Abstract
For more than 20 years, sustainable development has been advocated as a way of tackling growing global environmental and social problems. The sustainable development discourse has always had a strong technological component and the literature boasts an enormous amount of debate on which technologies should be developed and employed and how this can most efficiently be done. The mainstream discourse in sustainable development argues for an eco-efficiency approach in which a technology push strategy boosts efficiency levels by a factor 10 and more in industrialised and developing countries. A minority argues for a socio-cultural lifestyle switch, relying on new values, quality of life, sufficiency and redistribution strategies, with calls for appropriate and soft technologies. It is remarkable, however, that the articles, books and policy debates on sustainability seldom explicitly draw in a discussion of the nature of technology, how technology influences and is influenced by society, and what this implies for sustainable development. The mainstream interprets technology as neutral and instrumental: technology is no more than an instrument to reach a goal; it cannot be judged on its intrinsic characteristics, only on its use. The alternative view often builds on an autonomous and substantive interpretation of technology: technology is an autonomous, almost uncontrollable power that fundamentally reshapes our culture. A more balanced approach seems to be growing in the research on socio-technical sustainability transitions where the focus shifts to the co-evolution of technology and society, and to the networks, seamless webs and complex multi-actor processes that may carry a sustainability transition forward. This approach builds on insights from recent traditions in the philosophy and sociology of technology, in particular the social construction of technology (SCOT) and actor-network theory (ANT). While this provides for a better understanding of the nature and potential role of technology in sustainability policies, it remains to be seen whether it will actually influence the choice between technologies. This article investigates the different conceptualisations of technology in the sustainability debate. It first distinguishes between different approaches of sustainability and how these are related to differing views on technology. It then moves on to how the socio-technical transitions research incorporates insights from contemporary philosophy and sociology of technology. It reflects on the potential of transitions research to give guidance in technology choices, suggesting that the transition approach might be strengthened by drawing in insights from critical theory of technology and by taking a more political stance in defining sustainable development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Achterhuis H. (1995) Natuur tussen mythe en techniek. Ambo, Baarn
Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology. The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Banuri T., Weyant J., Akuma G., Najam A., Pinguelli R. L., Rayner S., Sachs W., Sharma R., Yohe G. et al (2001) Setting the stage: Climate change and sustainable development. In: Metz B. (eds) Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, contribution of working III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Belz F.-M. (2004) A transition towards sustainability in the Swiss agri-food chain (1970–2000): Using and improving the multi-level perspective. In: Elzen B., Geels F., Green K. (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, pp 97–113
Bos B. (2004) Een kwestie van beheersing. Over de rol van planten, dieren en mensen in technologische systemen. De Vliegende Beer, Amsterdam
Chertow M. R. (2001) The IPAT equation and its variants. Changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(4): 13–29
Correljé A., Verbong G. (2004) The transition from coal to gas: Radical change of the Dutch gas system. In: Elzen B., Geels F., Green K. (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, pp 114–134
Dyson F.J. (2009) Technology and social justice. In: Johnson D.G., Wetmore J.M. (eds) Technology and society. Building our sociotechnical future. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 5–12
Elzen B., Geels F. W., Green K. (2004) Conclusion. Transitions to sustainability: Lessons learned and remaining challenges. In: Elzen B., Geels F. W., Green K. (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 282–300
Feenberg A. (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London
Feenberg A. (2001) Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press, New York
Feenberg A. (2005) Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies 1(1): 47–64
Feng P., Feenberg A. et al (2008) Thinking about design. Critical theory of technology and the design process. In: Vermaas P. E. (eds) Philosophy and design. Springer, Berlin
Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Rotmans, J. (2008). Conceptualising, observing and influencing socio-ecological transitions. MATISSE Working Papers 26, Institute of Social Ecology/DRIFT, Vienna/Rotterdam. http://www.matisse-project.net.
Geels F. W. (2004) From technical systems of innovation to socio-technical systems Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897–920
Geels F.W. (2004). Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In: Elzen B., Geels F., Green K. (eds). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 19–47). Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.
Geels F. W. (2005) Technological transition and system innovations. A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Geels F. W., Schot J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417
Goeminne, G., & Paredis, E. (forthcoming). The concept of ecological debt: Challenging established science-policy frameworks in the transition to sustainable development. In E. Techera (Ed.), Frontiers of Environment and Citizenship. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press (In print).
Goeminne, G., Kolen, F., & Paredis, E. (forthcoming). Addressing the sustainability challenge beyond the fact-value dichotomy. A call for engaged knowledge. In D. Aerts, B. D’Hooghe, and N. Note (Eds.), Worldviews, science and us: Bridging knowledge and its implications for our perspectives of the world. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company (In print).
Grin J. (2007) The multilevel perspective and design of system innovations. In: Vanden Bergh J., Bruinsma F. (eds) Managing the transition to renewable energy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Halsnaes K., Shukla P. et al (2007) Framing issues. In: Metz B., Davidson O. R. (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Harper E.M., Graedel T.E. (2004) Industrial ecology: A teenager’s progress. Technology in Society 26: 433–445
Hopwood B., Mellor M., O’Brien G. (2005) Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development 13: 38–52
Ihde D. (2004) Has the philosophy of technology arrived? A state-of-the-art review. Philosophy of Science 71: 117–131
IPCC (2000). Special report on emission scenarios. Special report of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change.
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy. Sustainable Development Commission.
Johnson, D., Wetmore, J. (eds) (2009) Technology and society. Building our sociotechnical future. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Karlsson R. (2009) A global Fordian compromise? And what it would mean for the transition to sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy 12: 190–197
Konradm, K., Voss, J.-P., & Truffer, B. (2006). Transformations in consumption and production patterns from a regime perspective. In M. Andersen & A. Tukker (Eds.), Proceedings: Perspective on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production, Workshop of the SCORE!-network, 20–21 April 2006, Copenhagen, (pp. 439–458).
Loorbach D. (2007) Transition management, new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht
Markard J., Truffer B. (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37: 596–615
Nykvist B., Whitmarsh L. (2008) A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche decelopment in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 75: 1373–1387
Paredis E. (2009) Socio-technische systeeminnovaties en transities: Van theoretische inzichten naar beleidsvertaling. Research paper CDO/UGent, Gent
Paredis, E., Goeminne, G., & Maes Lambrecht, J. (2006). Equity and sustainable development in a post-kyoto agreement: The interests and concerns of developing countries. Final Report VLIR-BVO project 2005, VLIR/CDO, Brussel/Gent.
Peeters J. (1996) Leven naar menselijke maat. Otto Ulrichs antwoord op moderne schaarste. In: Janssens F., Melle U. (eds) Voeten in de aarde. Radicale groene denkers. Hadewijch/Van Arkel, Antwerpen/Utrecht
Perkins R. (2003) Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum 27: 177–188
Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and Artifacts. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (reprint in Johnson and Wetmore 2009).
Raven R. (2005) Strategic niche management for biomass. A comparative study on the experimental introduction of bioenergy technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven,
Ravenn R., Verbong G. (2007) Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector: The case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19: 491–507
Rip A., Kemp R. (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S., Malone E. (eds) Human choice and climate change. Batelle Press, Columbus, pp 327–399
Robinson J. (2004) Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48: 369–384
Rotmans J. (2003) Transitiemanagement: Sleutel voor een duurzame samenleving. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen
Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M. (2001) More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1): 15–31
Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D., & Kemp, R. (2007). Transition management: Its origin, evolution and critique. Paper presented at the workshop Politics and governance in sustainable socio-technical transitions, 19–21 September 2007, Schloss Blankensee, Berlin.
Sachs, W. (eds) (1992) The development dictionary. A guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books, London
Sachs, W. (eds) (1993) Global ecology A. new arena of political conflict. Zed Books, London
Sachs W. (1999) Planet dialectics. Explorations in environment and development. Zed Books, London/New York
Sathaye J., Najam A. et al (2007) Sustainable development and mitigation. In: Metz B., Davidson O. R., Bosch P. R., Dave R., Meyer L. A. (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Schot J., Geels F. W. (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20(5): 537–554
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. London: Blond and Briggs.
Smith A. (2005) The alternative technology movement: An analysis of its framing and negotiation of technology development. Human Ecology Review 12(2): 106–119
Smith A. (2007) Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19(4): 427–450
Smith A., Stirling A., Berkhout F. (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510
Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2008). Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: Critical issues for sustainability governance. STEPS Working Paper 8, STEPS Centre, Brighton.
Sneddon C., Howarth R. B., Norgaard R. B. (2006) Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological Economics 57: 253–268
Ulrich O. (1992) Technology. In: Sachs W. (eds) The development dictionary. A guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books, London
Verbong G., Geels F. W., Raven R. (2008) Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, closed networks and technologyfocused learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20(5): 555–573
Vergragt P. (2006) How technology could contribute to a sustainable world. GTI Paper Series 8, Tellus Institute, Boston
Von Weiszäcker E., Lovins A.B., Lovins L. H. (1997) Factor four. Doubling wealth, halving resource use. Earthscan Publications, London
Voss J.-P., Smith A., Grin J. (2009) Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences 42: 275–302
Winner L. (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(3): 362–378
World Commission on Environment and Development: (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paredis, E. Sustainability Transitions and the Nature of Technology. Found Sci 16, 195–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9197-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9197-4