Abstract
Chemokines are a large family of proteins that, once associated to its receptor on leukocytes, stimulate their movement and migration from blood to tissues. Once in the tissue, immune cells trigger inflammation that, when uncontrolled, leads to fibrosis development. Among the immune cells, macrophages take a special role in fibrosis formation, since macrophage depletion reflects less collagen deposition. The majority of tissue macrophages is derived from monocytes, especially monocytes expressing the chemokine receptor CCR2. Here, we investigated the role of infiltrating CCR2+ cells in the development of fibrosis, and specifically, the dynamic of infiltration of these cells into kidneys under chronic obstructive lesion. Using liposome-encapsulated clodronate, we observed that macrophage depletion culminated in less collagen deposition and reduced chemokines milieu that were released in the damaged kidney after obstructive nephropathy. We also obstructed the kidneys of CCL3−/−, CCR2−/−, CCR4−/−, CCR5−/−, and C57BL/6 mice and we found that among all animals, CCR2−/− mice demonstrated the more robust protection, reflected by less inflammatory and Th17-related cytokines and less collagen formation. Next we evaluated the dynamic of CCR2+/rfp cell infiltration and we observed that they adhere onto the vessels at early stages of disease, culminating in increased recruitment of CCR2+/rfp cells at later stages. On the other hand, CCR2rfp/rfp animals exhibited less fibrosis formation and reduced numbers of recruited cells at later stages. We have experimentally demonstrated that inflammatory CCR2+ cells that reach the injured kidney at initial stages after tissue damage are responsible for the fibrotic pattern observed at later time points in the context of UUO.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The term “chemokine” is a contraction of “chemotactic cytokine” and refers to a large family of structurally homologous proteins that stimulate the movement of leukocytes and regulate their migration from blood to tissues (Griffith et al. 2014). Chemokines are classified into four families, based on the number and location of the N-terminal cysteine residues. The first two families are the CC chemokines, where residues are adjacent, and the CXC family, whose residues are separated by one amino acid. A small number of chemokines has a single cysteine (C family) or two cysteines separated by three amino acids (CX3C) (Rot and von Andrian 2004). Chemokine receptors, in turn, are differentially expressed on all leukocytes. The receptor occupancy of its respective chemokine immediately initiates intracellular responses (Bromley et al. 2008; Sallusto and Baggiolini 2008), such as increasing cytoplasmic calcium and activation of protein kinase C (Rot and von Andrian 2004). Indeed, changes in the cytoskeleton as well as the polymerization of the actin and myosin filaments were observed, resulting in increased cell motility. These signals also alter the conformation of cell surface integrins, increasing the affinity of them with their ligands (Kufareva et al. 2015).
Activated leukocytes play critical roles in injury and fibrosis development (Bohle et al. 1992; Sean Eardley and Cockwell 2005). Subsets of inflammatory cells are recruited into injured compartments after the release of pro-inflammatory mediators by activated resident cells. Recruited inflammatory cells propagate and amplify the immune response through the release of cytokines and growth factors, modulate extracellular matrix synthesis by the release of proteases, further promote the lesion by reactive oxygen species (ROS), and also initiate the healing process and tissue repair via the removal of immune complexes or cellular debris (Eddy 2000; Segerer et al. 2000; Sean Eardley and Cockwell 2005). The release of pro-inflammatory mediators, the activation of resident cells, hypoxia, and ROS production characterize the inflammation process and ultimately promotes fibrosis (Porubsky et al. 2004). Moreover, the number of macrophages and T cells generally correlates with the loss of tissue function in various forms of diseases due to uncontrolled immune response initiated by these cells (Vielhauer et al. 2004; Segerer and Nelson 2005).
CCR2 and its main ligand, CCL2, an inflammatory chemokine also known as monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) (Segerer and Nelson 2005) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several different disease processes (O’Connor et al. 2015). It has been shown that CCR2 is responsible for Ly6Chigh monocyte recruitment (Kitagawa et al. 2004; Peng et al. 2015a, b) and regulation of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts (Xia et al. 2013) in kidneys underwent ureteral obstruction. Besides chemotactic function, CCL2 presents pro-survival properties once deficiency for CCL2 aggravates tubular damage in the ischemia/reperfusion model of disease (Stroo et al. 2015). CCR2 is, however, mainly related to the influx of inflammatory monocytes into the injured kidney (Giunti et al. 2010; Chousterman et al. 2016). In addition to inflammatory monocytes, CCR2 is also expressed in mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. In this context, CCR2 regulates inflammation and renal injury repair by acting as a decoy to suppress CCL2 activity (Shen et al. 2016). Indeed, blocking CCR2 in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (Furuichi et al. 2003a, b) and unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO) model (Lefebvre et al. 2016) led to decreased renal damage and reduced influx of macrophages and neutrophils. Also, it was observed that pharmacological blockage of CCR2 reduces the percentage of cells co-expressing F4/80 and CD206 accumulating in the kidneys, a reduction that is related to kidney protection in experimental renal artery stenosis (Kashyap et al. 2016). CCL2 mRNA and protein were also measured in the urine of patients with lupus nephritis, and its levels correlated with the clinical disease activity and histological score (Nakashima et al. 2004). Accordingly, CCR2 inhibition with CCX140-B has renoprotective effects on top of current standard medication in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy (Weir 2015). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of infiltrating monocytes for the development of fibrosis, and specifically, the milieu of chemokines released in the context of UUO. We confirmed the involvement of CCR2 in renal pathology by analyzing kidney damage and fibrosis formation in animals deficient for CCR2. In addition, we investigated the dynamic of CCR2+ cell infiltration in kidneys under chronic obstructive lesion. We observed that inflammatory CCR2+ cells that reach the injured kidney at initial stages after tissue damage are responsible for the fibrotic pattern observed at later time points in the context of UUO.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
Male CCL3−/−, CCR2−/−, CCR4−/−, CCR5−/−, CCR2+/rfp, and CCR2rfp/rfp, all in C57BL/6 background, and control mice aging 6–8 weeks, from Jackson Laboratory, were bred and housed in a pathogen-free facility. CCR2rfp/rfp animals express red fluorescein protein (RFP) instead of CCR2 and CCR2+/rfp animals express both CCR2 and RFP. Mice were kept on a 12 h light/dark cycle in a temperature-controlled room at 21–23 °C, with free access to water and food. On day 0, mice were anaesthetised with Ketamine–Xylazine (Agribrands do Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and UUO was performed by complete ligation of the left ureter. Animals were placed in single cages and warmed by indirect light until completely recovered from anesthesia. Seven days later, mice were sacrificed for biochemical, histological, protein, and genetic analyses. All procedures were approved by the internal ethics committee of the University of Sao Paulo (CEUA 45/2009).
Liposome preparation and macrophage depletion
The macrophage depletion kinetics was previously evaluated (Braga et al. 2016). Briefly, an ethereal solution (0.5 mL) containing phosphatidylcholine (50 mg), and cholesterol (8 mg) were injected (0.2 mL/min) into 5 mL of a 50 mM clodronate (Schering, São Paulo, Brazil) aqueous solution maintained at 42 °C. The liposome suspension was centrifuged at 22,800g for 30 min (Hitachi Himac CR20B2 centrifuge; Hitachi Ltd.) at 25 °C, and the liposome-containing pellet was washed by centrifugation. The final pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of saline solution. The final phosphatidylcholine and clodronate concentrations in the liposomes were 10 and 0.5 mmol/L, respectively. Mice were injected i.p. with 100 µL of liposome preparation (6 µg of clodronate) 24 h before the UUO surgery and with 200 µL of liposome preparation (12 µg of clodronate) during surgery and 3 d later. Animals were killed after 7 days of surgery.
Renal function outcomes
Proteinuria was measured in samples collected from the pelvis of obstructed mice 7 days post-surgery and from mice before surgery. All samples were analyzed by colorimetric assays using commercially available kits for creatinine and protein measurement (Labtest, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Normalization was achieved by dividing the protein/creatinine ratio at day 7 by the ratio before surgery in each animal in each group.
Sirius red staining
Kidneys were harvested and placed in 10% buffered formaldehyde for fixation. Summarily, the slides were de-paraffinized, rehydrated, and immersed in saturated picric acid solution for 15 min and then in Picrosirius for 20 min. Counterstaining was performed using Harris hematoxylin. Picrosirius-stained sections were analyzed by an Olympus BX50 microscope and camera. Manual photographs were taken of the cortex, magnified at 20×, and observed under polarized light. Images of at least 20 different fields in each slide were taken, and structures such as the glomeruli, subcapsular cortex, large vessels, and medulla were excluded. For the morphometric analysis, image processing and analysis in Java Image J software was used. The result of the analysis was represented by percentage and refers to the proportion of the stained volume to the total cortical interstitial volume.
Cytokines profile
Renal tissue was lysed in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor. CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, and CXCL2 were measured in a Bio-Plex mouse Plex cytokine assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The assay was read on the Bio-Plex suspension array system, and the data were analyzed using Bio-Plex Manager software version 4.0. Standard curves ranged from 32,000 to 1.95 pg/mL.
Intravital microscopy
Mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection of Ketamine–Xylazine, and during the experiments the animals were maintained at 37 °C on a microscopy heating chamber (PeCon GmbH, German). CCR2+/rfp or CCR2rfp/rfp animals were used to study the recruitment of monocytes in the microcirculation of the obstructed kidneys. The obstructed and normal kidneys were exteriorized through a lateral incision, and immobilized in a heated well incorporated into a custom-built stage. They were observed with a confocal microscope (LSM 780 Carl Zeiss) under a 20× and 40× objective (20/0.50 NA). The experiments were performed at days 1, 2, 6, and 14 after obstruction using a 488- and 543-nm laser lane of excitation. The images were collected using a single z step and a time-lapse course was acquired every 4 s over a 45 min period. The emitted fluorescence was detected by scanned detectors with 490–520, 575–605-nm and emission filters. Pre-defined settings for laser power and detector gain were used for all experiments (Sipos et al. 2007).
The images were analyzed according to a previously described protocol using ImageJ software (Menezes et al. 2008). Briefly, the numbers of CCR2+/rfp or CCR2rfp/rfp rolling, adherent, and recruited cells were determined offline during video playback analysis. The rolling CCR2 (RFP) cells were considered as those cells moving at a velocity less than that of erythrocytes within a given vessel and they were considered as the number of rolling leukocytes passing at a given point in the venule per minute. The adherent leukocytes were considered to remain as stationary cells for at least 15 s. and total leukocyte adhesion was considered as the number of recruited cells within a 5 µm length of tissue in 15 min.
Statistics
The data were described in terms of the mean and S.E.M. Differences among groups were compared using ANOVA (with Tukey’s post-test). Significant differences were considered as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® 5. ANOVA one way with Tukey’s post hoc test was performed to verify significant differences between the groups.
Results
Macrophage role in kidney fibrosis development
Several groups have shown that macrophage depletion leads to less collagen deposition and further protection in UUO model (Sung et al. 2007; Kitamoto et al. 2009; Braga et al. 2012). We confirmed such data after depleting macrophages in C57BL/6 mice that underwent UUO using liposome-encapsulated clodronate. We observed that macrophage depletion led to reduced proteinuria and less collagen deposition, as seen in Fig. 1a–c. Next, we investigated specific chemokines and their receptors that macrophages use to its process of infiltration in injured kidneys. Macrophage-depleted animals showed lower levels of MCP1/CCL2, MIP1α/CCL3, MIP1β/CCl4, and MIP2α/CXCL2 protein, as compared to non-treated animals after UUO. Otherwise, RANTES/CCL5 did not change among the groups (Fig. 2a–e). Such data demonstrate that macrophages either amplify the inflammation pattern through the recruitment of additional immune cells, or provide cytokines and chemokines to activate residential cells, leading to fibrosis development in obstructive nephropathy.
CCR2 and CCR4 are important in fibrosis development
We next investigated the development of fibrosis and the production of inflammatory pattern-related cytokines into different chemokine and chemokine receptor-deficient animals. In addition to CCL3-deficient mice, we obstructed the ureter of CCR2−/− mice (the receptor of CCL2, CCL7, CCL12, CCL13, and CCL16), CCR4−/− (the CCL17 and CCL22 receptor), and CCR5−/− animals (the receptor of CCL3, CCl4, CCL5, CCL8, and CCL14). CCR2−/− and CCR4−/− animals were protected against the development of renal fibrosis, since these animals showed decreased proteinuria and less collagen deposition when compared to WT animals, as seen in Fig. 3a, b. On the other hand, mice deficient in CCL3 or CCR5 were not protected against fibrosis development.
Thereafter, we investigated the inflammatory pattern in obstructed kidneys of these animals. CCR2−/− and CCR4−/− mice showed lower TNFα and p40(IL12) protein levels, both inflammatory cytokines, when compared to WT animals (Fig. 4a, b). Indeed, only CCR2−/− animals showed decreased VEGF protein levels (Fig. 4c), the vascular and endothelial growth factor, in spite of no differences in IL-10 (Fig. 4d), an anti-inflammatory-related protein. Interestingly, both CCR2−/− and CCR4−/− animals showed reduced amounts of Th17-related cytokine profile: IL6, IL17, and GM-CSF (Fig. 4e–g). CCR5−/− and CCL3−/− mice, in turn, showed no difference in the levels of cytokine levels when compared to WT animals, except for IL17. These data demonstrated that among all investigated animals, CCR2−/− mice presented the more robust protection. It has been shown that CCR2 is responsible for pro-inflammatory monocyte recruitment to damaged sites (Kitagawa et al. 2004; Tsou et al. 2007; Peng et al. 2015a, b) and it is important for the development of chronic kidney disease (Furuichi et al. 2009; Giunti et al. 2010; Sezgin et al. 2011).
Dynamic of CCR2+ cell infiltration
We next tracked CCR2+/rfp cells into obstructed kidneys throughout different days. To assess and to study the recruited CCR2+/rfp cells, kidneys after UUO were visualized by confocal time-lapse microscopy. The dynamic of CCR2+/rfp cell infiltration indicates that such cells adhere onto vessels since the first day after UUO, corresponding to the peak of adherent cells (Fig. 5a). Indeed, the number of CCR2+/rfp rolling cells also reached the peak at the initial stages of UUO, as seen in Fig. 5b. The increased number of adherent cells on days one and two culminates in increased CCR2+/rfp cells recruited at day six and day fourteen into damaged kidneys, as quantified in Fig. 5c. A representative image of kidney RFP cells recruited at day 14 is shown in Fig. 5d. On the other hand, CCR2 deficiency, observed in CCR2rfp/rfp animals, led to decreased ability of these cells to adhere and to roll through the blood vessels, reflecting reduced numbers of recruited cells at later stages. Altogether, our data indicated that the absence of CCR2, previously demonstrated as being predictive for less fibrosis formation, led to reduced number of CCR2+ cells recruited to obstructed kidneys at chronic phase.
Discussion
Fibrosis is defined as a process of excessive amount of connective tissue production in the course of a reactive process (Wick et al. 2013). It has been demonstrated that macrophages are crucial cells for the development of renal fibrosis (Braga et al. 2012). Macrophages are heterogeneous cells that can develop from different sources (Geissmann et al. 2010; Wynn et al. 2013; Dey et al. 2014; Cassado Ados et al. 2015), however, the majority of them are derived from the infiltration of monocytes expressing chemokine receptors (Geissmann et al. 2003; Serbina and Pamer 2006; Wynn et al. 2013). In the present study, it has been demonstrated that liposome-encapsulated clodronate leads to reduced release of chemokines into obstructed kidneys, a finding corroborated by the fact that macrophages amplify local inflammation through the production of chemokines (Cao et al. 2015).
Different chemokines and chemokine receptors have also been related to kidney lesions in obstructive nephropathy (Mia et al. 2015; Peng et al. 2015a, 2015b; Yuan et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016). In this current report we demonstrated that, different from CCR5 and CCL3, the chemokine receptor CCR2 is directly related to the fibrotic pattern, a finding consistent with the data from a previous study indicating that CCR2 inhibition is beneficial in the context of fibrosis through a diminishing infiltration and accumulation of macrophages in obstructed kidneys (Kitagawa et al. 2004). We also observed a marginal role of CCR4 in renal fibrosis development, despite the fact that CCR4 is described as being related to pulmonary fibrosis, more than renal fibrosis (Trujillo et al. 2008; Kawamura et al. 2015; Adegunsoye et al. 2016).
CCR2 deficiency led to decreased Th17-related cytokines production, an immune response profile associated with nephropathy and progressive fibrosis (Mehrotra et al. 2015; Mehrotra et al. 2016), and also led to decreased VEGF production, a described molecule directly related to renal fibrosis, being therapeutically inhibition of VEGF under discussion in the clinical practice as a treatment of kidney fibrosis (Katagiri et al. 2016; Vanhove et al. 2016). After UUO injury, bone marrow CCR2+ monocyte egress of blood circulation and, within kidney, it is suggested that these cells switch their phenotype (Peng et al. 2015a, b), contributing for the formation of fibrosis. It could be possible that the cytokines milieu in the obstructed kidney leads to phenotype switching into the monocyte-derived macrophages or even to bone marrow-derived fibroblasts uptake (Xia et al. 2013). We demonstrated that CCR2+ cells adhere and become rolling onto vessels since the first day after UUO, and progressively, CCR2+ cells are recruited to obstructed kidneys, increasing the number of recruited cells over time.
Altogether, the data in the present study indicate that macrophage depletion reflects reduced fibrosis, as monocytes/macrophages consider central cells for fibrotic process (Han et al. 2017). Indeed, macrophages amplify the tissue damage through the activation of parenchymal cells and the production of chemokines, which are the attractive molecules for immune cells. CCR2 and CCR4 deficiency, specifically, led to reduced inflammatory and Th17-related cytokines—both these immune response patterns are associated with kidney fibrosis development (Kim et al. 2015; Mehrotra et al. 2015; Mehrotra et al. 2016; Silva et al. 2016). Among the chemokine receptors analyzed, CCR2 presents a special role in the context of fibrosis once CCR2+ cells infiltrate the damaged kidney at initial stages, culminating in higher number of monocytes at later phase. Moreover, CCR2 deficiency reflected reduced loss of renal function and less collagen deposition. Together, these data provide new insight into the role of CCR2+ cells and macrophages for renal fibrosis development following UUO, and provide the foundation for therapeutic strategies.
References
Adegunsoye A, Hrusch CL et al (2016) Skewed lung CCR4 to CCR6 CD4+ T cell ratio in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with pulmonary function. Front Immunol 7:516
Bohle A, Wehrmann M et al (1992) The long-term prognosis of the primary glomerulonephritides. A morphological and clinical analysis of 1747 cases. Pathol Res Pract 188(7):908–924
Braga TT, Correa-Costa M et al (2012) MyD88 signaling pathway is involved in renal fibrosis by favoring a TH2 immune response and activating alternative M2 macrophages. Mol Med 18:1231–1239
Braga TT, Correa-Costa M et al (2016) Early infiltration of p40IL12(+)CCR7(+)CD11b(+) cells is critical for fibrosis development. Immun Inflamm Dis 4(3):300–314
Bromley SK, Mempel TR et al (2008) Orchestrating the orchestrators: chemokines in control of T cell traffic. Nat Immunol 9(9):970–980
Cao Q, Harris DC et al (2015) Macrophages in kidney injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Physiology (Bethesda) 30(3):183–194
Cassado Ados A, D’Imperio Lima MR et al (2015) Revisiting mouse peritoneal macrophages: heterogeneity, development, and function. Front Immunol 6:225
Chousterman BG, Boissonnas A et al (2016) Ly6Chigh monocytes protect against kidney damage during sepsis via a CX3CR1-dependent adhesion mechanism. J Am Soc Nephrol 27(3):792–803
Dey A, Allen J et al (2014) Ontogeny and polarization of macrophages in inflammation: blood monocytes versus tissue macrophages. Front Immunol 5:683
Eddy AA (2000) Molecular basis of renal fibrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 15(3–4):290–301
Furuichi K, Wada T et al (2003a) CCR2 signaling contributes to ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 14(10):2503–2515
Furuichi K, Wada T et al (2003b) Gene therapy expressing amino-terminal truncated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 prevents renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 14(4):1066–1071
Furuichi K, Kaneko S et al (2009) Chemokine/chemokine receptor-mediated inflammation regulates pathologic changes from acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol 13(1):9–14
Geissmann F, Jung S et al (2003) Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity 19(1):71–82
Geissmann F, Manz MG et al (2010) Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science 327(5966):656–661
Giunti S, Barutta F et al (2010) Targeting the MCP-1/CCR2 System in diabetic kidney disease. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 8(6):849–860
Griffith JW, Sokol CL et al (2014) Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 32:659–702
Han H, Zhu J et al (2017) Renal recruitment of B lymphocytes exacerbates tubulointerstitial fibrosis by promoting monocyte mobilization and infiltration after unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Pathol 241(1):80–90
Kashyap S, Warner GM et al (2016) Blockade of CCR2 reduces macrophage influx and development of chronic renal damage in murine renovascular hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 310(5):F372–F384
Katagiri D, Hamasaki Y et al (2016) Interstitial renal fibrosis due to multiple cisplatin treatments is ameliorated by semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase inhibition. Kidney Int 89(2):374–385
Kawamura E, Hisano S et al (2015) Immunohistological analysis for immunological response and mechanism of interstitial fibrosis in IgG4-related kidney disease. Mod Rheumatol 25(4):571–578
Kim SM, Lee SH et al (2015) Targeting T helper 17 by mycophenolate mofetil attenuates diabetic nephropathy progression. Transl Res 166(4):375–383
Kitagawa K, Wada T et al (2004) Blockade of CCR2 ameliorates progressive fibrosis in kidney. Am J Pathol 165(1):237–246
Kitamoto K, Machida Y et al (2009) Effects of liposome clodronate on renal leukocyte populations and renal fibrosis in murine obstructive nephropathy. J Pharmacol Sci 111(3):285–292
Kufareva I, Salanga CL et al (2015) Chemokine and chemokine receptor structure and interactions: implications for therapeutic strategies. Immunol Cell Biol 93(4):372–383
Lefebvre E, Moyle G et al (2016) Antifibrotic effects of the dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonist cenicriviroc in animal models of liver and kidney fibrosis. PLoS One 11(6):e0158156
Mehrotra P, Patel JB et al (2015) Th-17 cell activation in response to high salt following acute kidney injury is associated with progressive fibrosis and attenuated by AT-1R antagonism. Kidney Int 88(4):776–784
Mehrotra P, Collett JA et al (2016) IL-17 mediates neutrophil infiltration and renal fibrosis following recovery from ischemia reperfusion:compensatory role of Natural Killer cells in athymic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol ajprenal 00462:02016
Menezes GB, Rezende RM et al (2008) Differential involvement of cyclooxygenase isoforms in neutrophil migration in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 598(1–3):118–122
Mia S, Federico G et al (2015) Impact of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha1 deficiency on tissue Injury following unilateral ureteral obstruction. PLoS One 10(8):e0135235
Nakashima H, Akahoshi M et al (2004) Absence of association between the MCP-1 gene polymorphism and histological phenotype of lupus nephritis. Lupus 13(3):165–167
O’Connor T, Borsig L et al (2015) CCL2-CCR2 signaling in disease pathogenesis. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 15(2):105–118
Peng X, Zhang J et al (2015a) CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Interaction Increases the Population of Ly6C-CX3CR1hi Macrophages Contributing to Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction-Induced Fibrosis. J Immunol 195(6):2797–2805
Peng X, Zhang J et al (2015b) CX3CL1-CX3CR1 interaction increases the population of Ly6C(−)CX3CR1(hi) macrophages contributing to unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced fibrosis. J Immunol 195(6):2797–2805
Porubsky S, Schmid H et al (2004) Influence of native and hypochlorite-modified low-density lipoprotein on gene expression in human proximal tubular epithelium. Am J Pathol 164(6):2175–2187
Rot A, von Andrian UH (2004) Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 22:891–928
Sallusto F, Baggiolini M (2008) Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nat Immunol 9(9):949–952
Sean Eardley K, Cockwell P (2005) Macrophages and progressive tubulointerstitial disease. Kidney Int 68(2):437–455
Segerer S, Nelson PJ (2005) Chemokines in renal diseases. ScientificWorldJournal 5:835–844
Segerer S, Nelson PJ et al (2000) Chemokines, chemokine receptors, and renal disease: from basic science to pathophysiologic and therapeutic studies. J Am Soc Nephrol 11(1):152–176
Serbina NV, Pamer EG (2006) Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat Immunol 7(3):311–317
Sezgin I, Koksal B et al (2011) CCR2 polymorphism in chronic renal failure patients requiring long-term hemodialysis. Intern Med 50(21):2457–2461
Shen B, Liu J et al (2016) CCR2 Positive Exosome Released by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Suppresses Macrophage Functions and Alleviates Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Renal Injury. Stem Cells Int 2016:1240301
Silva RC, Terra FF et al (2016) Reduced expression of VAChT increases renal fibrosis. Pathophysiology 23(3):229–236
Sipos A, Toma I et al (2007) Advances in renal (patho)physiology using multiphoton microscopy. Kidney Int 72(10):1188–1191
Stroo I, Claessen N et al (2015) Deficiency for the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 aggravates tubular damage after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. PLoS One 10(4):e0123203
Sung SA, Jo SK et al (2007) Reduction of renal fibrosis as a result of liposome encapsulated clodronate induced macrophage depletion after unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. Nephron Exp Nephrol 105(1):e1–e9
Trujillo G, O’Connor EC et al (2008) A novel mechanism for CCR4 in the regulation of macrophage activation in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 172(5):1209–1221
Tsou CL, Peters W et al (2007) Critical roles for CCR2 and MCP-3 in monocyte mobilization from bone marrow and recruitment to inflammatory sites. J Clin Invest 117(4):902–909
Vanhove, T., R. Goldschmeding, et al. (2016). “Kidney fibrosis: origins and interventions.” Transplantation
Vielhauer V, Berning E et al (2004) CCR1 blockade reduces interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in mice with glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 66(6):2264–2278
Weir MR (2015) CCR2 inhibition: a panacea for diabetic kidney disease? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3(9):666–667
Wick G, Grundtman C et al (2013) The immunology of fibrosis. Annu Rev Immunol 31:107–135
Wynn TA, Chawla A et al (2013) Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 496(7446):445–455
Xia Y, Entman ML et al (2013) CCR2 regulates the uptake of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts in renal fibrosis. PLoS One 8(10):e77493
Yang J, Zhu F et al (2016) Continuous AMD3100 treatment worsens renal fibrosis through regulation of bone marrow derived pro-angiogenic cells homing and T-cell-related inflammation. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0149926
Yuan A, Lee Y et al (2015) Chemokine receptor Cxcr4 contributes to kidney fibrosis via multiple effectors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 308(5):F459–F472
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge funding provided by CNPq, Capes, and Fapesp (2014/06992-8 and 2012/02270-2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braga, T.T., Correa-Costa, M., Silva, R.C. et al. CCR2 contributes to the recruitment of monocytes and leads to kidney inflammation and fibrosis development. Inflammopharmacol 26, 403–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-017-0317-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-017-0317-4