1 Introduction

Environmental pollution is a global phenomenon due to its adverse effects on the health of humans, plants, and animals. Industrialization and urbanization are greatly associated with pollution issues. Many organic and industrial effluents have been introduced into the environment to increase water and land pollution problems [1, 2]. Dyes and nitroaromatic compounds are a main group of environmental pollutants. Among nitroaromatic compounds, nitrophenols are widely produced by dyes, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals from industrial and agricultural activities. Among many nitrocompounds, P-nitrophenol (PNP), which is used in the treatment of eye and skin irritation, is capable of causing cyanosis, confusion, and unconsciousness [3,4,5]. There are several methods for the reduction of P-nitrophenol (PNP) to p-aminophenol (PAP) such as catalytic hydrogenation, electrolytic reduction, metal/acid reduction, and chemical reduction. In addition to being economically viable, some of these methods create many problems during the reduction of PNP to PAP [6]. Chemical reduction of PNP is a relatively green method in which NaBH4 is used to reduce PNP to PAP as a starting material for the preparation of antioxidants, analgesics, febrifuge drugs, and dyes. The disadvantage of this method is the long reaction time [7, 8]. The application of an appropriate catalyst to reduce the reaction time is a challenge for researchers [9, 10]. Dyes are environmental contaminants generally produced from such sources as textile, paper, and plastic industries. These compounds prevent sunlight permeation into the water, decrease the photosynthetic action, and cause death of aquatics. In addition, most dyes contain known carcinogenic aromatic groups. Among these chemical compounds, methylene blue (MB) is a heterocyclic dye with toxic and harmful effects on water [11, 12]. Photocatalytic methods have been introduced as green and low-cost approaches for the effective elimination of dyes from wastewaters under mild conditions [13]. Given its large surface area, structure, fast electron transport, and low-charge recombination, titanium dioxide (n-type semiconductor) has shown enhanced performance in photocatalytic and catalytic reactions [14]. Regretfully, UV light irradiation can generate electron–hole pairs due to the high band gap of titanium dioxide (Eg = 3.0–3.2 eV) [15, 16]. In addition, electron–hole pairs on the surface recombine very fast, resulting in low photocatalytic and catalytic efficiency [17]. To overcome these obstacles, different methods have been developed to enhance the photocatalytic and catalytic efficiency of TiO2. Loading of noble metals over titanium dioxide has been reported as an effective method to restrain the electron–hole recombination. Therefore, noble metals such as Pt, Au, Pd, and Ag have been extensively used in TiO2 to improve the electron–hole separation and expand the absorption of UV light active TiO2 semiconductor to the visible light region [18,19,20,21]. Nevertheless, the photocatalytic and catalytic performance of TiO2 can be further improved by the use of bimetallic compounds (BM) [22]. A combination of the properties associated with two individual metals is expected to be shown by BM deposited on TiO2. Copper oxide, a p-type semiconductor, is considered as a supporting material mixed with n-type photocatalysts such as TiO2 [23, 24]. Cobalt oxide, a p-type appropriate semiconductor, is also applied in mixtures such as CuO, WO3 [25, 26]. Thus, metal oxides (p-type semiconductors) supported on titanium dioxide (n-type semiconductor) improve the absorption of visible light by titanium dioxide. There are different techniques to dope metals on the nano titanium dioxide surface such as sol–gel, hydrothermal, solvothermal, and microwave-assisted methods [9]. The hydrothermal method has shown to be promising with respect to the enhancement of catalytic and photocatalytic activities in the elimination of organic pollutants from waste water. Process parameters such as concentration of alkaline solution, structure of raw materials, reaction temperature, reaction time, and the effect of acid on washing affect the morphology of the titanium dioxide obtained from hydrothermal methods [27].

In our research group, many efforts have been made to expand the absorption of titanium dioxide to visible light using various compounds through reducing the band gap. In these studies, titanium dioxide was supported on some metal oxides such as CuO, NiO, and V2O5 prepared from metal shift base complexes [28,29,30]. In continuation of our studies on the photocatalytic properties of mixed oxides, the effect of metal salts and complexes on TiO2 morphology and its catalytic and photocatalytic activities have been studied. Cobalt(III) acetylacetonate/copper(II) acetylacetonate (sample 1) and cobalt(II) nitrate/copper(II) nitrate (sample 2) were applied as copper and cobalt oxide sources, respectively. XRD, XPS, Raman, SEM, TEM, DR–UV–Vis, CV, and N2 adsorption–desorption analyses were then used to characterize CuO–CoO/TiO2. Methylene blue and P-nitrophenol were used as pollutants to study the photocatalytic and catalytic activities of the samples under visible light.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials

All chemicals including sodium hydroxide, Cu(acac)2, Co(acac)3, Cu(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2, and methylene blue were obtained from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. NaBH4, para, and amino nitrophenol were supplied by Merck Chemical Co. TiO2 nanoparticles (P-25) were purchased from Hanau-Wolfgang Co. (Germany).

2.2 Characterizations

UV–Visible spectra were recorded on a JASCO V-750 spectrophotometer. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out using a Philips (model EM 208S, 100 kV, W Filament) instrument. Cu and Co contents of the catalysts were measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer, Optima 7300DV). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a Scintag X-ray diffractometer with X-ray wavelength of 1.54 Å (CuKα radiation source). A Physical Electronics PHI5700 photoelectron spectrometer with AlKα (1486.6 eV) radiation source was used to conduct X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS). Raman spectroscopy was performed on a Takvm P50COR10 apparatus using a green laser (530 nm). A JEOL JSM-6390A scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray detector was used to perform morphological observations. A Shimadzu 2450 instrument was used to perform ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–Vis DRS). Kubelka–Munk equation was used to calculate the band gap energy of the samples. N2 adsorption–desorption (BET) was used to evaluate the pore structure, size, and kind of isotherms of the two samples.

2.3 Preparation of samples 1 and 2

Samples of different surface areas were prepared using hydrothermal method with different metal salts nitrates and acetyl acetonates. Throughout the experiments, the NaOH concentration was set at 10 M and the hydrothermal reaction was carried out at constant temperature of 180 °C for 24 h to obtain samples 1 and 2 with different effective surface areas. First, 1.00 g of TiO2 nanoparticles (P-25) was dispersed in 50 mL of 10 M NaOH aqueous solution using a magnetic stirrer at 50 °C for 30 min, followed by the addition of the metal salts (0.261 g of Cu(acac)2 and 0.356 g of Co (acac)3 for sample 1 and 0.261 g of Cu(NO3)2 and 0.356 g of Co (NO3)2 for sample 2) to the suspension. Having been stirred for 1 h, the mixture was transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and subjected to hydrothermal treatment at 180 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, the contents of the autoclave were allowed to cool down to room temperature. The product formed was treated with 50 mL of 0.1 M HCl overnight, followed by washing with distilled water until the pH of the water reached 7. The sample was then filtered, dried at 80 °C, spread into a ceramic boat, and calcined in air at 350 °C for 5 h at a rate of 2 °C/min. The products obtained were denoted as samples 1 and 2 [31,32,33].

2.4 Photocatalytic activity

2.4.1 Photodegradation of MB by samples 1 and 2

2 mg of sample 1 or 2 was used in the degradation of 5 mL of an aqueous solution of MB (10 ppm) in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2 (0.1 M) under visible light irradiation. UV–Vis spectroscopy was used to monitor the progress of the reaction. All the photocatalytic experiments were performed at ambient temperature. The reaction times for degradation of MB were determined as 7 and 4 min in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2 (0.1 M) for sample 1, respectively. In addition, for sample 2, the reaction times were 40 and 10 min in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2 (0.1 M), respectively. The absorption spectra of MB were recorded for 1 and 5 min for samples 1 and 2, respectively.

2.4.2 Free radical scavenger tests

The photocatalytic degradation of MB is affected by the various free radical scavengers. Therefore, the reaction was studied using some radical scavengers to determine the active species. In order to investigate the effect of hydroxyl radicals (˙OH), superoxide radicals (˙O2), and holes (h+), p-benzoquinone (BQ), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) scavengers were used, respectively. In this study, the effect of the cited scavengers on both samples was evaluated. For every sample, a solution was prepared using 1 mmol of the scavenger, 2 mg of the catalyst, 5 mL of an aqueous solution of MB (10 ppm), and 1 mL of H2O2 (0.1 M) under visible light irradiation at room temperature.

2.5 Catalyst activity

2.5.1 Reduction of PNP to PAP by samples 1 and 2

1.5 mL of an aqueous solution of 10–4 M PNP and 0.5 mL of fresh 10–2 M NaBH4 were added into a quartz cell. 2 mg of sample 1 or 2 was then added to the mixture to start the reduction reaction. UV–Vis spectroscopy was used to follow the progress of the reaction. 4-NP has a maximum absorption peak at 318 nm, which changes to 400 nm upon the addition of NaBH4 due to the formation of phenolate. After PNP reduction, the peak at about 400 nm is flattened and an amine peak appears at 300 nm. The concentration chart was plotted vs. absorption to evaluate the reaction rate.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Structure characterization

3.1.1 FE-SEM and EDX

FE-SEM spectroscopy was carried out to study the morphology of sample surfaces. Under the same conditions, two different reactants (metal salts) were applied to prepare samples 1 and 2 nanocompounds. Based on the FE-SEM images, two different shapes were obtained for these nanocompounds. The FE-SEM image of sample 1 is shown in Fig. S1a, b. According to the micrograph, sample 1 has a nanosheet structure. In addition, the FE-SEM image of sample 2 is shown in Fig. S1b. A sponge-like structure was obtained for this compound. On the other hand, the average particle size of this sample was found to be 20 nm [34,35,36].

Figure S2a, b shows the EDX spectra of samples 1 and 2, respectively. The spectra confirm the presence of Co, Cu, Ti, and O in both samples. The formation of the samples is clearly confirmed by the EDX spectra.

3.1.2 TEM studies

The TEM micrographs of samples 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 1a, b, respectively. In sample 1, the presence of the holes inside the fibrous like structures confirms the formation of nanotubes and nanosheets. The inner and outer diameters of the nanotubes were found to be 5 and 13 nm, respectively. Furthermore, the diameter of nanosheets was found to be 43 nm (Fig. 1a). According to the TEM image of sample 2 (Fig. 1b), the nanoparticles are spherically shaped [37, 38].

Fig. 1
figure 1

TEM image of a sample 1, b sample 2

Hydrothermal method has been used to dope mixed oxides on TiO2 surface in this work. Surface morphology is reportedly influenced by different conditions such as temperature, heating time, NaOH concentration, and acid washing step. In this study, two samples were prepared under identical conditions using different metal salts. According to FE-SEM and TEM, sample 1 which contains Cu(acac)2 and Co(acac)3 is of nanotube and nanosheet morphology. However, sample 2 which contains Cu(NO3)2 and Co(NO3)2) is a nanoparticle. In addition to the conditions pointed out, the type of metal salt seems to affect the surface morphology in hydrothermal method [27, 34,35,36,37].

3.1.3 X-ray diffraction

In order to determine the crystal planes and obtain some information on the structure of nanocomposites, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out Fig. S3 shows the XRD patterns of samples 1 and 2, prepared at 350 °C. The Braggs reflections of sample 1 were observed at angles of 25.325° (101), 38.601° (112), 48.074° (200), 55.106° (211), 62.750° (204), 68.842° (116), and 75.129° (215). However, for sample 2, the corresponding angles were 25.307° (101), 38.570° (112), 48.043° (200), 55.068° (105), 62.689° (204), 68.750° (116), and 75.050° (215). Based on these reflections, anatase phase was confirmed for TiO2 in both samples (JCPDS files No. 01-0562 and 83-2243 for samples 1 and 2, respectively) [37, 38]. The presence of CuO is confirmed in both samples by peaks at 35.610° (110), 38.686° \((\overline{1}11)\) , and 48.659° \((\overline{2}02)\) for sample 1 and 35.744° \((\overline{1}11)\), 38.958° (111), 50.850° \((\overline{2}02)\), nd 66.229° (022) for sample 2 (JCPDS files no. 80-1916 and 01-1117 for samples 1 and 2, respectively) [37, 38]. Furthermore, the composition of CoO is identified by the plane at 34.477° (111), 40.450° (200), and 57.220° (220) for sample 1 and 35.500° (111), and 58.350° (220) for sample 2 (JCPDS files no. 75-0419 and 42-1300 for samples 1 and 2, respectively) [39, 40].

3.1.4 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

The XPS spectrum of sample 1 is shown in Fig. 2. As observed in Fig. 2b, the high-resolution Ti2p XPS spectra of sample 1 and the peaks at 458.90 and 464.50 eV are associated with (Ti2p3/2) and (Ti2p1/2), respectively. The high-resolution O1s XPS spectrum of sample 1 is shown in Fig. 2c. The peak at 531.3 eV is attributed to the hydroxyl oxygen. The XPS spectrum of CoO is shown in Fig. 2d. The reported value of Co(II) in CoO is 780 eV along with the presence of its characteristic shakeup satellite peak at 786.3 eV. The peak positions measured for this sample are 781.10 and 787.60 eV, confirming the presence of CoO and divalent cobalt as CoO. Moreover, Fig. 2e shows the XPS spectrum of CuO. The main peaks of Cu(II) at 932.70 eV (Cu 2p3/2) and 952.00 eV (Cu 2p1/2) and the characteristic shakeup satellite peaks observed at 941.90 and 960.00 eV, respectively, confirm the presence of CuO in the composition [40,41,42].

Fig. 2
figure 2

XPS spectra of sample 1 a survey spectrum and high-resolution of b Ti2p; c O1s; d Cu2p; and e Co2p

The XPS spectrum of sample 2 is s shown in Fig. 3. As observed in Fig. 3b, the high-resolution Ti2p XPS spectrum of sample 2 shows peaks at 459.50 and 464.50 eV, which are due to (Ti2p3/2) and (Ti2p1/2of Ti4+), respectively. The high-resolution O1s XPS spectrum of sample 2 is shown in Fig. 3c. The peak at 530.50 eV corresponds to the hydroxyl oxygen. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Cu2p of sample 2 (Fig. 3d) shows four peaks at 932.50, 952.00, 944.00, and 957.00 eV. The peaks at binding energies of 932.50 and 952.00 eV are ascribed to the Cu2p3/2 and Cu2p1/2, respectively. Meanwhile, the peaks at 944.00 and 957.00 eV corresponding to the binding energy shakeup satellites are due to pure CuO. The binding energies of pure CoO are observed at 781.50 and 788.00 eV (Fig. 3e) [40,41,42].

Fig. 3
figure 3

XPS spectra of sample 2 a survey spectrum and high resolution of b Ti2p; c O1s; d Cu2p; and e Co2p

3.1.5 Raman spectroscopy

The Raman spectra of both samples and TiO2 (P-25) are illustrated in Fig. 4. The bands at 153, 643, 401, and 520 cm−1 are assigned to the Eg (153 and 643 cm−1) and B1g (401 and 520 cm−1) modes of anatase TiO2 crystals for TiO2 (P-25). The observed peaks at 156, 631, 395, and 514 cm−1 correspond to the Eg (156 and 631 cm−1) and B1g (395 and 514 cm−1) modes of anatase TiO2 crystals for sample 1. For sample 2, the peaks at 153, 401, 520, and 631 cm−1 correspond to the Eg (153 and 631 cm−1) and B1g (401 and 520 cm−1) modes of anatase TiO2 crystals. Compared with the undoped sample, the most intense peak at 153 cm−1 shows the blueshift while the peaks at 401, 520, and 643 cm−1 show redshift in Sample 1. On the other hand, in comparison to bare TiO2 (P-25), the peak at 643 shows red shift. In addition, the intensity and sharpness of all peaks are decreased relative to the undoped TiO2 (P-25). The weak peaks observed at 269 and 695 cm−1 are related to the Ag (269 cm−1) and B2g (695 cm−1) modes of CuO for both samples. The peak at 695 cm−1 might be due to A1g mode of CoO, which overlaps with CuO peak for both samples. On the other hand, the peak at 269 cm−1 is related to titanate structure of TiO2, which overlaps with CuO peak in samples 1 and 2 [43,44,45]. The results confirmed the formation of CuO–CoO/TiO2, which is in agreement with data obtained from the XPS and XRD analyses.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Raman spectra

3.2 N2 adsorption–desorption analysis

The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of samples 1 and 2 were used to evaluate the pore structure and size. The isotherms of the two samples have classical hysteresis loops, as observed in Fig. 5a, b. The adsorption–desorption isotherms of samples 1 and 2 are classical type IV and V, respectively. A hysteresis loop is known to indicate the presence of mesoporous structure in the samples. The pore size distribution curves of samples 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 6a, b, respectively. A pore diameter of 6.95 nm and a total pore volume of 0.790 cm3 g−1 were obtained for sample 1 while the corresponding values for sample 2 were 1.85 nm and 0.282 cm3 g−1, respectively. Furthermore, BET equation was used to calculate the specific surface areas of the samples. The SBET values were 161.1 and 211.67 m2 g−1 for samples 1 and 2, respectively. Sample 2 had a smaller pore size and pore volume and a bigger specific surface area compared to sample 1, according to the results. Table 1 shows all the results [42, 46,47,48].

Fig. 5
figure 5

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of a sample 1; b sample 2

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Particle size distribution of mesoporous a sample 1; b sample 2

Table 1 Surface area, pore size, pore volume, and band gap of samples 1, 2, and P25-TiO2

3.2.1 UV–Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Figure S4a, b shows the UV–Vis absorption spectra of the two samples. The samples clearly show a larger photocurrent under visible light irradiation compared with TiO2 P-25. This causes the easy transfer of the excited electrons in the valance band of the metals to the conduction band of TiO2. The optical absorbance (F(R)) of the samples from Kubelka–Munk formalism (Fig. 7a, b) was used to determine the band gap energy of the photocatalysts. Using this equation, semiconducting materials can be analyzed using a Tauc plot of [F(Rhv]n vs. hv where hv is the photon energy and n = ½ for direct band gap of the photocatalyst. The band gap energies determined for samples 1 and 2 were 2.0 and 2.5, respectively. However, the reported band gap for TiO2 P-25 is 3.20. According to the results, sample 1 has a smaller band gap than sample 2. Table 1 shows all the band gap values determined [49,50,51].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Plot of [αhv]2 vs. photon energy(hv) a sample 1; b sample 2

3.2.2 Cyclic voltammetry

Slides of 3 × 1 cm used in cyclic voltammetry were prepared for each sample. The samples were deposited on glass/ITO substrates as a thin layer of nearly 40 nm at slow rates, less than 1 nm/s, by vacuum thermal evaporation. In this experiment, platinum plate and Ag/AgCl couple were applied as auxiliary and reference electrodes, respectively, and the slides containing the thin layer of the sample were used as the working electrode. Cyclic voltammetry tests were carried out at a scan rate of 20 mV/s under nitrogen at room temperature. A solution of 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium phosphorus hexafluoride (TBAPF6) in anhydrous acetonitrile (CH3CN) was used as the electrolyte [52].

Sample 1 shows a reduction peak at − 0.509 V. The energy level of LUMO was calculated at − 4.438 eV by Eq. 1. In addition, the oxidation peak at 1.44 V, leading to a HOMO level was calculated at − 6.387 eV by Eq. 2. The band gap energy was determined as 1.95 eV, which is in good agreement with the obtained band gap from the optical absorption spectrum (2.0 eV). In sample 2, the reduction and oxidation peaks were observed at − 0.586 and 1.86 V, respectively. The energy levels of LUMO and HOMO were calculated as − 4.361 eV and − 6.807 eV, respectively. Furthermore the band gap energy was determined to be 2.44 eV (the obtained band gap from optical absorption spectrum is 2.5 eV) [22, 53] (Table 2).

$$E_{{{\text{LUMO}}}} = - e(4.75 + E_{{{\text{red,}}\,{\text{vs}}\,{\text{NHE}}}} )\,({\text{eV}})$$
(1)
$$E_{{{\text{HUMO}}}} = - e(4.75 + E_{{{\text{ox,}}\,{\text{vs}}\,{\text{NHE}}}} )\,({\text{eV}})$$
(2)
$$E_{{{\text{NHE}}}} = E_{{{\text{Ag}}/{\text{AgCl}}}} + 0.197$$
Table 2 The HOMO, LUMO levels, and band gap approximated from CV

3.3 Visible light photocatalytic activity of samples 1 and 2

The photocatalytic activity of both samples was determined by monitoring methylene blue degradation in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation using a Tungsten Lamp (500 W). The intensity of the light was 200 mW/cm2. The intensity and calibration of light source were measured by Digital Luxmeter (LX-1010B). The lamp was placed at a fixed distance of 20 cm from the reaction vessel. The two solutions containing 5 mL of the solution prepared by mixing 2 mg of samples, 10 ppm of MB in neutral pH and distilled water, were stirred at ambient temperature. To investigate the effect of H2O2, 1 mL of H2O2 was added to the solutions and the reactions were continued under these conditions. The photocatalytic degradation of MB under the visible light irradiation over 2 mg samples in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2 is shown in Fig. S5a, b and Fig. 8a, b. Upon increasing the irradiation time, the absorbance of the residual dye decreases to total photodegradation after 7 and 4 min for sample 1 and 40 and 10 min for sample 2 in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2, respectively. The photocatalytic degradation of MB under the visible light irradiation after 80 min for TiO2 P-25 (2 mg) is shown in Fig. S5c. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used as the electron acceptor to prevent the recombination of e/h+ pairs, which reduces the photocatalytic efficiency. According to the results, sample 1 has a higher photocatalytic activity than sample 2 because of its smaller band gap, which facilitates the electron transfer to the conductive band of TiO2 [53,54,55].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Photocatalytic degradation of MB under the visible light irradiation in the presence of 1 ml of H2O2 a sample 1; b sample 2

Generally, photogenerated holes (h+), hydroxyl radicals (˙OH), and superoxide radicals (˙O2) are the active species applied in the photocatalytic degradation of dyes. EDTA, BQ, and IPA scavengers were used to study the effects of h+, ˙O2, and ˙OH, respectively. Photodegradation efficiency (%) of MB using different scavengers for two samples is shown in Fig. 9. As observed, MB is degraded by 85%, 67%, and 34% in BQ, IPA, and EDTA, respectively. It is found that the hydroxyl radical (˙OH) is the main active species in the degradation process of MB for sample 1. Moreover, MB is degraded by 76%, 90%, and 46% in EDTA, BQ, and IPA, respectively. The results show that the hole (h+) is the main active species in the degradation process of MB for sample 2 [56]

Fig. 9
figure 9

Degradation efficiency (%) of MB in the presence of different scavengers a sample 1; b sample 2

3.3.1 Kinetic investigation

The plots of − ln(A/A0) of M.B vs. irradiation time (in which A0 and A are the absorbance values at t = 0 and time (t), respectively) for samples 1 and 2 in the absence and presence of 1 mL of H2O2 are shown in Fig. S6. All the plots are linear. Thus, the photocatalytic degradation of MB follows pseudo first-order kinetics. Therefore, it is reasonable to assess the slopes of the plots of − ln(A/A0) of M.B vs. irradiation time as the observed rate constants (kobs) of photocatalytic degradation process. The recyclability of samples 1 and 2 was then studied in the degradation experiments under simulated visible light irradiation. The degradation time of MB in the presence of 1 mL of H2O2 increased to 24 and 40 min for samples 1 and 2, respectively, over 4 cycles (Fig. 10a, b). This increase in degradation time may be attributed to the reduction of TiO2 active sites during the photodegradation reactions. Tables 3 and 4 summarize all the rate constants evaluated.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Recovery of a sample 1; b sample 2 in the degradation reaction of MB in the presence of H2O2

Table 3 Recovery of sample1 in the degradation reaction of MB in the presence of H2O2
Table 4 Recovery of sample2 in the degradation reaction of MB in the presence of H2O2

Some reported photocatalytic degradation of MB were collected on Table 5 [47, 57, 58]. Based on these results, the best time for degradation of MB through visible light is 60 min for 10 ppm of dye via 0.2 g of catalyst [57]. In this study, in presence of 2 mg of photocatalyst, in addition to use of visible light as source of energy the time of degradation were reduced to 4 and 7 min for CuO–CoO/TiO2 nanotube/nanosheet in the presence of H2O2 and without H2O2, respectively.

Table 5 Degradation of MB with other catalysts

3.4 Catalytic reduction of P-nitrophenol using NaBH4 and samples 1 and 2

The catalytic activity of both samples was evaluated in the reduction of PNP to PAP. An aqueous solution of 1.5 mL of 1 × 10–4 mM P-nitrophenol and 0.5 mL of fresh 1 × 10–2 mM NaBH4 were poured into a quartz cell. The solutions containing 2 mg of the sample were then added to the mixture to initiate the reduction reaction. UV–Vis spectroscopy was used to follow the progress of the reaction. The original adsorption peak of 4-nitrophenol observed at 317 nm, red-shifted to 400 nm and the color of the mixture changed from yellow to bright yellow upon the addition of NaBH4 due to the formation of PNP ions. PNP reduction was very slow in the presence of NaBH4 without the catalyst. The reduction of PNP was observed to complete in 5 and 3 min for samples 1 and 2, respectively. The 400 nm peak sharply decreased and a typical absorption peak at 300 nm significantly increased due to the formation of PAP (Fig. 11). The slopes of the plots of − ln(A/A0) for PNP vs. time at 400 nm as the observed rate constants (kobs) of catalytic process were assessed by the good linear correlation (Fig. S7). Sample 2 has a better catalytic activity than sample 1, according to the results since the surface area of sample 2 was higher.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Catalytic reaction of PNP in the presence of NaBH4 a sample 1; b sample 2

The recyclability of the two samples in the reduction of 1 × 10–4 mM 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol in aqueous 1 × 10–2 mM NaBH4 was evaluated. The time reduction extent increased to 14 and 8 min for samples 1 and 2, respectively, over 3 cycles (Fig. 12). Tables 6 and 7 summarize all the rate constants evaluated.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Recovery of a sample 1; b sample 2 in the reduction of PNP in the presence of NaBH4

Table 6 Recovery of sample 1 in the reduction of PNP
Table 7 Recovery of sample 2 in the reduction of PNP

3.5 ICP

To prepare the samples for ICP analysis, a certain amount of sample 1 or 2 was dissolved in 15 M nitric acid prior to and following the reduction of P-nitrophenol and photodegradation of MB. This analysis was used to evaluate Cu and Co weights. A solution, which contained 10 ppm of the sample, was prepared for this purpose. The results are as follows in Tables 8 and 9.

Table 8 ICP analysis of sample 1
Table 9 ICP analysis of sample 2

4 Conclusion

Two samples have been successfully prepared by hydrothermal method using Co/Cu nitrate (sample 1) and Co/Cu acetylacetonate (sample 2). According to the results, the surface properties and catalytic and photocatalytic activities were affected by the type of the metal salt. Samples 1 and 2 had nanotube/nanosheets and nanoparticle morphologies, respectively. Cu and Co were incorporated on TiO2 as CuO and CoO, respectively. The CuO–CoO/TiO2 nanotubes/nanosheets (sample 1) with lower band gap degraded MB in 4 min in the presence of H2O2 using a Tungsten Lamp. In addition, the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol by NaBH4 was carried out using each of the samples. Sample 2 with greater surface area was a better catalyst in the reduction of PNP.