Abstract
Heat stress is a major productivity lowering factor in wheat. Wild progenitor species offer a wide spectrum of adaptation traits and can serve as valuable donors of stress tolerance. In the present study, genetic variation in 129 accessions of Aegilops tauschii Coss., the D genome donor of wheat, was evaluated for two heat tolerance related traits viz., cell membrane stability (CMS) and TTC (2,3,5-Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) based cell viability. Cell membrane stability in the Ae. tauschii accessions at vegetative stage ranged from 15.24 to 80.39%. Nineteen Ae. tauschii accessions were superior to the tolerant bread wheat control (C 273). At anthesis stage a similar spectrum of variation was observed with twenty three accessions showing higher cell membrane stability than C 273. The average CMS level of entire germplasm set at anthesis (47.61%) was lower than at vegetative stage (58.89%). Clear genotypic differences were also observed for TTC based cell viability test. Ae. tauschii accessions displayed a range from 18.73 to 84.39% with eight genotypes excelling over tolerant bread wheat. Correlation of CMS values recorded at two stages was significant but of low predictive value (r2 = 0.137). Similarly significant but moderate correlation was obtained between CMS and TTC test (r2 = 0.325). Consequently all the three parameters were used to derive a cell thermotolerance index which was in turn used to identify ten tolerant Ae. tauschii genotypes. The identified accessions were re- evaluated for 1 more year and the three parameters viz., CMS at vegetative (r2 = 0.954) and anthesis stage (r2 = 0.932) and TTC cell viability at vegetative stage (r2 = 0.888) showed high correlation Strategy for use of identified accessions as donors is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Wheat is a cool season crop, but its cultivation extends well beyond its typical adaptation zone. Globally, terminal heat stress is estimated to affect wheat productivity on millions of acres. In India alone, about 13.5 million ha of wheat crop (about half of the total acreage) is estimated to be heat stressed (Joshi et al. 2007). With the current trends of climate change, the heat stressed wheat production environments around the world are apprehended to increase about three fold by 2050 (Trethowan et al. 2005). The projected scenario challenges the sustenance of current productivity levels, and makes progressive increase in productivity to meet the future food requirements even harder. Adoption of heat stress tolerance as an important breeding objective has become imperative in wheat. Assessment of genetic variation for heat tolerance traits and identification of donor germplasm thus becomes an essential pre-requisite. Cultivated germplasm would be the preferred donor option, keeping in view ease of subsequent utilization. The wild germplasm, on the other hand, owing to its diverse ecogeographical distribution and adaptation to various stress prone environments, may throw up novel and hitherto untapped genetic variation. For instance, Aegilops geniculata accessions were found to possess relevant variation for improvement of heat and drought stress tolerance in wheat (Zaharieva et al. 2001). Skovmand et al. (2001) recommended the search for new variation in the progenitor gene pool represented by the wild diploid donors of the three wheat genomes for heat stress tolerance traits including leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, stem reserve mobilization. Similarly, Valkoun (2001) has emphasized gene introgression from Triticum boeoticum, Triticum urartu and Aegilops taushii for tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses as well as productivity.
Heat tolerance is a complex trait and yield reduction under stress provides a convenient and useful measure of tolerance. This strategy, however, is not effective for screening of wild and locally unadapted germplasm (e.g., winter habit lines in environments suitable for spring wheat). Physiological and biochemical indices which have a bearing on tolerance serve as a useful alternative. While physiological and biochemical components of heat tolerance in wheat are yet to be fully delineated, useful physiological indices including canopy temperature depression (Blum et al. 1982; Reynolds et al. 2007) and stem reserve mobilization (Fokar et al. 1998; Blum 1998) have been shown to be associated with heat tolerance, though mainly in the context of cultivated germplasm. Carbon isotope discrimination also serves as a useful test of drought and heat tolerance (Reynolds et al. 2007) but may not be suitable for large number of samples. Cell membrane stability (CMS) and TTC (2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) based cell viability are used as indicators of heat tolerance mechanisms operating at cellular level. These two tests are rapid, provide flexibility in terms of stage of plant development and are amenable to use in breeding for heat tolerance. Unlike some other tests which require larger plots planted under commercial agronomic regimes, CMS and TTC can be easily applied to wild germplasm. The cellular membrane stability test estimates the amount of electrolyte leakage from heat stressed tissues in vitro using a simple conductometric technique. The TTC cell viability assay is based on the principles of tetrazolium salt reduction to formazan by dehydrogenase respiratory enzyme and thus indicates resilience of the mitochondrial component cell machinery when challenged with heat stress. (Chen et al. 1982; Porter et al. 1995; Fokar et al. 1998).
In the present study 129 accessions of Ae. tauschii Coss., the D genome donor of wheat were evaluated for cell membrane stability and TTC based cell viability. Ae. tauschii is regarded as a rich reservoir of genetic variation for improvement of bread wheat (Cox 1998). It has the greatest amplitude of genetic variation as well as the widest ecological adaptation among the three diploid progenitors of bread wheat (Zohary et al. 1969). Results pertaining to extent of variation observed for the two traits, and Ae. tauschii accessions identified as promising donors are presented.
Materials and methods
Plant material
A set of 129 Ae. tauschii accessions from the collection of about 250 being maintained at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana were selected for the study, primarily on basis of resistance to stripe and leaf rust and robust growth habit. The PAU Ae. tauschii collection incorporates materials sourced from University of Missouri and Kansas State University, USA; CIMMYT, Mexico; ICARDA, Syria and IPK Gaterslaben, Germany.
Raising of plants and field layout
The experiment was conducted in the Wheat Section of Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (30°54′ N and 75°48′ E) during 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 crop seasons. Ae. tauschii seeds germinated in small plastic cups were vernalized in growth chamber maintained at 4–6°C with 8 h light/16 h dark photoperiod for about 6 weeks. The vernalized seedlings were transplanted in field. The natural day length was supplemented with artificial lighting to ensure 14–15 h of light per day. The plots consisted of a single row of 1 m length. Three replications were sown in a randomized complete block design. The transplanting was made in last week of October. The maximum temperature for 1 week prior to sampling of leaf tissues at vegetative stage (27.0–30.6°C in 2007–2008 and 27.2–31.5°C in 2008–2009) and anthesis stage (27.2–34.0°C in 2007–2008 and 26.8–33.2°C in 2008–2009) was adequate for heat hardening. Three cultivated varieties representing tolerant (C 273), widely cultivated (PBW 343) and new promising (PBW 550) genotypes were included to serve as checks.
Screening for cell membrane stability (CMS)
Cell membrane stability was measured at both vegetative and anthesis stage corresponding to Zadoks growth stages GS30 and GS65 respectively (Zadoks et al. 1974). The assay was performed according to Sadalla et al. (1990a) with some minor modifications. Six leaves (7 cm long) per accession were excised, kept in stoppered glass vials and washed for 2–3 times with de-ionized water. The water was drained off but desiccation of samples was prevented by stoppering the vials. Samples were then kept for 1 h in water bath preheated to 49°C for administering the heat shock. After treatment, three replications (two leaves per vial) for each accession were made and 15 ml of de-ionized water was added to each vial making certain that cut ends of leaf samples were submerged. All vials were then placed for incubation at about 10°C for 24 h. After incubation samples were equilibrated for 1 h at room temperature and the conductivity (μ siemens) recorded using a digital conductivity meter (Model CON 510, Eutech Instruments, India). After the measurements were taken, vials were autoclaved for 15 min at 121°C/0.10 MPa and their conductance was measured again. CMS was expressed in percentage units as per Ibrahim and Quick (2001),
T1: conductivity reading after heat shock at 49°C, T2: conductivity reading after autoclaving.
Screening for TTC based cell viability
TTC based cell viability was measured at anthesis, corresponding to Zadoks growth stages GS65 (Zadoks et al. 1974). This test was performed with some minor modifications in method followed by Ibrahim and Quick (2001). Two sets of two leaves (3.5 cm long) per accession were excised, placed in a test tube containing 0.1 ml deionized water and washed for 2–3 times with de-ionized water. First set served as a control and was left at 25°C for 1 h. Second set of samples which served as treatment were kept for 1 h in water bath preheated at 49°C for administering the heat shock. After 25 and 49°C treatments, 8 ml of TTC solution (0.8% 2,3,5- triphenyl tetrazolium chloride in 0.05 M NaPO4 buffer, pH 7.4) was added in each test tube and vacuum infiltrated for 10 min. The tissue was incubated in TTC solution for 24 h at 25°C in the dark. After incubation, leaf samples were washed 2–3 times with de-ionized water and formazan was extracted with 3 ml of 95% ethanol for 24 h at 25°C in darkness. The amount of formazan dye produced by TTC reduction was determined spectrophotometrically at 530 nm. Cell viability, as a measure of thermotolerance, was determined as follows:
ODh: mean optical density for heat stressed sample (49°C for 1 h), ODc: mean optical density for control sample (25°C for 1 h).
Results and discussion
The screening of Ae. tauschii accessions revealed ample genetic variation for cellular membrane stability (Table 1). The CMS values at vegetative stage ranged from 15.24% (PAU acc. 14194) to 80.39% (PAU acc. 14202). This spectrum was wider than the CMS recorded for the bread wheat controls (Fig. 1), PBW 550 with a stability value of 36.90% showed sensitivity and C 273 represented the tolerant check at 64.80% CMS. Nineteen Ae. tauschii accessions were superior to the tolerant bread wheat control and eleven showed membrane stability lower than the sensitive control. A similar range of 12.27% (PAU acc. 14106) to 76.70% (PAU acc. 14588) was observed for CMS values at anthesis. C 273 again represented tolerant check (56.70% stability) and PBW 550 showing sensitivity with CMS of 30.60% (Fig. 2). Twenty three Ae. tauschii accessions were superior to best bread wheat, whereas seven Ae. tauschii accessions had CMS lower than sensitive control. The average CMS level at anthesis (47.61%) was, however, lower than the average of the germplasm set at vegetative stage (58.89%). There seems to be a decline in CMS with plant age, a trend also reported by Blum and Ebercon (1981) and Fokar et al. (1998). It is important to know the extent to which relative ranking of genotypes are conserved across the two developmental stages. The correlation (r) of CMS values across two stages for the entire set worked out to be 0.37 which is highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) but not of great predictive value (r2 = 0.137). A shift in tolerance pattern across the two stages is indicated and screening at one stage may not substitute for tests at the other stage. To qualify as thermostable in sub tropical and tropical environments, where stress prevails at vegetative as well as anthesis stages (Rane et al. 2007), a genotype may need to have high CMS at both stages.
The TTC based cell viability test conducted at vegetative stage also brought out clear genotypic differences (Table 1; Fig. 3). Cell viability values for set of accessions ranged from 18.73% (PAU acc. 14606) to 83.40% (PAU acc. 9815). Among the bread wheat checks PBW 343 (75.21%) showed higher percentage cell viability and PBW 550 (38.40%) showed sensitivity. C 273 (65.31%) which was highly tolerant for CMS test at both stages behaved moderately tolerant for this test. Eight Ae. tauschii accessions showed cell viability superior to PBW 343, the tolerant bread wheat check. On the other end of the distribution, thirty four accessions had percent cell viability scores below the sensitive cultivated wheat (PBW 550). Distribution pattern of CMS and TTC cell viability scores of Ae. tauschii accessions differs for number of lines transgressing the bread wheat checks on either extreme. In case of TTC cell viability, a relatively smaller number of accessions surpassed the tolerant bread wheat check and a larger group formed beyond the sensitive check. It might have thus been difficult to identify useful variation from a smaller set of Ae. tauschii accessions.
A significant correlation of r = 0.57 (P ≤ 0.0000001) was obtained between CMS (vegetative) and TTC test (also conducted at vegetative stage). This is revealing in the sense that two different tests but carried out at one stage show a greater degree of association (r2 = 0.325) than the same assay (CMS) conducted at the two stages (r2 = 0.137). The association of TTC test at vegetative stage with CMS at anthesis is also positive and significant (r2 = 0.221). Positive correlation between CMS and TTC tests have been reported by majority of the studies. Strong positive correlations were observed by Chen et al. (1982) on a set of dicotyledonous crops. In wheat, Sadalla et al. (1990b), Reynolds et al. (1994), Fokar et al. (1998) and Dhanda and Munjal (2006) obtained positive correlations between CMS and TTC tests. Positive correlations among the three tests conducted independently reflect an interlinked biological response to heat stress. The overlap however is not complete warranting the use of all three observations for selection of thermotolerant genotypes. A simple average of the three observations (CMS at two stages and TTC based cell viability) for each accession was worked out to give a composite cell thermotolerance index (CTI) which showed distribution of accessions beyond the bread wheat checks on either side (Fig. 4). On the basis of CTI, ten Ae. tauschii genotypes were identified. CMS and TTC cell viability values of these accessions were confirmed for one more season (2008–2009) and are listed in Table 2. Thermotolerance was well correlated across 2 years among the ten accessions and three checks. High coefficient of determination between 2 years for CMS (r2 = 0.954) and TTC (r2 = 0.888) at vegetative stage and CMS at anthesis stage (r2 = 0.932) showed the genetic component of variation to be strong. Further information on the ten identified accessions along with CTI averaged over 2 years is given in Table 3. Nine of ten accessions identified for high CTI belong to subspecies strangulata while one belonged to Ae. tauschii subsp. tauschii (Table 3). Subspecies tauschii is characterized by elongated cylindrical spikelets while strangulata has more quadrate spikelets, equally long as wide (Van Slageren 1994), besides a more robust plant type. Two of tolerant genotypes originated in Israel, two in Iran, one each in Turkminestan, Azerbaizjan and Afghanistan while three have an unknown geographic area of origin (Table 3).
The wheat checks were deliberately chosen to represent the wide range of variation in cultivated wheats. C 273 is a traditional, tall cultivar (now obsolete), which is known for adaptation to hot, dry environments and is regarded as a donor of drought and heat tolerance traits. In our studies (unpublished) C 273 represents the tolerant extreme for cell membrane stability among cultivated germplasm, making it a useful benchmark. Any variation beyond C 273 provides rationale for embarking on wide hybridization based transfer. PBW 343 (Attila), a cultivar developed at CIMMYT, Mexico is derived from Veery group of wheats which in turn emerged from a winter wheat × spring wheat hybridization programme. In the irrigated, subtropical wheat zone of India, PBW 343 is the most widely grown cultivar covering about 7 million hectares. Its excellent adaptation is attributed to high stomatal conductance leading to cooler canopy, besides a stay green habit. For the two heat tolerance related traits discussed in this paper, it shows medium to high scores. PBW 550 is a recently released cultivar which is known for heat avoidance rather than tolerance on account of its early maturity. PBW 343 and PBW 550 are thus suitable recipients for improved CMS and TTC cell viability traits from Ae. tauschii. The transfer programme has been initiated using a diploid × hexaploid cross approach (Gill and Raupp 1987; Sehgal 2005). The D genome of cultivated wheats has a narrow genetic base owing to the evolutionary bottleneck that marks the advent of hexaploid wheat. For instance 326 bp DNA sequence at Gss locus showed Ae. tauschii to be 30 times more diverse than Triticum aestivum (Caldwell et al. 2004). Reports of direct use of Ae. tauschii germplasm for heat tolerance in wheat are not available. However evidence for high temperature stress tolerance in synthetic hexaploid wheats has been reported by Yang et al. (2002) and the use of synthetic hexaploids for improving environmental stress tolerance in wheat has been shown to hold great potential (Trethowan and Mujeeb-Kazi 2008).
Wheat breeding for heat tolerance based on selection for yield in stress environments has been shown to be effective (Joshi et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2007). This simple strategy however, may not be effective for screening of wild species germplasm which carries potential donors of heat tolerance related traits. The association of the two cellular thermotolerance tests with field performance under stress is not addressed by this study, primarily due to the fact that this wild, winter habit species does not lend itself to a meaningful yield trial, particularly in our environment. The relationship of variation in CMS with heat tolerance has been indicated by studies in several crops including soybean (Martineau et al. 1979), sorghum (Sullivan and Ross 1979), potato and tomato (Chen et al. 1982), cowpea (Ismail and Hall 1999) and cotton (Azhar et al. 2005). Similarly, TTC based cell viability assay has been implicated strongly as a heat tolerance component (Chen et al. 1982). In wheat Reynolds et al. (1994), Fokar et al. (1998), Ibrahim and Quick (2001) and Dhanda and Munjal (2006) demonstrated positive association of CMS and TTC with field performance. Work at our centre with a set of wheat cultivars, including the checks used in this study show association of these two parameters with field performance (Bala 2008)
Further, yield reduction under stress is hard to assess in the segregating phase, making early generations selection almost impossible for heat tolerance per se. Transfer of component traits such as CMS and TTC based cell viability, from wild donors can be facilitated by rapid single plant assays on segregating materials and along with selection for other component traits may raise the heat tolerance levels beyond those presently available in wheat.
References
Azhar MT, Khan AA, Khan IA (2005) Combining ability analysis of heat tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L. Czech. J Genet Plant Breed 41:23–28
Bala S (2008) Studies on carbon and nitrogen metabolism in relation to sink strength under high temperature stress in wheat. M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Blum A (1998) Improving wheat grain filling under heat stress by stem reserve mobilization. Euphytica 100:77–83
Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell membrane stability as measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 21:43–47
Blum A, Mayer J, Gozlan G (1982) Infrared thermal sensing of plant canopies as a screening technique for dehydration avoidance in wheat. Field Crop Res 5:137–146
Caldwell KS, Dvorak J, Lagudah ES, Ahkunov E, Luo M, Molters P, Powell W (2004) Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their D genome diploid ancestor. Genetics 167:941–947
Chen HH, Shen ZY, Li PH (1982) Adaptability of crop plants to high temperature stress. Crop Sci 22:719–725
Cox TS (1998) Deepening the wheat gene pool. J Crop Prot 1:1–25
Dhanda SS, Munjal R (2006) Inheritance of cellular thermotolerance in bread wheat. Plant Breed 125:557–564
Fokar M, Nguyen HT, Blum A (1998) Heat tolerance in spring wheat, I. Genetic variability and heritability of cellular thermotolerance. Euphytica 104:1–8
Gill BS, Raupp WJ (1987) Direct genetic transfer from Aegilpos squarossa L. to hexaploid wheat. Crop Sci 27:445–450
Ibrahim AMH, Quick JS (2001) Heritability of heat tolerance in winter and spring wheat. Crop Sci 41:1401–1404
Ismail MA, Hall AE (1999) Reproductive-stage heat tolerance, leaf membrane stability and plant morphology in cowpea. Crop Sci 39:1762–1768
Joshi AK, Mishra B, Chatrath R, Ferrara GO, Ravi PS (2007) Wheat improvement in India, present status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Euphytica 157:431–446
Martineau JR, Williams JH, Specht JE (1979) Temperature tolerance in soybeans. II. Evaluation of segregating populations for membrane thermostability. Crop Sci 19:79–81
Porter DR, Nguyen HT, Burke JJ (1995) Genetic control of acquired high temperature tolerance in winter wheat. Euphytica 83:153–157
Rane J, Pannu RK, Sohu VS, Saini RS, Mishra B, Shoran J, Crossa J, Vagas M, Joshi AK (2007) Performance of yield and stability of advanced wheat genotypes under heat stress environments of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Crop Sci 47:1561–1573
Reynolds MP, Balota M, Delgado MIB, Amani I, Fischer RA (1994) Physiological and morphological traits associated with spring wheat yield under hot irrigated conditions. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:717–730
Reynolds MP, Saint Poerre C, Saad ASI, Vargas M, Condon AG (2007) Evaluating potential gains in wheat associated with stress adaptive trait expression in elite genetic resources under drought and heat stress. Crop Sci 47:172–189
Sadalla MM, Shanahan JF, Quick JS (1990a) Heat tolerance in winter wheat. I. Hardening and genetic effects on membrane thermostability. Crop Sci 30:1243–1247
Sadalla MM, Quick JS, Shanahan JF (1990b) Heat tolerance in winter wheat. II. Membrane thermostability and field performance. Crop Sci 30:1248–1251
Sehgal S (2005) Studies on incorporation of Karnal Bunt resistance and productivity traits from Aegilops tauschii Coss. into wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PhD Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Sharma R, Joshi AK, Trethowan R (2007) High yielding spring wheat germplasm for global irrigated and rainfed production systems. Euphytica 157:351–363
Skovmand B, Reynolds MP, Delacy IH (2001) Mining wheat germplasm collections for yield enhancing traits. Euphytica 119:26–32
Sullivan CY, Ross WM (1979) Selecting for drought and heat resistance in grain sorghum. In: Mussell H, Staples RC (eds) Stress physiology in crop plants. Wiley, New York, pp 263–281
Trethowan RM, Mujeeb-Kazi A (2008) Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Sci 48:1255–1265
Trethowan RM, Hodson D, Braun HJ, Pfeiffer WH (2005) Wheat breeding environments, 1988–2002. In: Dubin J, Lantican MA, Morris ML (eds) Impacts of international wheat breeding research in the developing world. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 4–11
Valkoun JJ (2001) Wheat prebreeding using wild progenitors. Euphytica 119:17–23
Van Slageren MW (1994) Wild wheats L, a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyuopyrun (Jaub. and Spach). Eig Wageningen Agricultural University and ICARDA
Yang J, Sears RG, Gill BS, Paulsen GM (2002) Growth and senescence characteristics associated with tolerance of wheat-alien amphiploids to high temperature under controlled conditions. Euphytica 126:185–193
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421
Zaharieva M, Gaulin E, Havaux M, Acevedo E, Monneveux P (2001) Drought and heat responses in the wild wheat relative Aegilops geniculata Roth. potential interest for wheat improvement. Crop Sci 41:1321–1329
Zohary D, Harlan JR, Vardi A (1969) The wild diploid progenitors of wheat and their breeding value. Euphytica 18:58–65
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support provided for this study by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Project No. BT/PR7851/AGR/2/376/2006). The sharing of Aegilops tauschii germplasm by IPK, Gatersleben, Germany, University of Missouri and WGRC, Kansas State University, USA is gratefully acknowledged. We are also thankful to Dr. H.S. Dhaliwal and Dr. Kuldeep Singh, School of Agricultural Biotechnology, PAU, Ludhiana for procuring and sharing this germplasm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S., Kaur, S., Sehgal, S. et al. Genotypic variation for cellular thermotolerance in Aegilops tauschii Coss., the D genome progenitor of wheat. Euphytica 175, 373–381 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0185-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0185-0