Abstract
This paper examines the International Congress of Zoology held in Washington D.C. in 1963 as a portrait of American zoologists’ search for effective and rewarding relationships with both each other and the public. Organizers of the congress envisioned the congress as a last ditch effort to unify the disparate subdisciplines of zoology, overcome the barriers of specialization, and ward off the heady claims of more reductionist biologists. The problems zoologists faced as they worked to fulfill these ambitious goals illuminate some of the challenges faced by members of the naturalist tradition as they worked to establish disciplinary unity while seeking public support in the competitive world of twentieth century science.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abir-Am, Pnina. 1985. Recasting the Disciplinary Order in Science: A Deconstruction of Rhetoric on ‹Biology and Physics’ at two International Congresses in 1931. Humanity and Society 9: 388–427
Agassiz, Alexander. 1912. “Address of the President.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Zoological Congress. Cambridge: The University Press, pp. 55–59
Allen, Garland E. 1975. Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Allen, Garland E. 1991. “Old Wine in New Bottles: From Eugenics to Population Control in the Work of Raymond Pearl.” Keith Benson, J. Maienschein and R. Rainger (eds.), The Expansion of American Biology. Rutgers, pp. 231–261
Appel, Toby A. 1988. Organizing Biology: The American Society of Naturalists and its ‹Affiliated Societies,’ 1883–1923. In Rainger, Ronald, Maienschein, J., Benson, K., (eds.). The American Development of Biology pp. 87–120. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania
Baldwin I.L. 1965. Opening Remarks. In John A. Moore (ed.). Nature, Man and Pesticides. Proceedings: XVI International Congress of Zoology, Washington, 20–27 August 1963, Vol. 7, pp. 1–4. Washington, DC: The Congress
Bateson, William. 1907. Facts Limiting the Theory of Heredity. Science 26: 649–660
Beatty, John. 1990. Evolutionary Anti-Reductionism: Historical Considerations. Biology and Philosophy 5: 199–210
Benson, Keith R. 1989. Biology’s ‹Phoenix’: Historical Perspectives on the Importance of the Organism. American Zoologist 29: 1067–1074
Benson, Keith R. 1990. The American Society of Zoologists, 1889–1989: A Century of Integrating the Biological Sciences. American Zoologist 30: 353–396
Black, Isabella. 1965. Race and Unreason: Anti-negro Opinion in Professional and Scientific Literature Since 1954. Phylon 26: 65–79
Brooks, William Keith. 1912. “Are Heredity and Variation Facts?” Proceedings of the Seventh International Zoological Congress. Cambridge: The University Press, pp. 88–98
Browne, Janet. 1996. Biogeography and Empire. In Jardine N.J., Secord J.A., Spary E.C. (eds.). Cultures of Natural History pp. 305–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cain, J.A. 2000a. For the ‹Promotion’ and ‹Integration’ of Various Fields: First Years of Evolution, 1947–1949. Archives of Natural History 27: 231–259
Cain , J.A. 2000b. Towards a ‹Greater Degree of Integration’: The Society for the Study of Speciation, 1939–1941. British Journal for the History of Science 33: 85–108
Caron, Joseph. 1988. Biology in the Life Sciences: A Historiographical Contribution. History of Science 26: 223–268
Commoner, Barry. 1961. In Defense of Biology. Science 133: 1745–1748
Coolidge, Harold. 1963. Introduction. In Field, J., Field, H. (eds.). Scientific Use of Natural Areas Symposium pp. vii–x. Washington, DC: International Congress of Zoology
Crawford, Elisabeth, Shinn, T., Sorlin, S. (eds.). 1993. Denationalizing Science: The Contexts of International Scientific Practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1964. Biology, Molecular and Organismic. American Zoologist 4: 443–452
Duryee, W.R. 1958. Book Reviews: Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Zoology. Science 127: 192–193
Everett-Lane, Debra Adrienne. 2004. “International Scientific Congresses, 1878–1913: Community and Conflict in the Pursuit of Knowledge.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University
Farber, Paul Lawrence. 2000. Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E.O. Wilson. Baltimore: John Hopkins
Farber, Paul Lawrence 2003. “Race-mixing and Science in the United States. Endeavour 27: 166–170
Friedmann, Herbert. 1960. Changing Environment of Zoological Research. Science 131: 590–593
Glick, T.F. (ed.). 1972. The Comparative Reception of Darwinism. Austin: University of Texas
Grobman, Arnold B. 1969. The Changing Classroom: The Role of the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co
Hall, E. Raymond. 1965. “Remarks by E. Raymond Hall.” Julia Allen Field and H.␣Field (eds.), Scientific Use of Natural Areas: A Symposium. Cambridge, pp. 8–11
Hartmann, Betsy. 1997. Population Control I: Birth of an Ideology. International Journal of Health Services 27: 523–540
Harwood, Jonathan. 1993. Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1922. Chicago: University of Chicago
Harwood, Jonathan. 1994. Metaphysical Foundations of the Evolutionary Synthesis: A Historiographical Note. Journal of the History of Biology 27: 1–20
Hayes, Wayland J. 1965. Effect of Pesticides on Human Health. In Moore, John A., (ed.). Nature, Man and Pesticides. Proceedings: XVI International Congress of Zoology, Washington, 20–27 August 1963 Vol. 7, pp. 27–34. Washington, DC: The Congress
Jackson , John P. Jr. 2001. In Ways Unacademical: The Reception of Carleton S. Coon’s The Origin of Races. Journal of the History of Biology 23: 247–285
Johnson, Kristin. 2007. Natural History as Stamp Collecting: A Brief History. Archives of Natural History 34: 244–258
Jolly, J. Christopher. 2003. “Thresholds of Uncertainty: Science and Responsibility in the Fallout Controversy.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University
Kay, Lily E. 1996. The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. USA: Oxford University Press
Kellicott, Wm. E. 1913. The Ninth International Congress at Monaco. Science 37: 593–595
Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-field Border in Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago
Krementsov, Nikolai. 2005. International Science Between the World Wars: The Case of Genetics. London and NY: Routledge
Kuenen, D.J. 1965. Man, Food, and Insects as an Ecological Problem. In Moore, John A., (ed.). Nature, Man and Pesticides. Proceedings: XVI International Congress of Zoology, Washington, 20–27 August 1963, Vol. 7, pp. 5–13. Washington, DC: The Congress
Lameere, Auguste. 1911–1912. “Opening Address.” International Congress of Entomology. Brussels, Belgium
Largent, Mark. 2000. These are Times of Scientific Ideals: Vernon Lyman Kellogg and Scientific Activism, 1890–1930. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Lemaine Roy Macleod, Mulkay M., Weingart P. (eds.). 1976. Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines. Chicago: Aldine
Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University
Maienschein, Jane. 1985. “History of Biology.” Osiris, 2nd Series 1: 147–162
Mayr, Ernst. 1963. The New versus the Classical in Science. Science 141: 765
Mayr, Ernst. 1973. The Last International Congress of Zoology? Science 180: 882–883
Mayr Ernst, Provine, William (eds.). 1998. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Messer-Davidow Ellen, Shumway D., Sylvan D. (eds.). 1993. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press Virginia
Moore, Kelly. 1996. Organizing Integrity: American Science and the Creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955–1975. The American Journal of Sociology 101: 1592–1627
Moore, John. 1998. “Transcript of Oral History Interview with John A. Moore, July 23, 1998,” by Jan Erickson, University of California, Riverside. Online at http://www.ucrhistory.ucr.edu/pdf/moore.pdf
Nye, Mary Jo. 1993a. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry: Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines, 1800–1850. Berkeley: University of California
Nye, Mary Jo. 1993b. National Styles? French and English Chemistry in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Osiris 8: 30–49
Nyhart, Lynn K. 1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago
Pauly, Philip J. 1988. Summer Resort and Scientific Discipline: Woods Hole and the Structure of American Biology, 1882–1925. In Rainger Ronald, Maienschein, J., Benson, K., (eds.). The American Development of Biology. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania
Pauly, Philip J. 2002. Biologists and the Promise of American Life: From Meriwether Lewis to Alfred Kinsey. Princeton University Press
Petrusewicz, Kasimierz. 1965. “Scientific Need of Natural Areas.” Julia Field and H. Field (eds.), Scientific Use of Natural Areas: Symposium. Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–8
Pianka, E.R. 2003. “A General Review of Zoological Trends During the 20th Century.” A. Legakis, S. Sfenthourakis, R. Polymeni and M. Thessalou-Legaki (eds.), The New Panorama of Animal Evolution, Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Zoology, Athens, Greece, September 2000. Sofia and Moscow, Pensoft, pp. 3–13
Por, F.D. 2003. “Chairman’s Opening Remarks.” A. Legakis, S. Sfenthourakis, R.␣Polymeni and M. Thessalou-Legaki (eds.), The New Panorama of Animal Evolution, Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Zoology, Athens, Greece, September 2000. Sofia and Moscow, Pensoft, pp. xii–xiv
Provine, William. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago
Rainger, Ronald. 1991. “Introduction.” Keith Benson, J. Maienschein and R. Rainger (eds.), The Expansion of American Biology. Rutgers, pp. 1–22
Reingold Nathan, Marc Rothenberg. 1987. Scientific Colonialism: A Cross-cultural Comparison. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institute
Romer, Alfred S. 1963. International Congress of Zoology, 20–27 August 1963. Science 140: 1113–1116
Rozwadowski, Helen M. 2003. The Sea Knows No Boundaries: A Century of Marine Science under ICES. Seattle: University of Washington
Sears, Paul B. 1965. “The Validity of Ecological Models.” In Moore, John A. (ed.). Nature, Man and Pesticides. Proceedings: XVI International Congress of Zoology, Washington, 20–27 August 1963, Vol. 7. Washington, DC: The Congress, pp. 35–44
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1965. End of an Era in Biology. Science 150: 1142–1143
Simpson, Beryl B., Per Brinck. 1981. The Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. In G.G.E. Scudder, Reveal, J. (eds.). Evolution Today: Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology pp. 455–461. Pittsburgh, PA: Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1992. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Journal of the History of Biology 25: 1–65
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1999. Essay Review: The Tormenting Desire for Unity. Journal of the History of Biology 32: 385–394
Spärck, Ragnar. 1956. “Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Zoology, Copenhagen, 5–12 August 1953. Copenhagen: Danish Science Press, pp. 46–47
Stejneger, L. 1924. A Chapter in the History of Zoological Nomenclature. Washington: The Smithsonian Institution
Stern, Curt. 1962. In Praise of Diversity. American Zoologist 2: 575–579
Vorfrank A. 1984. Soviet Marxism and Population Policy. Sociological Spectrum 4: 157–168
Wilson, E.O. 1995. The Naturalist. Grand Central
Winsor, Mary P. 1991. Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum. Chicago: University of Chicago
Xie, Xan, Zhang, W. and Por, F.D. 2006. “Summary Report on the 19th International Congress of Zoology, Beijing, August 2004.” Integrative Zoology 1: 3
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their extremely help- ful comments. Erik Ellis, Paul Farber, Anthony Gill, Marie Glitz, Manfred Laublicher, Jane Maienschein, Mary Jo Nye, Robert Nye, Kathleen Pigg, and the members of Arizona State University’s Human Dimensions of Biology Lab provided helpful comments on either the manuscript or presentations. I greatly appreciate the archival assistance of the Rockefeller Archives, John Innes Institute, Harvard University Archives, and Janice Goldblum of the National Academy of Science. This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Award #0324033.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, K. The Return of the Phoenix: The 1963 International Congress of Zoology and American Zoologists in the Twentieth Century. J Hist Biol 42, 417–456 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9160-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-008-9160-1