Abstract
Despite the fact that biovolume calculation is a common procedure in most phytoplankton and periphyton studies, diatom community analyses are usually based on relative abundance data. In a biomonitoring context, a community metric that accounts for cell size could be of interest due to the potential differences that might exist in nutrient uptake between large and small-sized species. This paper addresses the question of whether diatom community analysis should be based on relative abundance, biovolume or cell surface. The results show that although community structure expressed as relative proportion of taxa varied according to the metric used, the ordinations conducted with each metric were similar. The explained percentage of species variance was slightly higher with the relative abundance metric compared to the metrics based on relative biovolume or cell surface area. Partial CCAs showed that each water chemistry variable generally explained a higher portion of species variance when the relative abundance was used. The analyses conducted with two size groups (small and large taxa) expressed as relative abundance and relative biovolume showed similar results. Moreover, our data showed that there is no significant relationship between diatom size and total phosphorus. According to these results, it seems that relative abundance would be the most appropriate metric to use for biomonitoring purposes. The biovolume and cell surface area calculations added substantially to the total analysis time due to the numerous measurements required, but did not improve the variance explained in community structure, and site ordinations were not significantly different.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bernhardt E. S. and Likens G. E. (2004). Controls on periphyton biomass in heterotrophic streams. Freshwater Biology 49: 14–27
Biggs B. J. F. (2000). Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 17–31
Borchardt M. A. (1996). Nutrients. In: Stevenson, R., Bothwell, M. and Lowe, R. L. (eds) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, pp 184–227. Academic Press, San Diego
Busse S. and Snoeijs P. (2002). Gradient responses of epilithic diatom communities in the Bothnian Bay, northern Baltic Sea. Nova Hedwigia 74: 501–525
Busse S. and Snoeijs P. (2003). Gradient responses of diatom communities in the Bothnian Sea (northern Baltic Sea) with emphasis on responses to water movement. Phycologia 42: 451–464
Cattaneo A. (1987). Periphyton in lakes of different trophy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 296–303
Cattaneo A., Méthot G., Pinel-Alloul B., Niyonsenga T. and Lapierre L. (1995). Epiphyte size and taxonomy as biological indicators of ecological and toxicological factors in Lake Saint-François (Québec). Environmental Pollution 87: 357–372
Cattaneo A., Kerimian T., Roberge M. and Marty J. (1997). Periphyton distribution and abundance on substrata of different size along a gradient of stream trophy. Hydrobiologia 354: 101–110
Cox E. J. (1991). What is the basis for using diatoms as monitors of river quality?. In: Whitton, B. A., Rott, E. and Freidrich, G. (eds) Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers, pp 33–40. Institute of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Dodds W. K., Smith V. H. and Lohman K. (2002). Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 865–874
Fallu, M.-A., N. Allaire & R. Pienitz, 2000. Freshwater diatoms from northern Québec and Labrador (Canada). Species–environment relationships in lakes of boreal forest, forest-tundra and tundra regions. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, Vol. 45. J. Cramer, Berlin/Stuttgart, 200 pp
Fallu M.-A., Allaire N. and Pienitz R. (2002). Distribution of freshwater diatoms in 64 Labrador (Canada) lakes: species–environment relationships along latitudinal gradients and reconstruction models for water colour and alkalinity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 329–349
Francoeur S. N. (2001). Meta-analysis of lotic nutrient amendment experiments: detecting and quantifying subtle responses. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 358–368
Ghosh M. and Gaur J. P. (1998). Current velocity and the establishment of stream algal periphyton communities. Aquatic Botany 60: 1–10
Gosselain, V., S. Campeau, M. Gevrey, M. Coste, L. Ector, F. Rimet, J. Tison, F. Delmas, Y. S. Park, S. Lek & J.-P. Descy, 2005. Diatom typology of low-impacted conditions at a multi-regional scale: combined results of multivariate analyses and SOM. In Lek, S., M. Scardi, P. F. M. Verdonschot, J. -P. Descy & Y. S. Park (eds), Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems. Springer: 317–342
Harding J. H., Young R. G., Hayes J. W., Shearer D. A. and Stark J. D. (1999). Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum. Freshwater Biology 42: 345–357
Hill W. R. (1996). Effects of light. In: Stevenson, R. J. and Lowe, R. L. (eds) Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems , pp 121–148. Academic Press, San Diego
Hillebrand H., Dürselen C.-D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. and Zohary T. (1999). Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424
Jackson D. A. (1995). PROTEST: A PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance. Écoscience 2: 297–303
Jüttner I., Sharma S., Dahal B. M., Ormerod S. J., Chimonides P. J. and Cox E. J. (2003). Diatoms as indicators of stream quality in the Kathmandu Valley and Middle Hills of Nepal and India. Freshwater Biology 48: 2065–2084
Kelly M. G. (1998). Use of community-based indices to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Environmental Conservation 25: 22–29
Kelly M. G. and Whitton B. A. (1995). The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433–444
Kelly M. G., Penny G. J. and Whitton B. A. (1995). Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices used to assess river water quality. Hydrobiologia 302: 179–188
Krammer, K., 2000. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 1. The genus Pinnularia. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Ruggell, 703 pp
Krammer, K., 2002. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 3. Cymbella. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Ruggell, 584 pp
Krammer, K., 2003. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 4. Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navicymbula, Gomphocymbellopsis, Afrocymbella. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Ruggell, 530 pp
Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 876 pp
Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1988. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süβwas- serflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/2. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 596 pp
Krammer, K., & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991a. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/3. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/Jena, 576 pp
Krammer K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991b. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In Ettl, H., G. Gärtner, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süβwasserflora von Mittleuropa, Band 2/4. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, 437 pp
Lange-Bertalot, H., 2001. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats, Vol. 2. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Ruggell, 526 pp
Lavoie I., Vincent W. F., Pienitz R. and Painchaud J. (2004). Benthic algae as a bioindicator of agricultural pollution in lotic ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 7: 43–58
Maberly S. C., King L., Dent M. M., Jones R. I. and Gibson C. E. (2002). Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton and periphyton growth in upland lakes. Freshwater Biology 47: 2136–2152
McCormick P. V. and Stevenson R. J. (1991). Mechanisms of benthic algal succession in lotic environment. Ecology 72: 1835–1848
Mulholland P. J., Marzolf E. R., Hendricks S. P. and Wilkerson R. V. (1995). Longitudinal patterns of nutrient cycling and periphyton characteristics in stream: a test of upstream-downstream linkage. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14: 357–370
Nicholls K. H. and Dillon P. J. (1978). An evaluation of phosphorus–chlorophyll–phytoplankton relationships for lakes. International Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 63: 141–154
Pan Y., Stevenson R. J., Hill B. H., Herlihy A. T. and Collins G. B. (1996). Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 481–495
Pan Y., Stevenson R. J., Hill B. H. and Herlihy A. T. (2000). Ecoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 518–540
Peters, R. H., 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, U.K., 329 pp
Ponader, K. C., D. F. Charles & T. J. Belton, 2006. Diatom-based TP and TN inference models and indices for biomonitoring nutrient enrichment of New Jersey streams. In press. Ecological Indicators
Potapova M. G. and Charles D. F. (2003). Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biology 48: 1311–1328
Prygiel J. and Coste M. (1993). Utilisation des indices diatomiques pour la mesure de la qualité des eaux du bassin Artois-Picardie: bilan et perspectives. Annales de limnologie 29: 255–267
Prygiel, J., B. A. Whitton, J. Bukowska, 1999. Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers III. Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, France, 271 pp
Reavie, E. D. & J. P. Smol, 1998. Freshwater Diatoms from the St. Lawrence River. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, Vol. 41. J. Cramer, Berlin/Stuttgart, 136 pp
Rocha O. and Duncan A. (1985). The relationship between cell carbon and cell volume in freshwater algal species used in zooplankton studies. Journal of Plankton Research 7: 279–294
Rosemond A. D. (1993). Interactions among irradiance, nutrients and herbivores constrain a stream algal community. Oecologia 94: 585–594
Rosemond A. D., Mulholland P. J. and Elwood J. W. (1993). Top-down and bottom-up control of stream periphyton: effects of nutrients and herbivores. Ecology 74: 1264–1280
Rosemond A. D., Mulholland P. J. and Brawley S. H. (2000). Seasonally shifting limitation of stream periphyton: response of algal populations and assemblage biomass and productivity to variation in light, nutrients and herbivores. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 66–75
Schindler D. W. (1974). Eutrophication and recovery in experimental lakes: implications for lake management. Science 184: 897–899
Sicko-Goad L. M., Stoermer E. F. and Ladewski B. G. (1977). A morphometric method for correcting phytoplankton cell volume estimates. Protoplasma 93: 147–163
Smol J. P. and Cumming B. F. (2000). Tracking long-term changes in climate using algal indicators in lake sediments. Journal of Phycology 36: 986–1011
Snoeijs P., Busse S. and Potapova M. (2002). The importance of diatom cell size in community analysis. Journal of Phycology 38: 265–272
Stelzer R. S. and Lamberti G. A. (2001). Effects of N:P ratio and total nutrient concentration on stream periphyton community structure, biomass and elemental composition. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 356–367
Sun J. and Liu D. (2003). Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 25: 1331–1346
Ter Braak C. J. F. and Prentice I. C. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 271–317
Ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Smilauer, 2002. Reference Manual and User’s Guide to CANOCO for Windows (Version 4.5). Center for Biometry, Wageningen, 500 pp
Vavilova V. V. and Lewis W. M. (1999). Temporal and altitudinal variations in the attached algae of mountain streams in Colorado. Hydrobiologia 390: 99–106
Watson S. and Kalff J. (1981). Relationships between nanoplankton and lake trophic status. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 960–967
Watson S., McCauley E. and Downing J. A. (1992). Sigmoid relationships between phosphorus, algal biomass, and algal community structure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 2605–2610
Wellnitz T. A., Rader R. B. and Ward J. V. (1996). Light and a grazing mayfly shape periphyton in a Rocky Mountain stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 496–507
Winter J. and Duthie H. (2000a). Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 32–49
Winter J. and Duthie H. (2000b). Stream biomonitoring at an agricultural test site using benthic algae. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 1319–1325
Winter J. and Duthie H. (2000c). Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquatic Ecology 34: 345–353
Wunsam S., Cattaneo A. and Bourassa N. (2002). Comparing diatom species, genera and size in biomonitoring: a case study from streams in the Laurentians (Quebec, Canada). Freshwater Biology 47: 325–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Fallu, MA. et al. Diatoms and biomonitoring: should cell size be accounted for?. Hydrobiologia 573, 1–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0223-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0223-z