Abstract
To explore new kind of flexible transparent conductive oxide films for application in flexible optoelectronic devices, In-doped CdO thin films were synthesized by radio frequency magnetron sputtering on thin polyethylene terephthalate substrates at low temperature. The effects of growth time and temperature on the resistance and transmittance of In-doped CdO films were studied in detail for the first time. It is demonstrated that the sheet resistance of the film deposited at 100 °C for 20 min was 96.9 Ω/cm2 for the as-grown sample and increased about 6.4% after experienced 500 bending cycles. The results demonstrate that the In-doped CdO films possess not only excellent opto-electronic properties but also high mechanical stability. In-doped CdO films show great potential to be applied in wearable electronics, transparent devices, solar cells and so forth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Flexible optoelectronic devices have received more commercial and academic attention. In these devices components [1], for example, Indium Tin Oxide (ITO), an excellent material with good optoelectronic properties and chemical stability, has been widely used in various devices, such as in liquid crystal display (LCD) [2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, ITO films with excellent electrical properties need to be prepared above 150 °C, but at this temperature, the commonly used organic substrates will be deformed, which limits the substrate choice. On the other hand, the rising price of ITO is another disadvantage [2, 8]. ITO films, owing to their brittleness, also show low mechanical stability [9]. It is desirable to find a new material to substitute ITO in flexible devices [10,11,12,13].
As a potentially alternative material to ITO, doped CdO has attracted increasing attention recently. It is an n-type semiconductor with high mobility (> 100 cm2/V s) and high transmittance (75–98% in visible light region) [5, 14, 15]. The high transmittance spectral region of it can be adjusted easily by doping various elements with different concentrations [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In view of these facts, it is thought that the doped CdO is suitable to be applied as transparent conductive materials in various optoelectronic devices [5]. The price of CdO is also much cheaper than the ITO’s [8]. It is more important that highly conductive and transparent doped CdO film can be formed easily at room temperature (RT) by using RF magnetron sputtering system on various flexible organic substrates [5, 22,23,24], which suggests that CdO is promising for application in flexible optoelectronic devices.
It is reported that the resistivity of CdO films doped with B, Si, Ge, W are 1.56 × 10−4 Ω cm [25], 1.94 × 10−4 Ω cm [26], 2.76 × 10−4 Ω cm [27], 3.85 × 10−4 Ω cm [28], respectively. While the resistivity of CdO film doped with 5% In is 1.3 × 10−4 Ω cm [5], which is lower than that of the doped films shown above. However, there are few specific studies on the properties of the CdO-based flexible transparent films reported. In order to clarify the effects of growth conditions on the optical and electrical properties of the film, In-doped CdO films were deposited on ordinary polyethylene terephthalate (PET) films by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering under various conditions. Then the optoelectronic properties and mechanical stability of the films prepared under different conditions were characterized. It is reported that the films with the In concentration around 5% prepared under proper conditions exhibited good optoelectronic properties [5, 29]. In this work, the effect of synthesis temperature and time on the conductivity, transparency and mechanical stability of In-doped CdO films were studied in detail for the first time. 5% In-doped CdO films with good optical and electrical properties and high mechanical stability were synthesized, which satisfy well the requirements of application in flexible optoelectronic devices.
2 Experimental
In-doped CdO layers were deposited on thin PET films (0.0125 mm, purchased from Colleague Hardware) by RF sputtering using the JCP-350M2 high vacuum multi-target RF magnetron sputtering system. The sputtering targets CdO (99.99%) and In2O3 (99.99%) were purchased from Chinese New Metal Company. The PET substrates were cut into 2 cm2 and ultrasonically cleaned with de-ionized water and methanol, respectively, each for 30 min. Then the substrates were rinsed by de-ionized water and dried with nitrogen.
Before the deposition, the chamber was pumped down to the base pressure 1.5 × 10−3 Pa. The high purity Ar (99.99%) was then introduced into the chamber, controlled by a flow controller to fix the chamber’s pressure at 0.5 Pa during the whole sputtering process. To synthesized 5% In-doped CdO films with good optoelectronic properties, the sputtering power of the CdO and the In2O3 targets were set at 100 W and 20 W respectively, which is base on the works published previously [5]. In order to study the influence of sputtering parameters on the optical and electrical properties of the films, different sputtering conditions were used to prepare the CdO films: the deposition time was varied from 10 to 30 min and the temperature of substrate was varied from 25 to 150 °C. Because PET films would wrinkle heavily at a temperature higher than 150 °C, the samples were not prepared at higher deposition temperature. The deposition parameters for different samples are presented in Table 1.
The properties of the deposited samples were characterized systematically. The crystalline structures of the deposited samples were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku Smartlab) using Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength 1.5418 Å). Thicknesses of the samples were measured by a J.A.Woollam Co., Inc. Ellipsometry Solutions M-2000U. Electrical properties were characterized at RT through Hall Effect in the van der Pauw configuration using an Ecopia HMS-5000 system with a 0.556 T permanent magnet. The elemental concentration analysis was carried out by Hitachi Co., Inc. Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) SU8220 and the oxidation state of films were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (ESCALAB 250).
3 Results and analysis
3.1 Film structure
Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the prepared films. The diffraction peaks near 33.0° and 38.3° can be attributed to the crystal planes of (111), (200) of cubic CdO (JCPDS card #75-0594), which indicates that the CdO films, deposited at temperature lower than 150 °C, even at RT, crystallize well. However, ITO films with good crystallinity must be deposited above 300 °C by sputtering, and most organic substrates will suffer damage under this temperature [30]. This result indicates that comparing to ITO films, In-doped CdO is more suitable for application in flexible optoelectronic devices.
For the samples with deposition time of 10 min, the XRD spectra Fig. 1a) exhibited two distinct peaks near 27.8° and 44.5°, which can be assigned to cubic In2O3 (310) and (422) (JCPDS card #76-0152), respectively. With longer deposition time, the peaks of In2O3 were weaker in the XRD patterns of the samples. It is suggested that In2O3 tend to form and crystallize near the surface of PET, while inside the deposited film In serves as dopant in the lattice of CdO, which cause the decreasing of the peak of In2O3 for samples with longer growth time.
It can also be seen from Fig. 1a–c that the relative intensities and the widths of the peaks varied with the deposition time. When the growth time was 20 min or 30 min, the CdO (200) peak was the most intensive one, showing the deposited CdO film predominantly with the c-axis perpendicular to the substrates. Nevertheless, for the samples of growth time 10 min, the preferential crystal orientation vertical to the substrates was CdO (111). The widths of the peaks also were affected by the growth time, suggesting a variation of the grain size of the crystallite in the film with the film growth time. The average grain size in a polycrystal can be estimated by Scherrer formula:
where h, k and l are the indices of lattice planes, \({D}_{hkl}\) is the grain size of a crystal in the direction perpendicular to hkl direction, \({B}_{hkl}\) is the full width at half-maximun of the diffraction peak (hkl), λ is the wavelength of X-ray and \({\theta }_{hkl}\) is the Bragg angle. The Scherrer constant K is usually taken as 0.93 [31]. Figure 1d) shows the grain sizes estimated for three series samples of different growth times and temperatures. In the estimation the main peaks were used (111) for samples with deposition time of 10 min and (200) for the samples with longer growth time. It can be seen that the estimated grain size increases with the growth time. These results also suggest that, the crystallinity of the region near the PET substrate in the deposited In-doped CdO film was worse than that of the inside of the film, which may be caused by the amorphousness of PET, substrate, decreasing the crystallinity of the sample. Higher crystallinity means less grain boundaries in the samples, resulting in higher carrier mobility of the films.
In order to confirm that the existence of In2O3 crystals in the initial deposition region of the samples, XPS for different samples were taken and the results are shown in Fig. 2. For the oxygen spectra, the strongest peak around 532 eV can be attributed to O2− in CdO crystal [32]. For sample A-4 and B-4 with less growth time, another peak around 529 eV can be detected, which can be attributed to O2− in In2O3 crystal [33]. But for the spectra of sample C-4 with growth time of 30 min, this peak is much weaker. Figure 2 d) shows two peaks of In3+ 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 located around 452 eV and 445 eV respectively for the samples deposited under 100 °C with various growth time [33], which confirms the existence of In element. Fig.S1 in supporting materials shows the HRTEM image of sample C-4, in which In2O3 grains were observed near the PET substrates. The results confirm that at the beginning stage of deposition In2O3 tended to form separate nano-particles. As the film growing thicker, In atoms preferred to dope in the CdO crystal lattice. It is suggested that In2O3 grains are easier to form near the amorphous PET substrate in the initial stage of deposition, however, the In3+ ions tended to doped into CdO lattice when the CdO crystallized well in the subsequent film growing.
The samples can be referred as to Cd1−xInxO, and x means the cation ratios of In3+. Figure 3 shows the EDS results for the samples with deposition time of 30 min but different deposition temperature. The x changed from 0.051 to 0.058, which is what we required. The small variation indicated that the change of structure and electrical properties of samples were not caused by the cation ratios of In3+.
The thicknesses of the films were measured by an ellipsometer. The thickness and deposition rate of samples are shown in Fig. 4. With increasing temperature, the average deposition rate is slightly decreased for the samples with deposition time of 10 min or 20 min. But for the samples with a deposition time of 30 min, the deposition rate increased with deposition temperature. Combined with the XRD and the XPS results, this result can be ascribed to the different growing surface in the beginning and subsequent growth stage. In atoms preferentially form In2O3 grains on the amorphous PET substrate at the beginning, and tend to dope in the CdO lattice when the CdO dominates most growth surface.
3.2 Optical properties
Figure 5a represents the transmittance spectra, recorded in the spectral region 350 nm–1800 nm, of the In-doped CdO films on PET with different deposition conditions, where the contribution from PET substrates were excluded as background. The oscillatory feature shown in the spectra was caused by optical interference of films [34]. All the samples showed low transmittance in the ultraviolet (UV) region and the transmittance raised sharply around 400 nm. It is noteworthy that the B-4 showed the highest transmittance, being close to 100% at 700 nm. According to Fig. 5b, which shows the average transmittance of each sample, the average transmittances in the range of 500 nm–900 nm are 82, 91 and 85% for samples A-4, B-4 and C-4, respectively. Comparing with other works showing transmittance from 75 to 88% [34], B-4 showed higher transmittance in infrared band. The above results demonstrate that these CdO films are well suitable to be used in optoelectronic devices. With growth time of 20 min, samples not only had better crystallinity than samples with shorter growth time but also showed thinner thickness than samples with longer growth time. As the result, the sample with growth time of 20 min shows highest average transmittance, as shown in Fig. 5b.
3.3 Electrical properties
Figure 6 shows the effect of deposition times and substrate temperatures on the electric properties of the films. According to Fig. 6a, the increasing of deposition temperature reduced the sheet resistance of the samples. For the samples with growth time of 20 min or 30 min, the mobility increase with deposition temperature when the temperature is less than 75 °C, as shown in Fig. 6b. These results can be explained by the change of the grain size in the samples, as shown in Fig. 1d. Higher deposition temperature leads to better crystalline quality of films with larger grain size, which means less grain boundary and hence reduces carrier scattering. But when the growth temperature is higher than 75 °C, the temperature and deposition time have little impact on mobility. This phenomenon could be understood by considering the compensating effect of deposition temperature, the effect of expansion mismatch between PET and CdO. The thermal expansion coefficient of PET and CdO is 59.4 μm/K and 1.2 μm/K, respectively. The great expansion mismatch would result in the high stress in In-doped CdO films as the deposited sample cooled down to RT and hence introduces more crystalline defects in the films, and consequently decreases the mobility. These two opposite temperature effects on mobility neutralize each other at the temperature beyond 75 °C, leading to a weak dependence between mobility and deposition temperature. Figure 6c shows that higher deposition temperature increases carrier sheet concentration, which can be attributed to better crystallinity of the deposited films. It is not surprising that owing to their higher charge carrier concentration and mobility, films deposited with higher deposition temperature show lower sheet resistance.
3.4 Mechanical stability
The electrical properties of the curved samples were measured using a Hall System as shown in Fig. 7, where the sample film was placed on a Teflon rod located on the sample platform and pressed by probes against the rod, causing the film bending at a curvature of the rod surface. Different curvatures can be achieved by using rods with different radiuses.
To study the mechanical stability, which means the stability in optoelectronic properties of the film upon bending, the relative sheet resistances R/R0 of the films were measured under different bending curvatures, where R is the sheet resistance of the sample under bending and R0 is the sheet resistance before bending. Smaller variation in relative sheet resistance means better mechanical stability.
Figure 8 shows the relative sheet resistance of the films, deposited at various conditions, as functions of bending curvatures. All the samples showed constant resistance when the curvature was less than 0.06 mm−1. However, for samples deposited at 25 °C or 50 °C, the resistance raised notably when the bending curvature exceeded 0.06 mm−1, indicating the films had poor mechanical stability. But the mechanical stability of samples with deposition temperature from 75 to 125 °C was much better. Even with high bending curvature 0.19 mm−1, the relative resistance was still less than 200%. These phenomena can be interpreted by that high deposition temperature can promote the crystallinity of the film and enhance the adhesion between the film and PET, leading to better mechanical stability [3]. But the samples deposited at 150 °C showed higher relative sheet resistance under the bending of the same curvature, indicating that the film had worse crystallinity. This should be caused by the expansion mismatch between the PET substrate and the In-doped CdO film, inducing large inner stress in the In-doped CdO films during the cooling process. Similarly, under a considerable bending, large inner stress would be produced which would lead to more defects inside the film and degrade the electric properties of films.
The resistance change of the deposited samples after bending multiple cycles was tested, to see their mechanical stabilities. In the test each sample was bent convexly by fingers with a curvature of about 0.14 mm−1, and then naturally unfolded, completing a bending cycle. After repeated this cycle for different times, the sheet resistances of the samples were measured. The obtained relationships between relative sheet resistance and the number of bending cycles for samples grown with different parameters are shown in Fig. 9.
As shown in the Fig. 9, the relative sheet resistances of the films increase with the number of bending cycles. Among all the samples tested here the sample deposited at 100 °C with growth time 20 min (i.e. B4) showed lowest relative sheet resistance. It can be interpreted that increasing of deposition temperature can promote adhesion between films and substrates but also generate higher inner stress in the film. A sample deposited at 100 °C had good adhesion but the stress was still not very high, leading to its lowest relative sheet resistance. But for samples with growth time of 10 min, the increase in deposition temperature caused a rise in relative sheet resistance. It may be due the poor crystallinity of In-doped CdO films. Figure 9 also shows that with the same deposition temperature, samples with longer growth time of 30 min show higher relative sheet resistance. The reason is that higher internal stress would be introduced in the thicker film under the same bending curvature.
A suitable flexible conducting film should have both low sheet resistance and high mechanical stability. To clearly show the different behavior on the mechanical stability of the samples, as an example, the samples deposited at the temperature of 100 °C but with different growth times are compared in Fig. 10. It can be seen that B-4 shows a lower relative sheet resistance than that of A-4 and C-4 after 500 bending cycles. It indicates that the crystallinity of A-4 and C-4 is inferior to that of B-4, in other words more defects would exist in them, leading to degradation of film quality. This point is consistent to XRD results mentioned above. It is also noticed that the relative sheet resistance of sample C-4 increases more rapidly than A-4. As C-4 with higher thickness, the bending would generate higher inner stress and consequently make more defects formed in the film. As a result, the sheet resistance will rise more quickly with the bending cycles. The insert of Fig. 10 shows that after 500 bending cycles, R/R0 of B-4 just increases to 1.064, just slightly larger than that of the as-prepared sample (of sheet resistance 96.89 Ω/cm2), showing the film is of high mechanical stability, which meets the requirements in most applications to flexible devices.
It is noticed that the R/R0 of B-4 increased rapidly during the initial bending process shown in the insert of Fig. 10, which may be caused by the following reason. Because of the expansion mismatch between doped CdO film and substrate, stress existed in the as-prepared film. During the initial bending cycles, the stress released by introducing defects and caused the rapid increasing of R/R0. After the stress released completely, the R/R0 become steady.
3.5 Influence of substrates
To test the effect of different substrates on the electrical properties of the film, an In-doped CdO film was deposited on silicon substrate at 125 °C, for 20 min. Thus deposited sample had a sheet carrier concentration 1.24 × 1016/cm2, sheet resistance 35.86 Ω/cm2, and mobility 13.99 cm2/V s. But the sample B-5 deposited under the same condition had a sheet carrier concentration of 6.69 × 1015/cm2, sheet resistance of 70.48 Ω/cm2 and mobility of 13.24 cm2/V s. It is noticed that the sample deposited on silicon showed higher sheet carrier concentration. So the electrical properties of samples can be improved by selecting other substrates, which will be studied in further works.
4 Conclusion
In-doped CdO thin films was synthesized on PET substrate by RF magnetron sputtering. When the growth time was 20 min and the deposition temperature was 100 °C, the sample showed high transmittance of 75–98% in visible light region. The films also exhibited high mechanical stability. Without bending, its sheet resistance was 96.89 Ω/cm2, and after bending 500 times, the sheet resistance just increased by 6.4%. Under a bending curvature of 0.19 mm−1, the sheet resistance of the film just increased by 11.3%. The transmittance of the films can be further increased by anti-reflection coating layers, such as ZnO film, TiO2 film, Si3N4 film [35,36,37,38,39,40]. The effect of synthesis temperature and deposition time on the conductivity, transparency and mechanical stability of In-doped CdO films were studied in detail for the first time (Fig. 10).
Data availability
The data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
T. Hanada, T. Negishi, I. Shiroishi et al., Plastic substrate with gas barrier layer and transparent conductive oxide thin film for flexible displays. Thin Solid Films 518(11), 3089–3092 (2010)
D. Angmo, F.C. Krebs, Flexible ITO-free polymer solar cells. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 129(1), 1–14 (2013)
J.H. Kim, H.J. Seok, H.J. Seo et al., Flexible ITO films with atomically flat surfaces for high performance flexible perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 10(44), 20587–20598 (2018)
S.-I. Na, S.-S. Kim, J. Jo et al., Efficient and flexible ITO-free organic solar cells using highly conductive polymer anodes. Adv. Mater. 20(21), 4061–4067 (2008)
C.P. Liu, C.Y. Ho, C.K. Kwok et al., High mobility transparent amorphous CdO-In2O3 alloy films synthesized at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(7), 072108 (2017)
F. Li, Z. Lin, B. Zhang et al., Electrical and optical properties of flexible conductive carbon nanotube/Ag/Al-doped zinc oxide multilayer coatings. Thin Solid Films 525, 93–96 (2012)
N. Sun, G. Fang, P. Qin et al., Efficient flexible organic solar cells with room temperature sputtered and highly conductive NiO as hole-transporting layer. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/44/445101
Survey U S G. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019:U.S. Geological Survey, 2019
W.-L. Jeong, J.-H. Min, H.-M. Kwak et al., A highly conductive and flexible metal mesh/ultrathin ITO hybrid transparent electrode fabricated using low-temperature crystallization. J. Alloys Compd. 794, 114–119 (2019)
M.A. Shinde, K. Mallikarjuna, J. Noh et al., Highly stable silver nanowires based bilayered flexible transparent conductive electrode. Thin Solid Films 660, 447–454 (2018)
C.-S. Chen, C.-K. Hsieh, An easy, low-cost method to transfer large-scale graphene onto polyethylene terephthalate as a transparent conductive flexible substrate. Thin Solid Films 570, 595–598 (2014)
L.F. Lima, C.F. Matos, L.C. Gonçalves et al., Water based, solution-processable, transparent and flexible graphene oxide composite as electrodes in organic solar cell application. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 49(10), 105106 (2016)
Y.-H. Chiang, C.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Chen et al., The utilization of IZO transparent conductive oxide for tandem and substrate type perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aad71c
M. Xie, W. Zhu, K.M. Yu et al., Effects of doping and rapid thermal processing in Y doped CdO thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 776, 259–265 (2019)
A.A. Dakhel, Electrical and optical properties of iron-doped CdO. Thin Solid Films 518(6), 1712–1715 (2010)
R.J. Stella, G.T. Rao, V.P. Manjari et al., Structural and optical properties of CdO/ZnS core/shell nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 628, 39–45 (2015)
R.K. Gupta, Z. Serbetci, F. Yakuphanoglu, Bandgap variation in size controlled nanostructured Li–Ni co-doped CdO thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 515, 96–100 (2012)
L.J. Gao, S.F. Wang, R. Liu et al., The effect of Ni doping on the thermoelectric transport properties of CdO ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 662, 213–219 (2016)
R. Aydin, H. Cavusoglu, B. Sahin, Transition metal Mn/Cu co-doped CdO transparent conductive films: effect on structural, morphological and optical characteristics. J. Alloys Compd. 785, 523–530 (2019)
N. Kati, Controlling of optical band gap of the CdO films by zinc oxide. Mater. Sci. Pol. 37(1), 136–141 (2019)
A.A. Dakhel, Transparent conducting properties of samarium-doped CdO. J. Alloys Compd. 475(1–2), 51–54 (2009)
K.M. Yu, D.M. Detert, G.B. Chen et al., Defects and properties of cadmium oxide based transparent conductors. J. Appl. Phys. 119(18), 181501 (2016)
Z.G. Ji, M.M. Chen, P. Zhang et al., Deposition of low resistive transparent conducting ZnxCd1−xO films on flexible PET substrate at low temperature. J. Inorg. Mater. 23(2), 361–363 (2008)
K. Nomura, H. Ohta, A. Takagi, T. Kamiya, M. Hirano, H. Hosono, Room-temperature fabrication of transparent flexible thin-film transistors using amorphous oxide semiconductors. Nature 432, 488–492 (2004)
A.A. Dakhel, Structural, optical and electrical measurements on boron-doped CdO thin films. J. Mater. Sci. 46(21), 6925–6931 (2011)
A.A. Dakhel, Impact of silicon doping on the properties of transparent conducting CdO thin films. SILICON 11(1), 525–532 (2018)
A.A. Dakhel, Interfacial modification in Si/CdO heterojunction by Ge doping for optoelectronic applications. Solid State Sci. 25, 33–38 (2013)
A.A. Dakhel, Electrical and Optical Investigations on Tungsten-Incorporated CdO Thin Films. J. Electron. Mater. 41(9), 2405–2410 (2012)
Y.K. Zhu, R.J. Mendelsberg, J.Q. Zhu et al., Transparent and conductive indium doped cadmium oxide thin films prepared by pulsed filtered cathodic arc deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 265, 738–744 (2013)
H. Kim, C.M. Gilmore, A. Piqué et al., Electrical, optical, and structural properties of indium–tin–oxide thin films for organic light-emitting devices. J. Appl. Phys. 86(11), 6451–6461 (1999)
D.M. Smilgies, Scherrer grain-size analysis adapted to grazing-incidence scattering with area detectors. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42(Pt 6), 1030–1034 (2009)
S. Balamurugan, K. Usharani, D. Prabha et al., Ferromagnetism in CdO nanopowder—role of bioactive elements. Mater. Lett. 217, 202–205 (2018)
J. Shruthi, N. Jayababu, P. Ghosal et al., Ultrasensitive sensor based on Y2O3-In2O3 nanocomposites for the detection of methanol at room temperature. Ceram. Int. 45(17), 21497–21504 (2019)
P. Sakthivel, R. Murugan, S. Asaithambi et al., Influence of radiofrequency power on structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of magnetron sputtered CdO:Sm thin films as alternative TCO for optoelectronic applications. J. Alloys Compd. 765, 146–157 (2018)
S. Watanabe, T. Kodera, T. Ogihara, Influence of tellurite glass on reaction between Si3N4 anti-reflection coating film and Ag paste for electrodes in Si solar cells. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 124(3), 218–222 (2016)
A.S. Sarkin, N. Ekren, S. Saglam, A review of anti-reflection and self-cleaning coatings on photovoltaic panels. Sol. Energy 199, 63–73 (2020)
S. Sali, S. Kermadi, L. Zougar et al., Nanocrystalline proprieties of TiO2 thin film deposited by ultrasonic spray pulverization as an anti-reflection coating for solar cells applications. J. Electr. Eng. Elektrotech. Casopis 68(7), 24–30 (2017)
J.Y. Chen, K.W. Sun, Growth of vertically aligned ZnO nanorod arrays as anti-reflection layer in silicon solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94(5), 1078–1079 (2010)
E. Chanta, D. Wongratanaphisan, A. Gardchareon, et al., Effect of ZnO double layer as anti-reflection coating layer in ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells, in International Conference on Alternative Energy in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies, ed. by J. Waewsak, S. Othong, K. Sungkharak (Elsevier, 2015), pp. 879–884.
D.G. Chen, Anti-reflection (AR) coatings made by sol–gel processes: a review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 68(3–4), 313–336 (2001)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11374280 and 50772110).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The experiment was designed under Prof. Guanzhong Wang’s and Dr. Wei Zhu’s help. Dr. Zishu Zhu finished the main part of the work and wrote this manuscript. Dr. Yanpu Chen cleaned PET substrates and finished the study about the variation of sheet resistance during 500 cycles of different samples, which was shown in Fig. 10. Dr. Pingping Ma and Dr. Haolei Zhou helped to put forward some valuable suggestions for experiment, such as how to test electrical properties of bending films. Dr. Liren Lou and Prof. Guanzhong Wang guided Dr. Zishu Zhu to complete the revision and the XPS analysis was designed under Dr. Liren Lou’s advices.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Z., Zhu, W., Chen, Y. et al. High mechanical stable flexible transparent conductive In-doped CdO thin film deposited at low temperature on PET substrate. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 33, 5575–5586 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07745-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07745-5