Abstract
Section 1 introduces the hypothesis that competition among neighboring states may favor cultural innovation, and it surveys the available quantitative evidence. Section 2 starts from the assumption that European instrumental music had its breakthrough during the Baroque era and that the most famous composers came from the two countries characterized by the highest degree of political fragmentation: Italy and Germany. It suggests that political fragmentation has promoted musical composition and performance in several ways. The average duration of employment is proposed as a proxy for competition on the demand side. Section 3 shows that the most famous Italian and German composers of the Baroque period changed their employers significantly more often than their French and British counterparts did. Moreover, the Reformation led to musical competition between the Catholic and Protestant churches. Section 4 argues that competition for composers has also been important in other periods of European history – including competition between the Church and the courts. It shows that composers moved no less in the Renaissance than in the Baroque. Section 5 raises the question whether European music may also be said to express a competitive spirit.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adorno, T.W. (1980) Einleitung in die Musiksoziologie, 3rd edn. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main.
Baumgartner, A. (1989) Propyläen Welt der Musik: Die Komponisten, 5 vols. Propyläen, Berlin.
Baumol, W.J. and Baumol, H. (1994) “On the Economics of Musical Composition in Mozart's Vienna”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 171–198.
Berman, H.J. (1983) Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Berman, H.J. (1998) “The Western Legal Tradition: The Interaction of Revolutionary Innovation and Evolutionary Growth”, in P. Bernholz, M.E. Streit and R. Vaubel (eds.), Political Competition, Innovation, and Growth: A Historical Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 35–47.
Bernholz, P. and Vaubel, R. (2004) “Introduction and Overview”, in id. (eds.), Political Competition, Innovation, and Growth in the History of Asian Civilizations. Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Blume, F. (ed.) (1989) Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 17 Vols. Bärenreiter/dtv, Kassel, Germany.
Burkhardt, J. (1925) Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien, 14th edn. Kröner, Leipzig, Germany.
Chant, M. (1994) Musica Practica: The Social Practice of Western Music from Gregorian Chant to Postmodernism. Verso Books, New York.
Collins, R. (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cowen, T. (1998) In Praise of Commercial Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Elias, N. (1969) Die höfische Gesellschaft. Luchterhand, Darmstadt, Germany.
Elias, N. (1991) Mozart: Zur Soziologie eines Genies. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main.
Engel, H. (1989) “Soziologie der Musik”, in F. Blume (ed.), Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Vol. 12, pp. 949–967.
Hayek, F.A.V. (1968/1978) “Competition as a Discovery Procedure”, in C. Nishiyama and K. Leube (eds.), The Essence of Hayek. Hoover, Stanford, CA, pp. 254–265.
Honigsheim, P. (1961) ‘Musiksoziologie’. Handwörterbuch der Sozialwissenschaften 7, Stuttgart, pp. 485–494.
Hume, D. (1742/1985) “On the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences”, in id., Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 111–137.
Jones, E.L. (1981) The European Miracle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kant, I. (1784/1959) “Idea of a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View”, in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History. Free Press, New York, pp. 22–34.
Kepler, J. (1619) De Harmonice Mundi. Lincii Austriae.
Kroeber, A.L. (1944) Configurations of Culture Growth. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Murray, C. (2003) Human Accomplishment. Harper Collins, New York.
Naroll, R., Benjamin, E.C., Fohl, F.K., Fried, M.J., Hildreth, R.E., and Schaefer, J.M. (1971) “Creativity: A Cross-Historical Pilot Survey.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2: 181–188.
Nestler, G. (1962) Geschichte der Musik. Atlantis, Gütersloh, Germany.
Newbold, P. (1988) Statistics for Business and Economics, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Popper, K. (1984) “Schöpferische Selbstkritik in Wissenschaft und Kunst”, in id., Auf der Suche nach einer besseren Welt. Piper, Munich, Germany.
Preussner, E. (1954) Die bürgerliche Musikkultur. Bärenreiter, Kassel, Basel.
Rebling, E. (1935) Die soziologischen Grundlagen der Stilwandlungen der Musik um die Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Dissertation, Berlin.
Scherer, F.M. (2004) Quarter Notes and Bank Notes: The Economics of Music Composition in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Simonton, D.K. (1975) “Sociocultural Context of Individual Creativity: A Transhistorical Time-Series Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 1119–1133.
Simonton, D.K. (1976) “Ideological Diversity and Creativity: A Reevaluation of a Hypothesis.” Social Behaviour and Personality 4: 203–207.
Sorokin, P.A. (1937) Social and Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 2. American Book, New York.
Vaubel, R. (2005) Das Papsttum und der politische Wettbewerb in Europa, ORDO, Bd. 5b (forthcoming).
Wolff, C. (1991) Bach: Essays on this Life and Music. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL classification: Z11
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaubel, R. The Role of Competition in the Rise of Baroque and Renaissance Music. J Cult Econ 29, 277–297 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-0699-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-0699-9