Abstract
The STAR project’s extensive replicated sampling programmes have provided the first ever quantitative comparative studies of the susceptibility of a wide range of national macroinvertebrate sampling methods and taxonomic metrics to uncertainty resulting from the effects of field sampling variability and subsequent sub-sampling and laboratory (or bank-side) procedures and protocols. We summarise six STAR project papers examining various aspects of the potential sources of uncertainty in the observed fauna and observed metric values. The use of new simulation software STARBUGS (STAR Bioassessment Uncertainty Software System) to incorporate the effects of these potential errors into quantitative assessments of the uncertainty in assigning water bodies to WFD ecological status classes is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Buffagni S. Erba M. Cazzola J. Murray-Bligh H. Soszka P. Genoni (2006) ArticleTitleThe STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: Full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries Hydrobiologia 566 379–399
Clarke, R. T., 2004. 9th STAR Deliverable. Error/Uncertainty Module Software STARBUGS (STAR Bio Assessment Uncertainty Guidance Software) User Manual. www.eu-star.at
R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse J. F. Wright D. Moss (1996) ArticleTitleDerivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna Journal of Applied Statistics 23 311–332 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02664769624279
R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse R. J. M. Gunn J. M. Winder J. F. Wright (2002) ArticleTitleSampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices Freshwater Biology 47 1735–1751 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00885.x
R. T. Clarke J. F. Wright M. T. Furse (2003) ArticleTitleRIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers Ecological Modelling 160 219–233 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00255-7
R. T. Clarke J. Davy-Bowker L. Sandin N. Friberg R. K. Johnson B. Bis (2006a) ArticleTitleEstimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using ‘national’ macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status Hydrobiologia 566 477–503
R. T. Clarke A. Lorenz L. Sandin A. Schmidt-Kloiber J. Strackbein N. T. Kneebone P. Haase (2006b) ArticleTitleEffects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics Hydrobiologia 566 441–459
Dines, R. A. & J. A. D. Murray-Bligh, 2000. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques, Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, pp. 71–78
European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxemburg
Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29
P. Haase J. Murray-Bligh S. Lohse S. Pauls A. Sundermann R. Gunn R. Clarke (2006) ArticleTitleAssessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples Hydrobiologia 566 505–521
A. Lorenz R. T. Clarke (2006) ArticleTitleSample coherence – a field study approach to assess similarity of macroinvertebrate samples Hydrobiologia 566 461–476
F. Šporka H. E. Vlek E. Bulánková I. Krno (2006) ArticleTitleInfluence of seasonal variation on bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates Hydrobiologia 566 543–555
Vlek, H. E., 2004. Comparison of cost effectiveness between various macroinvertebrate field and laboratory protocols. European Commission, STAR (Standardisation of river classifications), Deliverable, N1, 78 pp, www.eu-star.at
H. E. Vlek F. Šporka I. Krno (2006) ArticleTitleInfluence of macroinvertebrate sample size on bioassessment of streams Hydrobiologia 566 523–542
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, R.T., Hering, D. Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS. Hydrobiologia 566, 433–439 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0079-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0079-2