Abstract
The complex product design is a continuously changing process from customer requirements to a maturity design. During this process a change of one part will, in most cases, causes changes in other parts and even the whole product. The assessment for the impacts of such changes can support designers’ designing and help manager to manage redesigning. A complex product can be considered as a weighted network of parts, subassemblies, or subsystems. Based on the theory of weighted networks, three changeability indices (degree-changeability, reach-changeability and between-changeability) are presented. Degree-changeability is used to calculate the direct change impacts. Reach-changeability is used to assess the indirectly change impacts because of propagation. If a part influences the other parts dramatically and it is also influenced by them, this part can be predicted by between-changeability. Finally, the three changeability indices are proven to be effective for the change impact assessment through a real-world case of Roots Blowers. With the analysis, the designers can avoid changing to “expensive” parts or subsystems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albert R., Barabási A. L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1): 47–97
Bavelas A. (1948) A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization 7: 16–30
Boccaletti S., Latora V., Moreno Y., Chavez M., Hwang D. U. (2006) Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports 424(4–5): 175–308
Clark K. B., Fujimoto T. (1991) Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Clarkson P. J., Simons C., Eckert C. (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design 126(9): 788–797
Cohen T., Navthe S., Fulton R. E. (2000) C-FAR, change favorable representation. Computer Aided Design 32(5): 321–338
Doreian P. (1974) On the connectivity of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3: 245–258
Eckert, C. M., Zanker, W. & Clarkson, P. J. (2001). Aspects of a better understanding of changes. In Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’01) (pp. 147–154). Glasgow, UK, 21–23 August.
Eckert C. M., Clarkson P. J., Zanker W. (2004) Change and customization in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design 15(1): 1–21
Eckert C. M., Keller R., Earl C., Clarkson P. J. (2006) Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91(12): 1521–1534
Flanagan, T. L., Eckert, C. M., Smith, J., Eger, T., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). A functional analysis of change propagation. In Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’03) (pp. 441–442). Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 August.
Freeman L. C. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1): 35–41
Freeman L. C. (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3): 215–239
Giffin, M. L. (2007). Change propagation in large technical systems, Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jarratt, T., Clarkson, P. J., Parks, G. & Eckert, C. M. (2002). Use of Monte Carlo methods in the prediction of change propagation. In Computer-based design: Engineering design conference 2002(EDC’02) (pp. 487–498). London, UK, 9–11 July.
Keller, R., Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. (2005). Multiple views to support engineering change management for complex products. In Proceedings of the third international conference on coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization (CMV’05) (pp. 33–41). London, UK, 5 July.
Keller, R., et al. (2007). Product models in design: A combined use of two models to assess change risks. In 16th international conference on engineering design (ICED’07) (pp. 673–674). Paris, France, 28–31 August.
Krishnapillai R., Zeid A. (2006) Mapping product design specification for mass customisation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(1): 29–43
Latora V., Marchiori M. (2005) Vulnerability and protection of infrastructure networks. Physical Review E 71(1): 015103(4)
Lee H. et al (2010) An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products. Journal of Engineering Design 21(1): 75–91
Martin M. V., Ishii K. (2002) Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design 13(4): 213–235
Mikkola J. H., Gassmann O. (2003) Managing modularity of product architectures toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(5): 204–218
Newman M. E. J. (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(3): 167–256
Ollinger, G. A. & Stahovich, T. F. (2001). RedesignIT-A constraint-based tool for managing design changes. In Proceedings of DETC ‘01 ASME 2001 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Pittsburgh, USA, 9–12 (September), Paper No. DETC2001/DTM-21702.
Pimmler, T. U. & Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions. In Proceedings of the ASME design theory and methodology conference (DTM’94) (pp. 343–351). Minneapolis, USA, September.
Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240–267
Simon H. (1996) The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press, MA
Shaw M. E. (1954) Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. Journal of Psychology 38: 139–149
Strogatz S. H. (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(3): 268–276
Suh N. P. (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York
Suh E. S., de Weck O., Kim I., Chang D. (2007) Flexible platform component design under uncertainty. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 115–126
Ulrich K., Tung K. (1991) Fundamentals of product modularity. Fundamentals of product modularity. Proceedings of the 1991 ASME winter annual meeting symposium on issues in design/manufacturing integration 39(12): 73–80
Ulrich K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440
VanWie M., Stone R. B., Thevenot H., Simpson T. (2007) Examination of platform and differentiating elements in product family Design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 77–96
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, H., Chu, X. A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product. J Intell Manuf 23, 1419–1431 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0454-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0454-8