Abstract
The USA is entering an era of energy diversity, and increasing nuclear capacity and concerns focus on accidents, security, waste, and pollution. Physical buffers that separate outsiders from nuclear facilities often support important natural ecosystems but may contain contaminants. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses nuclear reactors; the applicant provides environmental assessments that serve as the basis for Environmental Impact Statements developed by NRC. We provide a template for the types of information needed for safe siting of nuclear facilities with buffers in three categories: ecological, fate and transport, and human health information that can be used for risk evaluations. Each item on the lists is an indicator for evaluation, and individual indicators can be selected for specific region. Ecological information needs include biodiversity (species, populations, communities) and structure and functioning of ecosystems, habitats, and landscapes, in addition to common, abundant, and unique species and endangered and rare ones. The key variables of fate and transport are sources of release for radionuclides and other chemicals, nature of releases (atmospheric vapors, subsurface liquids), features, and properties of environmental media (wind speed, direction and atmospheric stability, hydraulic gradient, hydraulic conductivity, groundwater chemistry). Human health aspects include receptor populations (demography, density, dispersion, and distance), potential pathways (drinking water sources, gardening, fishing), and exposure opportunities (lifestyle activities). For each of the three types of information needs, we expect that only a few of the indicators will be applicable to a particular site and that stakeholders should agree on a site-specific suite.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alm, A. L. (1981). Energy supply interruptions and national security. Science, 27, 1379–1385.
ASTM (2003). Standard guide for developing conceptual site models for contaminated sites, E 1689–95.
Barnthouse, L. W. (1994). Issues in ecological risk assessment: The CRAM perspective. Risk Analysis, 14, 251–256.
Bartell, S. M., Gardner, R. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (1992). Ecological risk estimation. Boca Raton: Lewis.
Bhargavan, M. (2008). Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation. Health Physics, 95, 612–627.
Bingham, G., Bishop, R., Brody, M., Bromley, D., Clark, E. E., Cooper, W., et al. (1995). Issues in ecosystems valuation: Improving information for decision making. Ecological Economics, 14, 73–90.
Burger, J. (2004). Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: Consistency despite demographic and geographical differences. Environmental Research, 95, 215–223.
Burger, J. (2007a). The effect on ecological systems of remediation to protect human health. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1572–1578.
Burger, J. (2007b). Protective sustainability of ecosystems using Department of Energy buffer lands as a case study. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 70, 1815–1823.
Burger, J. (2007c). A framework for analysis of contamination on human and ecological receptors at DOE hazardous waste site buffer lands. Remediation, 19, 71–96.
Burger, J., Leschine, T. M., Greenberg, M., Karr, J., Gochfeld, M., & Powers, C. W. (2003). Shifting priorities at the department of energy’s bomb factories: Protecting human and ecological health. Environmental Management, 31, 157–167.
Burger, J., Carletta, M. A., Lowrie, K., Miller, K. T., & Greenberg, M. (2004). Assessing ecological resources for remediation and future land uses on contaminated lands. Environmental Management, 34, 1–10.
Burger, J., Mayer, H., Greenberg, M., Powers, C. W., Volz, C. D., & Gochfeld, M. (2006). Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: The case of the Department of Energy’s Amchitka Island nuclear test site. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 69, 1217–1238.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Powers, C. W., & Greenberg, M. (2007a). Defining an ecological baseline for restoration and natural resource damage assessment of contaminated sites: The case of the Department of Energy. Environmental Management, 50, 553–566.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., & Powers, C. W. (2007b). Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: Natural resource damages and the Department of Energy. Journal of Environmental Management, 82, 189–199.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Powers, C. W., Kosson, D. S., Halverson, J., Siekaniec, G., et al. (2007c). Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: Continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska. Environmental Management, 85, 232–244.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Pletnikoff, K., Sniigaroff, R., Snigaroff, D., & Stamm, T. (2008). Eco-cultural attributes: Evaluating ecological degradation in terms of ecological goods and services vs subsistence and Tribal values. Risk Analysis, 28, 1261–1271.
Cairns, J. Jr. (Ed.) (1994). Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems. Boca Raton: CRC.
Cairns, J. Jr, & Niederlehner, B. R. (1996). Developing a field of landscape ecotoxicology. Ecological Applications, 6, 790–796.
Cairns, J. Jr., Niederlehner, B. R., & Orvos, D. R. (1992). Predicting ecosystem risk. Princeton: Princeton Scientific Publishing Company.
Cena, F. (1999). The farm and rural community as economic systems. In F. B. Golley & J. Gellot (Eds.), Rural planning from an environmental systems perspective (pp. 229–286). New York: Springer.
Chien, C., Inyang, H. I., & Lorne, C. E. (2006). Barrier systems for environmental contaminant containment and treatment. Boca Raton: CRC.
Clarke, J. H., MacDonell, M. M., Smith, E. D., Dunne, R. J., & Waugh, W. J. (2004). Engineered containment and control systems: Nurturing nature. Risk Analysis, 24, 771–779.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
Crowley, K. D., & Ahearne, J. F. (2002). Managing the environmental legacy of U.S. nuclear-weapons production. American Scientist, 9, 514–523.
Cury, P. M., Mullon, C., Garcia, S. M., & Shannon, L. J. (2005). Viable theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62, 577–584.
Dale, V. H., & Parr, P. D. (1998). Preserving DOE’s research parks. Issues in Science and Technology, 14, 73–77.
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. (1994). Decidedly different expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository. Risk Analysis, 6, 643–648.
Goldstein, B. D., Erdal, S., Burger, J., Faustman, E. M., Friedlander, B. R., Greenberg, M., et al. (2000). Stakeholder participation: Experience from the CRESP program. Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology, 2, 103–111.
Greenberg, M. R. (1987). Sampling strategies for finding contaminated land. Applied Geography, 7, 197–202.
Greenberg, M., Burger, J., Powers, C., Leschine, T., Lowrie, K., Friedlander, B., et al. (2002). Choosing remediation and waste management options at hazardous and radioactive waste sites. Remediation, 13, 39–58.
Greenberg, M., Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Kosson, D., Lowrie, K., Mayer, H., et al. (2005). End-state land uses, sustainably protective systems, and risk management: A challenge for remediation and multigenerational stewardship. Remediation, 17, 91–105.
Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Burger, J., Powers, C., Gochfeld, M., & Mayer, H. (2007). Preferences for alternative risk management policies at the united states major nuclear weapons legacy sites. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 187–209.
Hance, B. J., Chess, C., & Sandman, P. (1989). Improving dialogue with communities: A risk communication manual for government. Trenton: Division of Science and Research, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
Harris, S. G., & Harper, B. L. (2000). Using eco-cultural dependency webs in risk assessment and characterization of risks to tribal health and cultures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2, 91–100.
Hart, M. (1999). Guide to sustainable community indicators. North Andover: Hart.
Heitgerd, J. L., & Lee, C. V. (2003). A new look at neighborhoods near National Priorities List sites. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1117–1126.
Hunsaker, C. T., Graham, R. L., Suter, G. W. II, O’Neill, R. V., Barnthouse, L. W., & Gardner, R. H. (1990). Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 14, 325–332.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2004). The nuclear power industry’s aging workforce: Transfer of knowledge to the next generation. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-1399.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2006). Risk management of knowledge loss in nuclear industry organizations. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Kosson, D., & Powers, C. (2008). The U.S. nuclear waste issue—solved: Nuclear energy is a must. disposal is within our reach. Christian Science Monitor, November 12, 2009.
Kunreuther, H., Easterling, D., Desvouseges, W., & Slovic, P. (1990). Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis, 10, 469–484.
Leitao, A. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.
Leschine, T. L. (Ed.) (2007). Long-term management of contaminated sites. Research in Socia Problems and Public Policy, 13 1–268.
Mayer, H. J., Greenberg, M., Burger, J., Gochfield, M., Powers, C. W., Kosson, D., et al. (2005). Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions. Risk Analysis, 25, 429–446.
Mitchell, J. (1992). Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. Risk Analysis, 1, 19–26.
National Research Council (NRC) (1986). Ecological knowledge and environmental problem-solving. Washington: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Long-term institutional management of U.S. Department of Energy legacy waste sites. Washington: National Academy Press.
Nez Perce Tribe (2003). Treaties: Nez Perce perspectives. Richland: US DOE and Confluence Press.
Norton, B. G. (1995). Seeking common ground for environmental change. Forum Applied Research in Public Policy, 11, 100–102.
Nuclear News (2009). Nuclear policies: Polls show growing support for nuclear. March 2009, pp. 17.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (2008). Expected new nuclear power plant applications. (updated August 18, 2008) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/new-licensing-files/expected-new-rx-applications.pdf [accessed 14 February 2009].
PCCRARM (1997). Risk assessment and management in regulatory decision-making. Washington: Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, US Government Printing Office.
Sekercioglu, C. H., & Sodhi, N. S. (2007). Conservation biology: Predicting birds’ responses to forest fragmentation. Current Biology, 17, R838–R840.
Sheehan, P. J. (1984). Effects on community and ecosystem structure and dynamics. In P. J. Sheehan, D. R. Miller, G. C. Butler, & P. Bourdeau (Eds.), Effects of pollutants at the ecosystem level. Chichester: Wiley.
Sheffield, J. (1998). World population growth and the role of annual energy use per capita. Technological Forecast of Social Change, 59, 55–87.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perceptions of risk. Science, 235, 280–285.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675–682.
Slovic, P., Layman, M., & Flynn, J. (1991). Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment, 3, 7–11, 28–30.
Soderqvist, T., Eggert, H., Olsson, B., & Soutukorva, A. (2005). Economic valuation for sustainale development in the Swedish coastal zone. Ambio, 34, 169–175.
Stumpff, L. M. (2006). Reweaving earth: An indigenous perspective on restoration planning and the National Environmental Policy Act. Environmental Practitioner, 8, 93–103.
Suter, G. W. II. (2001). Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment. Ecological Indicators, 1, 101–112.
Tano, M. L., Reuben, J. H., Powaukee, D., & Lester, A. D. (1996). An Indian tribal view of the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle: Historical and cultural lessons. Radwaste, March, 44–47.
Trayham, B., Clarke, J. H., Burger, J., & Waugh, J. (2008). Monitoring the long-term performance of engineered containment systems: Mitigating ecological risks. In Proceedings of waste management 2008.
UN (United Nations) (2008). Report of the world commission on environment and development. General assembly resolution 42/187/ 11 December 1987. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42–187.htm (accessed 21 February 2008).
USDOE (1999). From cleanup to stewardship: A companion report to accelerating cleanup: Paths to closure. Washington: Office of Environmental Management (DOE/EM-0466).
USDOE (2000). Paths to closure: Status report 2000. Washington: Office of Environmental Management, DOE-EM-0526.
USDOE (2001). Long-term stewardship report to Congress. Prepared to fulfill a requirement in the FY 2000 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Washington: DOE.
Walter, A. E. (2004). Feeding the nuclear pipeline: Enabling a global nuclear future. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1, 139–150.
Whalen, S. (1971). The Nez Perces’ relationship to their land. Indian Historian, 4, 30–33.
Whicker, F. W., Hinton, T. G., MacDonell, M. M., Pinder, J. E. III, & Habegger, L. J. (2004). Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites. Science, 303, 1615–1616.
Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2008). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29, 425–437.
Zender, L. S., Gilbreath, S., Sebalo, S., Leeman, W., & Erbeck, A. (2004). How much does tradition matter: Comparison of tribal versus non-tribal values in the context of waste site pollution. http://www.zender-engr.net (accessed 5 September 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burger, J., Clarke, J. & Gochfeld, M. Information needs for siting new, and evaluating current, nuclear facilities: ecology, fate and transport, and human health. Environ Monit Assess 172, 121–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1321-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1321-y