Summary
This article reflects on current debate over transformations of scientific research and universities. Four well-known mutation theories (Mode-2 knowledge production, triple helix of university–industry–government relations, academic capitalism and enterprise university), and their recent critiques, are reviewed. It is suggested that a better understanding of the changes can be achieved by drawing analytic insight from research that speaks about scientific practices. Advantages that may be so attained are illustrated through a case study of a plant-biotechnology research group that pursued to straddle the fuzzy university-business boundary. On such grounds, three arguments that pertain to the mutation theories are put forward: (1) the need to appreciate the dynamics between theoretical, experimental and applied dimensions of research work; (2) the fact that external research funding intermingles with the complex social ecology of disciplines at the departmental level of universities; (3) the difficulties academics encounter as they try to fuse their university activities with private commercial development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
U. Beck (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity Sage London
D. Bell (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society Heinemann London
D. Blumenthal M. Gluck K.S. Louis D. Wise (1986) ArticleTitle‘Industrial support of university research in biotechnology’ Science 231 IssueID4735 242–246 Occurrence Handle3941897
D. Blumenthal M. Gluck K. Seashore Louis M.A. Stoto D. Wise (1986) ArticleTitle‘University – industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university’ Science 232 IssueID4756 1361–1366 Occurrence Handle3715452
L. Busch W.B. Lacy J. Burkhardt L.R. Lacy (1991) Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies Blackwell Publishers Cambridge, MA
B.R. Clark (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation IAU Press and Pergamon Oxford
A.E. Clarke J.H. Fujimura (Eds) (1992) The Right Tools for the Job At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences Princeton University Press Princeton
J. Curry M. Kenney (1990) ArticleTitle‘Land-grant university–industry relationships in biotechnology: A comparison with the non-land-grant research universities’ Rural Sociology 55 IssueID1 44–57
Deem R., Johnson R., (2003). ‘Risking the university? Learning to be a manager-academic in UK universities’, Sociological Research Online 8(3). Available online at: <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/3/deem.html>
Elzinga A., (2002). ‘The New Production of Reductionism in Models Relating to Research Policy’. Paper to the Nobel Symposium, Science and Industry in the 20th Century, Stockholm, 21–23 November, 2002 at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
H. Etzkowitz (1998) ArticleTitle‘The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university – industry linkages’ Research Policy 27 IssueID8 823–833
H. Etzkowitz (2002) ArticleTitle‘Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university – industry – government networks’ Science and Public Policy 29 IssueID2 115–128
H. Etzkowitz (2003) ArticleTitle‘Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations’ Social Science Information 42 IssueID3 293–337 Occurrence Handle10.1177/05390184030423002
H. Etzkowitz (2003) ArticleTitle‘Research groups as “Quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university’ Research Policy 32 IssueID1 109–121 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
H. Etzkowitz L. Leydesdorff (2000) ArticleTitle‘The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations’ Research Policy 29 IssueID2 109–123 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
H. Etzkowitz J. Schuler Eugene M. Gulbrandsen (2000a) ‘The evolution of the entrepreneurial university’ M. Jacob T. Hellström (Eds) The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham 40–60
H. Etzkowitz A. Webster C. Gebhardt B.R. Cantisano Terra (2000b) ArticleTitle‘The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm’ Research Policy 29 IssueID2 313–330 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
J.H. Fujimura (1996) Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
R.L. Geiger (1988) ArticleTitle‘Milking the sacred cow: Research and the quest for useful knowledge in the American University since 1920’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 IssueID3–4 332–348
M. Gibbons (2000) ArticleTitle‘Mode 2 society and the emergence of context sensitive science’ Science and Public Policy 27 IssueID3 159–163
M. Gibbons C. Limoges H. Nowotny S. Schwartzman P. Scott M. Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies Sage London
A. Giddens (1990) The Consequences of Modernity Polity Press Cambridge
T.F. Gieryn (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line The University of Chicago Press Chicago
B. Godin (1998) ‘Writing performative history: The new New Atlantis?’, Social Studies of Science 28 IssueID3 465–483
H. Gottweis (1998) Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
M. Häyrinen-Alestalo (1999) ArticleTitle‘The university under the pressure of innovation policy – reflecting on European and Finnish experiences’ Science Studies 12 IssueID1 44–69
J.D. Jansen (2002) ArticleTitle‘Mode 2 knowledge and institutional life: Taking Gibbons on a walk through a South African University’ Higher Education 43 IssueID4 507–521 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015264929074
J. Kekäle (1997) Leadership Cultures in Academic Departments The University of Joensuu Joensuu
M. Kenney (1986) Biotechnology: The University - Industrial Complex Yale University Press New Haven
B.A. Kimmelman (1992) ‘Organisms and interests in scientific research: R. A. Emerson’s claims for the unique contributions of agricultural genetics’ A.E. Clarke J.H. Fujimura (Eds) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton University Press Princeton 198–232
D.L. Kleinman (2003) Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce The University of Wisconsin Press Madison
D.L. Kleinman S.P. Vallas (2001) ArticleTitle‘Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “Knowledge Worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States’ Theory and Society 30 451–492 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011815518959
K. Knorr Cetina (1982) ArticleTitle‘Scientific communities or transepistemic Arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science’ Social Studies of Science 12 101–130
K. Knorr Cetina (1999) Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
A. Kraak (Eds) (2000) Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa Human Sciences Research Council Pretoria
A. Kraak (2000) ‘Investigating new knowledge production: A South African higher education survey’ A. Kraak (Eds) Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa Human Sciences Research Council Pretoria 128–155
S. Krimsky J.G. Ennis R. Weissman (1991) ArticleTitle‘Academic - corporate ties in biotechnology: A quantitative study’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 16 IssueID3 275–287
W. Krohn W. Daele Particlevan den (1998) ArticleTitle‘Science as an agent of change: Finalization and experimental implementation’ Social Science Information 37 IssueID1 191–222
G. Krücken (2002) ArticleTitle‘Panta Rei – Re-thinking science, re-thinking society’ Science as Culture 11 IssueID1 125–130 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09505430120115770
G. Krücken (2003) ArticleTitle‘Learning the “New, New Thing”: On the role of path dependency in university structures’ Higher Education 46 IssueID3 315–339 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025344413682
H. Lacey (2000) ArticleTitle‘Seeds and the knowledge they embody’ Peace Review 12 IssueID4 563–569 Occurrence Handle10.1080/10402650020014654
M. Laiho M. Lappalainen L. Saxén (1996) Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research in Finland The Academy of Finland Tampere
T. Lenoir (1997) Instituting Science The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford University Press Stanford
L. Leydesdorff (1996) ArticleTitle‘Luhmann’s sociological theory: Its operationalization and future perspectives’ Social Science Information 35 IssueID2 283–306
L. Leydesdorff (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Triple Helix: An evolutionary model of innovations’ Research Policy 29 243–255 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
S. Marginson M. Considine (2000) The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia Cambridge University Press Cambridge
R. Miettinen (1998) ArticleTitle‘Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes’ Social Studies of Science 28 IssueID3 423–463
R. Miettinen (2002) National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric Edita Helsinki
J. Muller (2000) ‘What knowledge is of the most worth for the Millennial citizen?’ A. Kraak (Eds) Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production and Its Implications for Higher Education in South Africa Human Sciences Research Council Pretoria 70–87
A. Noro (2000) ArticleTitle‘Aikalaisdiagnoosi sosiologisen teorian kolmantena lajityyppinä’ Sosiologia 37 IssueID4 321–329
H. Nowotny P. Scott M. Gibbons (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty Polity Press Cambridge, MA
K. Packer A. Webster (1996) ArticleTitle‘Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 IssueID4 427–453
A. Pickering (Eds) (1992) Science as Practice and Culture The University of Chicago Press Chicago
B. Rappert A. Webster (1997) ArticleTitle‘Regimes of ordering: The commercialization of intellectual property rights in industrial – Academic Collaborations’ Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9 IssueID2 115–130
H.-J. Rheinberger (1997) Toward History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube Stanford University Press Stanford
A. Rip (2000) ‘Fashions, Lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production’ M. Jacob T. Hellström (Eds) The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press Buckingham 28–39
P.M. Rosset M.A. Altieri (1997) ArticleTitle‘Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture’ Society and Natural Resources 10 283–295
T. Shinn (1999) ArticleTitle‘Change or Mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science’ Social Science Information 38 IssueID1 149–176
T. Shinn (2002) ArticleTitle‘The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology’ Social Studies of Science 32 IssueID4 599–614 Occurrence Handle10.1177/030631202128967271
S. Slaughter L.L. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore
G. Subotzky (1999) ArticleTitle‘Alternatives to the entrepreneurial university: New modes of knowledge production in community service programs’ Higher Education 38 IssueID4 401–440 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003714528033
J. Tuunainen (2001) ArticleTitle‘Constructing objects and transforming experimental systems’ Perspectives on Science 9 IssueID1 78–105 Occurrence Handle10.1162/10636140152947803
J. Tuunainen (2002) ArticleTitle‘Reconsidering the mode 2 and triple helix: A critical comment based on a case study’ Science Studies 15 IssueID2 36–58
Tuunainen J., (2005). ‘When disciplinary worlds collide: The organizational ecology of disciplines in a university department’, Symbolic Interaction, 28(2).
Tuunainen J., (in press). ‘Contesting a hybrid firm at a traditional University’. Social Studies of Science.
A.J. Webster (1994) ‘University – corporate ties and the construction of research Agendas’, Sociology 28 IssueID1 123–142
P. Weingart (1997) ArticleTitle‘From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: Old wine in new bottles?’ Social Science Information 36 IssueID4 591–613
O.-H. Ylijoki (2003) ArticleTitle‘Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideas and practices of university research’ Higher Education 45 IssueID3 307–335 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022667923715
J. Ziman (2000) ‘Postacademic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms’ U. Segerstråhle (Eds) Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse About Science and Society State University of New York Press Albany 135–154
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuunainen, J. Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university. High Educ 50, 275–298 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6355-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6355-z