexor carpi radialis H-reflex in polyneuropathy: relations to conduction velocities of the median nerve and the soleus H-reflex latency. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 447–452.
84 Burke D, Adams RW, Skuse NF. The effects of voluntary contraction on the H reflex of human limb muscles. Brain 1989; 112(Pt. 2): 417–433.
85 Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 560–580.
86 Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Excitability and inhibitibility of moroneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 599–620.
87 Barakan TH, Dowman CBB, Eccles JC. Electric potentials generated by antidromic volleys in quadriceps and hamstring motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1949; 12: 393–424.
88 Renshaw B. Influence of discharge of motoneurons upon excitation of neighboring motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1941; 4: 167–183.
89 Panayiotopoulos CP, Chroni E. F-waves in clinical neurophysiology: a review, methodological issues and overall value in peripheral neuropathies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101: 365–374.
90 Schoenfeldt R, Groce R, Laurenzi B. Motor system monitoring during joint replacement operations. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 197–198.
91 Inghilleri M, Lorenzano C, Conte A, Frasca V, Manfredi M, Berardelli A. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the H reflex and F wave in the hand muscles. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 1096–1101.
92 Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Late responses. In: Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders: clinical-electrophysiologic correlations. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998: 45–56.
93 Roth G, Soichot P. Cancellation of single F wave by double stimulation in case of chronic denervation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 97: 155–158.
94 Maguire J, Wallace S, Madigan R, Leppanen R, Draper V. Evaluation of intrapedicular screw position using intraoperative evoked electromyography. Spine 1995; 20: 1068–1074.
95 Deletis V, Vodusek DB. Intraoperative recording of the bulbocavernosus reflex. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 88–92; discussion 92–93.
96 Collins VJ. Principles of anesthesia: General and regional anesthesia, 3rd Edition, Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993: 850–937.
97 Viby-Mogensen J. Neuromuscular monitoring. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia, 6th Edition. New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingston, 2005: 1551–1570.
98 Zhou HH, Mehta M, Leis AA. Spinal cord motoneuron excitability during isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 302–307.
99 Mavroudakis N, Vandesteene A, Brunko E, Defevrimont M, Zegers de Beyl D. Spinal and brain-stem SEPs and H-reflex during enflurane anesthesia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 82–85.
100 Zhou HH, Zhu C. Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave. Anesthesiol 2000; 93: 32–38.
101 Zhou HH, Turndorf H. Hyper- and hypoventilation affects spinal motor neuron excitability during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesth & Analg 1998; 87: 407–410.
102 Kakinohana M, Motonaga E, Taira Y, Okuda Y. [The effects of intravenous anesthetics, propofol, fentanyl and ketamine on the excitability of spinal motoneuron in human: an F-wave study]. [Japanese] Masui - Japanese J Anesthesiol 2000; 49: 596–601.
103 Kerz T, Hennes HJ, Feve A, Decq P, Filipetti P, Duvaldestin P. Effects of propofol on H-reflex in humans. Anesthesiol 2001; 94: 32–37.
104 Rehberg B, Grunewald M, Baars J, Fuegener K, Urban BW, Kox WJ. Monitoring of immobility to noxious stimulation during sevoflurane anesthesia using the spinal H-reflex. Anesthesiol 2004; 100: 44–50.
105 Jinks SL, Atherley RJ, Dominguez CL, Sigvardt KA, Antognini JF. Isoflurane disrupts central pattern generator activity and coordination in the lamprey isolated spinal cord. Anesthesiol 2005; 103:567–575.
106 Gronert GA, Antognini JF, Pessah IN. Malignant hyperthermia. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia, 5th Edition, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 1033–1052.
107 Hayes A, Breslin D, Reid J, Mirakhur RK. Comparison of recovery following rapacuronium, with and without neostigmine, and succinylcholine. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 859–863.
108 Ravussin P, de Tribolet N. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol for burst suppression in cerebral aneurysm surgery: preliminary report of 42 patients. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 236–240; discussion 240.
109 Hicks GE. The reliability and specificity of the Hoffman's Reflex during pediatric spinal instrumentations [abstract]. J Clin Monit Comput 2004; 18: 210.
110 Leppanen RE. Faces of spine care. From the electrodiagnostic lab. Where transcranial stimulation, H-reflexes and F-responses monitor cord function intraoperatively. Spine J 2004; 4: 601–603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leppanen, R.E. Intraoperative Applications Of The H-Reflex And F-Response: A Tutorial. J Clin Monit Comput 20, 267–304 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9036-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9036-x