Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop an instrument to measure school students’ competence in learning science as part of a large research project in Taiwan. The instrument consisted of 29 self-report, Likert-type items divided into 2 scales: Competence in Scientific Inquiry and Competence in Communication. The Competence in Scientific Inquiry scale contained 4 subscales: presenting questions and hypothesis, planning, experimenting and data gathering, and data analyzing, interpreting, and concluding. The Competence in Communication scale contained 4 subscales: expressing, evaluating, responding, and negotiating. Students were recruited randomly from primary, junior, and senior high schools in different regions of Taiwan to validate the instrument and establish its reliability and validity. The results of the analyses indicate that the instrument, scales, and subscales have reasonable internal consistency; that the theoretical structure was supported by empirical data; and that the subscales are homogeneous. These results indicate that it is an appropriate tool for measuring students’ competence in learning science. Implications and suggestions for further studies are included.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abell, S. K., Anderson, G. & Chezem, J. (2000). Science as argument and explanation: Exploring concepts of sound in third grade. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 65–79). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arbuckle, J. L. & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
Campbell, B., Kaunda, L., Allie, S., Buffler, A. & Lubben, F. (2000). The communication of laboratory investigations by university entrants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 37(8), 839–853.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science & Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hinrichsen, J. & Jarrett, D. (1999). Science inquiry for the classroom. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Huang, H. J. (2006). Listening to the language of constructing knowledge. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 4(3), 391–415.
Jarrett, D. (1997). Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703–710.
Krajcik, J. S. & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5987), 456–459.
National Science Teachers Association (2004). NSTA position statement: Scientific inquiry. Arlington, VA: Author.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: Author.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse [Special Issue]. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.
Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives (Vol. 1). New York: Teachers College Press.
Selby, C. C. (2006). What makes it science?: A modern look at scientific inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(7), 8–11.
Simpson, D. (1997). Collaborative conversations. Science Teacher, 64(7), 40–43.
Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A. & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 556–576.
Taiwan Ministry of Education (2006). Grade 1–9 curriculum of junior high and primary school: Science and technology. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
United States National Research Council (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
United States National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
van den Brock, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328(5977), 453–456.
van Ornum, B., Dunlap, L. L. & Shore, M. F. (2008). Psychological testing across the lifespan. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Verderber, R. F. & Verderber, K. S. (1995). Inter-ACT: Using interpersonal communication skills. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: Imperatives for the developed and developing world [Special Issue]. Science, 328(5977), 448–450.
Wood, T. (1999). Creating a context for argument in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 171–191.
Yore, L. D. (2009). Science literacy for all—more than a logo or rally flag! Proceedings of International Science Education Conference 2009 (pp. 2393–2427). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L. & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
Yore, L. D., Florence, M. K., Pearson, T. W. & Weaver, A. J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 109–141.
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D. & Tuan, H. L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy [Special Issue]. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 5(4), 559–589.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, HP., Chen, CC., Guo, GJ. et al. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPETENCE SCALE FOR LEARNING SCIENCE: INQUIRY AND COMMUNICATION. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 1213–1233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9256-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9256-x