Abstract
The study illustrates the utility of STREAM II as a modeling package to determine the pollution load due to organic matter in the River Yamuna during its course through the National Capital Territory that is Delhi, India. The study was done for a period from 1995–2005. Model simulates the dissolved oxygen and biochemical oxygen demand parameters in a two-dimensional fashion by performing the numerical solution to a set of differential equations representing aquatic life with the help of Crank–Nicholson finite difference method. The model was simulated and calibrated through the field water-quality primary data and the secondary data which were taken from Central Pollution Control Board. The main reasons for the high river pollution is increasing population of Delhi and other states, leading to generation of huge amounts of domestic sewage into the river Yamuna. The model gave a good agreement between calibrated and observed data, thus, actualizing the validity of the model. However, discrepancies noticed during model calibrations were attributed to the assumptions adopted in the model formulation and to lack of field data.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Al Rizzo, H. M., & Al Layla, M. A. (1987). A water quality model for the Tigris River and downstream of Sadam Dam, Iraq. Hydrological Science Journal des Sciences Hydrolopques, 34(6), 687–704.
Chapra, S. (1997). Surface water quality modeling. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Churchill, M. A., Elmorey, H. L., & Buckingham, R. A. (1962). The prediction of stream reaeration rates. Journal of Sanitary Engineering Div., ASCE, 88(4), 1–46.
CPCB (1980–1981). The Ganga River—part I—the Yamuna basin, ADSORBS/2. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB (1982–1983). Assimilation capacity of point pollution load, CUPS/12. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB (1999–2000). Water quality status of river Yamuna. Assessment and development study of River Basin series (ADSORBS). ADSORBS/30. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB (2006). Water quality status of river Yamuna (1999–2005), assessment and development study of River Basin series (ADSORBS). ADSORBS/41. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
Deb, A. K., & Bowers, D. (1983). Diurnal water quality modeling—a case study. Journal of Water Polluttion Control, 55(12), 1476–1488.
Modak, P. M., Gelda, R., Prabhakar, C., Gopakumar, & Dhoondia, J. (1988). STREAM-II—a two dimensional water quality model for wide and shallow streams. Bombay: Ganga Project Directorate, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
NEERI (1996). Carrying capacity based developmental planning of national capital region. Nagpur: National Environmental Engineering Research Institute.
O’Connor, D. J., & Dobbins, W. E. (1958). Mechanisms of reaeration in natural streams. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 123, 641–684.
Paliwal, R., Sharma, P., & Kansal, A. (2007). Water quality modelling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(2), 131–144. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, D., Singh, R.K. DO-BOD modeling of River Yamuna for national capital territory, India using STREAM II, a 2D water quality model. Environ Monit Assess 159, 231–240 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0625-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0625-7