Abstract
Several experiments were performed to evaluate the fertilization capability of Paracentrotus lividus sea urchin gametes, which are usually used in fertilization tests, but which, until now, were employed only for few hours after spawning.
The aim of this work is to evaluate the possibility of performing the bioassay for longer periods, employing ‘conserved' gametes. As far as the method, the sperm was stored ‘dry' at 4 ∘C; eggs were conserved in an antibiotic solution at 4 ∘C, and they were exposed both to copper solutions as reference toxicant and to aqueous matrices.
The use of conserved gametes in the fertilization bioassay lead to EC50 values which were acceptable for about 3 days. Moreover, these experiments permitted to identify the limiting factor: the male gamete.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, S., Hoffman, E., Steward, D. and Harte, J.: 1990, Ambient Toxicity Characterization of San Francisco Bay and Adjacent Wetland Ecosystem, Report, LBL-29579, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, pp. 1–85.
Ankley, G. T.: 1991, ‘Predicting the toxicity of bulk sediments to aquatic organisms with aqueous test fractions: Pore water vs. Elutriate’, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 10, 1359–1366.
Arizzi Novelli, A., Volpi Ghirardini, A., Giuliani, S., Falugi, C., Pagano, G. and Iaccarino, M.: 2001, ‘Valutazione della tossicità di acque e sedimenti costieri con gameti e embrioni di specie autoctone di ricci di mare utilizzando metodiche differenziate’, Biol. Mar. Medit. 8 (2), 41–59.
ASTM: 1995, ‘Standard guide for conducting static acute toxicity tests with echinoid embryos’, E 1563-95, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 1029–1046.
Carr, R. S. and Chapman, D. C.: 1995, ‘Comparison of methods for conducting marine and estuarine sediment porewater toxicity tests: Extraction, storage and handling techniques’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 28, 69–77.
Chapman, G. A.: 1995, ‘Sea urchin sperm cell test’, in: G.M. Rand (ed.) Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment, 2nd Edition, Bristol, PA, Taylor and Francis, pp. 189–205.
Cherr, G. N., Shenker, J. M., Lundmark, C. and Turner, K. O.: 1987, ‘Toxic effects of selected bleached kraft mill effluent constituents on the sea urchin sperm cell’, Toxicol. Chem. 6, 561–569.
Clementson, L. A. and Wayte, S. E.: 1992, ‘The effects of frozen storage of open-ocean seawater samples on the concentration of dissolved Phosphate and Nitrate’, Wat. Res. 26 (9), 1171–1176.
De Angelis, E.: 1975, ‘The problem of bacterial contamination during sea urchin egg culture’, Pubbl. Staz. Zool. 40, 19–25.
De Angelis, E.: 1976, ‘The effects of antibiotics on sea urchin egg culture’, Pubbl. Staz. Zool. 40, 26–33.
Decreto legislativo no. 152: 1999, ‘Disposizione sulla tutela delle acque dell'inquinamento e recepimento della direttiva 91/271/CEE concernente il trattamento delle acque reflue e della direttiva 91/676/CEE relativa alla protezione delle acque dell'inquinamento provocato dai nitrati provenienti da fonti agricole’, Gazzetta Ufficiale, 29 Maggio 1999, pp. 1–125.
Dinnel, P. A., Link, J. M. and Stober, Q. J.: 1987, ‘Improved methodology for a sea urchin sperm cell bioassay for marine waters’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 16, 23–32.
Dinnel, P. A., Pagano, G. and Ossida, P. S.: 1988, ‘A sea urchin test system for marine environmental monitoring’, in: R. D. Burke, P. V. Mladenov and R. L. Parsley (eds.), Echinoderm Biology. Proceedings of the Sixth International Echinoderm Conference, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 611–619.
Fenaux, L.: 1968, ‘Maturation des gonads et cycle saissonier des larves chez Arbacia lixula, Paracentrotus lividus, et Psammechinus microtuberculatus (Echinedes) à Villefranche-sur-Mer’, Vie Milieu 19, 1–52.
Finney, D. J.: 1971, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
Giambartolomei, F. M.: 1990, ‘Nuove acquisizioni sul test di fertilità dello sperma di riccio di mare Paracentrotus lividus’, Thesis, University of Padova, Italy.
Giuliani, S., Ennas, C., Pellegrini, D. and Kozinkova, L.: 2002, ‘The bioassay with sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus: Different end-points to be applied to different environmental studies’, Fres. Environ. Bull. 11 (10), 806–809.
Giuliani, S., Lera, S., Kozinkova, L., De Ranieri, S. and Pellegrini, D.: 2004, ‘Sensibilità del saggio di fecondazione con gameti di Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) al variare di alcune condizioni sperimentali’, Biol. Mar. Medit., in press.
Hamilton, M. A., Russo, R. C. and Thurston, R. V.: 1978, ‘Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 714–720.
ICES: 1997, Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment.
Kobayashi, N.: 1984, ‘Marine ecotoxicological testing with echinoderms’, in: G. Persoone, E. Jaspers and C. Claus (eds.), Ecotoxicological Testing for the Marine Environment, State Univ. Ghent and Inst. Mar. Scient. Res., Bredene, Belgium, pp. 341–405.
Kozinkova, L., Ennas, C., Giuliani, S. and Pellegrini, D.: 2003, ‘Valutazione della qualità dei gameti di Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) utilizzando Cu(NO3)2·3H2O come tossico di riferimento su animali stabulati e non stabulati’, Biol. Mar. Medit. 10 (2), 1101–1104.
Lambertson, J. Q., Dewitt, T. H. and Swartz, C.: 1992, ‘Assessment of sediment toxicity to marine benthos’, in: G. A. Burton (ed.), Lewis Publishers, Sediment Toxicity Assessment, pp. 183–211.
Mackintosh, R. F. and Bell, E.: 1970, ‘Reversible response to puromycin and some characteristics of the uptake and use of aminoacids by unfertilized sea urchin eggs’, Biol. Bull. 139, 296–303.
Marin, M. G., Da Los, L., Moschino, V. and Campesan, G.: 2001, ‘Sediment elutriate toxicity testing with embryos of sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus)’, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 4, 215–221.
Nemer, M. and Infante, A.: 1967, ‘Ribosomal ribonucleic acid of the sea urchin egg and its fate during embryogenesis’, J. Mol. Biol. 27, 73–86.
Pagano, G., Cipollaro, M., Corsale, G., Esposito, A., Ragucci, E., Giordano, G. G. and Trieff, N. M.: 1986, ‘The sea urchin: Bioassay for the assessment of damage from environmental contaminants’, in: J. Cairns (ed.), Community Toxicity Testing, ASTM STP 920, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 66–92.
Pellegrini, D., Giuliani, S., Onorati, F., Bigongiari, N., De Ranieri, S. and Meschini, P.: 1997, ‘Impiego di due saggi biologici per la valutazione della tossicità di sedimenti del porto di Piombino’, Biol. Mar. Medit. 4 (1), 490–492.
Pinto, B., Pellegrini, D., Gabellini, M. and Ausili, A.: 1995, ‘Harbour and coastal sediments chemistry and toxicology: a preliminary study in dredging activities’, J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 4, 1–17.
Tyler, A.: 1949, ‘A simple non-injurious method for inducing repeated spawning of sea urchins and sand dollars’, Collecting Net 19, 19–20.
U.S EPA:1991, Earl-Standard Operating Procedure Conducting the Sea Urchin Arbacia punctulata Fertilization Test, Environmental Research Laboratory, Narragansett, RI, pp. 125–131.
U.S. EPA: 1994, Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms, 600-4-91-003, Cincinnati, Ohio.
U.S. EPA: 1995, Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Water to West Coast Marine and Estuarine Organisms, 600/R-95/136, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Volpi Ghirardini, A. and Arizzi Novelli, A.: 2001, ‘A sperm cell toxicity test procedure for the Mediterranean species Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea)’, Environmental Technology 22, 439–445.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lera, S., Pellegrini, D. Evaluation of the Fertilization Capability of Paracentrotus Lividus Sea Urchin Storaged Gametes by the Exposure to Different Aqueous Matrices. Environ Monit Assess 119, 1–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9000-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9000-0