Abstract
As an important component of sustainable development in mountain areas, evaluation for sustainable land use is always one of the hotpots of researches on sustainable development. Traditional evaluation for sustainable land use mainly focuses on the sustainability of land use model and biological production on temporal scale, and overlooks the effects of land use patterns on the sustainability, while landscape ecology can be a good help to realize the spatial analysis of sustainable land use. In this study, a synthetic evaluation indexes system for sustainable land use was constructed through the application of landscape metrics. Taking Yongsheng County of Yunnan Province, China as a case study, a series of quantitative evaluation were conducted in 1996, 1999 and 2001, to monitor the temporal dynamics of regional land use sustainability. Two indicators, contributing amount of indexes, and obstacle amount of indexes, were also set up to ascertain the significance of all the evaluation indexes to the evaluation results. The results showed that, in the study phases, the land use sustainability of the whole county had been low with a stable but great spatial difference, and great changes took place in regional land use system in 1999 with the deviation from the aim of sustainable land use. It also showed that, the most important indexes contributing for the land use sustainability in the study period, were the indexes of population density and land use degree, followed by the index of landscape diversity and cropping index. And the most important indexes counteracting the land use sustainability were the indexes of per unit area total production value of industry and agriculture, per unit area yield of cereal crops, landscape fragmentation, followed by the indexes of per unit area yield of economic crops and fertilizer consume per unit area.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Antrop, M. (2006). Sustainable landscapes: Contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 187–197.
Botequillha, L. A., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.
Chen, B. M. (2001). A blue print of land use region based on regional indicator system for sustainable land use in China. Progress in Geography, 20, 247–253 (in Chinese).
Chen, B. M., & Zhang, F. R. (2001). Theory and methodology for sustainable land use indicator system in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16, 197–203 (in Chinese).
Ericksen, P. J., McSweeney, K., & Madison, F. W. (2002). Assessing linkages and sustainable land management for hillside agroecosystems in Central Honduras: Analysis of intermediate and catchment scale indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 91, 295–311.
FAO. (1993). FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management. World Soil Resources Report, 73.
Fu, B. J. (1995). The spatial pattern analysis of agricultural landscape in the loess area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 15, 113–120 (in Chinese).
Gulinck, H., Mugica, M., de Lucio, J. V., & Atauri, J. A. (2001). A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 257–270.
Gustafson, E. J. (1998). Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystem, 1, 143–156.
Haines-Young, R. (2000). Sustainable development and sustainable landscapes: Defining a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Fennia, 178, 7–14.
Liu, J. Y. (1992). The utilization of land in Tibet. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).
Liu, Y. Q., & Hao, J. M. (2003). Evaluation on spatial differentia of regional sustainable land use. Resources Science, 25, 56–62 (in Chinese).
Paoletti, M. G. (1999). Using bioindicators based on biodiversity to assess landscape sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystem, and Environment, 74, 1–18.
Peng, B. Z., An, X. D., Chen, F., & Pu, L. J. (2001). A study on sustainable land use in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Natural Resources, 16, 305–312 (in Chinese).
Peng, J., Wang, Y. L., Li, W. F., Yue, J., Wu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Evaluation for sustainable land use in coastal areas: A landscape ecological prospect. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 13, 25–36.
Peng, J., Wang, Y. L., Song, Z. Q., Jing, J., & Ding, Y. (2003). Research progress on evaluation for sustainable land use. Resources Science, 25, 85–93 (in Chinese).
Piorr, H. P. (2003). Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 17–33.
Qiu, Y., & Fu, B. J. (2000). Land evaluation for sustainable use based on landscape ecologic theory. Resources Science, 22, 1–8 (in Chinese).
Wang, Y. L., & Yang, X. J. (1999). The research on sustainable tourism development in the overall planning of scenic resort. Resources Science, 21, 37–43 (in Chinese).
Zhang, F. R., Qi, W., Xue, Y. S., & Xu, L. (2002). The methods for evaluating sustainable land management. Journal of China Agricultural University, 7, 40–46 (in Chinese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article has been previously published in Chinese language scientific journal. The appropriate notification to Environmental Monitoring and Assessment relative to the previous publication in the Chinese language journal was not done, raising serious questions relative to copyright. Therefore the paper has been withdrawn by the publisher and the printed version should not be cited and should be considered to be officially withdrawn.
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wu, J. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluation for sustainable land use in mountain areas of Northwestern Yunnan Province, China. Environ Monit Assess 133, 407–415 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9595-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9595-9