Abstract
The emerging knowledge society is one of the main reasons that underlie the appearance of the interactive combination of learning and working in higher education. It is argued that the coop education system and work-based learning can become important instruments in integrating learning and working only if coop education is organized as a knowledge network in which universities and business closely cooperate. Based on this community perspective on coop education, a literature study and secondary analysis of evaluation and policy studies with relation to coop education are performed, in order to distinguish drivers for the development of coop higher education as well as factors that inhibit the acceptance of coop higher education. To further the conceptualisation of the coop system, the cooperation between a university of professional education and a number of business partners in a particular project (the Interface project) has been explored and examined. It is concluded that the further development of a system of coop higher education requires a number of advancements among others: further conceptualisation of this specific type of higher education, a quality assurance system that makes explicit what we mean by academic standards and how students can meet these standards, and a clear description of responsibilities and obligations of the various parties involved. When it comes to the development of sustainable knowledge networks in which institutions of higher education and companies participate the design of a coop curriculum can be very helpful, but cultural differences still need to be overcome.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace. Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Blass, E. (2005). The rise and rise of the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 58–74.
Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Leren en instructie. Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and instruction. Psychology of the learner and the learning process]. Assen: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
Boshuizen, H. P. A.,Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (Eds.) (2004). Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Broek, J. F. H. van den (2001). Duaal academisch onderwijs: een strategische verkenning [Dual academic education: A strategic exploration]. Nijmegen: IOWO.
Cohen, E., Leeuw, H. Sluijsmans, L. Y. P., Vogels, E. R., & Wijngaarden, P. J. van (2002). Coop education as an innovative strategy. Enschede: University of Twente.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Commissie beoordeling experimenten duale opleidingen wetenschappelijk onderwijs (1999). Advies tweede tranche [Assessment Committee experiments dual university programmes. Advice second part]. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.
Duffy, Th. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction. A conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eteläpelto, A. & Collin, K. (2004), ‘From individual cognition to communities of practice – Theoretical underpinnings in analysing professional learning and expertise’. In H.P.A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 231–249). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Geelen, F. (2000). Duaal opleiden: Het dualisme voorbij?’ [Dual training: beyond dualism?]. Opleiding & Ontwikkeling, 13(3), 13–17.
Gray H., (Ed). (1999) Universities and the creation of wealth. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Grotendorst, A. (2006). ‘Examenvraagstukken. Dilemma’s en ontwerpvragen bij nieuwe beoordelingsvormen’, [Issues on examination. Dilemmas and design questions om new forms of assessment]. In A. Grotendorst (Ed.), Bekwaamheid op de proef gesteld. Perspectieven op competentiegericht beoordelen. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
Hall, P., & Weaver, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary teamwork: A long and winding road. Medical Education, 35, 875–876.
Harrison, R., & Kessels, J. W. M. (2004). Human resource development in a knowledge economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holleman, J. W., Oost, H., Milius, J., Berg, I. van den, & Admiraal, W. (1999). Gevraagd: academicus (m/v) [Wanted: Academic, male/female]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, IVLOS.
Inspectie van het Onderwijs (2001). Duaal academisch onderwijs: De werkplek als academische leerplek? [Dual academic education: The workplace as a place for academic learning]. Den Haag: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Jansink, F., Kwakman, K., & Streumer, J. (2005). The knowledge-productive corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 40–57.
Kessels, J. W. M. (2000). ‘Industrious Academia. Universities join forces with Knowledge Intensive Organisations in dual programmes’. Presented at the Six Countries Programme, 11 & 12 May 2000, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kessels, J. W. M. (2002). ‘De student koning, de school hofleverancier?’ [The student as a king, the school as a purveyor to the Royal Household]. Presented at the Congress of Netherlands Association of Universities of Professional Education, 11 November 2002, The Hague, The␣Netherlands.
Kessels, J. W. M. (2004). ‘The knowledge revolution and the knowledge economy: The challenge for HRD’. In J. Woodall, (Ed.), New frontiers in human resource development. London: Routledge.
Köbben, J. F., & Tromp, H. (1999). De onwelkome boodschap [The unwelcome message]. Amsterdam: Mets.
Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur & Wetenschappen. (2001). Grenzeloos leren [Boundless learning]. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD (1999). Thematic review of the transition from initial education to working life. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Education and Skills. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Ravens, J. van (2000). ‘Dualisering in de kenniseconomie. Van uitzondering tot regel’ [Dualising in the knowledge economy. From exception to rule]. Opleiding & Ontwikkeling, 13(3), 29–32.
Reuver, B. de (1999). ‘Schiet duaal leren zijn doel niet voorbij?’ [Does dual learning overshoot the mark?]. In Grensgevallen. Nieuwsbrief van het Instituut voor Interdisciplinaire Opleidingen. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Roobeek, A. J. M., & Mandersloot, E. H. U. (1998). Lerend werken, werkend leren. Een kennisnetwerkconcept voor duale leertrajecten [Learning and working. A knowledge network concept for dual learning trajectories]. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
Sanden, J. M. M. van der (1997). Duurzame ontwikkeling van leervermogen. Leren leren in het technische domein [Sustainable development of learning capacity. Learning to learn in the technical domain]. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit.
Schuyt, C. J. M. (1998). Op academisch niveau: scholing en vorming in een gedifferentieerd stelsel van hoger en wetenschappelijk onderwijs [On academic level: Schooling and training in a differentiated system of higher and university education]. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Tjepkema, S. (2002). HRD and learning organisations in Europe. London, Routledge.
Venkatraman, N., & Subramaniam, M. (2002). Theorizing the future of strategy: questions for␣shaping strategy research in the knowledge economy. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & E.␣Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 461–474). London: Sage.
Walton, J. (2005). Would the real corporate university please stand up? Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 7–20.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kessels, J., Kwakman, K. Interface: Establishing Knowledge Networks Between Higher Vocational Education and Businesses. High Educ 54, 689–703 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9018-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9018-4