Abstract
The tendency towards an increasing integration of the informational web into our daily physical world (in particular in so-called Ambient Intelligent technologies which combine ideas derived from the field of Ubiquitous Computing, Intelligent User Interfaces and Ubiquitous Communication) is likely to make the development of successful profiling and personalization algorithms, like the ones currently used by internet companies such as Amazon, even more important than it is today. I argue that the way in which we experience ourselves necessarily goes through a moment of technical mediation. Because of this algorithmic profiling that thrives on continuous reconfiguration of identification should not be understood as a supplementary process which maps a pre-established identity that exists independently from the profiling practice. In order to clarify how the experience of one’s identity can become affected by such machine-profiling a theoretical exploration of identity is made (including Agamben’s understanding of an apparatus, Ricoeur’s distinction between idem- and ipse-identity, and Stiegler’s notion of a conjunctive–disjunctive relationship towards retentional apparatuses). Although it is clear that no specific predictions about the impact of Ambient Intelligent technologies can be made without taking more particulars into account, the theoretical concepts are used to describe three general scenarios about the way wherein the experience of identity might become affected. To conclude, I argue that the experience of one’s identity may affect whether the cases of unwarranted discrimination resulting from ubiquitous differentiations and identifications within an Ambient Intelligent environment, will become a matter of societal concern.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agamben, G. (2009). What is an Apparatus? In W. Hamacher (Ed.) “What is an Apparatus?”, and other Essays (pp. 1–24). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agre, P. E., & Rotenberg, M. (2001). Technology and privacy: The new landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Alag, S. (2009). Collective intelligence in action. Greenwich: Manning.
Anolli, L. (2002). MaCHT: Miscommunication as CHance theory: Toward a unitary theory of communication and miscommunication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 3–42). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Ayres, I. (2007). Super crunchers. How anything can be predicted. London: John Murray.
Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul: The foundation of universalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Barnet, B. A. (2009). Idiomedia: The rise of personalized, aggregated content. Continuum: The Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(1), 93–99.
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bieliková, M., & Krajcovic, T. (2001). Ambient intelligence within a home environment [Electronic Version]. ERCIM News, 47. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/bielikova.html.
Brey, P. (2005). Freedom and privacy in ambient intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3), 157–166.
Custers, B. H. M. (2004). The power of knowledge. Ethical, legal, and technological aspects of data mining and group profiling in epidemiology. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.
Deleuze, G. (1992). What is a dispositif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michel Foucault philosopher (pp. 159–168). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Deleuze, G. (2000). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1992). From “Shibboleth: For Paul Celan”. In D. Attridge (Ed.), Acts of literature (pp. 370–413). New York: Routledge.
Elmer, G. (2004). Profiling machines: Mapping the personal information economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Harlow: Longman.
Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure. The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1996). Sex, power and the politics of identity. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Interviews, 1961–84 (pp. 382–390). New York: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, M. (2000). Preface. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari, Anti-oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (2001). Entretien avec Michel Foucault (D. Trombadori, Paris, fin 1978). In D. Defert & F. Ewald (Eds.), Dits et Écrits II 1976–1988 (pp. 860–914). Paris: Gallimard.
Gandy, O. (2002). Data mining and surveillance in the post-9.11 environment. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of IAMCR. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/ogandy/IAMCRdatamining.pdf.
Gandy, O. (2008). Engaging rational discrimination. Paper presented at the “Ethics, technology and identity”-conference, TU Delft, 2008, June 18–20. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/ogandy/Delft.pdf.
Groebner, V., Kyburz, M., & Peck, J. (2007). Who are you? Identification, deception, and surveillance in early modern Europe. New York: Zone Books.
Hacking, I. (2004). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hekman, S. J. (2004). Private selves, public identities: Reconsidering identity politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hildebrandt, M. (2009). Where idem meets ipse: Conceptual analysis. In M. Hildebrandt, B.-J. Koops, & K. de Vries (Eds.), Where idem-identity meets ipse-identity. Conceptual explorations (pp. 12–17). Deliverable 7.14a of the “The Future of Identitity in the Information Society” (FIDIS)-project, available at: http://www.fidis.net.
Hildebrandt, M., & Gutwirth, S. (Eds.). (2008). Profiling the European citizen. New York: Springer. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives.
Horvitz, E. (2007). Machine learning, reasoning, and intelligence in daily life: Directions and challenges. Paper presented at the proceedings of artificial intelligence techniques for ambient intelligence. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.research.microsoft.com/~horvitz/AmbientAI_Keynote.pdf.
Iskold, A. (2008). Rethinking recommendation engines [elec- tronic version]. ReadWriteWeb weblog. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rethinking_recommendation_engines.php.
Keegan, S., O’Hare, G. M. P., & O’Grady, M. J. (2008). Easishop: Ambient intelligence assists everyday shopping. Information Sciences, 178(3), 588–611.
Krumm, J., & Horvitz, E. (2007). Predestination: Where do you want to go today? Predicting driver destinations could help target location-based services. IEEE Computer Magazine, 40(4), 105–107.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). London: Routledge.
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1), 76–80.
Maes, P. (2005). Attentive objects: Enriching people’s natural interaction with everyday objects. Interactions, 12(4), 45–48.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Roudledge and Regan Paul.
Mead, G. H. (1959). Mind, self and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, F. (2001). Wired and smart: From the Fridge to the Bathtub [Electronic Version]. ERCIM News, 47. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/millar.html.
Mozer, M. C. (2005). Lessons from an adaptive home. In D. Cook & S. K. Das (Eds.), Smart environments: Technologies, protocols, and applications (pp. 273–294). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Ricoeur, P. (1994). Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1998). Critique & conviction. Conversations with François Azouvi and Marc de Launey. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2008). L’interprétation de soi. Allocution prononcée à Heidelberg en janvier 1990. In Y. C. Zarka (Ed.), Paul Ricoeur. Interprétation et reconnaissance (pp. 139–147). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sawicki, J. (1994). Foucault, feminism and questions of identity. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (pp. 286–313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shardanand, U., & Maes, P. (1995). Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. Paper presented at the computer–human interaction conference 1995: Human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado.
Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Du mußt dein Leben ändern. Über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Steinbock, D. (2005). Data matching, data mining, and due process. Georgia Law Review, 40(1), 1–84.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1. The fault of epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2003). Our ailing educational institutions (trans: S. Herbrechter of Chap. 4 of Stiegler’s “La technique et le temps, vol. 3, le temps du cinema”, 2001) [Electronic Version]. Culture Machine, 5. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/258/243.
Stiegler, B. (2007a). Anamnesis and hypomnesis. Plato as the first thinker of the proletarianisation. Paper presented at the “thinking media aesthetics: The emergence of a research field”-conference, University of Oslo 2007, October 18–19. Available at: http://www.arsindustrialis.org.
Stiegler, B. (2007b). L’inquiétante étrangeté de la pensée et la métaphysique de Pénélope (Préface). In G. Simondon (Ed.), L’individuation psychique et collective (pp. I–XVI). Paris: Aubier.
Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and time, 2: Disorientation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2010). Desire and knowledge: The dead seize the living. Elements for an organology of the Libido. Available at: http://www.arsindustrialis.org.
Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taminaux, J. (2008). Idem et ipse. Remarques arendtiennes sur Soi-même comme un autre. In Y. C. Zarka (Ed.), Paul Ricoeur. Interprétation et reconnaissance (pp. 119–147). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Uchyigit, G., & Ma, M. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Personalization techniques and recommender systems. Singapore: World Scientific.
Van Bendegem, J. P. (2008). Neat algorithms in messy environments. In M. Hildebrandt & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Profiling and the identity of the European citizen (pp. 100–103). New York: Springer.
Van Doorn, M., Van Loenen, E., & De Vries, A. (2007). Performing in ambient narratives. Supporting everyday life performances with technology. The Drama Review, 51(4), 68–79.
Vanhala, J. (2001). A flood of intelligence—The living room project [Electronic Version]. ERCIM News, 47. Retrieved 2009, Nov 13, from http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/vanhala.html.
Weber, W., Rabaey, J. M., & Aarts, E. (Eds.). (2005). Ambient intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 66–75.
Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1998). The coming age of calm technology. In P. J. Denning & R. M. Metcalfe (Eds.), Beyond calculation: The next fifty years (pp. 75–85). New York: Copernicus-Springer.
Wright, D., Gutwirth, S., Friedewald, M., Vildjiounaite, E., & Punie, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Safeguards in a world of ambient intelligence. New York: Springer.
Yates, F. A. (2007). The art of memory. London: Pimlico.
Zarsky, T. Z. (2002–2003). “Mine your own business!”: Making the case for the implications of the data mining of personal information in the forum of public opinion. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 5, 1–56.
Acknowledgments
Parts of this text build on FIDIS deliverable 7.14a, especially on Chaps. 3 and 5 (forthcoming at http://www.fidis.net). I thank Sebastian Abrahamsson (Oxford University), Niels van Dijk (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Mireille Hildebrandt (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Bernhard Irrgang (Technische Universität Dresden), Jannis Kallinikos (London School of Economics), Bert-Jaap Koops (Universiteit van Tilburg), Arun Tripathi (Technische Universität Dresden), Jennifer Schofield (Oxford University) and the three anonymous reviewers for their salient comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vries, K. Identity, profiling algorithms and a world of ambient intelligence. Ethics Inf Technol 12, 71–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9215-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9215-9