Abstract
The paper analyzes the concept of sustainable development in the light of the different interpretations existing on the issue since its appearance and establishment as an ideal to lead humanity’s line of progress. Within these interpretations, a characteristic generation of diverse debates can be appreciated, arising from different perspectives, academic as well as ideological, aiming at describing, clarifying and determining their conceptual reach.
Based on these facts a model of categorization for these debates has developed, a model in which interpretations generated on the concept of sustainable development were catalogued into four realms: conceptual, contextual, academic and geopolitical.
The configuration of these four areas of debate, as well as the recognition of the diversity of interpretations existing on sustainable development, is a reflection of the intrinsic complexity of the phenomena, which affect the natural and social world, both at the local and global level. The analysis of this complexity is based on the subjectivity, which is inherent to the interpretation of these phenomena, with permanent reference to the cultural context from which the diverse discourses were structured.
This global perspective on the state-of-the-art controversy concerning the idea of sustainable development as an articulatory axis reveals the necessity of building epistemological models, which can give a new direction to scientific research. From these new models, based on the analysis of the holistic character of reality, the subjective and the objective must be integrated in the generation of knowledge, which contributes usefully to the unceasing reconstruction of our world-(view).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- WCED:
-
World Commission on Environment and Development
References
F.D. Ávila-Pires L.C. Mior V. Porto Agüilar S.R. DeMello Schlemper (2000) ArticleTitle‘The concept of sustainable development revisited’ Fundations on Science 5 261–268 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011327612400
P. Bifani (1999) Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible AIEPALA Madrid 593
A. Escobar (1995) Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World Princeton University Press New Jersey 290
G. Esteva (1992) ‘Development’ W. Sachs (Eds) The Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power Zed Books Ltd London & New York 6–25
Funtowicz, S.: (1997), ‘Problemas ambientales complejos y la ciencia post-normal’, in UNESCO Chair, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, ¿Sostenible? Tecnología, desarrollo sostenible, y desequilibrios, Barcelona, Icaria, Antrazyt collection 104, p. 199–216.
Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. (2000). La Ciencia Posnormal. Ciencia con la gente. Barcelona, Icaria-Antrazit, p. 109.
Galeano E. (1999), Las venas abiertas de América Latina, Madrid, Siglo XXI editores SA., p. 486.
Gallopín, G., Funtowicz, S., O’Connor, M. and Ravetz, J.: (2001), ‘Una ciencia para el siglo XXI: del contrato social al núcleo científico’, Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales 168, 47–201. http://www.unesco.org/issj/ricsl68/fulltextl68spa.pdf (09/06/2003).
Jiménez Herrero, L.M.: (2000), Desarrollo Sostenible. Transición hacia la coevolución global, Madrid, Ediciones, Pirámide, p. 293.
Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M.: (2001), The Epistemological Challenge of Modelling Sustainability: Risk Uncertainty and Ignorance, Paper prepared for FRONTIERS 1 Conferences, New Hall, Cambridge, UK. http://www.euroecolecon.org/frontiers/Frontiers1/F1Contributions/F1papers/119-paper.pdf (24/04/2003).
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W.: (1972), The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, New York, New American Library, p. 207.
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L. and Randers, J.: (1992), Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future, Post Mills, Vermont, Chelsea Green, p. 300.
Morin, E.: (2001a), La mente bien ordenada. Repensar la reforma. Reformar el pensamiento, Barcelona, Editorial Seix Barral, p. 182.
Morin, E.: (2001b), Introducción al pensamiento complejo, Barcelona, Editorial Gedisa, S.A., p. 167.
Morin E., Kern A.B. (1993). Tierra-Patria, Barcelona, Editorial Kairós, S.A., p. 232.
Naredo, J.M.: (1997), ‘Sobre el origen, el uso y el contenido del término sostenible’, in Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transporte y Medio Ambiente-Comité Habitat II España (ed.), La construcción de la Ciudad Sostenible: fundamentos, Madrid. http://habitat.aq.upm.es/cs/p2/a004.html (16/06/2003).
Tibán, L.: (2000), ‘El concepto de desarrollo sustentable y los pueblos indígenas’, Boletín ICCI “RIMAY”, Publicación mensual del Instituto Científico de Culturas Indígenas. Year 2, No. 18. http://icci.nativeweb.org/boletin/18/tiban.html (16/10/2002).
D. Wagman (2000) ArticleTitle‘Los límites de la sociedad de consumo’ Medi ambient. Tecnología i cultura 28 57–60
World Commission on Environment and Development: (1987), Our Common Future, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 400.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osorio, L.A.R., Lobato, M.O. & Castillo, X.Á.D. Debates on Sustainable Development: Towards a Holistic View of Reality. Environ Dev Sustain 7, 501–518 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-5539-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-5539-0