Abstract
High serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are associated with an increased risk of sporadic breast cancer (BC). The aim of the present work is to evaluate the association between IGF-I and hereditary BC risk, using a case–control approach. The work represents an “ad interim” cross-sectional analysis of an ongoing study with a prospective design whose aim is to recruit a cohort of women belonging to high genetic risk families to test potential modulators of penetrance and prognosis. The odd of exposure to high serum IGF-I levels among women with a previous diagnosis of BC (“cases”) was compared with the odd among unaffected “controls”. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, controlling for confounders. We analysed 308 women (209 cases and 99 controls) at high genetic risk of BC. The adjusted OR of BC for the upper tertile of serum IGF-I versus the lowest one was 3.5 (95%CI 1.4–8.8). Excluding from the analysis 64 women under current Tamoxifen or GnRH analogues treatment, the adjusted OR of BC became 3.7 (95%CI 1.4–9.9). The association became stronger restricting the analysis to the 161 women (97 cases and 64 controls) with a proven BRCA mutation. If confirmed by a prospective approach, the association between IGF-I and familial BC will open further options for reducing BC risk in susceptible women.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
High serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) [1, 2]. The first published studies suggested that the association of IGF-I and BC was confined to young pre-menopausal women. Subsequent studies, however, found similar associations after menopause.
The IGF pathway comprises a complex system of molecules involved in regulation of different biological functions [1]. IGF-I is essential for the normal development of the female breast both during puberty and pregnancy [3], regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis [4] and is functionally linked to angiogenic factors and BC progression [5]. Growth hormone (GH) is the main regulator of IGF-I levels in the blood and the biological activity of IGF-I is modulated by the IGF-I binding proteins (IGFBPs) [6], two of which, IGFBP1 and IGFBP2 are synthesised in the liver under the control of insulin. Insulin promotes the synthesis of IGF-I [7] and inhibits IGFBPs formation in the liver [8], thus increasing the bio-availability of IGF-I. Insulin improves also the synthesis of androgens in the ovary and inhibits liver production of the sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), thus increasing the bio-availability of sex steroids (both androgens and estrogens) [8] consistently recognised as major risk factor for pre and post-menopausal BC [9–13]. Estrogens and IGF-I cooperates for the proliferation of BC cells [14].
Up to 5% of BC and 10% of ovarian cancer (OC) may be associated with an autosomic dominant BRCA gene mutations [15]. Such mutations confer very high lifetime risks of developing BC and most BC cases occur at young ages. Estimates of the lifetime cumulative risk (penetrance) of BC associated with BRCA mutations range from about 80% in studies on high risk families [16–20], to around 45% in population-based studies [21–27]. A sizeable proportion of mutation carriers, however, do not develop BC at all or develop it only late in life. Therefore, the penetrance of the genetic trait may be regulated through other genetic or environmental factors such as dietary, metabolic, and growth factors.
A case–control study within a cohort of 80 French-Canadian BC families showed that high energy intake (that is usually associated with higher bio-availability of growth factors) was positively and significantly associated with BC risk in BRCA mutation carriers [28]. A case-only study (COS), on gene-environment interaction in the occurrence of BC before the age of 40 [29–31] suggested a positive significant association with high consumption of milk in Italian women with a high probability of BRCA mutation [30]. Milk, directly stimulates insulin production or release [32, 33] and its consumption is associated with higher plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) [34, 35]. Recently, a mechanistic study by Maor et al. [36] hypothesized a functional interaction between the BRCA1 and IGF-I systems relevant to breast cancer biology and showed that BRCA1 gene expression is regulated by the IGF-I signalling pathway. The same author [37] showed that primary BC related to BRCA1 gene mutation revealed a significant elevation in IGF-I receptor levels compared with non-carriers. Another mechanistic study [38] suggested an increased intratumoral IGF-I protein expression in BRCA mutation carriers.
We hypothesised, therefore, that IGF-I might be important in hereditary BC. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the association between serum levels of IGF-I and hereditary BC risk, using a case–control approach. The work represents a cross-sectional “ad interim” analysis of a larger study with a prospective design who aims to recruit a cohort of women belonging to high genetic risk families to test if IGF-I and other metabolic indicators may influence their risk of BC and BC relapses. Confirming a positive association with BC would help to develop primary prevention recommendations for high risk families.
Subjects and methods
Subjects
Eligible study subjects were women with or without BC, aged 18–75, with a proved deleterious BRCA mutation or belonging to a family with a high probability of harbouring a BRCA deleterious mutation (≥50%) estimated on the basis of the family history.
We defined as cases women with a previous invasive BC, whatever their date of diagnosis, and as controls women who had not developed BC. Cases and controls could not be matched by family because several families provided only cases. On the other hand, several families provided only controls because no cases was still alive. All controls, however, were first degree relatives of BC cases.
Healthy women who tested negative for the BRCA mutation detected in their family were not eligible. Cases with distant metastases were not eligible.
308 eligible women were recruited through the genetic counselling activity of family clinics of several Italian Cancer Institutes.
The study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health and the Italian League Against Cancer and was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee of the collaborating Cancer Institutes.
All participants received full information about the study, and provided a written consent. They were enquired about their family history of breast and ovarian cancer with genetic pedigree reconstruction (to compute probability of BRCA mutation) and, if one or more family members had been tested for BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation, about the results of the test.
Participants were invited to undergo an anthropometric visit, to donate a blood sample and to fill in a questionnaire enquiring data about all factors related both to familial BC and hormonal-metabolic factors under study (disease treatment, oral contraceptive use, reproductive factors). Body weight was measured using electronic scale with women in light clothes and without shoes.
Methods
Software to compute probability of mutation
The major requirement of this study on hereditary BC was the identification of women at high genetic risk of BC. Without genetic test, the probability of a BRCA deleterious mutation was computed using a software developed in the frame of a multinational case-only study (C.O.S.) [29–31]. The C.O.S. software, based on the Bayesian logic developed by Berry and Parmigiani [39, 40], requires sex, age or age at death, age at BC or ovarian cancer diagnosis, and age of diagnosis of second or contralateral BC, in each participant’s family member and can accommodate up to the 4th degree relatives. It requires as well assumptions about the incidence of BC and OC in the general population and in BRCA mutation carriers. Since BC incidence has increased over generations, both in the general population [41] and in mutation carriers [42–45], we estimated age and birth cohort-specific BC incidence and penetrance rates [31, 46, 47]. Software results compare favourably with respect to the more widely used BRCAPRO [48].
Laboratory measurements
Blood samples were collected at recruitment into the study. Women were requested to donate 15 ml of blood; serum samples were aliquoted and stored at −80°.
Serum IGF-I was measured using commercially-available radioimmunoassay kits from Biosource (nivelles, Belgium). The coefficients of intra- and inter-assay variation were, respectively: 2.8 and 5.3% for a mean IGF-I level of 304 ng/ml.
The technicians analyzing the serum samples were blinded to the case or control status of the patients.
Statistical methods
The statistical analysis aimed to test the association between IGF-I and BC in women at high genetic risk. According to a case–control methodology the odd of exposure to high IGF-I levels among women with a previous diagnosis of BC (“cases”) was compared with the odd among unaffected “controls”.
IGF-I levels were normally distributed; we defined IGF-I tertiles on the basis control population.
The means of continuous variables in affected women were compared with those of unaffected by using Student’s t test. Chi-squared test was used to compare frequencies and percentages in relation to the disease status. An unconditional logistic regression model was used to compute the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); the dichotomous dependent variable was women’s disease status. The following covariates were considered as potential confounders according to a priori hypotheses: centre, age (in quintiles), body mass index (BMI) (in quintiles) menstrual status (natural menopause, induced menopause, first, second, third and fourth week of menstrual cycle, irregular cycle), fasting (yes or no) and time at blood test (≤10:00, 10:01–12:00, >12:00).
As hormonal treatment for BC is known to reduce IGF-I levels we carried out an analysis restricted to women without current hormonal treatment [49].
We performed also an analysis restricted to BRCA mutation carriers.
As time elapsed since BC diagnosis was associated with IGF-I levels, we carried out an analysis excluding cases diagnosed 10 years or more before recruitment.
A P-value of <0.05 was taken to be significant. All statistical tests were two-sided. All analysis were performed using the STATA 11 statistical package.
Results
The analysis was carried out on 308 women (mean age 45.0 ± 10.6 standard deviation), 209 cases and 99 controls. 161 of them, 97 cases and 64 controls (mean age 46.2 ± 11.2 standard deviation), tested positive for a BRCA gene mutation. 92 cases and 35 controls were not tested but belonged to a family with a probability of mutation over 50%. 20 cases who tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations were also included in the main analysis because their “a priori” probability of mutation was over 50% and the genetic test may lack sensitivity.
Cases were diagnosed on average 7.1 years (standard deviation 6.3) before recruitment.
Relevant characteristics of cases and controls, are reported in Table 1. BC cases were significantly older than controls. They showed a significantly different menstrual status, with a higher frequency of iatrogenic menopause. Cases showed a significantly lower weight than controls (P = 0.02) but there were no statistically significant differences in mean height and BMI. Oral contraceptive had been used by 63.5% of cases and by 61.6% of controls. 55 cases and only one control (a women with a positive genetic test) was under current Tamoxifen treatment.
The distribution of serum levels of IGF-I according to the disease status and potential confounding variables is reported in Table 2.
IGF-I significantly decreased with age. As a consequence, BC cases had somewhat lower average serum levels of IGF-I than controls (177.4 ± 61.0 ng/ml versus 192.8 ± 78.8 ng/ml, P = 0.06). However, post-menopausal BC cases, both with natural and induced menopause, showed significantly higher serum levels of IGF-I than post-menopausal controls (P = 0.05 and P = 0.04). In both cases and controls, IGF-I increased during the first 3 weeks of menstrual cycle and decreased during the fourth. Cases under Tamoxifen treatment had significantly lower IGF-I levels than cases without treatment (P = 0.00). Cases under GnRH analogues treatment had a non significantly higher IGF-I levels than cases without treatment (P = 0.08). Among cases IGFI levels initially increased by increasing BMI but decreased in overweight women. We did not find any significant association between serum levels of IGFI and type of BRCA mutation or probability of BRCA mutation (data not shown). There was no significant association with fasting conditions (P = 0.89).
We examined the association between serum levels of IGF-I and hereditary BC by a multiple logistic regression model (Table 3). The adjusted OR of BC for the upper tertile of serum IGF-I versus the lowest one was 3.5 (95%CI 1.4–8.8) with a significant trend of increased risk with increasing IGF-I concentration (P = 0.01). Excluding from the analysis 64 women under current Tamoxifen and/or GnRH analogues treatment, the adjusted OR of BC became 3.7 (95%CI 1.4–9.9) comparing the upper versus lowest tertile of IGF-I (Table 3a).
Restricting the analysis to the 161 women with a proved BRCA mutation (Table 3b), the adjusted OR of BC for the upper tertile of serum IGF-I versus the lowest one was 7.0 (95% IC 1.4-35.6). Excluding 25 women under current Tamoxifen and/or GnRH analogues treatment the OR became 6.6 (95% IC 1.3–34.2) (P for trend 0.02). A separated analysis for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated women did not suggest a differential effect (data not shown).
Among the 147 women (112 cases and 35 controls) included in the study because a high probability of BRCA mutation, but without a positive test, the adjusted OR of BC for the upper tertile of serum IGF-I versus the lowest one was 2.2 (95%CI 0.5–10.2) (Table 3c).
Excluding 71 cases diagnosed 10 years or more before enrollment into the study the association of IGF-I with BC became stronger. The adjusted OR of BC for the upper tertile of serum IGF-I versus the lowest one was 4.2 (95%CI 1.5–11.8; P for trend = 0.00)(data not shown).
Discussion
Comparing affected versus unaffected women belonging to high genetic risk families we found an increased risk of BC associated with high serum levels of IGF-I. This was, however, only an exploratory analysis that needs to be confirmed using a prospective approach. The study in fact, was a cross sectional analysis of baseline IGF-I values in a cohort of women belonging to high risk families who are being followed-up to test if IGF-I may modify the penetrance of genetic susceptibility and influence their risk of BC and of BC relapse.
Few studies tried to study BRCA penetrance modulators. Up to now, results on the possible role of several genes related to hormonal and growth factors as potential modifiers of risk (including androgen receptor, AIB1, HRAS, IGF1,19-CA, and progesterone receptor) have been inconsistent [50–53]. At present, there are no studies testing the relationship of serum levels of growth factors and penetrance of breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. However, mechanistic studies hypothesized a functional interaction between the BRCA1 and IGF-I systems relevant to BC biology and showed that BRCA1 gene expression is regulated by the IGF-I signalling pathway [36–38]. Our results support this hypothesis and suggest that serum levels of IGF-I may be a risk factor for hereditary BC. The greatest OR was found restricting the analysis to women with a positive BRCA genetic test.
There are several limitations to our study. First, we included prevalent cases from families with several BC survivors. Since we collected data and blood samples from our BC cases an average of 7.1 years after diagnosis, any relationship between serum levels of IGF-I and tumour-specific survival may have resulted in a biased estimate of the odds ratio. High IGF-I levels, in fact, may confer an increased risk of recurrences [54], which would reduce the prevalence of high levels in the selected series of cases. This bias might have reduced the strength of the association. Moreover, we found that serum levels of IGF-I decreased by increasing time from BC diagnosis (data not shown), which was only partially explained by increasing age, suggesting that patients with low levels of IGF-I experienced longer survival. Consistently our sensitivity analysis showed increasing ORs excluding cases diagnosed in the distant past.
Second, given the cross-sectional design, serum parameters of BC cases may be affected by disease treatment. Actually, Tamoxifen reduced the IGF-I levels, thus causing an underestimation of the OR. The treatment with GnRH analogues was associated with higher IGF-I levels. This latter observation was unknown “a priori” and may have occurred by chance. Previous observations, in fact, showed that GnRH analogues treatment did not change IGF-I levels in prostate cancer patients [55] and decreased levels of free IGF-I in children with central precocious puberty [56]. We checked, however the effect of excluding only cases under hormonal treatment without substantially any significant change in the strength of the association. Finally, since BC is a frequent disease in BRCA mutation carriers, the OR is not a reliable estimate of the relative risk. Given the expected cumulative incidence of BC in mutation carriers at the age of our cases (about 10%) [57] one can estimate that an OR = 3.5 could reflect a relative risk of 3.1. This overestimate, however, does not affect the statistical significance of the results. Overall the potential biases discussed above do not seem having caused any major overestimation of the observed OR. However, given the wide confidence intervals, larger studies are necessary to confirm or refute this observation. We expect that our ongoing prospective study will be more informative but we also expect that its statistical power will be affected by the increasing frequency of prophylactic mastectomy and adnexiectomy.
Knowledge of BC susceptibility genes, along with the introduction of predictive genetic testing, has made it possible to identify women at increased risk for inherited breast and ovarian cancer. Options currently available for these women include surveillance programs aimed at BC early detection, risk reducing bilateral mastectomy, and prophylactic adnexiectomy, while non-surgical primary prevention options (e.g. chemo-preventive options for interrupting the oestrogen-signalling pathway) are promising, but not yet firmly established [58, 59]. Tamoxifen adjuvant treatment has been found associated with lower incidence of contralateral BC in BRCA positive patients [60, 61]. Tamoxifen, however, seems equally effective in BRCA2 patients (mostly estrogen receptor positive) as in BRCA1 patients (mostly estrogen receptor negative), suggesting that the preventive mechanism may be partially mediated through the lowering effect on IGF-I levels. Several epidemiological observation suggested that factors related to bio-availability of growth factor, such as diet [62], body weight [63], high energy intake [63], and physical activity [64] may affect the penetrance in BRCA mutation carriers and in women belonging to high genetic risk families. The present results suggest that a mechanism underlying these associations may be the increased levels of IGF-I. We know that all these factors are related to the hormonal and metabolic risk pattern that is relevant for sporadic BC aetiology and prognosis and may be potentially modified [65]. A long-term low-protein and low calories diet is associated with lower insulin and IGF-I levels [66]. Recently, also physical activity has been found associated with lower IGF-I levels [67]. We previously showed that in post-menopausal women a comprehensive change in diet with reduced consumption of refined carbohydrates and saturated fats and increased consumption of whole-grain cereals, pulses and vegetables can reduce insulin and sex hormones, and increase the IGF-I binding proteins 1 and 2 thus reducing the bioavailability of IGF-I [68–71]. Confirming the associations between IGF-I and other markers of insulin resistance and familial BC in a prospective cohort of a large series of participants, susceptible women will have further options for reducing their risk of BC, either through lifestyle or chemoprevention.
References
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2010) Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol 11:530–542
Campagnoli C, Pasanisi P, Peris C, Berrino F (2008) Insulin-like growth factor-I and breast cancer: epidemiological and clinical data. In: Pasqualini JR (ed) Breast cancer: prognosis, treatment and prevention 2nd Edn. Paris: INFORMA-Healthcare. New York, London
Dickson R (1996) Biochemical control of breast development. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S (eds) Diseases of the breast. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
Stewart CE, Rotwein P (1996) Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiol Rev 76:1005–1026
Oh JS, Kucab JE, Bushel PR et al (2002) Insulin-like growth factor-1 inscribes a gene expression profile for angiogenic factors and cancer progression in breast epithelial cells. Neoplasia 4:204–217
Baxter RC, Butt AJ, Schedlich LJ et al (2000) Antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic activities of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. Growth Horm IGF Res 10((Suppl A)):S10–S11
Conover CA (1996) Regulation and physiological role of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Endocr J 43(Suppl):S43–S48
Kaaks R (1996) Nutrition, hormones, and breast cancer: is insulin the missing link? Cancer Causes Control 7:605–625
Eliassen AH, Missmer SA, Tworoger SS et al (2006) Endogenous steroid hormone concentrations and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1406–1415
Kaaks R, Rinaldi S, Key TJ et al (2005) Postmenopausal serum androgens, oestrogens and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Endocr Relat Cancer 12:1071–1082
Kaaks R, Berrino F, Key T et al (2005) Serum sex steroids in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 97:755–765
Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I et al (2002) Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:606–616
Micheli A, Muti P, Secreto G et al (2004) Endogenous sex hormones and subsequent breast cancer in premenopausal women. Int J Cancer 112:312–318
Lautenbach A, Budde A, Wrann CD et al (2009) Obesity and the associated mediators leptin, estrogen and IGF-I enhance the cell proliferation and early tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Nutr Cancer 61:484–491
Liebens FP, Carly B, Pastijn A et al (2007) Management of BRCA1/2 associated breast cancer: a systematic qualitative review of the state of knowledge in 2006. Eur J Cancer 43:238–257
The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1999) Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1310–1316
Brose MS, Rebbeck TR, Calzone KA et al (2002) Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1365–1372
Easton DF, Bishop DT, Ford D et al (1993) Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 52:678–701
Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689
Narod S, Ford D, Devilee P et al (1995) Genetic heterogeneity of breast-ovarian cancer revisited. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 57:957–958
Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases (2000) Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer 83:1301–1308
Bonadona V, Sinilnikova OM, Chopin S et al (2005) Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations to the incidence of breast cancer in young women: results from a prospective population-based study in France. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 43:404–413
Hopper JL, Southey MC, Dite GS et al (1999) Population-based estimate of the average age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for a defined set of protein-truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Australian Breast Cancer Family Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:741–747
Loman N, Bladstrom A, Johannsson O et al (2003) Cancer incidence in relatives of a population-based set of cases of early-onset breast cancer with a known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status. Breast Cancer Res 5:R175–R186
Peto J, Collins N, Barfoot R et al (1999) Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:943–949
Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DE et al (2006) Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1694–1706
Thorlacius S, Struewing JP, Hartge P et al (1998) Population-based study of risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA2 mutation. Lancet 352:1337–1339
Nkondjock A, Robidoux A, Paredes Y et al (2006) Diet, lifestyle and BRCA-related breast cancer risk among French-Canadians. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:285–294
Berrino F, Pasanisi P, Berrino J et al (2002) A European case-only study on familial breast cancer. IARC Sci Publ 156:63–65
Pasanisi P, Berrino J, Fusconi E et al (2005) A European Case-Only Study (COS) on familial breast cancer. J Nutr 135:3040S–3041S
Pasanisi P, Hedelin G, Berrino J et al (2009) Oral contraceptive use and BRCA penetrance: a case-only study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:2107–2113
Hoppe C, Udam TR, Lauritzen L et al (2004) Animal protein intake, serum insulin-like growth factor I, and growth in healthy 2.5-year-old Danish children. Am J Clin Nutr 80:447–452
Hoppe C, Molgaard C, Vaag A et al (2005) High intakes of milk, but not meat, increase s-insulin and insulin resistance in 8-year-old boys. Eur J Clin Nutr 59:393–398
Norat T, Dossus L, Rinaldi S et al (2007) Diet, serum insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF-binding protein-3 in European women. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:91–98
Holmes MD, Pollak MN, Willett WC et al (2002) Dietary correlates of plasma insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 concentrations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:852–861
Maor S, Papa MZ, Yarden RI et al (2007) Insulin-like growth factor-I controls BRCA1 gene expression through activation of transcription factor Sp1. Horm Metab Res 39:179–185
Maor S, Yosepovich A, Papa MZ et al (2007) Elevated insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) levels in primary breast tumors associated with BRCA1 mutation. Cancer Lett 257:236–243
Hudelist G, Wagner T, Rosner M et al (2007) Intratumoral IGF-I protein expression is selectively upregulated in breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. Endocr Relat Cancer 14:1053–1062
Berry DA, Parmigiani G, Sanchez J et al (1997) Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:227–238
Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 62:145–158
Capocaccia R, Verdecchia A, Micheli A et al (1990) Breast cancer incidence and prevalence estimated from survival and mortality. Cancer Causes Control 1:23–29
Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130
Chang-Claude J, Becher H, Eby N et al (1997) Modifying effect of reproductive risk factors on the age at onset of breast cancer for German BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 123:272–279
Narod SA, Goldgar D, Cannon-Albright L et al (1995) Risk modifiers in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. Int J Cancer 64:394–398
Narod SA (2006) Modifiers of risk of hereditary breast cancer. Oncogene 25:5832–5836
De Angelis G, De Angelis R, Frova L et al (1994) MIAMOD: a computer package to estimate chronic disease morbidity using mortality and survival data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 44:99–107
Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Egidi V et al (1989) A method for the estimation of chronic disease morbidity and trends from mortality data. Stat Med 8:201–216
Roudgari H, Miedzybrodzka ZH, Haites NE (2008) Probability estimation models for prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: COS compares favourably with other models. Fam Cancer 7:199–212
Decensi A, Gandini S, Serrano D et al (2007) Randomized dose-ranging trial of tamoxifen at low doses in hormone replacement therapy users. J Clin Oncol 25:4201–4209
Jernstrom H, Sandberg T, Bageman E et al (2005) Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) genotype predicts breast volume after pregnancy and hormonal contraception and is associated with circulating IGF-1 levels: implications for risk of early-onset breast cancer in young women from hereditary breast cancer families. Br J Cancer 92:857–866
Phelan CM, Rebbeck TR, Weber BL et al (1996) Ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers is modified by the HRAS1 variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) locus. Nat Genet 12:309–311
Rebbeck TR, Kantoff PW, Krithivas K et al (1999) Modification of BRCA1-associated breast cancer risk by the polymorphic androgen-receptor CAG repeat. Am J Hum Genet 64:1371–1377
Runnebaum IB, Wang-Gohrke S, Vesprini D et al (2001) Progesterone receptor variant increases ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who were never exposed to oral contraceptives. Pharmacogenetics 11:635–638
Pasanisi P, Venturelli E, Morelli D et al (2008) Serum insulin-like growth factor-I and platelet-derived growth factor as biomarkers of breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:1719–1722
Kurek R, Tunn UW, Eckart O et al (2000) The significance of serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int 85:125–129
Muller J, Juul A, Andersson AM et al (2000) Hormonal changes during GnRH analogue therapy in children with central precocious puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 13(Suppl 1):739–1746
Chen S, Iversen ES, Friebel T et al (2006) Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample. J Clin Oncol 24:863–871
Jatoi I, Anderson WF (2008) Management of women who have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 88:845–861
Roukos DH, Briasoulis E (2007) Individualized preventive and therapeutic management of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:578–590
Gronwald J, Tung N, Foulkes WD et al (2006) Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: an update. Int J Cancer 118:2281–2284
Reding KW, Bernstein JL, Langholz BM et al (2010) Adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers in a population-based study of risk of contralateral breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 23:491–498
Kotsopoulos J, Narod SA (2005) Towards a dietary prevention of hereditary breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 16:125–138
Nkondjock A, Robidoux A, Paredes Y et al (2006) Diet, lifestyle and BRCA-related breast cancer risk among French-Canadians. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:2852–2894
King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302:643–646
Berrino F, Villarini A, De Petris M et al (2006) Adjuvant diet to improve hormonal and metabolic factors affecting breast cancer prognosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1089:110–118
Fontana L, Klein S, Holloszy JO (2006) Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 84:1456–1462
Irwin ML, Varma K, Alvarez-Reeves M et al (2009) Randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise on insulin and insulin-like growth factors in breast cancer survivors: the Yale Exercise and Survivorship study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:306–313
Berrino F, Bellati C, Secreto G et al (2001) Reducing bioavailable sex hormones through a comprehensive change in diet: the diet and androgens (DIANA) randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:25–33
Berrino F, Pasanisi P, Bellati C et al (2005) Serum testosterone levels and breast cancer recurrence. Int J Cancer 113:499–502
Kaaks R, Bellati C, Venturelli E et al (2003) Effects of dietary intervention on IGF-I and IGF-binding proteins, and related alterations in sex steroid metabolism: the Diet and Androgens (DIANA) Randomised Trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:1079–1088
Pasanisi P, Berrino F, De Petris M et al (2006) Metabolic syndrome as a prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrences. Int J Cancer 119:236–238
Acknowledgments
We thank Mrs. Maria Grazia Guerrini for the editorial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pasanisi, P., Bruno, E., Venturelli, E. et al. Serum levels of IGF-I and BRCA penetrance: a case control study in breast cancer families. Familial Cancer 10, 521–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9437-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9437-y