Abstract
One way in which universities have sought to articulate the outcomes of a university education is through a description of the attributes of their graduates. Recent calls for universities to demonstrate the quality of their outcomes and processes have prompted a re-examination of the generic graduate attribute outcomes many Australian universities have espoused for the past decade. As university communities struggle to identify what combination of skills, attributes and knowledge to include in these statements of graduate outcomes, and begin to come to terms with how to develop curricula to effectively achieve such outcomes, the fundamental nature of these is a vital preliminary question to address. What are these things that universities call generic graduate attributes? This is a more fundamental question than what combination of skills, attributes and knowledge should be included on the graduate ‘shopping-list’, it is about the nature of the things on the list, and the nature of the list itself. In seeking to further our understanding of the meaning of generic graduate attributes, the research described in this paper used phenomenographic analysis to explore academics’ conceptions of generic graduate attributes in the context of contemporary teaching and learning practices at one Australian university. A way of describing the key aspects of the variation in academics’ understandings of the concept of graduate attributes is presented. The contribution of discipline background to conceptions of generic attributes is considered and the implications of the observed variation for universities’ current curriculum reform initiatives discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. Barnett (1990) The Idea of Higher Education Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham
R. Barnett (2000) Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham
S.C. Barrie J. Jones (1999) Integration of academic writing skills in university courses: A model for generic attributes curriculum development C. Rust G Gibbs (Eds) Improving Student Learning. The Oxford Centre for Staff Development Oxford 479–489
N. Bennett E. Dunne C. Carre (1999) ArticleTitlePatterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education Higher Education 37 71–93 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003451727126
N. Bennett E. Dunne C. Carré (2000) Skills Development in Higher Education and Employment. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham
J.B. Biggs K.F. Collis (1982) Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy New York Academic Press New York
Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K. and Watts, O. (2000). Generic Capabilities of ATN University Graduates.http:/www.clt.uts.edu.au/ATN.grad.cap.project. index.html
J. Bowden F. Marton (1998) The University of Learning: Beyond Quality and Competence Kogan Page London
J. Bowden E. Walsh (2000) Phenomenography RMIT Melbourne
J. Clanchy B. Ballard (1995) ArticleTitleGeneric skills in the context of higher education Higher Education Research and Development 14 IssueID2 155–166
I. Drummond I. Nixon J. Wiltshire (1998) ArticleTitlePersonal transferable skills in higher education: The problems of implementing good practice Quality Assurance in Education 6 IssueID1 44–58 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09684889810200359
N. Entwistle (1997) ArticleTitlePhenomenography in higher education Higher Education Research and Development 16 IssueID2 127–134
S. Fallows C. Steven (2000) Integrating Key Skills in Higher Education Kogan Page London
Goldsworthy, A. (2003). Developing Generic Skills: Examples of Best Practice. B-HERT News: Issue 16, April. Available at http://www.bhert.com/documents/B-HERTNEWSNo.16_001.pdf.
L. Harvey P. Knight (1996) Transforming Higher Education Open University Press Buckingham
Hager, P., Holland, S. and Beckett, D. (2002). Enhancing the Learning and Employability of Graduates: The Role of Generic Skills. Business/Higher Education Round Table Position Paper No. 9. Melbourne, Australia.
Higher Education Council, (HEC) Australia. (1992). Achieving Quality. Higher Education Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
L. Holmes (2000) Questioning the Key Skills Agenda S. Fallows C Steven (Eds) Integrating Key Skills in Higher Education Kogan Page London
F. Marton S. Booth (1997) Learning and Awareness Lawrence Erlbaum New Jersey
M. Prosser K. Trigwell (1999) Understanding learning and teaching: the experience of higher education SRHE and Open University Press Buckingham, UK
J. Sandberg (1997) ArticleTitleAre Phenomenographic Results Reliable? Higher Education Research and Development 16 IssueID2 203–212
Woodhouse, D. (1999). Quality and quality assurance, in Quality and Internationalisation in Higher Education, Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education. Paris: OECD. +
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barrie, S.C. Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates. High Educ 51, 215–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7