Abstract
If we accept that all plagiarism is wrong, the issue is black and white. But are there more challenging questions that color the issue with shades of gray that may influence or help clarify the ethical underpinnings of the act? Does intent matter? Does the venue matter? Does the form of writing matter? What about a professor when working as a private citizen, rather than in his/her academic role? Might plagiarism be mitigated when there is no associated financial gain? Is a writer’s history that exhibits impeccable ethical integrity relevant? Should these factors, and/or other factors, even be considered in a university’s administrative response — or non-response? What might employing an ethical approach contribute to wrestling with the dilemma? The authors explore critical issues that might face a senior academic administrator when confronting the need to respond on behalf of a university to a charge of plagiarism leveled by an influential newspaper against a university professor for a social responsibility-focused opinion-editorial published in this newspaper.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Association of University Professors (1991). Statement on plagiarism. Policy Documents and Reports, Ninth Edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved August 1, 2004, from http://www.lit.edu/departments/csep/PublicWWW/codes/coe/aaup-h.html..
Beauchamp, T.L. and Bowie, N.E. (1993). Ethical Theory and Business, Fourth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fifth Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bombardieri, M. (2004, September 28) Tribe admits not crediting author. The Boston Globe, pp. B1, B6.
Bombardieri, M. and Mehegan, D. (2004, September 9) Ogletree’s book contains lifted text. The Boston Globe, pp. B1–B4.
Bowie, N. (1987). Corporate management: Doing good and doing well. Hastings Center Report. February: 17–18.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publications.
Garner, B.A. (Ed.). (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition. St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Glassick, C., Huber, M.T. and Maeroff, G. (2000). Scholarship Assessed: An Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publications.
Goldstein, P. (2003). Copyright’s Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox, Revised Edition. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
Harris, M. (2004, May 4). The art of borrowing and the piracy of plagiarism. The Charlotte Observer. Retrieved May 4, 2004 from http://www.charlotte.com/mid/observer/news/opinion/8582954.htm?template=cor.
Huber, M. T. (2000). Evaluating outreach: Scholarship assessed approach. Penn State Outreach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved September 1, 2003 from http://www.outreach.psu/News/Pubs/Monograph/eval.html.
Indiana University Writing Tutorial Services (2004). Plagiarism: What it is and how to recognize and avoid it. Retrieved June 4, 2004 from http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/wts/plagiarism.html.
Lunsford, M. (2000). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate by Ernest Boyer. Book Review. Retrieved August 22, 2003 from http://www.uu.edu/centers/faculty/bookreviews/Lunsford.htm.
Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1994, December). ORI policies: ORI provides working definition of plagiarism. ORI Newsletter:3(1). Retrieved May 27, 2004 from http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/policies/plagiarism.asp.
Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1997). Model Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Issued April 1995; revised February 1997. [42 CFR ’50].
Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL) (2004). Avoiding plagiarism. Retrieved June 4, 2004, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/print/research/r_plagiar.html.
Rogers, J. (1996). Plagiary and the art of skillful citation: Why we need to talk about plagiarism. Baylor College of Medicine. Retrieved June 14, 2004, from http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/immuno/citewell/plagint.html.
Schworm, P. (2005, April 18) e.e. cummings scholar accused of plagiarism. The Boston Globe, pp. B1, B2.
Shakespeare, W. (1600). Much Ado About Nothing. Retrieved March 10, 2006, from http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/muchado/facts.html.
Spaff, B. (1983). Writing from Sources. New York, NY: St. Martins Press.
University of California at Davis Student Judicial Services. (2001, October 25). Avoiding plagiarism: Mastering the art of scholarship. Retrieved June 4, 2004, from http://sja.ucdavis.edu/avoid.htm.
University of Virginia Health System (2004). “The troubling legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis study.” Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.med.virginia.edu/hs-library/historical/apology.
Volokh, E. (2003). The mechanisms of the slippery slope. [Electronic version]. Harvard Law Review:116, Retrieved October 26, 2003, from http://www1.law.ucla.edu/~volokh/slippery.htm.].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Personal identifiers associated with the scenario have been removed or altered in an effort to protect confidentiality and promote anonymity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hiller, M.D., Peters, T.D. The Ethics of Opinion in Academe: Questions for an Ethical and Administrative Dilemma. J Acad Ethics 3, 183–203 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9013-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9013-5