Abstract
A new flocculation model using variable fractal dimension is proposed and validated with several experimental data and an existing model. The proposed model consists of two processes: aggregation and breakup due to flow turbulence. For aggregation process, the aggregate structure is considered to have the characteristic of self-similarity, the main concept of fractal theory. Under this assumption, a variable fractal dimension instead of a fixed one adopted by previous studies is utilized here for general cohesive sediment transport. For breakup, similar concept is adopted in a more empirical manner because breakup is too abrupt to entirely apply the concept of variable fractal dimension. By a linear combination of the formulations for aggregation and breakup processes, a flocculation model which can describe the temporal evolution of floc size is obtained. Flocculation model using variable fractal dimension is capable of predicting equilibrium floc size when compared with several experimental data sets using different types of mud provided that empirical coefficients are calibrated. Through model-data comparison with Manning and Dyer (Marine Geology 160:147–170, 1999), it is also clear that some of the empirical coefficients may depend on sediment concentration. Model results for the temporal evolution of floc size are less satisfactory, despite model results shows a more smooth “S-curve” for the temporal evolution of floc size as compared with the previous model using fixed fractal dimension. The proposed model is limited to mono-size of primary particle and dilute flow condition. These other features shall be investigated as future work.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- n :
-
Number of flocs per unit volume
- D, d:
-
Size of floc and primary particle
- D e :
-
Equilibrium floc size
- G :
-
Dissipation parameter (shear rate)
- \({\varepsilon}\) :
-
Dissipation rate of energy
- ν :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- t :
-
Time
- eb, ec, ed:
-
Efficiency parameter
- \({\phi}\) :
-
Volumetric concentration
- c :
-
Mass concentration
- ρs, ρf, ρw:
-
Density of primary particle, floc, and water
- f s :
-
Shape factor
- F :
-
Three-dimensional fractal dimension of floc
- α, β, a, p, q :
-
Coefficient
- F c :
-
Characteristic fractal dimension
- D fc :
-
Characteristic size of floc
- μ :
-
Dynamic viscosity of the fluid
- F y :
-
Yield strength of floc
- λ 0 :
-
Kolmogorov micro scale,
- \({k_A^{\prime}}\) , \({k_B^{\prime}}\):
-
Empirical dimensionless coefficient
- X :
-
Ratio of the equilibrium floc size to primary particle size
- F n :
-
Function
References
Akers RJ, Rushton AG, Stenhous JIT (1987) Floc breakage: the dynamic response of particle size distribution in a flocculated suspension to a step change in turbulent energy dissipation. Chem Eng Sci 42: 787–798
Argamam Y, Kaufman WJ (1970) Turbulence and flocculation. J Sanitary Eng ASCE 96(SA2): 223–241
Ayesa E, Margeli MT, Florez J, Garcia-heras JL (1991) Estimation of breakup and aggregation coefficients in flocculation by a new adjustment algorithm. Chem Eng Sci 46(1): 39–48
Biggs CA, Lant PA (2000) Activated sludge flocculation: on-line determination of floc size and the effect of shear. Water Res 34(9): 2542–2550
Bouyer D, Line A, Do-quang Z (2004) Experimental analysis of floc size distribution under different hydrodynamics in a mixing tank. AIChE 50(9): 2064–2081
Bratby J (1980) Coagulation and flocculation with an emphasis on water and waste water treatment. Uplands Press Ltd, Croydon, England
Camp TR, Stein PC (1943) Velocity gradients and internal work in fluid motion. J Boston Soc Civil Eng 30: 219–237
Dyer KR (1989) Sediment processes in estuaries: future research requirements. J Geophys Res 94(C10): 14327–14339
Dyer KR, Manning AJ (1999) Observation of the size, settling velocity and effective density of flocs, and their fractal dimensions. J Sea Res 41: 87–95
Harris CK, Traykovski PA, Geyer RW (2004) Including a near-bed turbid layer in a three-dimensional sediment transport model with application to the Eel River shelf, Northern California. In: Spaulding M (eds) Proceedings of the eighth conference on estuarine and coastal modeling. Am Soc Civ Engr, Reston, VA, pp 784–803
Hawley N (1982) Settling velocity distribution of natural aggregates. J Geophys Res 87(C12): 9489–9498
Hill PS, Newell ARM (1995) Comparison of two models of aggregation in continental-shelf bottom boundary layers. J Geophys Res 100(C11): 22749–22763
Hill PS, Voulgaris G, Trowbridge JH (2001) Controls on floc size in a continental shelf bottom boundary layer. J Geophys Res 106(C5): 9543–9549
Hsu T-J, Traykovski PA, Kineke GC (2007) On modeling boundary layer and gravity-driven fluid mud transport. J Geophys Res 112(C04011): doi: 0.1029/2006JC003719
Ives KJ (1978) Rate theories. The scientific basis of flocculation. Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rign, The Netherlands, pp 37–61
Jackson GA (1998) Using fractal scaling and two-dimensional particle size spectra to calculate coagulation rates for heterogeneous systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 202: 20–29
Khelifa A, Hill PS (2006) Models for effective density and settling velocity of flocs. J Hydraul Res 44(3): 390–401
Kramer TA, Clark MM (1999) Incorporation of aggregate breakup in the simulation of orthokinetic coagulation. J Colloid Interface Sci 216: 116–126
Kranenburg C (1994) The fractal structure of cohesive sediment aggregates. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 39: 451–460
Leentvaar J, Rebhun M (1983) Strength of ferric hydroxide flocs. Water Res 17: 895–902
Levich VG (1962) Physicochemical hydrodynamics. Prentice Hall
Lick W, Huang H, Jepsen R (1993) Flocculation of fine-grained sediments due to differential settling. J Geophys Res 98(C6): 10279–10288
Lick W, Lick J (1988) Aggregation and disaggregation of fine-grained lake sediments. J Great Lakes Res 14: 514–523
Manning AJ, Dyer KR (1999) A laboratory examination of floc characteristics with regard to turbulent shearing. Mar Geol 160: 147–170
Matsuo T, Unno H (1981) Forces acting on floc and strength of floc. J Env Engr Div ASCE 107(EE3): 527–545
McAnally WH, Mehta AJ (2000) Aggregation rate of fine sediment. J Hydraul Engr 126: 883–892
McCave IN (1984) Size spectra and aggregation of suspended particles in the deep ocean. Deep Sea Res 31(4): 329–352
Meakin P (1988) Fractal aggregates. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 28: 249–331
Mehta AJ (1987) On estuarine cohesive sediment suspension behavior. J Geophys Res 94(C10): 14303–14314
Merckelbach LM, Kranenburg C (2004) Determining effective stress and permeability equations for soft mud from simple laboratory experiments. Geotechnique 54(9): 581–591
Merckelbach LM, Kranenburg C, Winterwerp JC (2002) Strength modeling of consolidating mud beds. In: Winterwerp JC, Kranenburg C (eds) Fine sediment dynamics in the marine environment. Elsevier, p 359
Migniot C (1968) A study of the physical properties of various forms of very fine sediments and their behaviour under hydrodynamic action. Comonnunication prėsentė au Comitė Technique de la Sociėtė Hydrotechnique de France, La Houille Blanche 23(7): 591–620
O’Melia CR (1980) Aquasols: the behaviour of small particles in aquatic systems. Env Sci Tecnol 14(9): 1052–1060
Parker DS, Kaufman WJ, Jenkins D (1972) Floc breakup in turbulent flocculation processes. J Sanitary Engr Div 98(SA1): 79–97
Smoluchowski M (1917) Versuch einer Mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik Kolloidlösungen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 92: 129–168
Stolzenbach KD, Elimelich M (1994) The effect of density on collisions between sinking particles: implications for particle aggregation in the ocean. J Deep Sea Res I 13: 409–419
Tambo N, Hozumi H (1979) Physical characteristics of flocs-II: Strength of floc. Water Res 13: 421–427
Thomas DN, Judd SJ, Fawcett N (1999) Flocculation modeling: A review. Water Res 33(7): 1579–1592
Toorman EA (1999) Sedimentation and self-weight consolidation: constitutive equations and numerical modeling. Geotechnique 49(6): 709–726
Traykovski P, Geyer WR, Irish JD, Lynch JF (2000) The role of wave-induced fluid mud flows for cross-shelf transport on the Eel River continental shelf. Continental Shelf Res 20: 2113–2140
Tsai CH, Hwang SC (1995) Flocculation of sediment from the Tanshui River estuary. Mar Freshwater Res 46: 383–392
Tsai CH, Iacobellis HS, Lick W (1987) Flocculation of fine-grained sediments due to a uniform shear stress. J Great Lakes Res 13(2): 135–146
Van Der Ham R, Winterwerp JC (2001) Turbulent exchange of fine sediments in a tidal channel in the Ems/Dollard estuary: Part II. Analysis with a 1DV numerical model. Continental Shelf Res 21: 1629–1647
van Leussen W (1994) Estuarine macroflocs and their role in fine-grained sediment transport. University of Utrecht, Dissertation
Vicsek T (1992) Fractal growth phenomena. McGraw-Hill, New York
Warner JC, Sherwood CR, Signell RP, Harris CK, Arango HG (2007) Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current and sediment-transport model. Computers Geosci, accepted
Winterwerp JC (1998) A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of cohesive sediment. J Hydraul Res 36(3): 309–326
Winterwerp JC (2002) On the flocculation and settling velocity of estuarine mud. Continental Shelf Res 22: 1339–1360
Winterwerp JC, Manning AJ, Martens C, Mulder T, Vanlede J (2006) A heuristic formula for turbulence-induced flocculation of cohesive sediment. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 68: 195–207
Winterwerp JC, Van Kesteren WGM (2004) Introduction to the physics of cohesive sediments in the marine environment. In: Developments in sedimentology, vol 56. Elsevier, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Son, M., Hsu, TJ. Flocculation model of cohesive sediment using variable fractal dimension. Environ Fluid Mech 8, 55–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9050-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9050-7