Abstract
Phosphorus (P) runoff from agricultural land contributes to elevated P concentrations in surface water. Although P concentrations in runoff are often higher when soil P is increased, attempts to quantify this relationship in field studies have been inconclusive, either because of confounding within experiments or methodological differences between experiments. The present study attempted to address these issues using simulated rainfall at 15 pastoral locations with varied lithology, land-use intensity, plant cover and soil-P properties in SE Australia, at a total of 38 on-farm sites, each with paired plots. At 27 sites, one of each pair was covered with 70 % shade-cloth to reduce rainfall energy. Although these were uncultivated pastoral sites and surface soil erosion rates were all relatively low, eroded surface soil had sufficiently high concentrations of P to make a major contribution to total P in runoff from some sites, even when plant-available soil P was low. We conclude that greater vegetative cover is required to manage P in runoff than to manage soil erosion. When soil was adequately protected against erosion by either high vegetative cover or shade-cloth, greater than 90 % of the variation in both dissolved reactive P and total P was explained by two commonly measured soil variables: soil-test P (bicarbonate extract) and P-buffering index (where P was in the range where plants may respond to fertiliser). It appears that available soil P can be raised with fertiliser to improve agronomic production without fear of significantly increasing P losses in runoff provided soil test P remains below the agronomic critical concentration defined by the soil P-buffering index. These findings have broad relevance for environmental risk assessment and management where the data required for more complex procedures are unavailable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A range of responses in the mobilisation and transport of phosphorus (P) by rainfall-runoff has been reported for tilled and untilled conditions across varying agro-climatic environments and soil types (McDowell et al. 2001; Hart et al. 2004). Many studies have sought to establish a relationship between soil P and runoff P concentrations, in the hope that a soil P test could be used for environmental management, and ideally for agronomic management also. No general relationship has yet been established. Although runoff P mostly increases with soil P concentration, such relationships tend to be specific to site, land-use, and experimental method including the soil P test (Wendt and Corey 1980; Schärer et al. 2006; Nash et al. 2007; Tunney et al. 2007). Confounding factors in addition to tillage include recent fertiliser application (Hart et al. 2004) and variation in soil P-buffering capacity (Dougherty et al. 2010).
Studies of P runoff from dairy pastures in Australia show at paddock scale (Baginska et al. 1998; Cornish et al. 2002) and plot scale (Cornish et al. 2002; Dougherty et al. 2008a) that total P concentrations in runoff can be high (>1 mg L−1), predominantly in the dissolved form, and broadly related to soil P concentration. Other studies of pasture grazed by sheep at various locations in south-eastern Australia have also established rising relationships between the concentrations of P in soil and in runoff (McCaskill et al. 2003). However, methodological differences make it impossible to derive a single relationship from these studies that holds for all or even most of them, complicating the use of soil testing for environmental P management.
A further complication with managing P runoff from pastures is the lack of agreement about whether P is mobilised from pastoral land primarily by dissolution, or by particle detachment, as it is from cultivated land. Many studies at catchment scale indicate that particulate P dominates export from agricultural land, including pasture (e.g. McColl 1978; Smith 1987; Stevens et al. 1999; Douglas et al. 2007). However, whilst the majority of P measured in outflow from a catchment may occur as particulate P, much of that P may have been dissolved initially and adsorbed on to suspended particulate matter either in-stream or between collection and analysis of water samples (Sharpley et al. 1981, 2000; Lambert et al. 1992). In several Australian studies, up to 90 % of P in surface runoff from pastoral sites was in the form of dissolved reactive P (Nash and Murdoch 1997; Nash et al. 2000; Cornish et al. 2002). However, there was considerable variation in the proportions of total P as dissolved reactive P amongst these findings, which may be accounted for by variable sorption of P following mobilisation, or simply by differences in vegetative cover and soil erosion. Given typical total soil P concentrations of 0.04–0.4 % (Whitehead 2000), even low sediment concentrations may contribute appreciable P to runoff.
The aims of our research are first to understand the relative importance of dissolution and particle detachment as P mobilisation processes in surface runoff from pasture, and second to evaluate whether a single relationship between soil properties and runoff P could be used for environmental management across soil types and varying land-use intensity, if confined to pastoral land and developed with a consistent methodology across sites.
This paper reports on-farm research using a rainfall-simulator to investigate P loss in surface runoff from pastoral sites and its relationships with land use, groundcover, soil type, and soil P properties. The context was the Sydney Drinking Water Catchments in New South Wales, Australia, where the Sydney Catchment Authority provides guidance to land managers regarding fertiliser use, effluent disposal and other practices that may impact on water quality. This is a large catchment (15,700 km2) with low population density, so the detailed data required for complex water quality models or risk assessment tools are unavailable. The Sydney Catchment Authority requires broadly applicable guidelines that use readily obtainable inputs, to assist it to meet its water quality targets.
Materials and methods
Study area
The Sydney Drinking Water Catchments are situated in SE NSW, Australia. More than 60 % of the catchment area is non-agricultural land, mostly forest. Land use in the remaining 485,000 ha is mostly pastoral, ranging from intensive dairy on improved pasture through to fine wool production on unfertilised native pasture. Geology is varied, with sandstone, metamorphic rock, granite, basalt and shale comprising the most common lithological groups, making up 70 % of the catchment area (SCA/DWLC 2003). The soils derived from these parent materials cover a wide range of Australian Soil Classification orders, including Ferrosols derived from basalt, Chromosols and Kurosols from shale and metamorphic rock, and Kandosols and Tenosols from sandstone. Average annual rainfall for the catchment ranges from around 1,500 mm in the eastern-most areas, to around 600 mm in the west.
Locations and sites
Fifteen locations were included in the study, spread across the middle section of the catchment between the towns of Robertson (34°35′S, 150°35′E) in the east and Goulburn (34°45′S, 149°44′E) in the west. At each location, from two to six sites were selected for rainfall simulation, within 30-40 m of each other, thus with the same general land-use and lithology but varying soil P and vegetative cover. This resulted in a total of 38 sites for rainfall simulations. With the design of the rainfall simulator, each site was comprised of two plots, each with its own soil P and runoff data, giving a total of 76 plots.
All locations fell into one of the following designations of current land use/pasture type: native/unimproved pasture; rural residential (cattle, sheep or horses); improved pasture (excluding dairying); and dairy pasture. Dairying is a relatively small and declining industry in the region, but as dairy pasture is often associated with high P in runoff, one-third of the locations were selected because they were used currently or in the recent past for dairy production. Based on information provided by the present landowner on the fertiliser used in recent years, pasture improvement and stocking rates, we broadly considered the locations as being presently under ‘low’, ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ land use intensity.
The locations covered the most common soil lithological groups under agriculture in the catchment, namely metamorphic rock, basalt, and shale. Of the 76 plots, 18 were on basalt and 58 were on soils with non-basaltic lithology. Sites were avoided where fertiliser had been applied in the weeks prior to rainfall simulation and with obvious recent defecation, to minimise confounding by ‘incidental’ losses of P (Hart et al. 2004). All sites had a pasture cover, although of varying amount, and none showed obvious signs of soil erosion.
At each site, slope was measured using a spirit level clinometer, and the percentage vegetation cover, using a double layer grid point frame (50 points) of the same dimensions as the runoff plots, after Stanton (1960). Location descriptions are given in Table 1.
Soil sampling and analysis
For general characterisation of each location, two sets of soil samples were taken along transects in the vicinity of the runoff plot sites. One set of 25–30 core samples (2.5 cm diameter) was collected from the standard depth of 0–10 cm used for agronomic purposes. The other set of 25–30 samples (5 cm diameter) was collected from 0 to 2 cm, the depth commonly used for environmental purposes because surface runoff is thought to interact mainly with the top few mm of soil (Sharpley 1985). The cores were bulked, air dried at 40 °C, and passed through a 2 mm sieve.
Samples from both depths were analysed for bicarbonate-extractable (Colwell 1963) soil test P. The Colwell test is widely used in Australia for agronomic purposes, thus providing a large data base of potentially useful information for environmental-P management as well as agronomic management for which critical values are well established (Gourley et al. 2007). Briefly, 1.0 g soil was extracted with 100 mL 0.5 M NaHCO3, adjusted to pH 8.5, by shaking end-over-end for 16 h. Extracts were filtered (Adventec 5A) and extractable P was then measured, after colour development based on the molybdate blue method of Murphy and Riley (1962) (Rayment and Higginson 1992), using a Lachat Quickchem 8000 FIA+ ion flow injection analyser (LaChat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI).
The transect soil samples from the 0–10 cm depth were also analysed for phosphorus buffering index, the currently accepted commercial approach to measuring soil buffering capacity in Australia (Burkitt et al. 2002), as well as soil total P (TKP digestion in 18 M H2SO4 in the presence of a Cu catalyst, measured by FIA—QuickChem method 13-115-01-1-B), Total C and N (LECO CNS2000 Analyser, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI) and pH (1:5 water).
Soil properties determined from the transect sampling are summarised in Table 2. With respect to soil P properties at the 15 locations, total soil P ranged from 40 mg kg−1 for low input pasture on soil of metamorphic origin to 2,400 mg kg−1 for soil under intensive dairy management on soils derived from basalt. Colwell soil test P for the 0–10 cm depth (Colwell0–10) varied between locations from 7 to 307 mg kg−1 reflecting land use intensity, with soil test P for low input locations ranging from 7 to 21 mg kg−1 (mean 19 ± 1.9), moderate input locations from 15 to 60 mg kg−1 (54 ± 8.8), and high input locations from 37 to 307 mg kg−1 (159 ± 27.6). Colwell soil test P values for 10 of the 15 locations were in the range where pastures may respond to added P (<75 mg kg−1, refer to Table 2 footnotes and Havilah et al. 2005). The other 5 locations had soil test P values of between 60 and 307 mg kg−1. Four of these 5 locations were used now or in the past for dairy production. Phosphorus buffering index varied with lithology. Mean values for basalt (991, no units), shale (236) and metamorphic (61) locations fell within phosphorus buffering index categories of high, moderate and very low, respectively (Table 2).
To relate soil P to runoff P concentration, soils were also sampled from within the 76 rainfall-runoff simulator plots (10 cores per plot, bulked) and analysed for bicarbonate-extractable soil test P (0–2 and 0–10 cm) and phosphorus buffering index (0–10 cm) as described above.
Rainfall simulator and simulations
An oscillating boom rainfall simulator was used to generate surface runoff. It consisted of three Veejet 80100 flat fan nozzles attached to a hollow boom, mounted on an aluminium A-frame, 2.4 m above the ground, similar to Loch et al. (2001). The simulator allows ‘rainfall’ to be applied to two adjacent plots, 2.0 × 0.75 m in size. The plot boundaries were defined by lengths of 3 mm sheet steel, 150 mm wide, bolted together to form open-ended rectangles. These were aligned parallel with the direction of slope, open at the down-slope end, with a gap of 10 cm between the two plots. Steel boundaries were driven into the ground to a depth of 75 mm. A shallow trench was dug at the open end of each plot into which a stainless steel trough was located to collect runoff. A thin band of bentonite clay applied to the front edge formed a watertight seal between the trough and the plot surface. Perspex sheets were placed at an angle over the troughs, to prevent water being sprayed directly into them. The surface runoff from the plots was collected in gravity-fed containers a few meters down slope of the plots.
The first set of 27 simulations (locations 1–9) was conducted in Oct-Nov 2005. One of the paired plots in each of these simulations was chosen randomly and covered with shadecloth (70 % mesh) supported 150 mm above the soil surface on a rectangular wooden frame placed on the metal boundary sheets. Thus, the covered plots received the same rainfall intensity as the uncovered plots but with significantly reduced raindrop energy (Loch and Foley 1994). Vegetative cover on the paired plots varied from 46 to 100 %. Of the 27 pairs, 24 were on non-basalt soils. The pairs were matched well for groundcover (%), with the relationship between plots ‘with’ and ‘without’ shadecloth being:
In a second set of 11 simulations conducted in Nov. 2006, the shadecloth cover was not used. These provided a further 22 uncovered plots from locations 10–15. Twelve of these plots (6 pairs) were on basalt soils and the other 10 plots (5 pairs) were on non-basalt soils.
The total data-set comprised of 76 plots, each with its own soil P and runoff data; 27 plots with shadecloth from the first set, and 49 plots without shadecloth including 27 and 22 plots from the first and second set, respectively.
Water applied by the simulator was sourced from the Sydney Catchment Authority Pumping Station at Burrawang, NSW. Previous laboratory testing showed that the P concentration of this water was close to detectable limits, typically <0.01 mg L−1. To determine rainfall rate prior to each rainfall-runoff simulation, plots were covered with plastic sheeting that directed 100 % of the water applied into the collection troughs. The volume of runoff collected from each plot over 5 min was then measured, and if necessary the simulator was re-positioned so that each of the paired plots received approximately the same volume of water during a simulation run. In this study, a rainfall intensity of 60 mm h−1 was applied until runoff commenced, after which rainfall application was continued for a further 15 min.
Runoff sample collection and analysis
Surface runoff collected over this period from individual plots was bulked before sampling for analysis. Samples were stored on ice in the field before being returned to the laboratory, where they were stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Sub-aliquots of the collected runoff were filtered in the field (0.45 μm) immediately after collection for dissolved reactive P analysis, based on the molybdate blue method of Murphy and Riley (1962), using FIA as described above. Bulk sub-samples of the collected runoff were taken for analysis of total P and total suspended solids. Total P was determined by alkaline persulphate oxidation, after Hosomi and Sudo (1986) and Maher et al. (2002). The percentage of total P present as dissolved reactive P (%DRP) was calculated to express the relative magnitude of the two mobilisation processes, dissolution and particle detachment.
Although alkaline persulphate oxidation is widely used for total P determination in turbid water, some of the total P was evidently not fully extracted from 6 of the runoff samples in which dissolved reactive P values substantially exceeded their total P values (3 sites, each covered and uncovered with shadecloth). These sites were all at Location 4, which had soils derived from shale and a long history of dairy production with high inputs (Table 1) resulting in concentrations of Colwell P (211 mg kg−1) and total P (1,340 mg kg−1) that are extreme for soils with this lithology in Australia. Incomplete extraction of total P may result from condensation, complexation or occlusion of unfiltered (high total suspended solids) high-P samples during storage (Maher and Woo 1998; Jarvie et al. 2002). Repeating the analysis and the use of more aggressive extraction techniques (concentrated nitric + sulphuric acid; Pote and Daniel 2000) failed to resolve this issue. Data from Location 4 were therefore excluded from any statistical analyses requiring total P but retained in analyses of dissolved reactive P. We assume the problem was confined to total P in runoff samples from the shale soil with extreme P concentrations. Basalt soils are inherently higher in total P than non-basalt soils, but samples from basalt soils revealed no problem with total P extraction.
Total suspended solids were determined after method 2540D, described in Standard Methods (APHA 2005).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using MS Excel 2003, Minitab 14.1 and S-Plus 6.1. Regression relationships between soil P and P in runoff for all of the soil types were compared statistically before dividing soil types into two groups for analysis, namely basalt and non-basalt soils. A paired t test was used for comparisons involving paired plots. The measure of dispersion given after a mean is the standard error of the mean. In linear regression, where the intercept was not significantly different from zero (P ≥ 0.05) the regression has been forced through the origin. Multiple regression was used to predict runoff P concentration from soil test P and phosphorus buffering index. The equations were developed with data from plots with shadecloth, to minimise confounding from soil erosion, and tested with an independent set of data from plots without shadecloth but with high vegetative cover and low surface erosion.
Results
Soil test P at two sampling depths
Concentrations of soil test P in the 0–2 cm layer were higher than the 0-10 cm layer (Fig. 1). For basalt soils, the relationship between extractable P at the two depths was curvilinear, tending towards a 1:1 relationship as the concentration increased. For non-basalt soils, the relationship between depths was linear. Both regressions were highly significant (P < 0.001).
The percentage of total P present as dissolved reactive P in runoff (%DRP)
The %DRP varied widely, regardless of soil type and almost regardless of the absolute concentration of total P in runoff (Fig. 2). Three factors contributed to this variation.
First, %DRP was greater in plots with shadecloth (44 %, range 7–100 %) than paired-plots without shadecloth (28 %, range 1–96 %) (P < 0.01). These 24 plot-pairs comprised all of the covered plots and a sub-set of the uncovered plots shown in Fig. 2 (Location 4 was not included, see “Materials and methods”). Greater %DRP with shadecloth was associated with lower concentrations of total suspended solids, viz. 167 mg L−1 compared with 690 mg L−1 from uncovered plots (P < 0.01).
Second, for uncovered plots, %DRP was greater in basalt soils (73 ± 8.5 %) than shale (56 ± 8.23 %) and metamorphic (34 ± 11.4 %) soils (P < 0.05), thus appearing to mirror the differences in phosphorus buffering index shown in Table 2.
Third, weak but significant positive relationships between %DRP (y) and soil test P(x) were observed within the non-basalt group of sites, whether shadecloth was used (Eq. 2) or not (Eq. 3):
Effects of soil cover on concentrations of dissolved reactive P, total P and total suspended solids in runoff
For paired-plots (excluding Location 4), the mean dissolved reactive P concentration with shadecloth (0.23 mg L−1) was not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05) from dissolved reactive P concentration without shadecloth (0.28 mg L−1). When the plots with extreme soil P from Location 4 were included, shadecloth cover resulted in a small but significant (P < 0.05) decrease in dissolved reactive P concentration, from 0.76 to 0.64 mg L−1.
Shadecloth had potentially much greater effects on total P concentration (Fig. 3), but this was manifest only at the seven sites shown by closed symbols, for which total P averaged 2.78 mg L−1 when uncovered and 0.69 mg L−1 when covered (P < 0.001). With these seven plot-pairs, the difference in total P reflected a difference in sediment (total suspended solids) concentration which averaged 422 mg L−1 from the covered plots and 1,751 mg L−1 from the paired uncovered plots (P < 0.05). These plots were at sites with relatively low pasture cover in Table 1. Shadecloth had little effect on total P in runoff from plots with high vegetative cover and low total suspended solids (open diamonds), as shown by the near 1:1 regression for these data (Fig. 3).
Increasing vegetative cover in the absence of shadecloth substantially reduced sediment concentrations in runoff (Fig. 4). However, there was no such relationship between vegetative cover and total P in runoff because total P in soil (Table 2) varied between locations with similar groundcover (Table 1), resulting in P concentrations in the sediment in runoff ranging between 0.03 and 2.0 % (mean 0.34 %).
Effect of soil P concentration on P concentrations in runoff
Total P in runoff from plots without shadecloth
Despite a general trend for total P to rise with soil test P in the non-basalt group of soils, the data were variable and the relationships were not statistically significant for either the non-basalt or basalt soils, at either sampling depth (0–2 or 0–10 cm) (Fig. 5).
Dissolved reactive P in runoff from plots without shadecloth
Dissolved reactive P concentration in runoff responded positively to soil P concentration amongst both basalt and non-basalt soils (Fig. 6). Differences in runoff dissolved reactive P concentration between soil types were small at low soil test P but increased as soil test P increased. The slopes of the regressions were significantly different (P < 0.001). Consequently, dissolved reactive P concentrations in runoff were much greater in non-basalt than basalt soils at higher soil P concentrations.
Soil sampling depth affected the slope of the regression within non-basalt soils (P < 0.05), but the strength of the relationship was comparable for the two sampling depths (R 2 = 0.90 and 0.89).
Effect of shadecloth on the relationship between soil test P and P in runoff
This analysis was restricted to non-basalt sites because of the small number of basalt sites with shadecloth. Data were from the 0-10 cm soil sampling depth. There was a positive relationship between soil test P and total P in runoff when plots were covered with shadecloth but no relationship without shadecloth (Fig. 7, top). Dissolved reactive P concentrations also rose with increasing soil test P, but this relationship was significant whether plots were covered with shadecloth or not (Fig. 7, bottom). Linear regressions were fitted to these data because there was no strong statistical argument to use a non linear model across all of the data, but it is important to note that substantial increases in either total P or dissolved reactive P in the covered plots (and dissolved reactive P in uncovered plots) occurred only when Colwell0–10 soil test P was greater than about 30 mg kg−1.
Effect of soil P buffering index on P concentrations in runoff, with shadecloth
This analysis was restricted to plots with shadecloth cover to minimise the confounding effects of surface soil erosion, thus restricting the analysis to non-basalt soils. The response of P in runoff to soil phosphorus buffering index is given in Fig. 8, but because soil test P and phosphorus buffering index may be confounded, the soil test P associated with each value for phosphorus buffering index is shown in lieu of the customary symbols. P concentrations in runoff clearly rose as phosphorus buffering index fell, but all of the notably elevated values for total P (>0.3 mg L−1) and dissolved reactive P (>0.1 mg L−1) were also associated with soils with relatively high soil test P (>30 mg kg−1). Nevertheless, the possible importance of phosphorus buffering index independently of soil test P is suggested by the sites falling within a narrow range of soil test P (26–35 mg kg−1), shown in the inset graphs in Fig. 8.
The interaction between phosphorus buffering index and soil test P implicit in Fig. 8 for the covered non-basalt soils parallels the significant interaction in Fig. 6 where runoff dissolved reactive P concentrations from the highly buffered basalt soils were similar to the more weakly buffered non-basalt soils at low soil test P, but much lower at higher soil test P.
Predicting P concentrations in runoff
No statistical model was significant when fitted to the soil-P/runoff-P data for all of the sites. However, even without statistical analysis it was clear that high P concentrations in runoff could result from surface soil erosion (Fig. 3) and extreme soil P concentrations (Figs. 6, 7). The greater need is to predict runoff-P concentrations in the more uncertain situation where erosion is not a major factor and soil test P is within the range where farmers are most likely to be making decisions about fertiliser use and disposal of manure and effluent. Therefore, data were examined from plots with shadecloth (to manage erosion) and with <100 mg P kg−1 to determine if P concentrations in runoff could be predicted satisfactorily from the measured soil variables. The resultant regression equations were then tested using an independent set of data from plots with good vegetative cover (or <500 mg total suspended solids L−1).
The sites with shadecloth included 20 non-basalt and four basalt plots. The highest soil test P value in these data was 69 mg kg−1. The multiple regressions that best predicted total P and dissolved reactive P in runoff from soil Colwell0-10 soil test P, phosphorus buffering index and their interaction were:
Regressions of the observed values for total P and dissolved reactive P and those predicted from Eqs. 4 and 5 passed through the origin with slopes of 1.08 (total P) and 0.78 (dissolved reactive P) (Fig. 9). The models systematically slightly under-predicted dissolved reactive P at high concentrations but there was no evident bias in the predictions of total P.
The independent data comprised 29 plots without shadecloth but with good vegetative cover. There were 23 plots on non-basalt soils and six on basalt. Plots had >90 % groundcover and the highest soil test P value was 94 mg P kg−1. Some of these plots were pairs for the uncovered plots from the first set of simulations in 2005 and others were from the second set of simulations in 2006. Both regressions were significant (P < 0.01), with high R 2. However, Eq. 4 tended to under-predict total P at higher concentrations and Eq. 5 under-predicted dissolved reactive P at all concentrations.
Discussion and conclusion
Numerous studies in south-eastern Australia have together established that relatively higher P concentrations in runoff from pastures are generally associated with higher P concentrations in soil (Costin 1980; Baginska et al. 1998; Cornish et al. 2002; McCaskill et al. 2003; Barlow et al. 2005; Dougherty et al. 2008a, b). However, they provide no guideline for soil P that may be used for environmental risk assessment and management because any quantitative relationships between the concentrations of soil P and runoff P are location and experiment-specific, as with other research internationally (Hart et al. 2004).
We aimed to determine if a generally applicable relationship between concentrations of soil P and runoff P could be developed for pastoral land by using a single methodology on fields that covered a range of soil types and land-use intensity, and if so to propose guidelines for soil P to use in environmental management. The sites covered a wide range of values for soil properties thought to influence P concentrations in runoff, but avoided sites with recent fertiliser or manure accretion to minimise confounding by ‘incidental’ losses of P (Hart et al. 2004). In some cases runoff plots were paired, with one of each pair being covered with shadecloth to reduce rainfall energy to help distinguish between dissolution and particle detachment (soil erosion) as primary mobilisation processes.
Before considering relationships between soil P and runoff P, the following discussion addresses the relative importance of the mobilisation processes. This is important, as the form in which P is mobilised determines the approach taken to managing P losses in runoff. For example, if particulate P is the predominant form mobilised, then it may be beneficial to mitigate soil erosion or construct vegetated buffer strips near to the source, but these measures may have little or no effect on P exports if dissolved reactive P predominates (Dorioz et al. 2006; Fiener and Auerswald 2009). Despite the fundamental importance of this principle, there is no agreement in the literature as to whether P is mobilised from pastures predominantly as dissolved reactive P or in the particulate form resulting from surface soil erosion (Hart et al. 2004; Bilotta et al. 2008). This uncertainty arises partly from the possibility of dissolved reactive P sorption to soil in subsequent overland flow (Sharpley et al. 1981, 2000; Lambert et al. 1992), which we minimised by collecting and filtering samples immediately after runoff.
The mobilisation process in pastures
The relative importance of dissolution and particle detachment
Despite the lack of cultivation and the absence of obvious soil erosion at the pastoral study sites, dissolution did not always dominate P mobilisation. Three factors contributed to variation in the relative magnitude of P mobilisation as dissolved P, expressed as the percentage of total P as dissolved reactive P (%DRP).
First, the amount of vegetative cover was not always adequate to protect against particle detachment. Shadecloth reduced the mean concentrations of sediment in runoff from 690 to 167 mg L−1, thereby decreasing particulate P concentrations and increasing the mean %DRP from 28 % in uncovered plots to 44 % from the paired covered plots. The other two factors, soil type and soil test P, affected the %DRP through their effects on the concentration of dissolved reactive P. Soils derived from basalt had higher average %DRP (73 %) than soils derived from either shale (56 %) or metamorphic parent material (34 %). Whilst this appeared to reflect their differences in soil P buffering capacity, the relationship may not be a causal as the red Ferrosols derived from basalt tend to be structurally more stable than the other soils (mostly Kurosols). High soil test P also contributed to higher %DRP, which was most evident at four sites with non-basalt soils and a history of dairy production. Other research in Australia has found a high proportion of total P as dissolved reactive P in runoff from high-input dairy pastures (e.g. Nash and Murdoch 1997; Barlow et al. 2005; Dougherty et al. 2008a, b).
Surface soil erosion and the loss of P in runoff from pasture
Total P concentration in runoff was related to soil test P, but this was evident only when the confounding effect of soil erosion was reduced by protecting soils with shadecloth (Fig. 7, top). The importance of soil erosion was at first surprising, given that there was no obvious surface erosion at any of the sites. However, amongst the uncovered plots, sediment concentrations rose sharply as ground cover fell below 90 % (Fig. 4), with the highest total suspended solids concentrations (~3 g L−1) observed when vegetative groundcover was lowest (~50 %). The effect of ground cover on soil erosion is well known (Costin 1980; Castillo et al. 1997; Loch 2000) and there are published standards for the amount of cover recommended to protect against erosion. In arable farming the amount of residue recommended may be as low as 30 % (Freebairn et al. 2006), whilst for managing surface erosion in permanent pasture the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority advise >70 % cover (Anon. 2006).
Managing surface-soil erosion from pastures is thus an obvious first line of attack on P losses in runoff, but our data suggest that targets for managing soil erosion are too low for managing P losses in runoff. This is because erosion rates that are negligible from the perspective of soil conservation may nevertheless result in significant loss of sediment-P in runoff. The following estimates illustrate this point.
With total suspended solids of 3 g L−1, we estimate an average annual rate of soil erosion of <2.0 t ha−1 assuming 600 mm annual rainfall (typical for the west of the study region) and an annual runoff coefficient of 0.1 (Young et al. 2001). This also assumes that total suspended solids concentrations in rainfall-runoff are the same as with the rainfall simulator which, with its high rainfall rate of 60 mm h−1, may over-estimate average annual erosion. Whilst 2 t ha−1 exceeds the “tolerable” rate of soil loss of <0.5 t ha−1 year−1 espoused by Loughran et al. (2004), it is comparable to other studies on well-managed grazed pasture in SE NSW, for example 2.2 t ha−1 year−1 in Mahmoudzadeh et al. (2002) and 3.3 t ha−1 year−1 in Erskine et al. (2002). It is much less than may occur from tillage-based agriculture, e.g. 19 t ha−1 year−1 from vegetable farms near Sydney (Hollinger et al. 2001).
Despite sediment losses from the sites with 50 % groundcover being low from an erosion perspective, the concentrations of total P in runoff were high from an environmental perspective, with 3 mg P L−1 from sites with greatest total suspended solids being 150 times the default trigger value (0.02 mg L−1) requiring risk assessment in upland streams in slightly disturbed ecosystems in SE Australia (ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000). Thus, a relatively low erosion rate (<2 t ha−1 year−1) and low soil P (Fig. 5) may still lead to runoff P concentrations that concern environmental regulators.
Exports of P or ‘P loading’ are just as important as P concentrations, as the following estimates of annual export coefficient illustrate for sites generating runoff with 3 g L−1 total suspended solids. These calculations assume an average total P of 3 mg L−1 (Fig. 3), rainfall of 600 mm, and runoff coefficient of 0.1 (as above). The estimated export coefficient of 1.8 kg P ha−1 year−1 is comparable with farm-scale estimates in the region that have highlighted concerns with P runoff from pasture land (Baginska et al. 1998; Cornish et al. 2002). Thus, P losses of environmental concern may occur despite the rates of soil erosion being low from the perspective of soil conservation.
The groundcover required to manage P losses in runoff
Although surface erosion rates were low with around 50 % vegetative cover, as shown above, increasing cover to >90–95 % further reduced erosion (Fig. 2). Effective cover reduced total P concentrations in runoff to an order of magnitude less than occurred with 50 % ground cover, whether the cover came from vegetation (Fig. 3) or from shadecloth (Fig. 7). The exceptions to this were sites with extreme soil test P concentrations arising from a history of dairy production. We conclude that maintaining groundcover above the thresholds recommended for erosion management has the potential to significantly reduce total P losses from pasture sites without a history of dairy production.
In our study, low ground cover was sometimes associated with low soil P (Tables 1, 2), so consideration should be given to applying P fertiliser where soil infertility is likely to have contributed to the low ground cover (Robinson and Lazenby 1976; McGufficke 2003).
With respect to environmental water quality guidelines, it is notable that even with good ground cover and low soil test P, total P in runoff at the point of generation will be up to 0.2 mg L−1 (Fig. 7 top, right), which is well above the environmental ‘trigger’ value (0.02 mg L−1) for the streams to which field runoff discharges. Clearly it is inappropriate for environmental regulation to apply these trigger values to in-field or edge-of-field measurements.
Runoff P responses to soil test P and P buffering index
Where surface erosion was controlled through high ground cover or shadecloth, much of the remaining variation in P concentrations in runoff across the diverse soil types and land-use intensity was accounted for by variation in soil test P and phosphorus buffering index. Dissolved reactive P concentrations in runoff increased with soil test P, but in linear regressions the increase was much greater from non-basalt soils with low or moderate phosphorus buffering index than from basalt soils with high phosphorus buffering index (Fig. 6). Consequently, soil test P alone was unrelated to P concentration in runoff for the combined soil types, whereas multiple regression including both soil test P and phosphorus buffering index predicted P concentration in runoff reasonably well (Figs. 9, 10).
Whilst a range of runoff-P responses to soil test P has been reported in the literature (McDowell et al. 2001; Hart et al. 2004), the interacting effect of phosphorus buffering index is less well documented under field conditions. However, the chemistry behind the effect has been discussed (Ehlert et al. 2003; Moody 2007) and there is supporting evidence from controlled field experiments. In one laboratory study, Olsen soil test P (also bicarbonate extraction)/P sorption index (PSI) was a good predictor of ‘readily desorbable’ P (Hughes et al. 2006). Under controlled field conditions, dissolved reactive P concentration in overland flow from pasture was related, in one study, to Olsen P and P sorption index (PSI) (McDowell and Condron (2004) and, in another, to degree of P saturation which is a function of soil test P and PSI (Allen et al. 2006). In Australia, Dougherty et al. (2010) found that 80 % of the variation in dissolved reactive P concentration in runoff from pastures growing in reconstructed soils in runoff trays was explained by bicarbonate-extractable soil test P (Colwell) and phosphorus buffering index, which measure soil P quantity and buffering, respectively.
The present study included a heterogeneous set of field sites. In basalt soil, the runoff-P response to soil test P was clearly linear, as well as being smaller than in the non-basalt soils as discussed above. Statistically, the non-basalt soils behaved as a group, although contrasting responses may have been revealed with more data, given that phosphorus buffering index ranged from low to moderate (Table 2) and the response to soil test P appears much more likely to be non-linear in soils with low phosphorus buffering index (Dougherty et al. 2010).
For the non-basalt soils, the data for runoff P over the full range of soil test P were fitted to linear regression rather than non-linear regression, for statistical reasons, but inspection of the data suggests the response may be non-linear, at least at lower values of soil test P. There was no systematic rise in runoff P concentration up to about 50 mg Colwell0–2 P kg−1 (or 30 mg Colwell0–10 P kg−1) (Fig. 7). Some authors have fitted ‘bent stick’ statistical models to their data to capture this non-linearity, using the ‘break point’ to define a critical P concentration for environmental purposes (McDowell et al. 2003).
In the absence of data for P buffering capacity, 30 mg Colwell0–10 P kg−1 could be considered as a single ‘critical P’ concentration for environmental management of non-basalt pasture soils. However, there was clearly an effect of phosphorus buffering index even if the non-basalt soils were statistically homogeneous. For example, for a selection of non-basalt sites with soil test P of 30 (±5) mg kg−1, both total P and dissolved reactive P increased by an order of magnitude as phosphorus buffering index fell from 400 (moderate) to 25 (very low) (Fig. 8). This undoubtedly explains some of the variation in the relationship between soil test P and runoff P evident in Fig. 7.
Environmental risk prediction from soil test P and P buffering index
Multiple regression was used to predict total P and dissolved reactive P from soil test P and phosphorus buffering index, first with the data from plots covered with shadecloth to minimise confounding from soil erosion. The resultant equation was then used without re-parameterisation on independent data from plots without shadecloth but high vegetative cover, which we took to represent good pasture management. In the model providing the best fit, the runoff P responses to both soil test P and phosphorus buffering index were curvilinear (Eqs. 4, 5), which makes it risky to apply the model to data beyond the range used for parameterisation.
The model gave satisfactory predictions of P concentrations in runoff when applied to the independent data with soil test P < 100 mg kg−1 and vegetative cover >90 % and no shadecloth (Fig. 10).
The coefficient of determination for total P (R 2 = 0.91) using Eq. 4 and for dissolved reactive P (R 2 = 0.94) using Eq. 5 were superior to those using the model published by Dougherty et al. (2010) when parameterised with the present data, but the relationships were nevertheless highly significant:
These results confirm that soil P guidelines for environmental management need to reflect both soil P capacity and buffering. This is the conclusion reached by Gourley et al. (2007) for agronomic management in Australia, where current practice is to measure Colwell soil test P (a capacity test) and phosphorus buffering index and from these determine a critical concentration using Eq. 8:
Calculations using Eq. 8 result in critical concentrations of Colwell P for agronomic management ranging from 29 mg kg−1 for soils from very low phosphorus buffering index (36) through to 40 mg kg−1 for moderately buffered soils (141–280), and 55 mg kg−1 for soils with high phosphorus buffering index (281–840).
Management guidelines
The first step to reducing P concentrations in runoff is to maintain greater than 90–95 % ground cover, which is greater than recommended for managing soil erosion. Where ground cover is low because of P-deficiency, pasture improvement should be undertaken including the use of P fertiliser.
Where cover is high, fertiliser use should be guided by measurements of both soil P capacity and buffering. In Australia, where the Colwell soil test is common, we suggest that Eq. 8 (Gourley et al. 2007) can be used to provide critical P concentrations for environmental risk assessment that have been normalised for phosphorus buffering index.
Available soil P can be raised with fertiliser to improve agronomic production without fear of significantly increasing P losses in runoff provided soil test P remains below the agronomic critical concentration defined by the soil phosphorus buffering index. This supposition needs to be verified experimentally, but in the meantime it provides a defensible approach to environmental risk management.
The Colwell test uses a sampling depth of 10 cm for agronomic application. Although surface runoff is thought to interact mainly with the top few mm of soil (Sharpley 1985), values for soil test P in the 0–2 and 0–10 cm depths are highly correlated (Fig. 1), so the vast amount of soil P data collected for agronomic management should also be useful for environmental management.
Where P-fertiliser can be applied to pasture with little risk of significantly increasing P in runoff, care is still needed to avoid the ‘incidental losses’ associated with recently applied fertiliser (or manure). Once fertiliser P has been sorbed and entered into the various mineral and organic pools, it is much less likely to be mobilised than freshly applied fertiliser (Hart et al. 2004; Davis et al. 2005). Thus, it is management of the fertiliser that matters for environmental protection of water quality, not the concentration of P in the soil provided it remains below the critical value and soil erosion is managed by retaining good vegetative cover.
References
Allen BL, Mallarino AP, Klatt JG, Baker JL, Camara M (2006) Soil and surface runoff phosphorus relationships for five typical USA Midwest soils. J Environ Qual 35:599–610
Anon (2006) Best management practices for temperate perennial pastures in New South Wales. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, ISBN 0 7347 17261, pp 36
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. NWQMS Paper No. 4. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council & Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia
APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Baginska B, Cornish PS, Hollinger E, Kuczera G, Jones D (1998) Nutrient export from rural land in the Hawkesbury-Nepean catchment. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Wagga Wagga. (The Australian Society of Agronomy: Wagga Wagga, NSW.) pp 753-756
Barlow K, Nash D, Grayson RB (2005) Phosphorus export at the paddock, farm-section, and whole farm scale on an irrigated dairy farm in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Soil Res 56:1–9
Bilotta GS, Brazier RE, Haygarth PM, Macleod CJA, Butler P, Granger S, Krueger T, Freer J, Quinton J (2008) Rethinking the contribution of drained and undrained grasslands to sediment-related water quality problems. J Environ Qual 37:906–914
Burkitt LL, Moody PW, Gourley CJP, Hannah MC (2002) A simple phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils. Aust J Soil Res 40:497–513
Castillo VM, Martinez-Mena M, Albaladejo J (1997) Runoff and soil loss response to vegetation removal in a semiarid environment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1116–1121
Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3:190–197
Cornish PS, Hallissey R, Hollinger E (2002) Is a rainfall simulator useful for estimating phosphorus runoff from dairy pasture? A question of scale-dependency. Aust J Exp Agric 42:953–959
Costin AB (1980) Runoff and soil and nutrient losses from an improved pasture at Ginninderra, Southern Tablelands, New South Wales. Aust J Agric Res 31:533–546
Davis RL, Zhang H, Schroder JL, Wang JJ, Payton ME, Zazulak A (2005) Soil characteristics and phosphorus level effect on phosphorus loss in runoff. J Environ Qual 34:1640–1650
Dorioz JM, Wang D, Poulenard J, Trévisan D (2006) The effect of grass buffer strips on phosphorus dynamics—a critical review and synthesis as a basis for application in agricultural landscapes in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:4–21
Dougherty WJ, Nash DM, Cox JW, Chittleborough DJ, Fleming NK (2008a) Small-scale, high-intensity rainfall simulation under-estimates natural runoff P concentrations from pastures on hill-slopes. Aust J Soil Res 46:694–702
Dougherty WJ, Nicholls PJ, Milham PJ, Havilah EJ, Lawrie RA (2008b) Phosphorus fertilizer and grazing management effects on phosphorus in runoff from dairy pastures. J Environ Qual 37:417–428
Dougherty W, Burkitt L, Milham P, Harvey D (2010) The effect of soil available P and P buffering on runoff P concentration from pastures. In: Gilkes RJ, Prakongkep N (eds) Proceedings of the 19th world congress of soil science; soil solutions for a changing world; ISBN 978-0-646-53783-2; Published on DVD; http://www.iuss.org; Division Symposium 3.2; Nutrient best management practices; 2010 Aug 1–6. Brisbane, Australia: IUSS; 2010, pp 272–275
Douglas RW, Menary W, Jordan P (2007) Phosphorus and sediment transfers in a grassland river catchment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 77:199–212
Ehlert P, Morel C, Fotyma M, Destain J-P (2003) Potential role of phosphate buffering capacity of soils in fertilizer management strategies fitted to environmental goals. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:409–415
Erskine WD, Mahmoudzadeh A, Myers C (2002) Land use effects on sediment yields and soil loss rates in small basins of Triassic sandstone near Sydney, NSW, Australia. Catena 49:271–287
Fiener P, Auerswald K (2009) Effects of hydrodynamically rough grassed waterways on dissolved reactive phosphorus loads coming from agricultural watersheds. J Environ Qual 38:548–559
Freebairn DM, Cornish PS, Anderson WK, Walker SR, Robinson JB, Beswick AR (2006) Management Systems in Climate Regions of the World—Australia. In: ‘Dryland Agriculture’. Agronomy Monograph 23. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 2nd edn, Chap. 20, pp 837–878
Gourley CJP, Melland AR, Waller RA, Awty IM, Smith AP, Peverill KI, Hannah MC (2007) Making better fertiliser decisions for grazed pastures in Australia. Victorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne
Hart MR, Quin BF, Nguyen ML (2004) Phosphorus runoff from agricultural land and direct fertilizer effects: a review. J Environ Qual 33:1954–1972
Havilah E, Warren H, Lawrie R, Senn A, Milham P (2005) Fertilizers for pastures. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Sydney
Hollinger E, Cornish PS, Baginska B, Mann R, Kuczera G (2001) Farm-scale stormwater losses of sediment and nutrients from a market garden near Sydney, Australia. Agric Water Manage 47:227–241
Hosomi M, Sudo R (1986) Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in freshwater samples using persulphate digestion. Int J Environ Stud 27:267–275
Hughes S, Reynolds B, Bell SA, Gardner C (2006) Simple phosphorus saturation index to estimate risk of dissolved P in runoff from arable soils. Soil Use Manage 16:206–210
Jarvie HP, Withers PJA, Neal C (2002) Review of robust measurement of phosphorus in river water: sampling, storage, fractionation and sensitivity. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:113–132
Lambert D, Maher W, Hogg I (1992) Changes in phosphorus fractions during storage of lake water. Water Res 26:645–648
Loch RJ (2000) Effects of vegetation cover on runoff and erosion under simulated rain and overland flow on a rehabilitated site on the Meandu Mine, Tarong, Queensland. Aust J Soil Res 38:299–312
Loch RJ, Foley JL (1994) Measurement of aggregate breakdown under rain: comparison with tests of water stability and relationships with field measurements of infiltration. Aust J Soil Res 32:701–720
Loch RJ, Robotham BG, Zeller L, Masterman N, Orange DN, Bridge BJ, Sheridan G, Bourke JJ (2001) A multi-purpose rainfall simulator for field infiltration and erosion studies. Aust J Soil Res 39:599–610
Loughran RJ, Elliott GL, McFarlane DJ, Campbell BL (2004) A survey of soil erosion in Australia using caesium-137. Aust Geog Stud 42:221–233
Maher W, Woo L (1998) Procedures for the storage and digestion of natural waters for the determination of filterable reactive phosphorus, total filterable phosphorus and total phosphorus. Anal Chim Acta 375:5–47
Maher W, Krikowa F, Wruck D, Louie H, Nguyen T, Huang WY (2002) Determination of total phosphorus and nitrogen in turbid waters by oxidation with alkaline potassium peroxodisulfate and low pressure microwave digestion, autoclave heating or the use of closed vessels in a hot water bath comparison with Kjeldahl digestion. Anal Chim Acta 463:283–293
Mahmoudzadeh A, Erskine WD, Myers C (2002) Sediment yields and soil loss rates from native forest, pasture and cultivated land in the Bathurst area, New South Wales. Aust Forest 65:73–80
McCaskill MR, Ridley AM, Okam A, White RE, Michalk DL, Melland A, Johnston WH, Murphy SR, Andrew MH (2003) SGS nutrient theme: environmental assessment of nutrient application to extensive pastures in the high rainfall zone of southern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 43:927–944
McColl RHS (1978) Chemical runoff from pasture: the influence of fertiliser and riparian zones. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 12:371–380
McDowell RW, Condron LM (2004) Estimating phosphorus loss from New Zealand grassland soils. N Z J Agric Res 47:137–145
McDowell RW, Sharpley AN, Condron LM, Haygarth PM, Brookes PC (2001) Processes controlling soil phosphorus release to runoff and implications for agricultural management. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:269–284
McDowell RW, Monaghan RM, Morton J (2003) Soil phosphorus concentrations to minimise potential P loss to surface waters in Southland. N Z J Agric Res 46:239–253
McGufficke BR (2003) Native grassland management: a botanical study of two native grassland management options on a commercial cattle property. Rangel J 25:37–46
Moody PW (2007) Interpretation of a single-point P buffering index for adjusting critical levels of the Colwell soil P test. Aust J Soil Res 45:55–62
Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36
Nash D, Murdoch C (1997) Phosphorus in runoff from a fertile dairy pasture. Aust J Soil Res 35:419–429
Nash D, Hannah M, Halliwell D, Murdoch C (2000) Factors affecting phosphorus export from a pasture-based grazing system. J Environ Qual 29:1160–1166
Nash D, Hannah M, Barlow K, Robertson F, Mathers N, Butler C, Horton J (2007) A comparison of some surface soil phosphorus tests that could be used to assess P export potential. Aust J Soil Res 45:397–400
Pote DH, Daniel TC (2000) Analyzing for total phosphorus and total dissolved phosphorus in water samples. In: Pierzynski GM (ed) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. # 396. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp 94–97
Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne
Robinson GG, Lazenby A (1976) Effect of superphosphate, white clover and stocking rate on the productivity of natural pastures, Northern Tablelands, New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 16:209–217
Roth CH (2004) A framework relating soil surface condition to infiltration and sediment and nutrient mobilization in grazed rangelands of northeastern Queensland, Australia. Earth Surf Process Landforms 29:1093–1104
SCA/DLWC (2003) Sydney catchment authority soil landscape database. Sydney-South Coast Regional, Soil Survey Unit. NSW DLWC, Parramatta
Schärer M, Vollmer T, Frossard E, Stamm C, Flühler H, Sinaj S (2006) Effect of water composition on phosphorus concentration in runoff and water-soluble phosphate in two grassland soils. Eur J Soil Sci 57:228–234
Sharpley AN (1985) Depth of surface soil-runoff interaction as affected by rainfall, soil slope, and management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1010–1015
Sharpley AN, Ahuja LR, Menzel RG, Smith SJ, Rhoades ED, Olness AE (1981) The sorption of soluble phosphorus by soil material during transport in runoff from cropped and grassed watersheds. J Environ Qual 10:211–215
Sharpley AN, Foy BH, Withers PJA (2000) Practical and innovative measures for the control of agricultural phosphorus losses to water: an overview. J Environ Qual 29:1–9
Smith CM (1987) Sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen in channelised surface runoff from a New Zealand pastoral catchment. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 21:627–639
Stanton FW (1960) Ocular point frame. J Range Manage 13:153
Stevens DP, Cox FW, Chittleborough DJ (1999) Pathways of phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon movement over and through texturally differentiated soils, South Australia. Aust J Soil Res 37:679–693
Tunney H, Kiely G, Morgan G, Moles R, Byrne P, Jordan P, Daly K, Doody D, Kurz I, Bourke D, O’Reilly C, Ryan D, Holden N, Jennings E, Irvine K, Carton O (2007) Pathways for nutrient loss to water with emphasis on phosphorus: final integrated report. End of Project Report RMIS 5021. Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford
Wendt RC, Corey RB (1980) Phosphorus variations in surface runoff from agricultural lands as a function of land use. J Environ Qual 9:130–136
Whitehead DC (2000) Nutrient elements in grassland: soil-plant-animal relationships. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
Young WJ, Rustomji AO, Hughes D, Wilkins D (2001) Regionalisation of flow variables used in modelling riverine material transport in the National Land and Water Resources Audit. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra. Technical Report 36/01, August 2001
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by SCA/UWS Collaborative Research Project 91001274 and ARC Linkage grant LP0561858. Technical assistance was provided by Linda Allanson, Mark Emanuel, Les McNamara and Peter Paterson. Dr Warwick Dougherty provided useful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hart, M.R., Cornish, P.S. Available soil phosphorus, phosphorus buffering and soil cover determine most variation in phosphorus concentration in runoff from pastoral sites. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 93, 227–244 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9512-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9512-2