Introduction

BiFeO3(BFO), one of the single-phase multiferroic materials, has both ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties at room temperature (T C  = 1103 K, T N  = 640 K), and will produce a synergistic effect coupling between ferroelectric and ferromagnetic (magnetic coupling effect). BFO has the wide application prospect in the multistate memory, magnetic sensors, spintronic devices, and other fields [1]; hence it has attracted wide attention and research.

However, the volatilization of the Bi3+ of BFO and the valence states change of Fe will produce Fe2+ ions and oxygen vacancies. Therefore, BFO thin films have large leakage current and an unsaturated hysteresis loop in the applied electric field, and the ferroelectric property is poor. In addition, The pure BFO shows weak ferromagnetism due to the antiferromagnetic spin structure; hence the magnetoelectric coupling of the pure BFO is low and does not satisfy the practical application needs [2]. In order to improve the multiferroic properties of BFO thin films, an ion doping can be carried out. The research shows that an ion doping can reduce the leakage current, improve the properties of ferroelectric, but the ferromagnetic properties are not been increased obviously.

Our research group has done a lot of research work about ions doping on BFO thin films. For example, Liu et al. [3] have observed that Sr2+ ions doping could improve the ferroelectric property (2P r ~ 173.43 μC/cm2), while the ferromagnetism did not increase significantly (M s ~ 2.3 emu/cm3) in Bi0.89−x Sm0.11Sr x Fe0.94(Mn0.04Cr0.02)O3 films. Meanwhile, Ye et al. [4] prepared BFO thin films of Ho and Mn co-doping, the ferroelectric improved (2P r ~ 231.4 μC/cm2), but the ferromagnetic did not increase significantly (M s ~ 2.74 emu/cm3). More importantly, Dong et al. [5] have founded that the leakage current of the Tb, Mn, and Cr co-doped BFO thin films decreased, and the multiferroic properties improved (2P r ~ 239.6 μC/cm2, M s ~ 10.5 emu/cm3).

According to the above research, the Bi0.92−x Ho0.08Sr x Fe0.97Mn0.03O3 (BHSr x FMO, x = 0.01–0.04) thin films were prepared with the sol–gel method in this work, and we hope this will further increase the ferromagnetic property of BFO thin films.

Experimental procedure

Bi0.92−x Ho0.08Sr x Fe0.97Mn0.03O3 (BHSr x FMO, x = 0.01–0.04) thin films were fabricated on FTO (Fluorine doped tin oxide)/glass substrates using the sol–gel method. Bi0.91Ho0.08Sr0.01Fe0.97Mn0.03O3, Bi0.90Ho0.08Sr0.02Fe0.97Mn0.03O3, Bi0.89Ho0.08Sr0.03Fe0.97Mn0.03O3, and Bi0.92−x Ho0.08Sr0.04Fe0.97Mn0.03O3 thin films (hereinafter referred to as BHSr1FMO, BHSr2FMO, BHSr3FMO, and BHSr4FMO thin films, respectively) were successfully obtained. As raw materials, bismuth nitrate pentahydrate (Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, 5 mol% of excess Bi), Sr(NO3)2, Ho(NO3)3·6H2O, iron nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O), manganese acetate tetrahydrate (C4H6MnO4·4H2O), were mixed together with the atomic ratio of 0.92-x:0.08:x:0.97:0.03. Then raw materials were dissolved in the 2-methoxyethanol and acetic anhydride solvents, in which the volume ratio of 2-methoxyethanol and acetic anhydride was 3:1. The concentration of Fe3+ ion was 0.3 mol/L in the precursor solutions. Next, the solutions were stirred at room temperature for 2 h to obtain the homogeneous precursor solutions. The precursor solutions were deposited on FTO/glass substrates using a spin-coating method at a constant spinning rate of 4000 rpm for 15 s. After spin-coating, the deposited wet films were preheated at 473 K on a hot plate for 8 min and then the dried films were inserted into a furnace at 823 K under an air atmosphere for crystallization. These processes were repeated 15 times so as to obtain the desired film thickness. In order to measure the electrical properties, Au top electrodes (with the areas of 0.003 mm2) were deposited on the top surface of the thin films by ions sputtering through a metal shadow mask. After annealing at 558 K for 30 min, the electrodes could completely contact with the film.

An D/max-2200 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) by Japan Rigaku Company was used to identify the phase composition and crystal structure of the thin films. Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed by a British Renishaw inVia micro Raman spectrometer with an Ar ion laser excitation at 532 nm. A field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S4800, Hitachi) was used to observe the surface morphologies and interface contact of the films. The surface element composition and ion valence state of the samples were analyzed using an XPS of the XSAM800 spectrometer with Kratos. The leakage current densities of the films were measured by an Agilent E4980A. The electric hysteresis loops of the films were measured by a Radiant Multiferroic, and the magnetic properties of the films were analyzed using an MPMS-XL-7 superconducting quantum interference magnetic measuring system at room temperature.

Results and discussion

Structural characterization

Figure 1 is the XRD patterns of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films. The diffraction peaks of BFO and BHFMO thin films are consistent with the Standard Card of PDF (JCPDS No. 86-1518), which has distorted the rhombohedral perovskite structure, and the space lattices are R3c:H (161). There is a peak at the of 24°in the BHFMO thin film, which is the impurity phase of Bi2Fe4O9 [4]. The diffraction peaks of BHSr x FMO films are consistent with the Standard Card of PDF (JCPDS No. 74-2016); space lattices are R3m(160); and there are no impurity phases. Figure 1b shows the magnification of XRD patterns at the range of 30°–34°. The (104) peak of the BFO film is stronger than (110) peak. However, the intensity of (104) peak is weakened with Sr, Ho, and Mn co-doping, and later on the (104) peak and (110) peak are merged to a broad single peak. Compared with BHFMO and BHSr x FMO, we can find that the (110) peak of BHSr x FMO becomes wider than BHFMO, and the intensity increases when the amount of Sr2+ doping is more than 2%. This may be because Sr2+ doping makes the crystallinity of BHFMO film become better, and the grain sizes increases [6]. The changes of BHSr x FMO thin film peaks are due to the ionic radius of Sr2+(1.12 Å) large than that of Bi3+(1.03 Å), and the different ionic radii of doping leads to the distorted structure of the films [7].

Figure 1
figure 1

a XRD patterns of pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films; b the magnified XRD patterns at the range of 30–34°

In order to further analyze the effects of Sr2+ doping on the crystal structure of BHSr x FMO thin films, Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns (for all samples) have been preformed using the Maud program [8], as shown in Fig. 2 (the illustrations are structure models). The crystal structure parameters obtained from the Rietveld refinement of the XRD patterns are listed in Table 1. The refinement results agree with the experimental data, and the error factors (R w) are below 10.50%. According to the refinement results, the pure BFO film belongs to rhombohedral structure, R3c:H space group. BHFMO film belongs to rhombohedral structure, the R3c:H (73%) and R3m:R (27%); space group exhibits two kinds of coexistence [4]. From Table 1, we can also see that BHSr x FMO thin films belong to rhombohedral structure, R3c:H and R3m:R space groups. With the increased amount of Sr2+ doping, the proportions of R3m:R space groups are 37, 37, 49, and 36%, respectively. The lattice parameter (a) of R3m:R space group decreases from 3.954 to 3.797 Å, and the cell volume decreases from 61.811 to 51.362 Å3 with the increase of Sr2+ doping. It indicates that the space group of BHSr x FMO transforms from R3c:H to R3m:R with the increase of Sr2+ doping, and the structural distortion degree increases. When the amount of Sr2+ doping is 0.03, the lattice distortion is the most obvious.

Figure 2
figure 2

a Rietveld-refined XRD patterns of the pure BFO and BHFMO thin films, b Rietveld-refined XRD patterns of the BHSr x FMO thin films

Table 1 Details of the Rietveld-refined structural parameters of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films simulated based on the measured XRD patterns

As we all know, the structure transformation of films can also be reflected by Raman spectroscopy. Figure 3a shows Raman spectra of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films at room temperature, and each Raman active modes are obtained by decomposing the fitted curves into individual Lorentzian components. According to the group theory, the rhombohedral R3c structure of BFO has 13 Raman active modes (Г = 4A1 + 9E) [9]. In this experiment, the BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01–0.04) films have 8 active modes, and A1-1, A1-2, and A1-3 active modes of BHSr1FMO film are located at 144, 175, and 221 cm−1, and the E modes of BHSr1FMO film are located at 262, 369, 478, 523, and 611 cm−1, respectively. In addition, two-phonon modes are also observed around 900–1300 cm−1 in Fig. 3b [10]. The three different two-phonon Raman spectra of Pure BFO are 2A4(960 cm−1), 2E8(1100 cm−1), and 2E9(1240 cm−1), but the intensities of two-phonon modes are significantly decreased with doping Sr2+, Ho3+, and Mn2+ ions. Compared with the Raman active modes between BFO and BHFMO films, the following two conclusions can be obtained. On the one hand, it is known that the low frequency A modes are related to the Bi–O vibration and the high frequency E modes are related to the Fe–O vibration [11, 12]; On the other hand, the low frequency of A1-1, A1-2, A1-3 active modes have been merged, and the intensity of the E mode is increased at 621 cm−1. It indicates that Ho3+ and Mn2+ ions are doped into the BFO crystal lattice, which makes the Bi–O and Fe–O bond active modes change significantly [4]. Compared with Raman active modes of BHFMO and BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01–0.04) films, we can see that the intensities of A1-1, A1-2, A1-3 active modes decrease at the low frequency, and E mode (621 cm−1) shifts to the high frequency. This shows that Sr2+ ion is doped into the BFO lattice, which leads to the distortion of the structure of BHFMO film. The analyses of the Raman spectra support the XRD patterns analysis conclusion, and Sr2+ doping can cause the significant distortion of the structure of BHFMO thin film.

Figure 3
figure 3

Raman spectra of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films

The FE-SEM images of the surface and the cross-section micrographs of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films are shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4a shows the surface and the cross-section micrographs of the pure BFO film, which has the large grain size of about 150 nm, and the grains boundary are obvious. From the cross section, it can be seen that the thickness of the films is about 500 nm. Figure 4b shows the surface and the cross-section micrographs of BHFMO thin film, and the grain size is decreased obviously. This is because the doping ions (Ho3+ and Mn2+) act as nucleation centers in the BHFMO thin film, and the nucleation rate increases; this results in the decrease of the grain growth rate and the grain size [4]. The effects of ion doping on the grain size of BFO have also been reported in the BFO films doped with other ions [13, 14]. Figure 4c–f shows the surface and the cross-section micrographs of BHSr1FMO, BHSr2FMO, BHSr3FMO, and BHSr4FMO thin films, respectively. With the increased amount of Sr2+ doping, the grain size increases. It further indicates that due to the Sr2+ doping, the grain size of BHSr x FMO thin film increases in the XRD patterns. The abnormal growth of some grains causes the distribution of grain size not to be uniform, as shown in Fig. 4e. The grain size of the BHSr3FMO film is at the range of 50–120 nm. Meanwhile, the inset of Fig. 4e is the cross-section micrographs of the BHSr3FMO thin film. The thickness of the film is 550 nm, and the abnormal growth of grains leads to the surface of the film not to be smooth, so the uneven distribution of the particle size will cause the lattice strain [15]. In addition, Sr2+ doping leads to the film surface not to be smooth, which may affect the leakage current and ferroelectric properties [16].

Figure 4
figure 4

The FE-SEM images of the surface and the cross-section micrographs of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films, a pure BFO (illustration of the cross-section images), b BHFMO, c BHSr1FMO, d BHSr2FMO, e BHSr3FMO, f BHSr4FMO

As we all know, the main factors affecting the leakage current of BFO thin films include the fluctuation of the valence state between Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions and the oxygen vacancies. In addition, the valence state of Mn ions may be changed, so it also needs to make the analysis of Mn valence. The chemical valence states of Fe 2p, Mn 2p, and O 1 s are analyzed by XPS, as shown in Fig. 5. By fitting the Fe 2p3/2 peaks of all the thin films, as shown in Fig. 5a, the results show that all the thin films contain both Fe2+ and Fe3+. The ratios of Fe2+ ions of BFO and BHSr x FMO (x = 0.00–0.04) thin films are 44.80, 27.52, 19.82, 16.20, 14.74, and 13.86%, respectively, and the amount of Fe2+ ions decreases with the increase of Sr2+ amount. The valence state of Fe is very sensitive to the oxygen vacancies. In order to maintain the electrical neutrality, the formation of Fe2+ ions is bound to be accompanied by the oxygen vacancies, as shown in Eqs. (1) [17] and (2). The chemical valence states of Mn in the films are fitted by XPS spectra, as shown in Fig. 5b. The results indicate that there are Mn2+ and Mn3+ ions. The ratios of Mn2+ ions of BHSr x FMO (x = 0.00–0.04) thin films are 55.32, 59.07, 50.41, 51.36, 47.43%, respectively, and the valence fluctuation may occur as shown in the following Eq. (3).

Figure 5
figure 5

XPS spectra of a Fe 2p, b Mn 2p, and c O1 s of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films

With the increase of Sr2+ doping, the Mn2+ ions of BHSr1FMO thin films decrease because Sr2+ and Ho3+ ions doping promotes the binding of Mn2+ and oxygen vacancies. The equilibrium is shifted to the right, as shown in Eq. (4) [18]. Figure 5c shows the O 1 s of XPS spectra of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO (x = 0.00–0.04) thin films. The O 1 s track contains two peaks, with peak (OL) of low binding energy associated with BFO lattice oxygen, and peak (OH) of high binding energy associated with oxygen vacancies [19]. The ratios of OH of BFO and BHSr x FMO(x = 0.00–0.04) thin films are 20.59, 13.66, 14.05, 11.56, 12.92, 10.08%, respectively. The oxygen vacancies of BHFMO thin film decrease, because the Ho3+ ions substituting Bi3+ ions can decrease the volatilization of Bi3+ ions and lower the concentration of oxygen vacancies [20]. The amount of oxygen vacancies decreases with the Sr2+ doping, which is consistent with the results of the Fe 2p3/2 peaks. This is because Sr2+ and Ho2+ ions substitute Bi3+ ions of BHSr x FMO thin films and the internal charge of the film reaches a state of equilibrium, which will produce a part of the oxygen vacancies. The component defect equation is as shown in Eq. (5). However, the oxygen vacancies of BHSr3FMO thin films increase, which may be related to the structural distortion and the abnormal growth of some grains. According to the results of XPS spectra analyses, a certain amount of doping Sr2+ ions reduces the Fe2+ ions and oxygen vacancies, but Mn3+ ions increase, which shows that the valence state fluctuation of BHSr x FMO films is more obvious with doping Sr2+ ions. Accordingly, the decrease of Fe2+, Mn2+, and oxygen vacancies lead to the decrease of defect dipole of \( ({\text{Fe}}_{{\text{Fe}}}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \), so the oxygen vacancies of BHSr1FMO film are increased. In addition, the defect dipole of \( ({\text{Sr}}_{{_{{\text{Bi}}} }}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \) increases with the increase of doping Sr2+ ions, and thus the oxygen vacancies decrease [21]. The results may have a significant impact on the electrical properties of BHSr x FMO thin films.The defect chemical equations of BFO:

$$ 2{\text{Fe}}_{{\text{Fe}}} + {\text{O}}_{{\text{O}}} \to 2{\text{Fe}}_{{\text{Fe}}}^{\prime } + {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } + 1/2{\text{O}}_{2} $$
(1)
$$ 2{\text{Bi}}_{{\text{Bi}}} + 3{\text{O}}_{{\text{O}}} \to 2{\text{V}}_{{\text{Bi}}}^{{{\prime \prime \prime }}} + 3{\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } + {\text{Bi}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{3} $$
(2)

The defect chemical equations of BHFMO:

$$ {\text{Mn}}^{ 2+ } + {\text{Fe}}^{{ 3 { + }}} \to {\text{Mn}}^{ 3+ } + {\text{Fe}}^{{ 2 { + }}} $$
(3)
$$ {\text{MnO}}{\mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits^{{{\text{Fe}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{3} }}}2{\text{Mn}}_{{\text{Fe}}}^{{\prime }} + {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } + 2{\text{O}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \times } $$
(4)

The defect chemical equations of BHSr x FMO:

$$ 2{\text{SrO}}\mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits^{{{\text{Bi}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{3} }}2{\text{Sr}}_{{\text{Bi}}}^{{\prime }} + {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } + 2{\text{O}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \times } $$
(5)

Properties of thin films

Figure 6 shows the leakage current density of BHSr x FMO thin films at room temperature. The leakage current density of BHFMO thin film is 6.25 × 10−6 A/cm2 at 300 kV/cm. It can be seen that the leakage current density of thin films decreases with doping Sr2+ ions, and the leakage current densities of BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01–0.04) thin films are 1.8 × 10−5, 1.39 × 10−6, 1.74 × 10−6, 1.15 × 10−6 A/cm2, respectively, at 300 kV/cm. The leakage current of BHSr1FMO thin film increases, which is due to the increase of oxygen vacancies and the decrease of the defect dipoles of \( ({\text{Sr}}_{{_{{\text{Bi}}} }}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \). Generally, the leakage current density decreases with the increase of the amount of doping Sr2+ ions. Combining the XPS analysis results shows that Sr2+ and Ho3+ ions substituting Bi3+ ions can decrease the oxygen vacancies, resulting in the decrease of leakage current density [22]. This is different from the reports of Sr2+-doped BFO thin films [23].

Figure 6
figure 6

The Leakage current density of BHSr x FMO thin films at RT

Figure 7 shows the ferroelectric hysteresis loops (PE) and the transient currents recorded curve (IE) of the BHSr x FMO thin films measured at room temperature and 1 kHz. In an applied electric field of 536 kV/cm, the remnant polarization (2P r) and coercive field (2E c) of BHFMO thin film are 57.1 μC/cm2 and 477 kV/cm, respectively. The PE hysteresis loop of the BHFMO thin film is shrunk at the negative coercive field, which leads to the asymmetry of the coercive field. At the same time, the IE curve has two peaks in the negative electric field, which is in line with the antiferroelectric, so the BHFMO thin film has ferroelectric phase and antiferroelectric phase. This is because the \( ({\text{Fe}}_{{\text{Fe}}}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \) and \( ({\rm Mn}_{\rm Fe}^{{\prime }} - V_{\rm O}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \) defect dipoles are formed in the BHFMO film, which can make the ferroelectric domain difficult to switch and can cause the pinning effect on the domain wall, so make the ferroelectric domain difficult to switch [24]. The 2P r and 2E c of BHSr1FMO thin films are 80.1 μC/cm2 and 473 kV/cm, respectively, and the antiferroelectric phase disappears, which is due to the decrease of the \( ({\text{Fe}}_{{\text{Fe}}}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \) and \( ({\rm Mn}_{Fe}^{{\prime }} - V_{O}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \) defect dipoles with doping Sr2+ ions, the decrease of the pinning effect, and the ferroelectric domain easy to switch.

Figure 7
figure 7

The ferroelectric hysteresis loops (PE) and the transient currents recorded curves (IE) of the BHSr x FMO thin films measured at 1 kHz

The 2P r and 2E c of BHSr x FMO (x = 0.02–0.04) thin films are 53.5, 81.9, 78.4 μC/cm2 and 532, 524, 540 kV/cm, respectively. The 2E c of BHSr x FMO(x = 0.01–0.04) thin films is increased from 473 to 524 kV/cm. There are two reasons: on the one hand, the increase of the 2E c is due to the increase of the defect dipole of \( ({\text{Sr}}_{{_{{\text{Bi}}} }}^{{\prime }} - {\text{V}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot \cdot } )^{ \cdot } \), which clamps the domain wall motion. On the other hand, the ferroelectric phase plays an important role in the spontaneous polarization directions. It is generally known that the polarization direction of R3c:H space group of BFO thin film is [111] [25]. Although the R3c:H and R3m:R space groups belong to the 3m point group, the symmetric axis of R3m:R space group shifts.

The refinement results show that the α of the R3c:H space group is 90°, and the α of the R3m:R space group of BHSr x FMO(x = 0.01–0.04) thin films decreases from 89° to 77° (Table 1). Although the polarization direction of R3m:R space group of BHSr x FMO thin films is also [111], and the α of the R3m:R space group changes, which indicates that the polarization direction is changed, and the ferroelectric domain is difficult to switch, the 2E c of BHSr x FMO(x = 0.01–0.04) thin films increases with the increase of the R3m:R space group.

The further analyses of the transient currents recorded curve show that the IE curve consists of two parts. One part is that the ferroelectric domain inversion produces the real polarization current. The other part is that the leakage current causes the linear resistance of the interface between the thin film and the electrode, which leads to the increase of the switching current and leakage current of all the films [26]. And the IE curve shows that the switching current (I S) and the leakage current (I L) of BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01–0.04) thin films are 1.48, 0.97, 1.57, 1.37 mA and 0.75, 0.45, 0.65, 0.75 mA, respectively. The BHSr3FMO thin films show great ferroelectric properties, and the enhanced ferroelectric properties are mainly connected with the rhombohedral structure of R3c:H (51%)/R3m:R(49%) space groups at morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) [27].

Figure 8 shows the magnetic hysteresis loops (MH) of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films at room temperature. In the magnetic field of 8.0 k Oe, BFO thin film shows the weak ferromagnetic property (M s = 0.65 emu/cm3), which is because of the presence of Fe3+–O–Fe3+ bond in pure BFO and shows G-type antiferromagnetic ordering [28]. The saturation magnetization of BHFMO thin films increases (M s = 2.73 emu/cm3), which is due to the increase of the oxygen vacancies, and the spin bond angle of Fe3+–O–Fe3+ tilt [29]. The saturation magnetizations (M s) of BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01, 0.02, 0.04) thin films are 1.12, 1.61, and 0.9 emu/cm3, respectively. However, the magnetization of the BHSr3FMO thin film is 8.34 emu/cm3, and does not reach saturation in the magnetic field of 8.0 k Oe, which may be due to two reasons: On the one hand, according to the Rietveld results and the Raman spectra, it can be found that BHSr3FMO thin film belongs to rhombohedral structure, R3c:H(51%)/R3m:R(49%) space groups, and it is similar to the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB). It is indicated that the structural transformation gives rise to the continuing collapse of the space-modulated spin structure, which will release more magnetic power [30]. And the high frequency E mode (621 cm−1) of BHSr3FMO thin film is shifted to the high frequency, which shows that the change of the Fe–O bond of BHSr3FMO film will lead to the change of G-type antiferromagnetic ordering and the Fe3+–O–Fe2+ bond angle, and the antiferromagnetic lattice of BFO tilts. Thus, the magnetic properties of the BHSr3FMO film can be improved [31]. Furthermore, for multiferroic-based BFO materials, the effect of grain size influences the magnetic properties (mainly for a nonmetric grain size): with dimension less than 62 nm, the probable modification of cycloid spin structure of BiFeO3 can influence ferromagnetism [32]. The grain size of the BHSr3FMO film is in the range of 50–120 nm, and the abnormal growth of grains leads to different magnetic properties. On the other hand, combined with the leakage current and XPS analyses, the oxygen vacancies and Mn3+ ions of the BHSr3FMO thin film increase, which showed that the increase of oxygen vacancies makes the clusters of Fe3+–O–Fe2+ tilt, and the different magnetic moments of Mn2+ ions and Fe3+ ions also restrain the spiral spin structure [33]. Generally, the magnetic properties of BHSr3FMO thin film can be improved by the increase of structural distortion and oxygen vacancies.

Figure 8
figure 8

Magnetic hysteresis loops of the pure BFO and BHSr x FMO thin films at RT

Conclusions

The BHSr x FMO thin films are deposited on FTO substrates by the sol–gel method. The structural analyses show that BHSr x FMO (x = 0.01–0.04) thin films belong to rhombohedral structure, the Sr2+ ions doping causes the space groups transition from R3c:H to R3m:R. The Fe2+ and oxygen vacancies decrease with doping Sr2+ ions, and the leakage current density of BHSr3FMO film is 1.74 × 10−6 A/cm2 at 300 kV/cm. In an applied electric field of 536 kV/cm, the 2P r and 2E c of BHSr3FMO thin film are 81.9 μC/cm2 and 524 kV/cm, respectively. The I–E curve of BHSr3FMO thin film shows that the I S and the I L are 1.57 and 0.65 mA, respectively. In the magnetic field of 8000 Oe, the magnetization of the BHSr3FMO thin film increases significantly (M = 8.34 emu/cm3). The BHSr3FMO thin film shows the great multiferroic properties, which is mainly connected with the rhombohedral structure of R3c:H (51%)/R3m:R(49%) space groups at morphotropic phase boundary (MPB). It is believed that the multiferroic properties of BHSr x FMO thin films may have more potential applications in multiferroic microdevices and spintronic devices.