Abstract
Past research has suggested that the aggregation of deviant peers during treatment may cause harmful effects (T. J. Dishion, J. McCord, & F. Poulin, 1999). This study compared the effectiveness of problem-solving skills training groups in which all members had conduct problems (“pure” group condition) with groups that consisted of adolescents with and without behavior problems (“mixed” group condition). Participants were 139 sixth- and seventh-graders (mean age = 12.7; 63% male; 55% White) enrolled at public middle schools. Pre-, post-, and 6-month follow-up data were collected, along with intervention process variables. Results showed that, contrary to the deviancy training hypothesis, adolescents in the pure-group condition engaged in more adaptive in-session behavior and received lower scores on the parent and teacher ratings of externalizing behavior at postintervention than those in the mixed-group condition. Mediation analyses showed that the deviancy training that occurred in the mixed-group condition accounted for their worse postintervention scores, findings consistent with the deviancy training hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the teacher’s report form and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Arnold, M. E., & Hughes, J. N. (1999). First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 99–115.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Brestan, E. V., & Eyberg, S. M. (1998). Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 180–189.
Caplan, M., Weissberg, R. P., Grober, J. S., Sivo, P. J., Grady, K., & Jacoby, C. (1992). Social competence promotion with inner-city and suburban young adolescents: Effects on social adjustment and alcohol use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 56–63.
Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (1995). Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: Immediate and 1-year outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 538–548.
Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., Spracklen, K. M., & Li, F. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 803–824.
Dishion, T. J., Eddy, J. M., Haas, E., Li, F., & Spracklen, K. M. (1997). Friendships and violent behavior during adolescence. Social Development, 6, 207–223.
Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 421–471). New York: Wiley.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm---Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.
Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers. Criminology, 34, 493–518.
Feldman, R. A., Caplinger, T. E., & Wodarski, J. S. (1983). The St. Louis conundrum: The effective treatment of antisocial youths. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gresham, R. M., & Elliott, S. N (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Handwerk, M. (2000). The iatrogenic effects of group intervention for antisocial youth: Premature extrapolations? Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 223–238.
Hoyle, R. H., Donohew, R. L., Lorch, E. P., & Palmgreen, P. (1997, May). Sensation-seeking and drug-related attitudes and behaviors among adolescents. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Baltimore, MD.
Kamphaus, R. W., & Frick, P. J. (1996). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent personality and behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Landau, S., Milich, R., & Diener, M. B. (1998). Peer relations of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 83–105.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
McMahon, R. J., & Wells, K. C. (1998). Conduct problems. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (pp. 111–210). New York: Guilford.
Poulin, F., Dishion, T. J., & Burraston, B. (2001). Three-year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 214–224.
Weaver. B. (2000, July/August). APS Observer. (Available from the American Psychological Society, 1010 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005-4907).
Weissberg, R. P., Caplan, M., Bennetto, L., & Jackson, A. S. (1990). The social competence promotion program for young adolescents: Social problem-solving module. (Available from CASEL, http://www.casel.org)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mager, W., Milich, R., Harris, M.J. et al. Intervention Groups for Adolescents With Conduct Problems: Is Aggregation Harmful or Helpful?. J Abnorm Child Psychol 33, 349–362 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3572-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3572-6