Introduction

Heavy metal contamination has become an increasing global environmental problem for the last decades. In recent years, determination of a variety of heavy metals in different environmental samples has been performed by many scientists all over the world due to their adverse health effects. It has been reported that excessive dietary accumulation of heavy metals may cause serious systemic health problems in the human body (Oliver 1997; Adabanija and Oladunjoye 2014; Yaman 2006). Lead and cadmium as analytes in this study are members of the most serious heavy metal family. These elements are common toxic metals in the environment. Human beings are exposed to these elements through many sources such as ambient air, drinking water, food, industrial materials, mining facilities, and consumer products (Zhai et al. 2015). Cd and Pb exposure cause a broad range of adverse health effects such as renal, hepatic, and reproductive disorders in humans and animals (Hong et al. 2004; Koyu et al. 2006; Rehm and Waalkes 1988). High amounts of Pb and Cd are still present in the environment and continue to cause health concerns (Ozen et al. 2003; Yaman et al. 2000, 2005, 2007a, b; Yaman 1999; Yaman and Gucer 1995; Er et al. 2013; Kaplan and Yaman 2009; Kaplan et al. 2011a, b; Kaya and Yaman 2008). Copper is known as an essential micronutrient at low concentrations, but it becomes toxic at higher concentrations (Upadhyay 2014). Common industrial sources of Cu are reported as municipal garbage, agricultural chemicals, construction sites, electrical equipment, and vehicles (Bertram et al. 2002; Kaplan et al. 2011a, b; Akkus et al. 2013). In literature, nickel is described as a potential essential trace element for plants and animals and identified as essential micronutrient for activation of urease in higher plants. Natural geological activities such as weathering, volcanoes, and some industrial processes such as mining, milling, melting, metallurgical processes, and the combustion of fossil fuels result in nickel emission into the environment. It was also reported that this element can be accumulated by plants and animals (Schaumlöffel 2012; Yaman and Bakirdere 2003). Manganese is known as one of the essential elements for humans and animals. This element is essential for many functions such as development of the skeletal system, energy metabolism, function of reproductive hormones, activation of certain enzymes, and antioxidant functions. In case of deficiency of this element, poor bone formation, birth defects, and increased susceptibility to seizures may occur (Eum et al. 2014; ATSDR 2008; Aschner and Aschner 2005; Papavasilious et al. 1979; Keen et al. 1999; Aschner 2000). In addition, neurotoxic effect of environmental exposure to manganese for children and infants was reported in literature (Molina-Villalba et al. 2015).

There are many studies in literature to figure out the effects of mining facilities on the contamination of the environment (Xu et al. 2015; Paoliello et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2006). Mining activities are undoubtedly one of the biggest sources for many toxic elements to the environment. Mining facilities may release various metals including lead and cadmium into the surrounding environment and cause contamination in air, ground/surface waters, plants, and soils. Different health problems appear among local residents, and these effects persist long after ceasing the mining activities (Varrica et al. 2014). Hence, studies related with the determination of contamination level caused by mining area are very important.

In the determination of elements of interest, different instruments such as ICP-MS (Candeias et al. 2015), ICP-OES (Beeram et al. 2012), GFAAS (Bakirdere et al. 2013), and flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS) (Waterlot et al. 2013) have been used in literature. All these instruments have some advantages over others. FAAS offering moderate sensitivity and high selectivity has attracted considerable interest as an alternative way to monitor and quantify many heavy metals in different food and environmental samples (Keskin et al. 2013; Bakirdere and Yaman 2008).

This study was conducted to assess metal contamination levels caused by a former lead mining area. In the determination of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn, FAAS was used under optimum conditions.

Experimental

Apparatus and reagents

In the determination of analytes, ATI UNICAM 929 Model FAAS equipped with hollow cathode lamps was used. Experimental conditions of FAAS instrument are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 FAAS parameters used in the determination of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn

All of the chemicals and reagents used in this study were in high purity grade. Double-distilled water was used in all standard preparations and dilutions. All of the containers were washed up with nitric acid and rinsed with double-distilled water before using. All glass beakers and containers were kept in 1.0 mol/L HNO3 to eliminate/reduce any possible contamination when not in use. In the preparation of working standard solutions, proper dilutions were performed by 1.0 mol/L nitric acid from the stock solutions of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn (1000 mg/L).

Sampling area

The sampling area known as “Derebacı Gallery” was one of the most important mining areas for lead and some other elements/minerals. The production of lead went on here for a long period of time. This gallery is located about 2 km south part of the Keban Town of Elazığ and extends eastward (Fig. 1, http://cografyaharita.com/turkiye_mulki_idare_haritalari2.html). Surface and underground water in this mining area flows to the Karakaya Dam Lake. Some of the minerals have been carried by water, accumulating at the entrance and inside part of the gallery and produced about 0.5-m sediments in depth.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the location of the sampling area Derebacı Gallery

Collection and digestion of samples

In order to perform the determination of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn, soil and sediment samples were collected from different distances to mining area. In addition, current sediment and contaminated soil samples from outside the drift were collected for analysis. Samples were taken from the surface and 25 cm deep to find out the rate of deposition with time. In the analysis, samples were dried at 105 °C. After the homogenization step, finely powdered and homogenized 0.40 g sample was taken and 2.0 mL of HNO3/H2O2 mixture (2/1) was added. Samples were slowly shaken and heated on a hot plate till dryness. After cooling the sample, 2.0 mL of 0.75 mol/L nitric acid was added to the beaker and sample was centrifuged to obtain a clear solution separated from the solid part. After the proper amount of dilution, solutions containing the analytes of interest were analyzed by FAAS system. Blank measurement was also performed using the same procedure in the digestion step.

Different plant samples were also collected around the mining gallery to find the contamination levels. For this purpose, fresh/dry bulrush and moss were selected due to the high abundance of these species in the mining area. In the digestion step, samples were washed with tap water and distilled water to remove any possible soil and dust remnants and then dried at 100 °C. Proper amounts of dried samples were taken and put into pyrex beakers, and 1.0 mL H2SO4 was added to each beaker to eliminate/minimize the volatilization losses during the ashing procedure. Samples were inserted in the ashing furnace and ashed at 500 °C for 5 h. Nitric acid (2.0 mL of 0.75 mol/L) was added to the white ash, and samples were filtered to obtain a clear solution. Blank sample was also prepared using the same procedure. Determination of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn in clear solution was performed by FAAS system.

Result and discussion

Mining activities have been going on in several parts of Turkey. Some of the mining activities were stopped, but heavy metal contamination continues. In this study, the effect of a closed lead mining gallery on the environment was tried to be figured out. In order to find the best digestion and measurement conditions, all of the system parameters including acid type(s) and ratio in the digestion procedure, flame type, and sample flow rate in the FAAS system were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, digested samples were sent to the FAAS system for quantitative measurement of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn in the soil, sediment, and plant samples. In order to figure out whether there was any matrix interference on the analyte signal, standard addition method was applied to one sediment and plant samples. It was observed that there was no change in the slopes of linear calibration plot and standard addition method; therefore, direct calibration plot was applied throughout this study.

Lead

Lead is one of the most dangerous heavy metals causing many health problems even at trace levels. Possible contamination of environmental samples with this element could affect living organisms. The risk of lead poisoning through the food chain is getting higher as the soil lead level rises. According to a study conducted by Farag et al., significantly higher blood lead concentrations in a subsample of participants with hematuria in mining sites near Potosi, Bolivia were found (Farag et al. 2015). Hence, studies regarding the determination of contamination levels of this element are very important in scientific area. Results found in this study are seen in Tables 2 and 3. As seen in these tables, the highest concentration of lead was found in current sediment and from soil outside the drift. There was no big difference observed in the results of samples taken from surface and the depth of 25 cm. Among the plant samples analyzed, fresh moss taken 15.0 m away from gallery entrance having some ore residue had the highest lead level, 1003 ± 96 mg/kg, while a relatively low concentration of lead was found in the same plant taken from the gallery entrance. This shows that deposition of lead 15 m away from the gallery is higher than other sampling points. Due to the ore residue in this sampling point, this contamination level could be considered as normal. In addition, lead levels in dry bulrush at the gallery entrance and 8.0 m away from the gallery were found to be higher than fresh bulrush taken from the same points.

Table 2 Concentration of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn in sediments in the sampling area (mg/kg ± standard deviation, n = 4)
Table 3 Concentration of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni, and Mn in the selected plants (mg/kg ± standard deviation in dry mass, n = 3)

Cadmium

Cadmium has also been emitted to the environment from different mining facilities. There are many studies in literature to assess the contamination levels caused by mining activities. In one of the studies, heavy metal contamination including cadmium was evaluated by Pascauld et al., and they observed that cadmium contamination is very high even at very long distances from mining waste (Pascaud et al. 2015). In our study, results given in Table 2 reveal the differences in the level of cadmium in the sediments taken from the surface and a depth of 25 cm. It is clear that Cd levels in the inner gallery are higher than that in the surface sediments. In fresh moss taken from 15.0 m away from the gallery entrance (contaminated with ore residue), cadmium concentration was found to be the highest when compared with plants taken from other sampling points.

Copper

High amounts of copper have been released into the environment by mining activities. Many scientists have indicated the effects of mining activities on copper contamination in different environmental samples. O’neill et al. studied contamination with different heavy metals in surface water and sediments near the Tynagh silver mine site, and they found out that Cu, Cd, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn concentrations in both water and sediment were above guideline values downstream of the site (O’Neill et al. 2015). The results given in Table 2 showed that the copper concentrations in sediment and soil samples ranged from 0.6 to 11.5 mg/kg. In three sampling points, copper concentrations in 25 cm deep were higher than surface samples. This might be an indication of reduction in copper emission by the gallery. The plant samples in the studied area recorded Cu concentrations that varied from 2.2 to 34.5 mg/kg.

Nickel

There are some literature findings about the effect of mining activities on environmental Ni contamination. Ngole and Ekosse studied on copper, nickel, and zinc contaminations in soils within the mining area and landfilling environments. They observed that contamination level of elements of interest in soils around the mining area was considerably higher than those around the landfill. In that study, Ni concentration in the mining area was found to be 153.0 mg/kg while the level was 0.91 mg/kg in the landfill (Ngole and Ekosse 2012). This study is a good indication to show the effects of mining on environmental contamination of nickel. In our study, nickel concentrations were found to be significantly higher in current surface and deep sediments than soil and sediments taken from other sampling points. Among the plants collected, the highest Ni concentration (33.2 mg/kg) was observed in the fresh moss taken 15.0 m from the gallery entrance while the dry bulrush taken 8.0 m from the gallery entrance had the lowest Ni level, 0.70 mg/kg.

Manganese

Manganese is another well-known metal released into the environment by mining facilities, and it should be studied in mining regions due to its potential accumulation both in the environment and living organisms. Wei et al. performed a novel study regarding molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with a Mn hyperaccumulator Phytolacca americana in Mn mining area (Wei et al. 2014). They found out high contamination mining environment with manganese. Molina-Villalba et al. reported the biomonitoring of arsenic, cadmium, lead, manganese, and mercury in urine and hair of children living near mining and industrial areas (Molina-Villalba et al. 2015). In our study, the mining area was found to be heavily contaminated with manganese (Tables 2 and 3). In every sampling point, Mn concentration was much higher than other elements determined. In current sediment taken from 25 cm deep, 15,000 mg/kg Mn was found while the level was 4900 mg/kg in current surface sediment. Similar findings were observed for plant samples. In each plant sample, Mn concentration was found to be much higher than others. In fresh moss, 1170 mg/kg Mn was detected. These results demonstrate high contamination level of mining region with Mn by mining gallery.

Conclusion

In this study, assessment of the metal contamination in sediment, soil, and plant samples taken from around the former lead mining gallery was performed. Results found show that the environment of the mining area is likely affected by leaching of metals. High concentrations of some metals were observed not only in sediment but also in plant samples collected around the mining gallery. Metals were released and deposited in the sediments and plant samples. Values of contamination level indicated that the metal pollution in the current surface sediment was on the order of Mn > Pb > Cd > Ni > Cu. High levels of lead, manganese, and some other metals in sediment and soil samples in mining area might lead to the potential contamination of different environmental samples including plants and water. It can be concluded that the population living near mining areas might have a variety of health concerns. Contamination within the precincts of the mining environment may be dramatically decreased by rehabilitation of the gallery region.