Abstract
The occurrence and characterization of marine debris on beaches bring opportunities to track back the anthropogenic activities around shorelines as well as aid in waste management and control. In this study, the three largest beaches in Thanh Hoa (Vietnam) were examined for plastic waste, including macroplastics (≥ 5 mm) on sandy beaches and microplastics (MPs) (< 5 mm) in surface water. Among 3803 items collected on the beaches, plastic waste accounted for more than 98%. The majority of the plastic wastes found on these beaches were derived from fishing boats and food preservation foam packaging. The FT-IR data indicated that the macroplastics comprised 77% polystyrene, 17% polypropylene, and 6% high-density polyethylene, while MPs discovered in surface water included other forms of plastics such as polyethylene- acrylate, styrene/butadiene rubber gasket, ethylene/propylene copolymer, and zein purified. FT-IR data demonstrated that MPs might also be originated from automobile tire wear, the air, and skincare products, besides being degraded from macroplastics. The highest abundance of MPs was 44.1 items/m3 at Hai Tien beach, while the lowest was 15.5 items/m3 at Sam Son beach. The results showed that fragment form was the most frequent MP shape, accounting for 61.4 ± 14.3% of total MPs. MPs with a diameter smaller than 500 μm accounted for 70.2 ± 7.6% of all MPs. According to our research, MPs were transformed, transported, and accumulated due to anthropogenic activities and environmental processes. This study provided a comprehensive knowledge of plastic waste, essential in devising long-term development strategies in these locations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Marine debris is described as abandoned artificial artifacts which may be found practically anywhere in the marine environment (Gall & Thompson, 2015; Ryan, 2015). Marine debris can even be found in archipelagos, the seafloor, and the polar zones (Enrichetti et al., 2020; Garcés-Ordóñez et al., 2020; Kaviarasan et al., 2020; Mulochau et al., 2020). The composition of marine debris is quite diverse, arising from items used in anthropogenic activities in which plastic waste accounts for about 70% of total marine debris (Vlachogianni et al., 2018; Zablotski & Kraak, 2019) or reaches up to 89% of the volume in the Wusta Governorate Wetland Nature Reserve in Oman (van Hoytema et al., 2020). Plastic waste (particularly microplastics (MPs)) has a negative impact on the environment, ecosystems, and marine organisms due to their poor biodegradability and capability to adsorb hazardous organic chemicals such as persistent organic pollutants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, organochlorine insecticides, heavy metals, and antibiotic compounds (Frias et al., 2010; Jiménez-Skrzypek et al., 2021). These pollutants can impair ecosystem function (Ahmad et al., 2020; D’Alessandro et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2015a, b; Renzi et al., 2018; Tien et al., 2020) and have an impact on human health via the food chain (Sigler, 2014; Smith et al., 2018).
Recent research has identified MPs in the earth’s polar ice layers (Ivar Do Sul et al., 2014; Joana et al., 2021; Kanhai et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2021) as well as in some of the most pristine ecosystems, such as glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau in China (Y. Zhang et al., 2021). MPs are found in a variety of environments, including drinking water, sediments, coastal estuaries, offshore oceans (Almaiman et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2020; Schröder et al., 2021; Suteja et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2017), and coral reefs (Huang et al., 2019; Nie et al., 2019). The MP emission sources depend on the climatic circumstances – meteorological, hydrology, and socioeconomic factors, namely, wastewater treatment facilities, home wastewater, landfill leakages, ocean currents, human activities at sea such as fishing, oil drilling, tourism, or coastal activities (Cole et al., 2011; Faruk Çullu et al., 2021; Freeman et al., 2020). For example, some studies indicated that the marine debris was formed deep inside the continent, originating in estuaries and from human activities in coastal towns (Binetti et al., 2020; Ertaş, 2021). The study by Rangel-Buitrago et al. (2021) agreed that, on some distant Colombian Caribbean Sea islands, plastic waste is generated by anthropogenic activities (Rangel-Buitrago et al., 2021). Beaches in French Polynesia are classified as “dirty,” and the majority of marine litter originates on the mainland, including 43% of waste from the mainland, 17% from tourism activities, 15% from inshore fishing activities, 8% from marine life, and 8% from large offshore vessels (Verlis & Wilson, 2020). On the other hand, Veerasingam et al. (2020) concluded that marine debris in the studied location is mostly determined by wind and flow variables with a density of 1.98 items/m2 (Veerasingam et al., 2020). An investigation in the Mediterranean Sea at a depth of 250–400 m reported a rubbish density of 4.63 items/100m2 in relation to the rise in marine litter from discarded fishing gear. Approximately half of the floating waste gathers on the river’s beaches, with the other half flowing towards the sea due to the Stokes drift (Korshenko et al., 2020).
According to the research above, the occurrence of plastics waste or MPs can be used to trace back to human activities on the continent or at sea, such as abandoned fishing gear thrown at sea, service operations on the shore, sports and entertainment activities, and drifting to surrounding locations. Plastic wastes will have distinct characteristics in each location and must be individually studied in order to develop strategies to avoid and decrease pollution causes.
When assessing anticipated inputs of unmanaged plastic garbage within 50 km of coasts, Vietnam is among the top five nations in the world for post-consumption plastics pouring into the oceans (Kerber & Kramm, 2022). Surprisingly, only a few studies have investigated plastic pollution along Vietnam’s shores (Duong et al., 2020; Tran Nguyen et al., 2020; Truong et al., 2020). As a result of the adverse effects of plastic pollution, a pilot study along Vietnam’s coast is required to serve both local and international interests. In this study, macroplastics in three sandy beaches in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam (i.e., Hai Hoa beach, Hai Tien beach, and Sam Son beach), were examined. The physical and chemical characteristics of macroplastics have been thoroughly investigated by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurements. Besides, the abundance, colors, sizes, and shapes of MPs in the surface water were studied. To illustrate the visible plastic pollution, we took representative photos (Fig. 1) at the three beaches.
Methodology
Sampling
Samples from three different sandy beaches along the coast of Thanh Hoa, Vietnam (i.e., Hai Hoa beach, Hai Tien beach, and Sam Son beach) were collected. Thanh Hoa is a province in the North Central Region, with geographical coordinates of 19°23′–20°30′ northern latitude and 104°23′–106°30′ eastern longitude. The total area accounts for 3.37% of the entire natural area of Vietnam. The sampling locations are shown in Fig. 2. These beaches exhibit distinct forms of human effect on the beach, detailedly described in the Supplementary (Section S1). Sampling locations were chosen to ensure consistency for future sample occasions related to monitoring plastic waste. Thanh Hoa province has particular environmental features that might affect the presence or concentration of plastics, such as fast tourism development, an important aquaculture area in northern (150 km south of Hanoi capital), and rapid urbanization. Three beaches in this study cover 102 km of Thanh Hoa coast, which makes the total sampling area about 20 km2. Besides, each beach also represents a distinct characteristic. For example, Hai Tien beach is the most well-known and populated location. In comparison to two other beaches, Hai Hoa beach remains comparatively pristine.
Collecting samples from sandy beaches
Regarding macroplastics, samples were obtained for the first time from March 24 to 29, 2020, when tourists were inactive. The second time period was chosen from July 15 to July 20, 2020, during a period of significant tourist activity. The sampling periods were also selected based on the precipitation of the sampling location. From 1995 to 2020, the average rainfall at Thanh Hoa province’s monitoring station in March and July was 43 mm and 200 mm, respectively (General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 2021). As a result, in Thanh Hoa province, March corresponds to the dry season and July to the wet season. Every day throughout the sample period, starting at 4h30 a.m. (before the cleaning operations begin; see Fig. 1), marine debris was collected on beaches. Depending on the topography and weather circumstances, 4–8 samples were taken on each beach. The sampling procedures used were in accordance with the Guidelines for Marine Debris Survey and Monitoring (Alkalay et al., 2007; Anthony & Ellik, 2009). Briefly, a 10-m coastline was drawn out and split into 2-m sections for sampling. Each 2-m section represents the area along each transect from the water’s edge to the back of the beach (Fig. 3). All waste kinds with dimensions (≥ 5 mm) were collected at each sample unit. Then, macroplastics were manually separated from the other types for further analysis (Lim et al., 2021).
Collecting microplastics from surface water
The MP samples were obtained using the net towing method (Ryan et al., 2009), with a horizontal tow net (50-cm diameter, 150-cm length, 80-μm Dolphin™ bucket, Wildco®) with an attached mechanical flow meter (General Oceanics® Model 2030R) to measure water volume sampled (Fig. 4). MP samples were gathered using a net, transferred to a 500-ml brown sandblasting bottle, kept at 4 °C, and then sent to the laboratory for further testing (Bujaczek et al., 2021; Driscoll et al., 2021).
Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC)
Quality control and assurance measures are implemented to avoid plastic contamination from sample collection and MP determination in the laboratory.
Samples were collected and passed through 5-mm and 1-mm stainless steel sieves. The sieved fraction was then transferred to a 1000-mL colored glass flask, rinsing the bottom of the beaker with distilled water to ensure that the microplastics were completely transferred to the beaker. Blanks are performed in parallel, using distilled water, similar to the process of transferring the sample from the mesh through the sieve to the glass flask.
In the laboratory, samples are processed in glass beakers, and aluminum foil is used to cover the mouth of the cup during processing. All laboratory instruments used for MP’s determination were glass and stainless steel. The blank is paralleled with the actual sample to control for contamination, if any, from the environment (Scopetani et al., 2019).
Analytical method
Microplastic pretreatment and density separation
After being transported to the laboratory, materials were filtered using stainless steel sieves with mesh sizes of 5 mm and 1 mm. The particles bigger than 5 mm were discarded, while the remaining particles on the 1-mm sieve were rinsed with distilled water, collected in a petri dish, and dried for 24 h at 50 °C (J. Masura et al., 2015; Pico et al., 2019).
All particles that passed through the 1-mm sieve were transferred to a 1000-ml beaker and evaporated in a 90 °C water bath. Allow the beaker to dry and cool to room temperature before adding 20 ml of 0.05 M Fe(II) solution (7.5 g FeSO4.7H2O was added to 500-mL distilled water containing 3-mL concentrated H2SO4 to make the solution) (Masura et al., 2015). To eliminate organic matter interference, 20 mL of 30% H2O2 was added to the beaker containing the water sample, the combination was vigorously vibrated, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 5 min to allow the breakdown reaction to take place. The mixture was then cooked for 30 min in a water bath at 75 °C. If the organic waste dissolved incompletely, add another 20 mL of 30% H2O2, and restart the procedure (Masura et al., 2015).
To enhance the density of the solution, add 6.0 g of NaCl salt per 20 ml of sample (Kapukotuwa et al., 2022; Masura et al., 2015). To thoroughly dissolve the salt, the mixture was boiled in a water bath at 75 °C. The whole thing was then poured into a density funnel. The funnel was allowed to settle overnight (or 12 h); clamping in the density funnel was used to visually verify if the solids had settled and separated; settled particles were eliminated. Collect the supernatant in a beaker, then rinse the sample in the density funnel, and transfer it to a glass flask. Transfer the solution to a Whatman vacuum filter and filter it through a 0.45-µm cellulose acetate membrane before rinsing the filter funnel with distilled water. Place the membrane filter in a Petri dish, and dry for 24 h at 50 °C (Duong et al., 2022; Kapukotuwa et al., 2022).
Classification of macroplastics
In general, marine debris is classified according to material properties (Anthony & Ellik, 2009), including plastics, metal, glass, paper, rubber, cloth, wood, and ceramics. In this study, macroplastics were classified as items, including food covers (e.g., candy, snacks, drinks, cups, others), plastic bags, styrofoam (e.g., sponge, food packaging foam, foam buoy, foam insulation, others), fishing gear (e.g., fishing nets, traps), and some other form.
Determine the abundance, shape, color, and size of microplastics
For MPs on the 1-mm sieve, the size of particles was determined by a ruler, while color and shape were determined by direct observation. MPs with a diameter of less than 1 mm, on the filter membrane, are observed with a Leica S9i stereo microscope with a magnification of 6.1 × -55x; MP items are counted, measured, and observed by image analysis stools (LAS-X images). The size of the MPs is divided into four classes as follows: 100–500 µm, 500–1000 µm, 1000–2000 µm, and 2000–5000 µm. MPs were categorized following the recommendation of UNEP (Peter et al., 2019). Briefly, the MP shape was classified into three types, including pellets, fragments (i.e., fragments, film, foam), and fibers. The color of microplastics is identified through some of the following basic colors: blue, yellow, red, purple, black, and white (Frias et al., 2018).
Chemical properties of plastic waste
MPs after the separation step (Sect. "Microplastic pretreatment and density separation") and macroplastics were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurements (Frias et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018; Napper et al., 2021). The obtained infrared spectrum was then compared with those available in the library to determine the type of plastics. In this study, an Agilent’s FTIR Carry 630 spectrometer and the universal library Agilent Polymer Handheld ATR Library were used.
Results and discussions
Properties of macroplastics at beaches
For better visualization, some photos of macroplastics in the region were presented (Fig. 5). Figure 5 shows that the source of macroplastics on these beaches was mainly anthropogenic activities.
As can be seen in Table 1, the largest component of macroplastics on beaches is foam (70.2 ± 18%, n = 35), which originates from foam containers that hold food from locals and visitors. Furthermore, the usage of foam in the making of fishing boats has been recognized as the primary source of foam waste on the province’s beaches (Fig. 1, Section S3). As reported, fishers frequently utilize styrofoam as buoyancy material for boats. These foams are mostly formed of polystyrene, which decomposes easily in the environment to produce a large number of pieces (Terzi et al., 2020).
In this study, the scan range was from 4000 to 650 cm−1 (Fig. 6). The polymer types of the MPs were selected from the Agilent Micro Lab FTIR software library, and the best quality result was chosen. If the hit quality reached lower than 70%, we matched the measured spectrum to the library’s and determined the polymer kinds based on the look and shape of the fragments (Yukioka et al., 2020).
The results show that 77% of macroplastics were polystyrene (PS), 17% were high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and only 6% were polypropylene (PP). These polymers are commonly employed in the production of daily items. PS, in particular, accounts for a significant portion of plastic waste since it is thermoplastic, hard, light, and insulating. PS was widely used in packaging, building materials, and maritime time but had limited recyclability. Rivers, rains, water treatment facilities, structural damage, boats, or direct discharge all contribute to the presence of PS resin in the maritime environment (Kwon et al., 2017). It is readily carried away by waves and wind due to its small weight. As a result, they are readily disseminated throughout the ecosystem. During beach cleanup, PS resin proved especially difficult to remove. More significantly, it has been seen to have an impact on many sorts of marine species that float-eat on the water’s surface, such as clogging the gastrointestinal tract or exposing the animal to hazardous compounds (Turner, 2020).
Microplastic characteristics
Abundance
Three MP samples were collected along the coast at each beach. The distance of two samples on the same beach is 1 km apart. There are nine water samples in total, numbered S1–S9. S1, S2, and S3 were collected at Hai Tien Beach; S4, S5, and S6 were collected at Sam Son Beach; S7, S8, and S9 were collected at Hai Hoa beach. The total number of MPs collected in this research was 4897 pieces, which were dispersed throughout all sample sites from S1 to S9. Table 2 shows the abundance and number of MP collected at sample sites on the beaches of Hai Tien, Sam Son, and Hai Hoa in Thanh Hoa province.
The MP abundance in the studied area varied from 15.5 to 44.1 (items/m3), with an average value was 30.1 (items/m3). S2 sample on the Hai Tien beach presented the largest value (i.e., 44.1 items/m3), whereas the minimum value was at S5 on Sam Son beach (i.e., 15.5 items/m3). The results indicated that despite a close distance from the Lach Hoi estuary, the MP abundance in Hai Tien and Hai Hoa beaches was higher than in Sam Son, where all wastewater from Thanh Hoa city was discharged. This result can be explained by MP properties such as small size, low density, and existence suspended in water. Besides, the abundance of MPs at a location in the aquatic environment depends on two main factors, including sources from estuaries (referred to as continental sources) such as wastewater from people living on the coast, fishing, processing, and preservation of aquatic products and exchange or dilution by cleaner water blocks on the sea (reducing MP density). Thus, for Sam Son beach, the wave dynamics are the strongest due to the lack of shielding in front of the beach. The small-grained (e.g., sediment components, MPs) are less likely to exist and are mostly swept away. In comparison, Hai Tien and Hai Hoa beaches are hidden in the bay area and Hon Me island cluster, respectively. The wave dynamics of these beaches are weak, creating conditions for the convergence of microplastics. Besides, Sam Son beach protrudes to the sea, so the water exchange with the deepwater area of the Gulf of Tonkin takes place better than the rest of the beaches, and the dilution of the content of microplastic particles occurs strong.
Currently, there is no national standard for MP monitoring worldwide. Some common sampling methods include net tow, injecting a defined volume through a filter, or injecting a defined volume through a sieve. Mesh size and sieve size were often different in published works. In this study, the data used for comparison were used with the same net-based method (i.e., net tow). Table 3 shows that the MP abundance in water at the beach of Thanh Hoa province ranges from 15.5–44.1 items/m3, much higher than that of the Bach Dang estuary, Vietnam, and other areas such as Bohai Sea, China; Scotland; Benoa Bay, Indonesia; Qatar; and Northern Gulf, Mexico. This demonstrated the degree of MP pollution generated by wastewater from human activities such as residence, operating restaurants, hotels, aquaculture, and fishing greatly damaged the shoreline, which requires attention for mitigating strategies.
Shape features
Many studies have been published to divide MPs into many categories: pellets, fragments, fibers, films, ropes and filaments, and foam. In this study, MPs were identified with three characteristic forms: pellets, fragments, and fibers (Figs. 7, 8). The shape characteristics of the MPs in this study are shown in Fig. 7. Fragments were the predominant shape in most of the studied locations accounting for 61.4 ± 14.3%, followed by filaments attributed for 27.9 ± 14.5%, and the lowest contribution is pellets which accounted for 10.6 ± 14.3% of the total found items. MPs composed a large part of fragments because they were derived from various types of sources such as plastic bags, food packaging, fishing gear, and means of transportation (Ma et al., 2021; Sivadas et al., 2022; Zablotski & Kraak, 2019). Prolonged under the sea weather, mechanical processes, and possibly waste incineration also increase plastic fragments. Fibrous MPs account for the second major after fragments because this type is mainly derived from fibers in the washing process of textiles (De Falco et al., 2019). It is also the most commonly ingested microplastic by marine organisms, posing a significant threat to marine life in the area (Rebelein et al., 2021).
S7, S8, and S9 belonging to Hai Hoa beach contained a large number of pellets MPs (i.e., 30.3 ± 10.3% of total MPs) larger than the other two areas (i.e., Hai Tien and Sam Son beaches). This difference can be explained for two reasons. Firstly, it was reported that MPs in the shape of pellets are present in many cleaning products, such as facial cleansers, shampoo, detergent, and skincare products (Fendall & Sewell, 2009). Secondly, it is related to the administration of household wastewater treatment systems. A poor wastewater treatment system will increase the number of microplastics in water (Franco et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2022). The actual survey (also included in this study) showed that, in Hai Tien and Sam Son beaches, domestic wastewater from households, hotels, and restaurants on the coast is collected into the sewer system for centralized treatment, while in Hai Hoa, these wastes are discharged directly to the beach. This is the reason why MPs present in Hai Hoa beach water are significantly higher than in Sam Son and Hai Tien.
Size features
Size features of MPs are shown in Fig. 9. Among collected samples at three beaches (i.e., Hai Tien, Sam Son, and Hai Hoa), MPs with small sizes in the range of 100–500 µm were the main proportion, accounting for 70.2 ± 7.6% of total particles; followed by MPs with sizes in the range of 500–1000 µm, accounting for 23.5 ± 4.4% of total items. The MPs with sizes ranging from 1000 to 2000 µm (or 4.9 ± 2.3% of total items). The size range of 2000–5000 µm is attributed to the smallest part (i.e., 1.4 ± 1.2% of the total number of items). With the predominant small-sized microplastic composition, the result implied that the microplastics originated mainly from domestic wastewater sources, including wastewater from clothes washing machines, wastewater from cleaning activities (additives of detergents, cosmetics, toothpaste), and activities of transportation (microplastics are formed by worn tires) (Yukioka et al., 2020).
Color features
MP colors were identified with seven colors, including blue, red, purple, yellow, white, and black. The result is presented in Fig. 10 and Table 4. A total of 4897 MPs items in water at three beaches (i.e., Hai Tien, Sam Son, and Hai Hoa) was found, in which white pieces were 1451 items, accounting for 29.6%; yellow pieces were 1431 items, accounting for 29.2%; black pieces were 992 items, accounting for 20.3%; blue pieces were 691 items, accounting for 14.1%; red pieces were 186 items, accounting for 3.8%; and purple pieces were 146 items, accounting for 3% (Fig. 7). Thus, the color of microplastics was ranked in order from highest to lowest as follows: white > yellow > black > blue > red > purple. Yellow, white, and black were the colors that account for a large percentage of microplastics in the study area. These are also commonly used colors in products that are likely to emit microplastics into the marine environment, such as synthetic fiber clothing, additives in shampoo, toothpaste, facial cleansers, cosmetics, and dust caused by worn tires during operation. Some items have been identified polymer type through FTIR method combined with spectrum library. The result is shown in Fig. 11. In addition to the polymers recognized in macroplastics analysis (i.e., PS, HDPE, PP), many other forms of plastics have been discovered. Data demonstrates that, in addition to being derived from the degradation of macroplastics, MPs may also be derived from automobile tire wear, the air, and skincare products (Fendall & Sewell, 2009; Han et al., 2020; Nachite et al., 2019; Uheida et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Yukioka et al., 2020).
Conclusions
The results showed that macroplastics (especially polystyrene) make up the main component, a persistent waste with low recyclability. MPs were present in the marine water at all sampling points of three beaches (i.e., Hai Tien, Sam Son, Hai Hoa) in Thanh Hoa province. The abundance of MPs was relatively high compared to published works in Vietnam as well as worldwide, which poses a severe threat to marine life in the aquatic environment. The abundance of MPs at beaches depends mainly on factors such as the source of discharge and topographical and hydrological factors of the beach area. The characteristics such as the shape, size, and color of microplastics show that the origin of MPs comes from wastes in the continent released by rivers through estuaries. Besides, other anthropogenic activities are also the main sources, such as domestic wastewater of people living on the coast, fishing, aquaculture, and seafood processing activities. In conclusion, this study provides comprehensive information and data as a reference for establishing long-term control and monitoring measures for MPs in this area.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Ahmad, M., Li, J.-L., Wang, P.-D., Hozzein, W. N., & Li, W.-J. (2020). Environmental perspectives of microplastic pollution in the aquatic environment: A review. Marine Life Science & Technology, 2(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-020-00056-w
Alkalay, R., Pasternak, G., & Zask, A. (2007). Clean-coast index-A new approach for beach cleanliness assessment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50(5–6), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.10.002
Almaiman, L., Aljomah, A., Bineid, M., Aljeldah, F. M., Aldawsari, F., Liebmann, B., et al. (2021). The occurrence and dietary intake related to the presence of microplastics in drinking water in Saudi Arabia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09132-9
Anthony, C., & Ellik, A. (2009). UNEP/IOC Guidelines on Survey and Monitoring of Marine Litter. UNEP.
Aytan, U., Valente, A., Senturk, Y., Usta, R., Esensoy Sahin, F. B., Mazlum, R. E., & Agirbas, E. (2016). First evaluation of neustonic microplastics in Black Sea waters. Marine Environmental Research, 119, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.05.009
Binetti, U., Silburn, B., Russell, J., van Hoytema, N., Meakins, B., Kohler, P., et al. (2020). First marine litter survey on beaches in Solomon Islands and Vanuatu, South Pacific: Using OSPAR protocol to inform the development of national action plans to tackle land-based solid waste pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161(PA), 111827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111827
Bujaczek, T., Kolter, S., Locky, D., & Ross, M. S. (2021). Characterization of microplastics and anthropogenic fibers in surface waters of the North Saskatchewan River, Alberta, Canada. Facets, 6(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0057
Castillo, A. B., Al-Maslamani, I., & Obbard, J. P. (2016). Prevalence of microplastics in the marine waters of Qatar. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 111(1–2), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.108
Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12), 2588–2597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025
D’Alessandro, M., Esposito, V., Porporato, E. M. D., Berto, D., Renzi, M., Giacobbe, S., et al. (2018). Relationships between plastic litter and chemical pollutants on benthic biodiversity. Environmental Pollution, 242(2018), 1546–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.002
De Falco, F., Di Pace, E., Cocca, M., & Avella, M. (2019). The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43023-x
Di Mauro, R., Kupchik, M. J., & Benfield, M. C. (2017). Abundant plankton-sized microplastic particles in shelf waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Pollution, 230, 798–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.030
Driscoll, S. C., Glassic, H. C., Guy, C. S., & Koel, T. M. (2021). Presence of microplastics in the food web of the largest high-elevation lake in North America. Water, 13(3), 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030264
Duong, T. N., Dinh, H. N., Kieu, L. T. C., Emilie, S., Bui, T. M. H., Le, D. C., Nguyen, H. T. & Duong, T. L. (2020). Evaluation of microplastic pollution in the surface water of Bach Dang estuary, Red River system, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Chemistry, 58(6E12), 140–146.
Duong, T. T., Le, P. T., Nguyen, T. N. H., Hoang, T. Q., Ngo, H. M., Doan, T. O., et al. (2022). Selection of a density separation solution to study microplastics in tropical riverine sediment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09664-0
Enrichetti, F., Dominguez-Carrió, C., Toma, M., Bavestrello, G., Canese, S., & Bo, M. (2020). Assessment and distribution of seafloor litter on the deep Ligurian continental shelf and shelf break (NW Mediterranean Sea). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 151(January), 110872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110872
Ertaş, A. (2021). Assessment of origin and abundance of beach litter in Homa Lagoon coast, West Mediterranean Sea of Turkey. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 249(October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107114
Faruk Çullu, A., Sönmez, V. Z., & Sivri, N. (2021). Microplastic contamination in surface waters of the Küçükçekmece Lagoon, Marmara Sea (Turkey): Sources and areal distribution. Environmental Pollution, 268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115801
Fendall, L. S., & Sewell, M. A. (2009). Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: Microplastics in facial cleansers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(8), 1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025
Franco, A. A., Arellano, J. M., Albendín, G., Rodríguez-Barroso, R., Quiroga, J. M., & Coello, M. D. (2021). Microplastic pollution in wastewater treatment plants in the city of Cádiz: Abundance, removal efficiency and presence in receiving water body. Science of the Total Environment, 776, 145795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145795
Freeman, S., Booth, A. M., Sabbah, I., Tiller, R., Dierking, J., Klun, K., et al. (2020). Between source and sea: The role of wastewater treatment in reducing marine microplastics. Journal of Environmental Management, 266(October 2019), 110642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110642
Frias, J. P. G. L., Sobral, P., & Ferreira, A. M. (2010). Organic pollutants in microplastics from two beaches of the Portuguese coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(11), 1988–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.030
Frias, J., Pagter, E., Nash, R., O’Connor, I., Carretero, O., Filgueiras, A., Viñas, L., Gago, J., Antunes, J., Bessa, F., & Sobral, P. (2018). Standardised protocol for monitoring microplastics in sediments.
Gall, S. C., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). The impact of debris on marine life. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 92(1–2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.041
Garcés-Ordóñez, O., Espinosa Díaz, L. F., Pereira Cardoso, R., & Costa Muniz, M. (2020). The impact of tourism on marine litter pollution on Santa Marta beaches, Colombian Caribbean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160(2), 111558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111558
Garcés-Ordóñez, O., Espinosa, L. F., Costa Muniz, M., Salles Pereira, L. B., & Meigikos dos Anjos, R. (2021). Abundance, distribution, and characteristics of microplastics in coastal surface waters of the Colombian Caribbean and Pacific. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13723-x
General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2021). Statistical year book of 2020. Retrieved October 5, 2022, from https://www.gso.gov.vn/en/homepage/
Han, M., Niu, X., Tang, M., Zhang, B. T., Wang, G., Yue, W., et al. (2020). Distribution of microplastics in surface water of the lower Yellow River near estuary. Science of the Total Environment, 707, 135601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135601
Huang, Y., Yan, M., Xu, K., Nie, H., Gong, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Distribution characteristics of microplastics in Zhubi Reef from South China Sea. Environmental Pollution, 255, 113133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113133
Ivar Do Sul, J. A., Costa, M. F., & Fillmann, G. (2014). Microplastics in the pelagic environment around oceanic islands of the western Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 225(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2004-z
Jiang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Yang, F., Chen, M., & Wang, J. (2020). Characterization of microplastics in the surface seawater of the South Yellow Sea as affected by season. Science of the Total Environment, 724, 138375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138375
Jiménez-Skrzypek, G., Hernández-Sánchez, C., Ortega-Zamora, C., González-Sálamo, J., González-Curbelo, M. Á., & Hernández-Borges, J. (2021). Microplastic-adsorbed organic contaminants: Analytical methods and occurrence. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116186
Joana, F., Filipa, B., Vanessa, O., Andrés, B., Paula, S., Claire M., W., et al. (2021). Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: using penguins as biological samplers. Science of the Total Environment, 147698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
Kang, J. H., Kwon, O. Y., Lee, K. W., Song, Y. K., & Shim, W. J. (2015a). Marine neustonic microplastics around the southeastern coast of Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 96(1–2), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.054
Kang, J. H., Kwon, O. Y., & Shim, W. J. (2015b). Potential threat of microplastics to zooplanktivores in the surface waters of the southern sea of Korea. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 69(3), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0210-3
Kanhai, L. D. K., Gårdfeldt, K., Lyashevska, O., Hassellöv, M., Thompson, R. C., & O’Connor, I. (2018). Microplastics in sub-surface waters of the Arctic Central Basin. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 130(October 2017), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.011
Kapukotuwa, R. W. M. G. K., Jayasena, N., Weerakoon, K. C., Abayasekara, C. L., & Rajakaruna, R. S. (2022). High levels of microplastics in commercial salt and industrial salterns in Sri Lanka. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113239
Kaviarasan, T., Naik, S., Sivadas, S. K., Dhineka, K., Sambandam, M., Sivyer, D., et al. (2020). Assessment of litter in the remote beaches of Lakshadweep Islands, Arabian Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161(PB), 111760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111760
Kerber, H., & Kramm, J. (2022). From laissez-faire to action? Exploring perceptions of plastic pollution and impetus for action. Insights from Phu Quoc Island. Marine Policy, 137(November 2021), 104924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104924
Kim, J.-S., Lee, H.-J., Kim, S.-K., & Kim, H.-J. (2018). Global pattern of microplastics (MPs) in commercial food-grade salts: Sea salt as an indicator of seawater MP pollution. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(21), 12819–12828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04180
Korshenko, E., Zhurbas, V., Osadchiev, A., & Belyakova, P. (2020). Fate of river-borne floating litter during the flooding event in the northeastern part of the Black Sea in October 2018. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160(October), 111678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111678
Kwon, B. G., Amamiya, K., Sato, H., Chung, S. Y., Kodera, Y., Kim, S. K., et al. (2017). Monitoring of styrene oligomers as indicators of polystyrene plastic pollution in the North-West Pacific Ocean. Chemosphere, 180, 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.060
Lim, D. T., Thi, N., Huong, L., Hue, N. T., & Quan, D. T. (2021). Preliminary assessment of marine debris pollution and coastal water quality on some beaches in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 21(3), 329–340.
Lorenz, C., Roscher, L., Meyer, M. S., Hildebrandt, L., Prume, J., Löder, M. G. J., et al. (2019). Spatial distribution of microplastics in sediments and surface waters of the southern North Sea. Environmental Pollution, 252, 1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.093
Ma, X., Zhou, Y., Yang, L., & Tong, J. (2021). A survey of marine coastal litters around zhoushan island, china and their impacts. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020183
Masura, J., Baker, J., Foster, G., & Arthur, C. (2015). Laboratory methods for the analysis of microplastics in the marine environment: Recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments. https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-604
Mishra, A. K., Singh, J., & Mishra, P. P. (2021). Microplastics in polar regions: An early warning to the World’s pristine ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 784, 147149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147149
Mulochau, T., Lelabousse, C., & Séré, M. (2020). Estimations of densities of marine litter on the fringing reefs of Mayotte (France – South Western Indian Ocean) - Impacts on coral communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160(June), 111643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111643
Nachite, D., Maziane, F., Anfuso, G., & Williams, A. T. (2019). Spatial and temporal variations of litter at the Mediterranean beaches of Morocco mainly due to beach users. Ocean and Coastal Management, 179(June), 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104846
Napper, I. E., Baroth, A., Barrett, A. C., Bhola, S., Chowdhury, G. W., Davies, B. F. R., et al. (2021). The abundance and characteristics of microplastics in surface water in the transboundary Ganges River. Environmental Pollution, 274, 116348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116348
Nie, H., Wang, J., Xu, K., Huang, Y., & Yan, M. (2019). Microplastic pollution in water and fish samples around Nanxun Reef in Nansha Islands, South China Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 696, 134022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134022
Peter, K., Alexander, T., & Francois, G. (2019). Guidelines for the monitoring and assessment of plastic litter in the ocean. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Retrieved 2022, from http://www.gesamp.org/publications/guidelines-for-the-monitoring-and-assessment-of-plastic-litter-in-the-ocean
Pico, Y., Alfarhan, A., & Barcelo, D. (2019). Nano- and microplastic analysis: Focus on their occurrence in freshwater ecosystems and remediation technologies. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.022. Elsevier B.V.
Rangel-Buitrago, N., Mendoza, A. V., Mantilla-Barbosa, E., Arroyo-Olarte, H., Arana, V. A., Trilleras, J., et al. (2021). Plastic pollution on the Colombian central Caribbean beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 162(November 2020), 111837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111837
Rebelein, A., Int-Veen, I., Kammann, U., & Scharsack, J. P. (2021). Microplastic fibers — Underestimated threat to aquatic organisms? Science of the Total Environment, 777, 146045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146045
Renzi, M., Blašković, A., Bernardi, G., & Russo, G. F. (2018). Plastic litter transfer from sediments towards marine trophic webs: A case study on holothurians. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 135(April), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.038
Russell, M., & Webster, L. (2021). Microplastics in sea surface waters around Scotland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 166, 112210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112210
Ryan, P. G. (2015). A brief history of marine litter research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01360
Ryan, P. G., Moore, C. J., Van Franeker, J. A., & Moloney, C. L. (2009). Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1999–2012. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0207
Schröder, K., Kossel, E., & Lenz, M. (2021). Microplastic abundance in beach sediments of the Kiel Fjord, Western Baltic Sea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (Thompson 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12220-x
Scopetani, C., Chelazzi, D., Cincinelli, A., & Esterhuizen-Londt, M. (2019). Assessment of microplastic pollution: Occurrence and characterisation in Vesijärvi lake and Pikku Vesijärvi pond, Finland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7843-z
Sigler, M. (2014). The effects of plastic pollution on aquatic wildlife: Current situations and future solutions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 225(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2184-6
Sivadas, S. K., Mishra, P., Kaviarasan, T., Sambandam, M., Dhineka, K., Murthy, M. V. R., et al. (2022). Litter and plastic monitoring in the Indian marine environment: A review of current research, policies, waste management, and a roadmap for multidisciplinary action. Marine Pollution Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113424. Elsevier Ltd.
Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2018). Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
Suteja, Y., Atmadipoera, A. S., Riani, E., Nurjaya, I. W., Nugroho, D., & Cordova, M. R. (2021). Spatial and temporal distribution of microplastic in surface water of tropical estuary: Case study in Benoa Bay, Bali, Indonesia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 163(January), 111979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.111979
Terzi, Y., Erüz, C., & Özşeker, K. (2020). Marine litter composition and sources on coasts of south-eastern Black Sea: A long-term case study. Waste Management, 105, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.032
Tien, C. J., Wang, Z. X., & Chen, C. S. (2020). Microplastics in water, sediment and fish from the Fengshan River system: Relationship to aquatic factors and accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by fish. Environmental Pollution, 265, 114962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114962
Tran Nguyen, Q. A., Nguyen, H. N. Y., Strady, E., Nguyen, Q. T., Trinh-Dang, M., & Vo, V. M. (2020). Characteristics of microplastics in shoreline sediments from a tropical and urbanized beach (Da Nang, Vietnam). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161(July), 111768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111768
Truong, H. D., Luu, V. D., Nguyen, D. T., Le, V. D., Le, T. K. L., Tran, D. Q., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Composition and distribution of microplastics in surface sediments of Tien Yen Bay, Quang Ninh, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Hydrometeorology, 719(11), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.36335/vnjhm.2020(719).14-25
Turner, A. (2020). Foamed polystyrene in the marine environment: Sources, additives, transport, behavior, and impacts. Environmental Science and Technology, 54(17), 10411–10420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03221
Uheida, A., Mejía, H. G., Abdel-Rehim, M., Hamd, W., & Dutta, J. (2021). Visible light photocatalytic degradation of polypropylene microplastics in a continuous water flow system. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 406(August 2020), 124299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124299
van Hoytema, N., Bullimore, R. D., Al Adhoobi, A. S., Al-Khanbashi, M. H., Whomersley, P., & Le Quesne, W. J. F. (2020). Fishing gear dominates marine litter in the Wetlands Reserve in Al Wusta Governorate, Oman. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 159(May), 111503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111503
Veerasingam, S., Al-Khayat, J. A., Aboobacker, V. M., Hamza, S., & Vethamony, P. (2020). Sources, spatial distribution and characteristics of marine litter along the west coast of Qatar. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 159(June), 111478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111478
Verlis, K. M., & Wilson, S. P. (2020). Paradise Trashed: Sources and solutions to marine litter in a small island developing state. Waste Management, 103, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.020
Vlachogianni, T., Fortibuoni, T., Ronchi, F., Zeri, C., Mazziotti, C., Tutman, P., et al. (2018). Marine litter on the beaches of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas: An assessment of their abundance, composition and sources. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 131(March), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.006
Wang, X., Bolan, N., Tsang, D. C. W., Sarkar, B., Bradney, L., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of microplastics aggregation in aquatic environment: Influence factors, analytical methods, and environmental implications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 402(July 2020), 123496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123496
Wu, X., Zhao, X., Chen, R., Liu, P., Liang, W., Wang, J., et al. (2022). Wastewater treatment plants act as essential sources of microplastic formation in aquatic environments: A critical review. Water Research, 221, 118825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118825
Yukioka, S., Tanaka, S., Nabetani, Y., Suzuki, Y., Ushijima, T., Fujii, S., et al. (2020). Occurrence and characteristics of microplastics in surface road dust in Kusatsu (Japan), Da Nang (Vietnam), and Kathmandu (Nepal). Environmental Pollution, 256, 113447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113447
Zablotski, Y., & Kraak, S. B. M. (2019). Marine litter on the Baltic seafloor collected by the international fish-trawl survey. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 141(October 2018), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.014
Zhang, W., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Mu, J., Wang, P., et al. (2017). Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Bohai Sea, China. Environmental Pollution, 231, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.058
Zhang, W., Zhang, S., Zhao, Q., Qu, L., Ma, D., & Wang, J. (2020). Spatio-temporal distribution of plastic and microplastic debris in the surface water of the Bohai Sea, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 158(July), 111343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111343
Zhang, Y., Gao, T., Kang, S., Allen, S., Luo, X., & Allen, D. (2021). Microplastics in glaciers of the Tibetan Plateau: Evidence for the long-range transport of microplastics. Science of the Total Environment, 758, 143634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143634
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology under the grand number VAST06.03/20-21, QTRU02.03/21-22, and CSCL10.03/22-22.
Nguyen Quang Bac was funded by Vingroup JSC and supported by the Master, PhD Scholarship Programme of Vingroup Innovation Foundation (VINIF), Institute of Big Data, code VINIF.2021.TS.101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dao Dinh Cham: conceptualization, methodology, project administration. Duong Thi Lim: formal analysis, validation, supervision. Nguyen Thi Huong Thuy: investigation, resources. Nguyen Thi Hue: data curation, resources. Nguyen Thi Lan Huong: funding acquisition, writing original draft. Nguyen Thi Huong Thuy: data curation, resources. Dang Tran Quan: data collection, analysis. Dao Ngoc Nhiem: investigation, resources, visualization. Pham Ngoc Chuc: data collection, analysis. Nguyen Thi Ha Chi: data curation, resources. Duong Cong Dien: data collection, methodology, software. Bui Thi Thu: data collection, analysis. Nguyen Quang Bac: visualization, writing – review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dao, C.D., Duong, L.T., Nguyen, T.H.T. et al. Plastic waste in sandy beaches and surface water in Thanh Hoa, Vietnam: abundance, characterization, and sources. Environ Monit Assess 195, 255 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10868-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10868-1